By Jim Rossignol on September 29th, 2008 at 11:52 am.
Oh boy, this is the big one for strategy types. The land battles trailer for Empire: Total War shows those 18th century musketeers in action, with the ultra-detailed new battle maps that allow proper use of terrain, and of buildings. The game is coming up in February 2009 and I’m already writing off most of the month’s potential productivity… We should have more detailed info on the game for you soon.
That campaign map is beautiful.
I really hope that the AI isnt as bad as M2:TW was. That was a dreadful game
report
A plea to creative assembly.
Please, please, please put Rourkes Drift in the historical battles. I want a game version of Zulu damnit!
report
I’ll just leave this here…
report
Well… I’ve seen enough of those Medieval 2 videos to approach this with caution. An excellent video does not mean a great game will follow, but man, I both hope and predict that it will!
The detail in those units – like the drumming – was mindblowing, considering there can be about 1,000 units doing the same thing at the same time.
I think that, finally, I might have a strategy game I love more than Rome!
report
Dante: Wrong period. This is 1700-1800.
KG
report
Bugger.
The date ranges for Total War games are getting smaller as they get further into the future, eventually they’ll be doing ‘Last Week: Total War!’
report
I’m currently playing Medieval 2: Kingdoms (as the rampaging Welsh juggernaut) and the prospect of fewer sieges and more open battles is rather appealing at the moment, particularly given that the AI copes a lot better with the latter. Garrisoning could be interesting too, so long as it isn’t as twitchy as getting troops on or off walls in Medieval.
report
Well, Dante, last week was really bloody! (ask Sarah Palin)
report
Total War games have been crack since day one of Shogun. I will be sleeping outside Best Buy for this one.
Jigglybean: You may be relieved to know that Medieval 2 was developed by their CA’s Canada studio. This is being developed by CA’s British studio, they’re the Shogun, Medieval 1, Rome guys.
report
I actually stopped watching at the first glimpse of the campaign map cause I wanted it to be a surprise when I play it.
UBER WANT.
report
the AI in Medieval 2 was absolutely abysmal, verging on non existent. Even on Very Hard mode, the only thing that made it vaguely challenging was the fact I got my money sapped and they got lots of it for free. Half the units were made totally obsolete simply by being 3 different shades of absolutely useless (archers taking out about 4 men from a unit before they engaged when those units are militia is ‘not a good cost/benefit equation’ or whatever, and the knights that rarely got a showing because most of the battles were sieges and they were pretty poor then). I understand that it was deliberate to show that most archers in the period (with the exception of longbowmen…. who still sucked anyway once you scaled the walls, which you would in about 2 minutes) weren’t of the highest quality, but there wasn’t much point in having them, from a players perspective.
And despite ALL of that, it was still a game I spent weeks playing because it was great fun. So if they fix that, pleasepleaseplease, this will be a truly defining RTS.
report
In a post on the TWC fan forums one of the devs said there’s be no historical battles in this version.
I’m not too bothered about the short period of time it covers as there’s as there’s so much technical progress and upheaval in it. It also allows them to return to a two turns per year format rather than the ambiguous “turns” which represented about 2.345 years in medieval. I do wish they were making the game longer than 200 turns though.
report
It looks like epic scale Company of Heroes but with elephants instead of tanks.
That’s enough for me to get a preorder.
report
@ Real Horror,
Thanks for the info. I was aware of that and I am pleased that the UK guys are working on this – fingers crossed still.
report
I’m going to give it a miss, I’m waiting for Wars of the Roses: Total War. Finally show those Lancastrians what for.
report
this was around 80% FMV. Whats the point? If I want to see epic Napoleonic warfare, I’ll watch the Russian war and peace movie.
The actual gameplay footage didn’t look anything like as good as company of heroes. They still have huge stupid oversized flags, which makes it look a bit ridiculous.
I’d love this game to be awesome, but nothing in the video makes me think it’s a must buy tbh.
report
Without large flags the interface would be horrible.
report
God, yes.
18th century tailors certainly knew how to make a sexy military uniform.
report
I just hope they’re not all siege battles, like in the last two Total War outings. That was the worst part of the newified campaign map, seconded by the overly complex movement system whose nuances were cool but totally irrelevant, especially when you could buy the entire armed forces of the Roman Empire from them.
report
Any chance of their being a multiplayer campaign mode? This would put it over the top for me.
report
I thought Medieval 2 was developed by the Australian studio?
report
It was.
report
Are there any HD versions of this video? Or atleast higher res?
report
I hope I’m not out of line in linking to another games site but you can view it in somewhat better quality on eurogamer.tv.
@Maximum Fish
One of the things they’ve done with the new campaign map is to move a lot of city upgrades outside of the city; if you want to defend that fancy new engineering workshop you built you are going to have to march out and meet the enemy army on the field.
report
The AI designer for Empires, or one of them I read, is Luster, developer of the superlative Lands To Conquer mod for M2:TW. The mod made the AI in M2:TW far more believable, both in strategic and tactical modes (VH / VH). There were still some quirks to be sure, but far more enjoyable none the less.
Luster’s farewell post on the TWCenter forum.
report
“Without large flags the interface would be horrible.”
somehow Company Of heroes muddles though.
report
That’s good to hear about Lusted. Firaxis produced impressive improvements for Beyond the Sword’s AI when they hired on a Civ 4 modder.
The AI and overall difficulty level for Medieval 2 was woeful, and Empire will not be a compelling purchase for me unless they make a successful attempt to rectify those shortcomings.
report
No. It wasn’t. The opening twenty seconds were, and then it was all using the in game engine, whether there was an overlaying interface or not.
report
@Cliffski: the opening bit with the cannon balls and ships is FMV, then from where it says “Actual Gameplay Footage” onwards is in-game. The little men really are animated like that. Sure, they’ve ramped it up with camera wobble and removed the UI, but it’s still their engine.
report
I hope reviewers comment on whether the issues of Medieval TW2 were fixed. Seemed like all the reviews on MTW2 glossed over it’s rough edges. Sure it seems like a great game, until you actually try and play it.
Don’t get me wrong, it was fun, but I remember Rome TW being better.
report
Re: AI. I interviewed Creative recently. In hard numbers, they’ve just got many more people working on AI this time around. The last game this team made – Rome – had one, and he wasn’t a pure AI guy and did other stuff. I think – without checking my article – there’s 3 this time around, plus another two part timers.
KG
report
Let’s hope after this release they re-do Rome. It is still my favorite era for these scale of battles. I catch myself re-installing it and playing every so often.
report
Rome was the best one so far, easily.
report
/award medal for services to great game ideas
report
You could kill more Popes in Med2 though.
report
i’m really looking forward too it, while M2:TW wasn’t perfectly balanced and the AI was at times sub par or prone to cheating it was none the less excellent and mods like Stainless Steal kept me occupied for months :)
report
If the skirmishing is that good it’ll make a nice change from the to-me-to-you semi-turn-based attacking in Medieval 2 & Rome.
report
GOTY ’09 for me for sure. For those who don’t like the unit flags (which are mostly appropriate for this time period) there’s always a (rather small) mod released that removes them. This has been the case for the previous games in the series.
report
But what if I don’t want the way I need to think to be changed? I need to think that way!
report
I personally hope they remove a lot of the changes they tried in M:TW2 such as attempting to balance each of the big nations at the beginning of the game. The distinct imbalance made the older games much more interesting for me.
report
Like Dante, I wish the timescale were a bit larger. There’s just that crucial period between the end of Medieval Total War (2) and Empire where lots o’ the good stuff happens.
You’ve got your Thirty Years War (say it with me, DEFENESTRATION CUTSCENE!), The Golden Century of Spain (no, I’m not Spanish. I’m from Finland. Don’t blame jingoism, blame Arturo Perez-Reverte’s excellent Captain Alatriste novels), The rise of the Netherlands, Latvia and Poland (Winged Hussars!) fighting the newly formed Russians while Sweden running amok, Barbary Corsairs, The Medici and Italian Doge at each others’ throats, the Golden Age of Piracy etc.
Also, a few years into the other direction into the 19th century you get the Crimean War. Epic stuff.
Yes, late-Medieval has a bit of the pike, sword, and arquebus era, but I wish I could start a bit earlier in Empire and either lead or trounce Spanish tercios in Flemish fields. So yes, I can do that in Europa Universalis III, but I want to see the literal squares of pikemen and arquebusiers.
So yes, we get the Napoleonic era and the American War of Independence. So there’s the Anglos and French catered for. Maybe they’re saving something for the expansion packs, but still.
Still would’ve been nice with those Spanish tercios… Oh and alright *waves Finnish flag*, ravaging across the German states with Finnish Hakkapeliitta cavalry and also preventing Swedes from losing Finland to the tsars (or the opposite, taking Stockholm for Mother Russia) in 1808, or fighting the combined French and British expeditionary forces across the Baltic archipelago.
report
Its completely innacurate though, I heard that soldiers during this time hardly ever hit one another(it was to do with phsycology, physology or phrenology).
I like Rome but, what annoyed me about it, was it was too hard to control my army. To get them all to march towards the enemy you clicked, and then they’d all fall out of sinc. I’d end up more fighting my army trying to get it to do what I wanted it to do than I would the enemy.
report
@Calabi
I believe green soldiers would often aim too high, some models of muskets in that period had an arcing trajectory (first upward and then downwards) so their shots would go over the heads of their intended targets. You’ll often read about NCOs shouting “aim low, men!”.
Aiming too low, however, could potentially result in the shot rolling out the end of the musket :D
report
They should do a Cuba: Total War, where the first player to do anything in any turn loses.
report
The troops aren’t in proper formation (shoulder to shoulder) since CA focused on “dancing duels” instead of making a suitable game engine.
Once again you only get to command up to 20 units with a cap at about 250 men in each.
Most units seemed to be identical, with only the facing colours changing with each nation.
Shogun total war was a landmark in RTS gaming. I don’t think anything else even came close to that, except maybe the Myth series(actually that comparison is far from perfect. But both were 3d-ish, and you had to make do with what you had at the start of the game, no mass producing units). Rome total war added 3d in place of the sprites. What’s new with this? naval battles….yeah, woohoo. A realistic scale should have been the goal, and an AI which isn’t dumber than dirt.
p.s. yes the graphics do look good, but after 5 minutes of that you just end up zooming out anyway in order to play the game.
p.p.s. And while I’m ranting and raving, I might as well mention CA’s support towards moders. As in the fact that it’s non-existent. Lots of people put in a ton of effort and time in mods for RTW, producing stuff which outshone RTW, and made expansions like Barbarian invasion (or, *snicker* alexander) laughable in comparison. Europa Barbarorum, Fourth age and Napoleonic are but a few of those.
Oh well, there is always HW les grognards and the mysterious LGS game.
report
About the giant flags: Since Rome: Total War it’s been really easy to disable them. In the same folder as the .exe there is a file called preferences (for medieval 2 it’s medieval2.preferences.CFG). It opens in notepad, and all you do is scroll down to the line that says:
show_banners = 1
And change the 1 to a 0, save file and voila! You can also remove that ridiculously large HUD that Rome introduced, and use the slick and less imposing Shogun and Medieval HUD (full_battle_HUD = 0). Even those silly green unit selection arrows/circles can be removed from within that file. It’s literally a 5 second operation.
In fact, the preference file has a ton of customization options, and I don’t understand why CA don’t let you do all of that from the in game options menu.
I look forward to Empire, but only when Mod’s come out to remove those ridiculous hollywood-swordfight animations, or “dancing duels” as Scundoo aptly put it. I am curious about the naval battles though. I hope they don’t mess them up.
report
In CoH you can never see anything more than a few hundred yards away. TW games allow you to control troops on the other side of the battle field from your viewpoint. Why are you even comparing TW to CoH? They are completely different scale RTS games.
report
Empire: Total Peace! How come that doesn’t exist?
report
osmanlı empire emperyalist america-england-franca-napolia-rusia( but petro) the return otoman empire
report
ottoman empire(turkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk)
report
no engilısh-no france-no america-no rusia
report
no france emparyalistttttttttttt
report
want. but after reading the reviews and comments about M2 im not entirely sure i want to buy it. been playing Rome forever and never felt a need to switch until i heard Empire might be a multi-threaded game that can utilize more than one core of your processor. if thats the case they have a lot of power to work with and i can believe it might be a good investment as eventually mods will come out to simulate any time period/ fantasy realm you can think of just like Rome has currently.
and just for the record i dont think:
“p.p.s. And while I’m ranting and raving, I might as well mention CA’s support towards moders. As in the fact that it’s non-existent. Lots of people put in a ton of effort and time in mods for RTW, producing stuff which outshone RTW, and made expansions like Barbarian invasion (or, *snicker* alexander) laughable in comparison. Europa Barbarorum, Fourth age and Napoleonic are but a few of those.”
…is entirely true.
as far as i know Fourth Age requires Barbarian Invasion.
report
dağılın lan osmanlı geliyor heyttttttttttttt
report
no france no franceeeeeeeeee napolyon = manys
report
I would equate the open formations they show as being a compromise for the sake of collision detection. In any event, shoulder to shoulder did not always mean that in a literal sense. Until the French developed a good system for deploying swiftly into column the emphasis was entirely on firepower, which necessistated that troops have some degree of freedom for movement. Any game developer would take this leeway to cut down on the processor burden that results from huge formations colliding with eachother.
The only way around this that I can think of would be totally scripted drill movements (actually not a bad idea) that would have to be individual for each nation that used a different system. It is far easier to use a dirivative of A* that will set spacing and force the system to use a limited number of turns to approximate drill movement, but most players would have no appetite for the loss in freedom of anything remotely resembling an implementation of an 18th century drill manual. I fear that most will already be frustrated by the game’s demand that you micromanage volleys.
I can’t say how pleased I am at the superficial historical accuracy displayed so far. The cannons fire solid shot, and The uniforms passingly resemble some actually used. This is a step up for Total War, which has not had decent authenticity at any point in it’s existence, and has usually been abysmal and more influenced by what people expect than what actually happened. The only exception would be Shogun, but I exempt that because there wasn’t much chance for detail with bitmap soldiers.
report
Damn, I can’t wait.
I just hope they include some more larger, unoticed revolutions. For instance, if the Russian faction has made Riga and the Baltics a great place ( high civilization, very advanced etc. ) and a revolution happens in one of the cities, the whole Baltics could divide from the Russians, and try to get their independance.
Apcourse, If I was the Russian faction, I’d surrender to them, and allow them to make me their vassal.
report
Sop talking about Company of Heroes. Sorry if he did a while ago but I have no time to finish reading. COH may have gotten by without the big flags (and it is my favorite game currently) but the total war games need things like that for the massive scale. You get two nations fighting together on low graphics (mine is high but my friends is not) with similar units and it can be very hard to distinquish without using the flashing green and red thing. Which is annoying. Oh, and there are no where near as many seiges in this one! The others were in medieval times, many more seiges then. Can not wait to get this game. On my “things to do… URGENT” list! PS I thought Medieval was and is (just reinstalled after watching trailer) very fun. The game can be hard at certain points.
report
Better AI and diplomacy that is more than “give me a moment to kill some other guys before your sudden and inevitable betrayal” would make this a perfect game.
report
And I thought the fight animations in med II were cool. Seriously, I will lose every battle because I’ll be too busy staring at the infantry fights.
report
this looks like an awesome game and i hoe they have improved on MTW2 AI tacttics with cavalary of sending them round behind the main army to attack your flank,this got exteremely boring and repetetive
report
About the FMV:after the bit wer it said “actual gameplay footage” it was in game however i suspect the HUD was slightly edited to make for better viewing
report
how many turns are there in the empire total war game?
report