Comments on: Do We Look Fat In This? http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/09/22/do-we-look-fat-in-this/ Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:22:17 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Feet http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/09/22/do-we-look-fat-in-this/comment-page-1/#comment-1669 Feet Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:09:08 +0000 http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=299#comment-1669 You fixed it. Hurrah. You fixed it. Hurrah.

]]> By: Feet http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/09/22/do-we-look-fat-in-this/comment-page-1/#comment-1662 Feet Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:21:36 +0000 http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=299#comment-1662 The side bar doesn't appear at the side on my IE7, it appears at the bottom, underneath the Next Page button (I have IE7 Pro installed if that makes a difference). The side bar doesn’t appear at the side on my IE7, it appears at the bottom, underneath the Next Page button (I have IE7 Pro installed if that makes a difference).

]]> By: Jim Rossignol http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/09/22/do-we-look-fat-in-this/comment-page-1/#comment-1654 Jim Rossignol Mon, 24 Sep 2007 08:59:12 +0000 http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=299#comment-1654 Mo, that's a really good point. We'll sort that. Mo, that’s a really good point. We’ll sort that.

]]> By: Jim Rossignol http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/09/22/do-we-look-fat-in-this/comment-page-1/#comment-1653 Jim Rossignol Mon, 24 Sep 2007 08:58:29 +0000 http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=299#comment-1653 Leo, don't make me come over there. Leo, don’t make me come over there.

]]> By: Leo http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/09/22/do-we-look-fat-in-this/comment-page-1/#comment-1652 Leo Mon, 24 Sep 2007 08:49:42 +0000 http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=299#comment-1652 How many comments for a week-old blog? Anyway, this new look is the shit. And by the shit I mean just shit, with no 'the'. How many comments for a week-old blog?

Anyway, this new look is the shit. And by the shit I mean just shit, with no ‘the’.

]]> By: Mo http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/09/22/do-we-look-fat-in-this/comment-page-1/#comment-1642 Mo Sun, 23 Sep 2007 22:44:59 +0000 http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=299#comment-1642 Okay, that *totally* wasn't there when I last looked! Being a bit nit-picky here, but the titles on the sidebar (Search for lost treasure, Play fun free stuff, etc) really shouldn't be maroon. I thought they were links at first and was appalled when I found that I had been deceived. Perhaps colour it a lighter shade of grey? Okay, that *totally* wasn’t there when I last looked!

Being a bit nit-picky here, but the titles on the sidebar (Search for lost treasure, Play fun free stuff, etc) really shouldn’t be maroon. I thought they were links at first and was appalled when I found that I had been deceived. Perhaps colour it a lighter shade of grey?

]]> By: Mo http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/09/22/do-we-look-fat-in-this/comment-page-1/#comment-1637 Mo Sun, 23 Sep 2007 19:04:40 +0000 http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=299#comment-1637 I love the look! The old site looked hacked together (probably because it was, eh?) but this one looks quite, dare I say it, sexy. One issue though ... am I missing something or is there no "next page" link? Looking at the front-page right now, I get articles from Sept 20th to Sept 23rd. Clicking on the archive for Sept 07 yields the same result. The only way to read earlier stuff from September is to go to this page: http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/index.php?paged=2 Which I had to type into the address bar. I love the look!

The old site looked hacked together (probably because it was, eh?) but this one looks quite, dare I say it, sexy.

One issue though … am I missing something or is there no “next page” link?
Looking at the front-page right now, I get articles from Sept 20th to Sept 23rd. Clicking on the archive for Sept 07 yields the same result. The only way to read earlier stuff from September is to go to this page:

http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/index.php?paged=2

Which I had to type into the address bar.

]]> By: Duncan MacGregor http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/09/22/do-we-look-fat-in-this/comment-page-1/#comment-1602 Duncan MacGregor Sun, 23 Sep 2007 01:19:36 +0000 http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=299#comment-1602 Safari 3 beta on a Mac (go on, mock me), and you're right it is centred, but that doesn't help if you tend to use a fairly narrow default window size. Safari 3 beta on a Mac (go on, mock me), and you’re right it is centred, but that doesn’t help if you tend to use a fairly narrow default window size.

]]> By: David http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/09/22/do-we-look-fat-in-this/comment-page-1/#comment-1599 David Sat, 22 Sep 2007 22:55:27 +0000 http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=299#comment-1599 Well, the new design is beginning to grow on me. Does it also know that its days are numbered? That eventually it won't look pretty enough and, like its predecessor, will find itself consigned to the great recycle bin in the sky? If it doesn't, try to keep that from it - we don't want the template getting all irrational once it realises that it won't be with us forever and ever. Well, the new design is beginning to grow on me.
Does it also know that its days are numbered? That eventually it won’t look pretty enough and, like its predecessor, will find itself consigned to the great recycle bin in the sky?
If it doesn’t, try to keep that from it – we don’t want the template getting all irrational once it realises that it won’t be with us forever and ever.

]]> By: James http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/09/22/do-we-look-fat-in-this/comment-page-1/#comment-1596 James Sat, 22 Sep 2007 19:59:03 +0000 http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=299#comment-1596 Also, after a few days, and moans have subsided and bugs surfaced I will chat with Jim, and much squashing of stuff will occur. Also, after a few days, and moans have subsided and bugs surfaced I will chat with Jim, and much squashing of stuff will occur.

]]> By: James http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/09/22/do-we-look-fat-in-this/comment-page-1/#comment-1594 James Sat, 22 Sep 2007 19:35:08 +0000 http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=299#comment-1594 The site is designed specifically for resolutions higher than 800x600, so any browser would display it like that. I don't think there are many hardcore gamers playing lower than 1024x768. The site is designed specifically for resolutions higher than 800×600, so any browser would display it like that. I don’t think there are many hardcore gamers playing lower than 1024×768.

]]> By: John Walker http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/09/22/do-we-look-fat-in-this/comment-page-1/#comment-1593 John Walker Sat, 22 Sep 2007 19:05:54 +0000 http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=299#comment-1593 It isn't here, Duncan. Which browser are you using? It's centred with both Firefox and IE. (You've made my day saying that though - I bitch and moan about sites being left on the left, and now I feel vindicated). It isn’t here, Duncan. Which browser are you using? It’s centred with both Firefox and IE. (You’ve made my day saying that though – I bitch and moan about sites being left on the left, and now I feel vindicated).

]]>