<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eurogamer: Total War Kingdoms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/09/09/eurogamer-total-war-kingdoms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/09/09/eurogamer-total-war-kingdoms/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:35:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rohan online crone</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/09/09/eurogamer-total-war-kingdoms/comment-page-1/#comment-151123</link>
		<dc:creator>rohan online crone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 05:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=205#comment-151123</guid>
		<description>When you have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rohangold.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;rohan online crone&lt;/a&gt;, and than you can go on this game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you have <a href="http://www.rohangold.net/" rel="nofollow">rohan online crone</a>, and than you can go on this game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xander</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/09/09/eurogamer-total-war-kingdoms/comment-page-1/#comment-943</link>
		<dc:creator>Xander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 22:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=205#comment-943</guid>
		<description>Hmm. I mostly agree.

Although, after first impressions, I actually think Britannia is the strongest campaign (which is bizarre because, you know, it&#039;s just repackaged Viking Invasion).

The new features are great. And yet, the cavalry charge is still fubar, pathing on the campaign map still blows, your generals still live to be 200 years old, and battles are mind-numbingly easy even on Very Hard.

So, it&#039;s the same old Rome engine. I hope they rebuild it all from scratch for Empire, but I&#039;m not holding my breath.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. I mostly agree.</p>
<p>Although, after first impressions, I actually think Britannia is the strongest campaign (which is bizarre because, you know, it&#8217;s just repackaged Viking Invasion).</p>
<p>The new features are great. And yet, the cavalry charge is still fubar, pathing on the campaign map still blows, your generals still live to be 200 years old, and battles are mind-numbingly easy even on Very Hard.</p>
<p>So, it&#8217;s the same old Rome engine. I hope they rebuild it all from scratch for Empire, but I&#8217;m not holding my breath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SwiftRanger</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/09/09/eurogamer-total-war-kingdoms/comment-page-1/#comment-937</link>
		<dc:creator>SwiftRanger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 18:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=205#comment-937</guid>
		<description>Dunno, Empire is still probably a year away, and not all screenshots look as finished as they should be (the land battle shots f.e. look less detailed and diverse than what you see in Medieval II imo). 

That installation method sounds ridiculous idd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dunno, Empire is still probably a year away, and not all screenshots look as finished as they should be (the land battle shots f.e. look less detailed and diverse than what you see in Medieval II imo). </p>
<p>That installation method sounds ridiculous idd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
