<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Levine: &#8220;&#8230;opposed to multiple endings&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/10/05/levine-opposed-to-multiple-endings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/10/05/levine-opposed-to-multiple-endings/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pidesco</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/10/05/levine-opposed-to-multiple-endings/comment-page-1/#comment-2780</link>
		<dc:creator>Pidesco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 10:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=372#comment-2780</guid>
		<description>“Especially worthwhile is his final statement where he notes “If the sales success of BioShock means anything, it means that we can trust our audience a little more”. And Amen to that.”

I&#039;d like to see how Bioshock would have done without the marketing millions behind it. 

And, on a related note, I&#039;d also like to see how System Shock 2 would have done if it had those marketing millions behind it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Especially worthwhile is his final statement where he notes “If the sales success of BioShock means anything, it means that we can trust our audience a little more”. And Amen to that.”</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see how Bioshock would have done without the marketing millions behind it. </p>
<p>And, on a related note, I&#8217;d also like to see how System Shock 2 would have done if it had those marketing millions behind it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/10/05/levine-opposed-to-multiple-endings/comment-page-1/#comment-2652</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 15:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=372#comment-2652</guid>
		<description>Since 2001 most of us Americans know what Manichean means, even if some don&#039;t know the word specifically.

[POLITICALLY TINGED FROWNY FACE!!]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since 2001 most of us Americans know what Manichean means, even if some don&#8217;t know the word specifically.</p>
<p>[POLITICALLY TINGED FROWNY FACE!!]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Coxall</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/10/05/levine-opposed-to-multiple-endings/comment-page-1/#comment-2631</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Coxall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 14:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=372#comment-2631</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I hope that by saying “we can trust our audience a little more” he means that there will be no more stupid copy protection that plague PC gamers.&lt;/i&gt;

Just because the developers trust you doesn&#039;t mean the publishers won&#039;t still treat you like idiots. Developers have a non-zero chance of not being fuckwits. This doesn&#039;t apply to publishers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I hope that by saying “we can trust our audience a little more” he means that there will be no more stupid copy protection that plague PC gamers.</i></p>
<p>Just because the developers trust you doesn&#8217;t mean the publishers won&#8217;t still treat you like idiots. Developers have a non-zero chance of not being fuckwits. This doesn&#8217;t apply to publishers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leth</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/10/05/levine-opposed-to-multiple-endings/comment-page-1/#comment-2620</link>
		<dc:creator>Leth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 12:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=372#comment-2620</guid>
		<description>I hope that by saying &quot;we can trust our audience a little more&quot; he means that there will be no more stupid copy protection that plague PC gamers.  As of right now I am not buying any game from 2K games anymore. (not that it matters anyway)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope that by saying &#8220;we can trust our audience a little more&#8221; he means that there will be no more stupid copy protection that plague PC gamers.  As of right now I am not buying any game from 2K games anymore. (not that it matters anyway)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trystero</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/10/05/levine-opposed-to-multiple-endings/comment-page-1/#comment-2619</link>
		<dc:creator>Trystero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 12:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=372#comment-2619</guid>
		<description>Great use of the word &#039;Manichean&#039;. It got me through a lot of seminars at university. The last time i heard someone else use it was John Humphrys on Radio 4 quite a while ago. He put it to Tony Blair that he see &quot;the world in Manichean terms&quot; which utterly confounded Blair, who had to ask for the meaning of the word. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great use of the word &#8216;Manichean&#8217;. It got me through a lot of seminars at university. The last time i heard someone else use it was John Humphrys on Radio 4 quite a while ago. He put it to Tony Blair that he see &#8220;the world in Manichean terms&#8221; which utterly confounded Blair, who had to ask for the meaning of the word. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_B</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/10/05/levine-opposed-to-multiple-endings/comment-page-1/#comment-2604</link>
		<dc:creator>The_B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 09:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=372#comment-2604</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;Especially worthwhile is his final statement where he notes “If the sales success of BioShock means anything, it means that we can trust our audience a little more”. And Amen to that.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

How long before someone pipes up with something about the copy protection?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Especially worthwhile is his final statement where he notes “If the sales success of BioShock means anything, it means that we can trust our audience a little more”. And Amen to that.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>How long before someone pipes up with something about the copy protection?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrashT</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/10/05/levine-opposed-to-multiple-endings/comment-page-1/#comment-2587</link>
		<dc:creator>CrashT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 01:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=372#comment-2587</guid>
		<description>In more BioShock related fun, Chris Kline&#039;s (Irrational Lead Programmer) IGDA Montreal Presentation on &quot;Saying &#039;Yes&#039; to the Player&quot; is up on GoogleVideo: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4508664361400518462

Includes some video footage of original BioShock concepts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In more BioShock related fun, Chris Kline&#8217;s (Irrational Lead Programmer) IGDA Montreal Presentation on &#8220;Saying &#8216;Yes&#8217; to the Player&#8221; is up on GoogleVideo: <a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4508664361400518462" rel="nofollow">http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4508664361400518462</a></p>
<p>Includes some video footage of original BioShock concepts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kieron Gillen</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/10/05/levine-opposed-to-multiple-endings/comment-page-1/#comment-2583</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieron Gillen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 01:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=372#comment-2583</guid>
		<description>It was in that faux-Rolling-Stone-esque interview in the back of (I think) Issue 11.

KG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was in that faux-Rolling-Stone-esque interview in the back of (I think) Issue 11.</p>
<p>KG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wiper</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/10/05/levine-opposed-to-multiple-endings/comment-page-1/#comment-2582</link>
		<dc:creator>wiper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=372#comment-2582</guid>
		<description>Really? I&#039;d forgotten that. I was probably too busy looking at the pretty pictures.

And the wordosity I&#039;m recalling (a word Firefox doesn&#039;t like, shockingly) was years ago, and only occasional, so I&#039;m going to blame you merrily anyway.

Tomorrow I get to play Bioshock for the first time. Yay!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? I&#8217;d forgotten that. I was probably too busy looking at the pretty pictures.</p>
<p>And the wordosity I&#8217;m recalling (a word Firefox doesn&#8217;t like, shockingly) was years ago, and only occasional, so I&#8217;m going to blame you merrily anyway.</p>
<p>Tomorrow I get to play Bioshock for the first time. Yay!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kieron Gillen</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/10/05/levine-opposed-to-multiple-endings/comment-page-1/#comment-2580</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieron Gillen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=372#comment-2580</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t blame me for Edge&#039;s wordosity. I barely write for &#039;em.

I got it from Alan Moore who has Ozymandius use it to describe Rorschach.

KG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t blame me for Edge&#8217;s wordosity. I barely write for &#8216;em.</p>
<p>I got it from Alan Moore who has Ozymandius use it to describe Rorschach.</p>
<p>KG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wiper</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/10/05/levine-opposed-to-multiple-endings/comment-page-1/#comment-2579</link>
		<dc:creator>wiper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=372#comment-2579</guid>
		<description>&quot;the endings are a harsh Manichean dichotomy&quot; - I&#039;m beginning to think it was you who was responsible for the renaissance of obscure/defunct terms in Edge (Lilliputian, anyone?). I mean, who was the last person to talk about the Manicheans besides Saint Augustine?

In other news: Mr. Levine says he wanted you to &quot;have a sense of your impact on the world through lots of little permutations rather than like a giant ending piece&quot;, but he doesn&#039;t directly say whether he means that he doesn&#039;t think there should be a &#039;giant ending piece&#039; at all, or whether it simply shouldn&#039;t directly reflect your actions: does this mean that the game would normally have had a blank/ambiguous ending, a-la KOTOR II? Or that it would have had a single, &#039;grand&#039; ending that was relatively amoral? Or something else entirely? Curious. I&#039;d read the piece in full, but I&#039;m worried that I&#039;d spoil the game for myself - the binary endings currently disappoint me only in principle as I&#039;ve still not played the game, so perhaps I&#039;ll love them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the endings are a harsh Manichean dichotomy&#8221; &#8211; I&#8217;m beginning to think it was you who was responsible for the renaissance of obscure/defunct terms in Edge (Lilliputian, anyone?). I mean, who was the last person to talk about the Manicheans besides Saint Augustine?</p>
<p>In other news: Mr. Levine says he wanted you to &#8220;have a sense of your impact on the world through lots of little permutations rather than like a giant ending piece&#8221;, but he doesn&#8217;t directly say whether he means that he doesn&#8217;t think there should be a &#8216;giant ending piece&#8217; at all, or whether it simply shouldn&#8217;t directly reflect your actions: does this mean that the game would normally have had a blank/ambiguous ending, a-la KOTOR II? Or that it would have had a single, &#8216;grand&#8217; ending that was relatively amoral? Or something else entirely? Curious. I&#8217;d read the piece in full, but I&#8217;m worried that I&#8217;d spoil the game for myself &#8211; the binary endings currently disappoint me only in principle as I&#8217;ve still not played the game, so perhaps I&#8217;ll love them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
