Comments on: E3: The Trailers – Wolfenstein

By: magallanes

magallanes — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 13:45:39 +0000

Hi there:

how can describe this video?… simple :this video sux!!.

Some executives think that if a dynamite explosion is cool, then doubling the amount of dynamite will be double of cool.

By: Jochen Scheisse

Jochen Scheisse — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 09:02:02 +0000

Looking forward to this. Comic Nazis with Tesla Fists vs. Blaskovicz > Dialogue in a standard WW2 game

Of course here we’ll also get corny dialogue and ridiculous slaughter of a lone hero, but that will actually fit the game.

By: Jonathan

Jonathan — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 06:06:20 +0000

Jet pack nazis? I hate those guys!

By: Manwe

Manwe — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:01:02 +0000

Psychic powers? Arrrghh. Painkiller Overdoes made the same mistake when they got rid of the titular weapon, and replaced it with some kind of energy ball firing affair. Painkiller = good, firing magical balls of energy = bad

In Wolfenstein (and Doom), the character you play is meant to be the uber marine, super soldier. Not some kind of monster destroying, violent, Derek Acorah.

Bring back the Super shotgun (Yes from Doom 2 and not Wolfenstein) and chainsaw. No need for psychic messiness

By: Nick Halme

Nick Halme — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:06:20 +0000

Hey, Quake 4 was an above average game — what, did the single-player experience really let you down? It is Quake, after all.

By: Senethro

Senethro — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 05:10:37 +0000

stijn: No, honestly, he meant W:ET. The RTCW people are crazy and still haven’t forgiven Splash Damage for ruining their dead game by making a better version thats free.

By: Stijn

Stijn — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 20:37:48 +0000

Uh? No. RtCW:ET gets played between 4-7 times a week for at least an hour each time at my house. It is, in a word, awesome.

mujadaddy, I think he meant ET: Quake Wars, not Wolfenstein: ET ;)

By: Alex Taldren

Alex Taldren — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:36:43 +0000

Here’s to hoping it has very fun and competitive, team-based multiplayer!

By: KindredPhantom

KindredPhantom — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:06:43 +0000

I have never played a Wolfenstein game, if this is any good then it shall be my first.

By: SwiftRanger

SwiftRanger — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:33:38 +0000

“Raven – who have much to prove after Quake 4.”

Nah, it was relatively fine for what is was set out to do: make a sequel/sort of a remake of Quake 2, even the bosses were just as easy. Story? It’s Quake ffs. And Raven got the most important part absolutely right: the weaponfeel, unlike some other self-proclaimed high-profile shooters.

By: born2expire

born2expire — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:29:56 +0000

wow, looks to be on par with Raven’s track record, YAWN!

wake me up when Raven does something decent, or not fucking up a existing license.

Q4′s main problem is that the multiplayer sucked beyond belief, I mean i still play Q3, but Q4 was just shit.

By: Maximum Fish

Maximum Fish — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:44:48 +0000

Q4′s problem was that storyline frills only serve to constrain a game that should be about over the top senseless carnage and other pixelantiism. It still had good shooting stuff, just not enough. Color me excited when they announce a sequel to painkiller.