Rock, Paper, Shotgun

We Interrupt This Broadcast…

By Alec Meer on October 10th, 2007 at 4:17 pm.

Sorry, sorry, this isn’t about a Valve game. But it’s pretty big news if it’s true. And, realistically speaking, it probably is true. A supposedly leaked document brings news of (the inevitable) Battlefield 3, and what it may contain.

Standing out from the neatly bullet-pointed and occasionally tedious list at the link above is a claim that matches will now feature teams of up to 40 each. That’s 80 men all told. 80! Death will be bloody and regular. Also mentioned are customisable, MMO-style avatars, a fairly logical evolution from the rank system of BF2/2142. It’d certainly be quite a thing to know that the man who just shot you in the head actually chose the face he’s now sneering at your dismembered carcass with, rather than simply bearing the same image the game hands out to every player. Gives murder a more personal touch, doesn’t it? It’s reportedly set in a similar time-frame (i.e. modernish day) to Battlefield 2, and it’s coming next Summer.

EA have given only a resounding ‘no comment’ so far. Understandable, really. Of course, the tinfoil hat-wearing part of me can’t help but wonder if it could be a stealth announcement to take advantage of Team Fortress 2 and Quake Wars causing teamplay mania at the moment. But that’s only because I’m a crazy, paranoid loon who likes making up stories.

I don’t have any pictures of it I’m afraid, so here’s one of Sega Bass Fishing instead.

__________________

« | »

, , .

3 Comments »

  1. The_B says:

    I loved the controller. I want one for my PC.

    report

  2. saru-sama says:

    BF2 was great, but let’s hope EA/Dice take some cues from Valve and do some homework on how to create fun game experiences. 40 on 40 gameplay sounds great, but it would be better if they refined the broken multiplayer features they have in place today.

    For example, I really hope they do something to reinforce team play and cooperation. Commanders and squad leaders need to have more influence (why not give them the ability to reward/rebuke teams with points?)

    In any event… sweet that we’re get BF3!!

    report

Comment on this story

XHTML: Allowed code: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Search

Respond to our gibber

  • MadMatty : “haters gonna hate” on The Sunday Papers
  • nootpingu86 : “If we're going to use that word as a stand-in for awe-inspiring let's use it for a game that actually cares about verisimilitude and using ...” on The Sunday Papers
  • InternetBatman : “@Wizardry But Neverwinter Nights, which was also ATB solved a lot of those problems. Flanking and backstabbing still worked. Opportunity attacks were in there and ...” on Obsidian Want To Know What You Want Them To Make
  • jaheira : “Good post Sinderlin. Doesn't your argument that Valve have a moral requirement to tell us what's going on depend on your definition of promising? What ...” on The Sunday Papers
  • InternetBatman : “It seems like you're arguing that narrative content is bad (by reducing the dependence on game mechanics and making the game less freeform), that game ...” on Obsidian Want To Know What You Want Them To Make

Browse the archive