<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Entirely Baseless Analysis: UK Charts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/10/16/entirely-baseless-analysis-uk-charts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/10/16/entirely-baseless-analysis-uk-charts/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:11:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alec Meer</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/10/16/entirely-baseless-analysis-uk-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-4096</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec Meer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 18:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=436#comment-4096</guid>
		<description>Apparently someone just found their way to RPS by Googling for Monkey Toucher 5000. Perhaps if we all believe hard enough, the game will spring into existence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently someone just found their way to RPS by Googling for Monkey Toucher 5000. Perhaps if we all believe hard enough, the game will spring into existence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec Meer</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/10/16/entirely-baseless-analysis-uk-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-4080</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec Meer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=436#comment-4080</guid>
		<description>Kast: WE READ ALL
Joe: No, sadly. Don&#039;t have my original text either, and it was written during my time at Future Publishing so I wouldn&#039;t have the rights to it in any case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kast: WE READ ALL<br />
Joe: No, sadly. Don&#8217;t have my original text either, and it was written during my time at Future Publishing so I wouldn&#8217;t have the rights to it in any case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kast</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/10/16/entirely-baseless-analysis-uk-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-4073</link>
		<dc:creator>Kast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=436#comment-4073</guid>
		<description>I myself am an ardent CSI: Las Vegas fan. I love the series and books and consider it my equivalent of a soap - come for the forensics, stay for the drama.

I&#039;ve played the first three games and found them all brutally tedious. I wanted them to be fun. I wanted them to be intelligent and imaginative. Instead they are without exception plain, cliché-ed piles of tripe. Nothing but find-the-pixel searches, carpet-bomb style conversation trees and (worst of all) bored voice acting. Voice acting, I tell you! The one thing you&#039;d expect it to get right!

But no. I was betrayed. Luckily I&#039;d only borrowed the games so CBS Interactive never got my precious money.

(Also, I wonder if anyone will read this? The articles about to fall off the front page).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I myself am an ardent CSI: Las Vegas fan. I love the series and books and consider it my equivalent of a soap &#8211; come for the forensics, stay for the drama.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve played the first three games and found them all brutally tedious. I wanted them to be fun. I wanted them to be intelligent and imaginative. Instead they are without exception plain, cliché-ed piles of tripe. Nothing but find-the-pixel searches, carpet-bomb style conversation trees and (worst of all) bored voice acting. Voice acting, I tell you! The one thing you&#8217;d expect it to get right!</p>
<p>But no. I was betrayed. Luckily I&#8217;d only borrowed the games so CBS Interactive never got my precious money.</p>
<p>(Also, I wonder if anyone will read this? The articles about to fall off the front page).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/10/16/entirely-baseless-analysis-uk-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-4066</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=436#comment-4066</guid>
		<description>Is the makin&#039; magic review on the internet anywhere?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the makin&#8217; magic review on the internet anywhere?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garth</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/10/16/entirely-baseless-analysis-uk-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-3834</link>
		<dc:creator>Garth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 01:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=436#comment-3834</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m shocked Quake Wars is selling that well (although that is the UK list, and that type of game is quite popular there. It felt so mediocre to me, I figured it&#039;d do O.K., then disappear.

Guess we&#039;ll see, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m shocked Quake Wars is selling that well (although that is the UK list, and that type of game is quite popular there. It felt so mediocre to me, I figured it&#8217;d do O.K., then disappear.</p>
<p>Guess we&#8217;ll see, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chis</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/10/16/entirely-baseless-analysis-uk-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-3789</link>
		<dc:creator>Chis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=436#comment-3789</guid>
		<description>&gt; 2. The Sims 2: Bon Voyage

Well, it wasn&#039;t going to be Erotic Dreams, was it?

(More&#039;s the pity ;P)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; 2. The Sims 2: Bon Voyage</p>
<p>Well, it wasn&#8217;t going to be Erotic Dreams, was it?</p>
<p>(More&#8217;s the pity ;P)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Arctor</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/10/16/entirely-baseless-analysis-uk-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-3781</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Arctor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=436#comment-3781</guid>
		<description>Makin Magic PCG review was hilarious. One of my favourite bad-game-reviews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Makin Magic PCG review was hilarious. One of my favourite bad-game-reviews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/10/16/entirely-baseless-analysis-uk-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-3747</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=436#comment-3747</guid>
		<description>The CSI game is made by the excellent Telltale Games, also making the Sam &amp; Max episodes, so clearly it has to be superb!

Actually I have no idea, but considering the development talent it might actually be a good game. I doubt 99% of the people who bought it considered the whole &#039;quality&#039; thing seriously though, as I&#039;m assuming that audience is largely a bit thick and doesn&#039;t really have an opinion on anything they play.

I am not a generalist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CSI game is made by the excellent Telltale Games, also making the Sam &amp; Max episodes, so clearly it has to be superb!</p>
<p>Actually I have no idea, but considering the development talent it might actually be a good game. I doubt 99% of the people who bought it considered the whole &#8216;quality&#8217; thing seriously though, as I&#8217;m assuming that audience is largely a bit thick and doesn&#8217;t really have an opinion on anything they play.</p>
<p>I am not a generalist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rahul Gonsalves</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/10/16/entirely-baseless-analysis-uk-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-3737</link>
		<dc:creator>Rahul Gonsalves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 13:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=436#comment-3737</guid>
		<description>Hmmm. I still enjoy the Settlers 2. The 10th Anniversary Edition gets plenty of play time. But the Rise of an Empire one? Granted, I haven&#039;t finished it, neither have I read your review, but the inability to have multiple storehouses was a serious, serious mistake, IMHO.

@cigol, how does Anno 1701 stack up as a city-building game? Does it justify a &#039;Strategy&#039; tag?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm. I still enjoy the Settlers 2. The 10th Anniversary Edition gets plenty of play time. But the Rise of an Empire one? Granted, I haven&#8217;t finished it, neither have I read your review, but the inability to have multiple storehouses was a serious, serious mistake, IMHO.</p>
<p>@cigol, how does Anno 1701 stack up as a city-building game? Does it justify a &#8216;Strategy&#8217; tag?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec Meer</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/10/16/entirely-baseless-analysis-uk-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-3726</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec Meer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 13:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=436#comment-3726</guid>
		<description>That review was me, in fact, and one of my prouder moments, so chuffed someone remembers it. A rare instance of being able to slip a concept review past PCG&#039;s overlords.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That review was me, in fact, and one of my prouder moments, so chuffed someone remembers it. A rare instance of being able to slip a concept review past PCG&#8217;s overlords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feet</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/10/16/entirely-baseless-analysis-uk-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-3720</link>
		<dc:creator>Feet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=436#comment-3720</guid>
		<description>I remember reading the review of Makin&#039; Magic in PCG when it was first released, it might have been reviewed by one of you lot, or possibly Cobbett, my memory fails me. Anyway it basically described the typical day of an EA exec, the one who decided to drop the g. Was very well done, and I always recall it when I see the words &quot;The Sims&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember reading the review of Makin&#8217; Magic in PCG when it was first released, it might have been reviewed by one of you lot, or possibly Cobbett, my memory fails me. Anyway it basically described the typical day of an EA exec, the one who decided to drop the g. Was very well done, and I always recall it when I see the words &#8220;The Sims&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Turin Turambar</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/10/16/entirely-baseless-analysis-uk-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-3719</link>
		<dc:creator>Turin Turambar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=436#comment-3719</guid>
		<description>The list has already been updated. Now it is like this:


1 The Sims 2: Bon Voyage
2 Quake Wars: Enemy Territory
3 Csi: Hard Evidence
4 Rail Simulator
5 Company of Heroes: Opposing Fronts
6 World In Conflict
7 Command and Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars
8 The Settlers: Rise of An Empire
9 Medal of Honor: Airborne
10 FIFA 08</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The list has already been updated. Now it is like this:</p>
<p>1 The Sims 2: Bon Voyage<br />
2 Quake Wars: Enemy Territory<br />
3 Csi: Hard Evidence<br />
4 Rail Simulator<br />
5 Company of Heroes: Opposing Fronts<br />
6 World In Conflict<br />
7 Command and Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars<br />
8 The Settlers: Rise of An Empire<br />
9 Medal of Honor: Airborne<br />
10 FIFA 08</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
