Comments on: Cross Fire: Counter-Strike Map To Be Removed

By: onur

onur — Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:48:58 +0000

dssdjajgdjdu87udldjjd
dhashd
dsi;dsa
sddlad
dadad;
adkda’d;dsaa

By: caramelcarrot

caramelcarrot — Sat, 02 Aug 2008 12:31:08 +0000

Wasn’t Cross-Fire one of the names that Gooseman actually said he considered for Counter-strike?

By: Crispy

Crispy — Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:19:18 +0000

So, The bomb has been defused, then?

By: too early not enough coffee

too early not enough coffee — Fri, 01 Aug 2008 01:48:26 +0000

forgive me, but I felt this had to be done (spoiler: crosslimbocounterfireloststrike)

By: G4BOX

G4BOX — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:27:12 +0000

And we would have gotten away with it, if it weren’t for those meddling kids.

By: Bozzl3y

Bozzl3y — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:09:33 +0000

CounterCrossStrikeFire makes me feel sooooo glaaaaad :0)

(I tried coming up with a CS-themed version of My Favourite Things, but I gave up)

By: Dorian Cornelius Jasper

Dorian Cornelius Jasper — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:35:39 +0000

This still makes me sad. But it’s a hollow sadness, because I’m not likely to play the game, anyway.

By: Noc

Noc — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:38:33 +0000

Well, at least it has a sophisticated game engine.

By: Larington

Larington — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:17:54 +0000

I hasten to use the name Planetside on RPS, due to previous cases where I’ve derailed the comments thread by doing so, but it too had a case where a far eastern game called Welkin #### (Can’t remember the number) appeared to have ripped not just the graphics engine but a large number of sound assets from it as well, whats become of that game since then I am unsure.

By: McFool

McFool — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:07:14 +0000

Wow, what a failure, and they don’t seem to care at all.

By: Cooper

Cooper — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:03:07 +0000

Although publishers are potentially liable for copyright infringement, warranty and indemnification clauses from authours which usually state there are – for example – no known copyright infringements and that the authour will pay for any damages the publisher sustains.

Even so – and despite these clauses – publishers should be astute enough to check that the material released under their name doesn’t infringe upon copyrights.

By: Nilocy

Nilocy — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:01:30 +0000

Another injustice solved by the RPS crew!