<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bioshock: Patched At Last</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/12/04/bioshock-patched-at-last/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/12/04/bioshock-patched-at-last/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:45:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Piratepete</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/12/04/bioshock-patched-at-last/comment-page-1/#comment-11755</link>
		<dc:creator>Piratepete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 09:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=696#comment-11755</guid>
		<description>yay.

Finally got it to work, finished the game last night. Ending was ok but can you tell me if there are alternate endings because it...erm....wasn&#039;t quite what I expected.

Replay possibility? meh out of ten i think. maybe huh out of ten if there is another ending to see</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yay.</p>
<p>Finally got it to work, finished the game last night. Ending was ok but can you tell me if there are alternate endings because it&#8230;erm&#8230;.wasn&#8217;t quite what I expected.</p>
<p>Replay possibility? meh out of ten i think. maybe huh out of ten if there is another ending to see</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piratepete</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/12/04/bioshock-patched-at-last/comment-page-1/#comment-11651</link>
		<dc:creator>Piratepete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 19:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=696#comment-11651</guid>
		<description>nope uninstalled - reinstalled, repatched same problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nope uninstalled &#8211; reinstalled, repatched same problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: malkav11</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/12/04/bioshock-patched-at-last/comment-page-1/#comment-11641</link>
		<dc:creator>malkav11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=696#comment-11641</guid>
		<description>I love co-op, and in many games I&#039;d be champing at the bit for its inclusion. Bioshock just doesn&#039;t really seem like an appropriate game for it, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love co-op, and in many games I&#8217;d be champing at the bit for its inclusion. Bioshock just doesn&#8217;t really seem like an appropriate game for it, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garth</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/12/04/bioshock-patched-at-last/comment-page-1/#comment-11637</link>
		<dc:creator>Garth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=696#comment-11637</guid>
		<description>Jeremy hit the nail right on the head with regards to co-op. Why is it that we had it for so long, and then lost it? Quake, Rainbow Six (pretty much every version until it showed up on consoles, bizarrely), System Shock, Perfect Dark (original and Zero), and then, what Gears of War? Not only was that &lt;i&gt;the most&lt;/i&gt; buggy co-op FPS I&#039;ve ever played, it wasn&#039;t even worth playing. Cover is one thing, but requiring it for every single fucking kill? Count me out.

Somewhere along the way, it was decided that games needed massive budgets to make them have unplayably-ugly bloom or some shit, and that actual control and playability were a distant 3rd priority. 

I&#039;d rather have an ugly game with great controls and co-op than a pretty game with mediocre controls and SP and deathmatch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy hit the nail right on the head with regards to co-op. Why is it that we had it for so long, and then lost it? Quake, Rainbow Six (pretty much every version until it showed up on consoles, bizarrely), System Shock, Perfect Dark (original and Zero), and then, what Gears of War? Not only was that <i>the most</i> buggy co-op FPS I&#8217;ve ever played, it wasn&#8217;t even worth playing. Cover is one thing, but requiring it for every single fucking kill? Count me out.</p>
<p>Somewhere along the way, it was decided that games needed massive budgets to make them have unplayably-ugly bloom or some shit, and that actual control and playability were a distant 3rd priority. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d rather have an ugly game with great controls and co-op than a pretty game with mediocre controls and SP and deathmatch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kuddles</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/12/04/bioshock-patched-at-last/comment-page-1/#comment-11625</link>
		<dc:creator>kuddles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 16:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=696#comment-11625</guid>
		<description>The real depressing thing about this patch is how they had to conform to the pressure.  A developer finally makes a game that takes advantage of widescreen monitors, and they got torn to shreds for doing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real depressing thing about this patch is how they had to conform to the pressure.  A developer finally makes a game that takes advantage of widescreen monitors, and they got torn to shreds for doing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Wonderstuff</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/12/04/bioshock-patched-at-last/comment-page-1/#comment-11571</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Wonderstuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=696#comment-11571</guid>
		<description>Wish I had originally played this with the new FOV setting on my 360 (you realise how cramped it was before - the new setting seems more natural and not like you are looking through binoculars).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wish I had originally played this with the new FOV setting on my 360 (you realise how cramped it was before &#8211; the new setting seems more natural and not like you are looking through binoculars).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Arctor</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/12/04/bioshock-patched-at-last/comment-page-1/#comment-11568</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Arctor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 09:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=696#comment-11568</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s wrong with a game that is great first time but you don&#039;t really care to replay?

I don&#039;t mind. I&#039;ve seen most of it, I had a great time, now I can play the many other games I have to play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s wrong with a game that is great first time but you don&#8217;t really care to replay?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mind. I&#8217;ve seen most of it, I had a great time, now I can play the many other games I have to play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LSNDuck</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/12/04/bioshock-patched-at-last/comment-page-1/#comment-11567</link>
		<dc:creator>LSNDuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 09:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=696#comment-11567</guid>
		<description>Jeremy, you are right indeed (as is Funkula).  I have a good gaming friend, and we regularly play together.  We both much prefer co-op gaming over DM or other competitive modes.  We have battled through all three Sams on Serious, Lego Star Wars, Baldur&#039;s Gate, and yet there are so few games out there that encourage co-operation.  System Shock 2 is next on our list, but then the hopeless search for another game starts again.

More please developers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy, you are right indeed (as is Funkula).  I have a good gaming friend, and we regularly play together.  We both much prefer co-op gaming over DM or other competitive modes.  We have battled through all three Sams on Serious, Lego Star Wars, Baldur&#8217;s Gate, and yet there are so few games out there that encourage co-operation.  System Shock 2 is next on our list, but then the hopeless search for another game starts again.</p>
<p>More please developers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/12/04/bioshock-patched-at-last/comment-page-1/#comment-11565</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 09:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=696#comment-11565</guid>
		<description>Another big &#039;meh&#039; for Bioshock from me these days too. Enjoyed my first play-through but replaying it with a patch? Nah.

It&#039;s just a silly little jolly-bobble for giggly baby-men.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another big &#8216;meh&#8217; for Bioshock from me these days too. Enjoyed my first play-through but replaying it with a patch? Nah.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just a silly little jolly-bobble for giggly baby-men.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Sombrero Kid</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/12/04/bioshock-patched-at-last/comment-page-1/#comment-11563</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sombrero Kid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 09:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=696#comment-11563</guid>
		<description>this is pissing me off! 
when will people get this through their heads! 

The original game was widescreen it was developed for wide screen monitors, the team desided when the aspect ratio was not 16:9 to add screen content to the top and bottem of the screen thus providing the fairest experiance since the vertical FOV is less important than the horizontal.

people moaned about it because they don&#039;t understand or they think widescreen is better in some way and that they wanted extra content over square monitors god damn it or whatever thier stupid point of view was.

Irrational responded by saying it&#039;s correct the way it is anyone who wants a bigger FOV for widescreen is gonna get an artificicially wide FOV but we&#039;ll shove it in the patch to shut you up.

thus the pictures on videogamer are correct the borders on the top and bottom are the extra borders added for 4:3 users (which morfs the image on screen in a way it was not intended) and the new borders on the sides are added in the patch to let widescreen guys see more of the action.

i realise i&#039;m talking to myself here, i wish irrational had released it with 360 degree FOV and then told you all to just block out the parts of your screen you don&#039;t want and then you can all get the FOV you want!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is pissing me off!<br />
when will people get this through their heads! </p>
<p>The original game was widescreen it was developed for wide screen monitors, the team desided when the aspect ratio was not 16:9 to add screen content to the top and bottem of the screen thus providing the fairest experiance since the vertical FOV is less important than the horizontal.</p>
<p>people moaned about it because they don&#8217;t understand or they think widescreen is better in some way and that they wanted extra content over square monitors god damn it or whatever thier stupid point of view was.</p>
<p>Irrational responded by saying it&#8217;s correct the way it is anyone who wants a bigger FOV for widescreen is gonna get an artificicially wide FOV but we&#8217;ll shove it in the patch to shut you up.</p>
<p>thus the pictures on videogamer are correct the borders on the top and bottom are the extra borders added for 4:3 users (which morfs the image on screen in a way it was not intended) and the new borders on the sides are added in the patch to let widescreen guys see more of the action.</p>
<p>i realise i&#8217;m talking to myself here, i wish irrational had released it with 360 degree FOV and then told you all to just block out the parts of your screen you don&#8217;t want and then you can all get the FOV you want!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piratepete</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/12/04/bioshock-patched-at-last/comment-page-1/#comment-11562</link>
		<dc:creator>Piratepete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 08:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=696#comment-11562</guid>
		<description>Ahh right so the UK version of the patch is not actually the UK version. Clear as mud. So a reinstallation is on the cards for me then.

Annoyingly I was very close to finishing the game, tbh part of me isn&#039;t entirely sure whether I want to waste the time doing so.

What I don&#039;t get is that on both patch versions it points to Bioshock.exe. being in the wrong location</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh right so the UK version of the patch is not actually the UK version. Clear as mud. So a reinstallation is on the cards for me then.</p>
<p>Annoyingly I was very close to finishing the game, tbh part of me isn&#8217;t entirely sure whether I want to waste the time doing so.</p>
<p>What I don&#8217;t get is that on both patch versions it points to Bioshock.exe. being in the wrong location</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Funkula</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2007/12/04/bioshock-patched-at-last/comment-page-1/#comment-11561</link>
		<dc:creator>Funkula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 07:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=696#comment-11561</guid>
		<description>I realize this is nothing like what you&#039;re talking about, but Serious Sam had the best co-op ever.

&lt;i&gt;Ever.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realize this is nothing like what you&#8217;re talking about, but Serious Sam had the best co-op ever.</p>
<p><i>Ever.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
