<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scaremongering Anew</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/11/20/scaremongering-anew/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/11/20/scaremongering-anew/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:34:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: malkav11</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/11/20/scaremongering-anew/comment-page-1/#comment-9422</link>
		<dc:creator>malkav11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 05:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=610#comment-9422</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t trust demos because nine times out of ten they a) leave out the parts I was interested in in the first place, b) run poorer, c) play poorer, d) are almost as large as the full game for much less content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t trust demos because nine times out of ten they a) leave out the parts I was interested in in the first place, b) run poorer, c) play poorer, d) are almost as large as the full game for much less content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piratepete</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/11/20/scaremongering-anew/comment-page-1/#comment-9324</link>
		<dc:creator>Piratepete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=610#comment-9324</guid>
		<description>well given the trouble I have had getting anything to run decently on my new PC except for Bioshock and Tomb Raider Anniversary, I am seriously considering a console for my next purchase and buying a cheapo Dell Pc for the web.

oh and my gravatar works now. yay me :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well given the trouble I have had getting anything to run decently on my new PC except for Bioshock and Tomb Raider Anniversary, I am seriously considering a console for my next purchase and buying a cheapo Dell Pc for the web.</p>
<p>oh and my gravatar works now. yay me :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AbyssUK</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/11/20/scaremongering-anew/comment-page-1/#comment-9323</link>
		<dc:creator>AbyssUK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=610#comment-9323</guid>
		<description>So many bad games are made these days on PC&#039;s.. you said piracy is a big cause in people not buying games anymore.. i&#039;d say thats true.. because I torrent a game try it realise its a bag of total wank and therefore don&#039;t buy it.

I don&#039;t trust demo&#039;s as 9/10 times the demos are gimped to a) run better b) look better c) feel better so I&#039;d much rather trial the full version thank you.

However if I do like a game I do buy it.. I know a lot of people don&#039;t, but hey am better than them :)

Also the only game people need is Codename Eagle, so there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So many bad games are made these days on PC&#8217;s.. you said piracy is a big cause in people not buying games anymore.. i&#8217;d say thats true.. because I torrent a game try it realise its a bag of total wank and therefore don&#8217;t buy it.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t trust demo&#8217;s as 9/10 times the demos are gimped to a) run better b) look better c) feel better so I&#8217;d much rather trial the full version thank you.</p>
<p>However if I do like a game I do buy it.. I know a lot of people don&#8217;t, but hey am better than them :)</p>
<p>Also the only game people need is Codename Eagle, so there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WCAYPAHWAT</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/11/20/scaremongering-anew/comment-page-1/#comment-9309</link>
		<dc:creator>WCAYPAHWAT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 07:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=610#comment-9309</guid>
		<description>I just figure if i only want ones days worth of entertainment, i&#039;ll go out and hire a pile of DVD&#039;s for $10, rather than drop $100 on a (mediocre) game. 

Especially now, as i no longer live near an EB with their lovely return policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just figure if i only want ones days worth of entertainment, i&#8217;ll go out and hire a pile of DVD&#8217;s for $10, rather than drop $100 on a (mediocre) game. </p>
<p>Especially now, as i no longer live near an EB with their lovely return policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/11/20/scaremongering-anew/comment-page-1/#comment-9303</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 06:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=610#comment-9303</guid>
		<description>well all it means is that the gaming corporations have found out that games with replay value take away from valuable time that regular consumers need to consume their games. they&#039;d rather toss out 4 or 5 mediocre, short games that nobody wants to replay than make a really fun long lasting game that everybody wants to replay because 5 games that reach out to their own niche market make more income than  a huge sellout title that caters to everyone. the video game industry has now turned into an entertainment industry on par with independent short films? id rather have the video game industry up there with classic novels i mean they already have a writing staff for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well all it means is that the gaming corporations have found out that games with replay value take away from valuable time that regular consumers need to consume their games. they&#8217;d rather toss out 4 or 5 mediocre, short games that nobody wants to replay than make a really fun long lasting game that everybody wants to replay because 5 games that reach out to their own niche market make more income than  a huge sellout title that caters to everyone. the video game industry has now turned into an entertainment industry on par with independent short films? id rather have the video game industry up there with classic novels i mean they already have a writing staff for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: malkav11</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/11/20/scaremongering-anew/comment-page-1/#comment-9302</link>
		<dc:creator>malkav11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 06:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=610#comment-9302</guid>
		<description>I for one don&#039;t *want* to have reason to replay games. There&#039;s too many clamoring for my attention as it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one don&#8217;t *want* to have reason to replay games. There&#8217;s too many clamoring for my attention as it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WCAYPAHWAT</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/11/20/scaremongering-anew/comment-page-1/#comment-9292</link>
		<dc:creator>WCAYPAHWAT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 02:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=610#comment-9292</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not really sure hardware lagging behind is the real problem here. I&#039;m running a quite beastly (yet last gen) system 

Oblivion ran like a dream on full settings... STALKER, smooooth.... WiC, no problems... ditto with bioshock and CoD4. Not a hitch with The Witcher... And so on and so forth....

However, the big titles in my &#039;currently playing&#039; list?

System Shock 2, Tiberian sun, Deus Ex, and UT99.

It seems newer games just dont give me any reason to replay them whatsoever. Obviously the market just needs more compelling products. not just Look At Me!!! showcases, which are good for a blast, but then you&#039;ve seen it all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not really sure hardware lagging behind is the real problem here. I&#8217;m running a quite beastly (yet last gen) system </p>
<p>Oblivion ran like a dream on full settings&#8230; STALKER, smooooth&#8230;. WiC, no problems&#8230; ditto with bioshock and CoD4. Not a hitch with The Witcher&#8230; And so on and so forth&#8230;.</p>
<p>However, the big titles in my &#8216;currently playing&#8217; list?</p>
<p>System Shock 2, Tiberian sun, Deus Ex, and UT99.</p>
<p>It seems newer games just dont give me any reason to replay them whatsoever. Obviously the market just needs more compelling products. not just Look At Me!!! showcases, which are good for a blast, but then you&#8217;ve seen it all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: malkav11</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/11/20/scaremongering-anew/comment-page-1/#comment-9288</link>
		<dc:creator>malkav11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 01:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=610#comment-9288</guid>
		<description>Of course retail boxed sales are going down - the biggest specialty game retailer in the market is now Gamestop (not EB, who actually supported the PC market) and they&#039;ve shoved PC gaming off into a corner with a haphazard selection of perhaps one or two copies each of anything other than the very latest, hottest titles, those being locked securely behind the counter. They&#039;ll grudgingly make those sales, but their focus is the used console game market and that&#039;s where they&#039;re going to devote their effort.

And the non-specialty stores simply don&#039;t have the space or the interest to carry more than a handful of AAA titles and a splash of niche.

I don&#039;t think digital distribution is so inherently superior that it&#039;s capturing the market by that dint. (I for one find it rather alarming, not exciting, thanks to the inflated prices and ridiculously unfriendly policies most digital distribution services offer.) But when one&#039;s choices are to hunt all over one&#039;s city or town for a retailer that might have a copy of the game you want, to order online and receive it an indeterminate number of days later (or pay outrageous sums to receive it &quot;quickly&quot;), or simply enter one&#039;s credit card number and start downloading....

Well. I think you get the picture..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course retail boxed sales are going down &#8211; the biggest specialty game retailer in the market is now Gamestop (not EB, who actually supported the PC market) and they&#8217;ve shoved PC gaming off into a corner with a haphazard selection of perhaps one or two copies each of anything other than the very latest, hottest titles, those being locked securely behind the counter. They&#8217;ll grudgingly make those sales, but their focus is the used console game market and that&#8217;s where they&#8217;re going to devote their effort.</p>
<p>And the non-specialty stores simply don&#8217;t have the space or the interest to carry more than a handful of AAA titles and a splash of niche.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think digital distribution is so inherently superior that it&#8217;s capturing the market by that dint. (I for one find it rather alarming, not exciting, thanks to the inflated prices and ridiculously unfriendly policies most digital distribution services offer.) But when one&#8217;s choices are to hunt all over one&#8217;s city or town for a retailer that might have a copy of the game you want, to order online and receive it an indeterminate number of days later (or pay outrageous sums to receive it &#8220;quickly&#8221;), or simply enter one&#8217;s credit card number and start downloading&#8230;.</p>
<p>Well. I think you get the picture..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark-P</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/11/20/scaremongering-anew/comment-page-1/#comment-9262</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark-P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 21:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=610#comment-9262</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I&#039;m looking forward to giving it another chance when I get my next PC and can pick it up for a tenner. It&#039;s been so many years since TA, I really *want* to like it. It&#039;s just not making it easy for me. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m looking forward to giving it another chance when I get my next PC and can pick it up for a tenner. It&#8217;s been so many years since TA, I really *want* to like it. It&#8217;s just not making it easy for me. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SwiftRanger</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/11/20/scaremongering-anew/comment-page-1/#comment-9257</link>
		<dc:creator>SwiftRanger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 21:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=610#comment-9257</guid>
		<description>&quot;I’ll compare it to Medieval Total War 2, which runs well enough with a lot happening on-screen on medium-low settings and still looks beautiful. MTW2 I bought after the demo, SC I didn’t. I don’t know what the relevant demographics for PC owners are, but I can’t help wondering if SC might have sold better and been a better game if the resources spent on tech-bloat had been directed elsewhere.&quot;

Well, SupCom is different, M2: TW is a good game but scale-wise I don&#039;t think the largest M2:TW map would even fit into the smallest SupCom map, it does have thousands of gorgeously detailed units (no flying units though:p) but they are all grouped together in 10-14 squads or so which means it&#039;s a lot softer on pathing. So, not even that is a fair comparison.;)

But sure, SupCom doesn&#039;t look good on low settings (you should really see it in Cartographic View for a surprise:p) but even then I can still understand why it&#039;s so performance-draining, because the tech-bloat is a lot more than some added shaders, it&#039;s just another (with the zoom literally higher) level of gameplay. While TA has its awesome close-up Michael Bay-like explosions which never seem to get boring and those gritty, carved out maps, SupCom has the controls/interface commands of a real, massive wargame. I can&#039;t go back to those manual single-load Atlasses, I want my Ferry command.:p 

Just saying: you&#039;ll get by perhaps if you can play it with all options in the coming years. TA had me hooked me on even the smallest maps and from then on things only got better once my hardware catched up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’ll compare it to Medieval Total War 2, which runs well enough with a lot happening on-screen on medium-low settings and still looks beautiful. MTW2 I bought after the demo, SC I didn’t. I don’t know what the relevant demographics for PC owners are, but I can’t help wondering if SC might have sold better and been a better game if the resources spent on tech-bloat had been directed elsewhere.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, SupCom is different, M2: TW is a good game but scale-wise I don&#8217;t think the largest M2:TW map would even fit into the smallest SupCom map, it does have thousands of gorgeously detailed units (no flying units though:p) but they are all grouped together in 10-14 squads or so which means it&#8217;s a lot softer on pathing. So, not even that is a fair comparison.;)</p>
<p>But sure, SupCom doesn&#8217;t look good on low settings (you should really see it in Cartographic View for a surprise:p) but even then I can still understand why it&#8217;s so performance-draining, because the tech-bloat is a lot more than some added shaders, it&#8217;s just another (with the zoom literally higher) level of gameplay. While TA has its awesome close-up Michael Bay-like explosions which never seem to get boring and those gritty, carved out maps, SupCom has the controls/interface commands of a real, massive wargame. I can&#8217;t go back to those manual single-load Atlasses, I want my Ferry command.:p </p>
<p>Just saying: you&#8217;ll get by perhaps if you can play it with all options in the coming years. TA had me hooked me on even the smallest maps and from then on things only got better once my hardware catched up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrokenSymmetry</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/11/20/scaremongering-anew/comment-page-1/#comment-9253</link>
		<dc:creator>BrokenSymmetry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 21:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=610#comment-9253</guid>
		<description>Why do PC games force me to understand what &quot;anisotropic filtering&quot; and &quot;triple buffering&quot; mean? Why is every PC game I buy a gamble if it will even start up on my Vista system?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do PC games force me to understand what &#8220;anisotropic filtering&#8221; and &#8220;triple buffering&#8221; mean? Why is every PC game I buy a gamble if it will even start up on my Vista system?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pidesco</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/11/20/scaremongering-anew/comment-page-1/#comment-9251</link>
		<dc:creator>Pidesco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=610#comment-9251</guid>
		<description>My previous comment was actually supposed to be about how hardware costs and the supposed inability to play games properly with a cheap computer are silly complaints. Got a little sidetracked there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My previous comment was actually supposed to be about how hardware costs and the supposed inability to play games properly with a cheap computer are silly complaints. Got a little sidetracked there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
