Comments on: Cross Fire: Counter-Strike Map To Be Removed

By: Kimshall

Kimshall — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:23:14 +0000

Looks interesting as i’ve never checked that game before but i’ll surely check the similarity between the two after all Counter Strike Online is the best way to play instant counter strike.

By: onur

onur — Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:48:58 +0000

dssdjajgdjdu87udldjjd
dhashd
dsi;dsa
sddlad
dadad;
adkda’d;dsaa

By: caramelcarrot

caramelcarrot — Sat, 02 Aug 2008 12:31:08 +0000

Wasn’t Cross-Fire one of the names that Gooseman actually said he considered for Counter-strike?

By: Crispy

Crispy — Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:19:18 +0000

So, The bomb has been defused, then?

By: too early not enough coffee

too early not enough coffee — Fri, 01 Aug 2008 01:48:26 +0000

forgive me, but I felt this had to be done

(spoiler: crosslimbocounterfireloststrike)

By: G4BOX

G4BOX — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:27:12 +0000

And we would have gotten away with it, if it weren’t for those meddling kids.

By: Bozzl3y

Bozzl3y — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:09:33 +0000

CounterCrossStrikeFire makes me feel sooooo glaaaaad :0)

(I tried coming up with a CS-themed version of My Favourite Things, but I gave up)

By: Dorian Cornelius Jasper

Dorian Cornelius Jasper — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:35:39 +0000

This still makes me sad. But it’s a hollow sadness, because I’m not likely to play the game, anyway.

By: Noc

Noc — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:38:33 +0000

Well, at least it has a sophisticated game engine.

By: Larington

Larington — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:17:54 +0000

I hasten to use the name Planetside on RPS, due to previous cases where I’ve derailed the comments thread by doing so, but it too had a case where a far eastern game called Welkin #### (Can’t remember the number) appeared to have ripped not just the graphics engine but a large number of sound assets from it as well, whats become of that game since then I am unsure.

By: McFool

McFool — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:07:14 +0000

Wow, what a failure, and they don’t seem to care at all.

By: Cooper

Cooper — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:03:07 +0000

Although publishers are potentially liable for copyright infringement, warranty and indemnification clauses from authours which usually state there are – for example – no known copyright infringements and that the authour will pay for any damages the publisher sustains.

Even so – and despite these clauses – publishers should be astute enough to check that the material released under their name doesn’t infringe upon copyrights.