Rock, Paper, Shotgun

The Sunday Papers

Posted by Kieron Gillen on October 27th, 2008 at 1:21 am.

Share:

BOOGIE WONDERLAAAAAAAANNNND!
Well, Monday morning, but I’ve been off at the London MCM expo doing my thang (And hello to any readers who said hi). Anyway, even if it’s Monday morning when you read this, it’s still a good time to sit back and take in a carefully prepared list of pieces which caught my eye this week which I tried desperately hard not to include any links to top disco classics.

Failed.

__________________


Related Stories:

__________________

« Multiwinia Multiplayer Now | Grand Theft Auto 4 Inbound For PC »

.

74 Comments »

  1. mrrobsa says:

    @Radiant:

    New Scientist is a shitter for it too, ‘WHY WE’LL BE DEAD TOMORROW’, and the article reveals a new style of string theory which hypothesises an alternate dimension each day where we all die or something equally rubbish.

  2. AbyssUK says:

    Dear RPS, I have no idea on how to run a website about games or indeed how to write correctly in southern queen like English. I do however have a degree in a real science (chemistry) so that makes me better than you or indeed anybody else. So please give me a job so that I can alleviate your burden of having not enough time in the day to play computer games and write about the things you love most, instead of for example testing the highly entertaining sealing characteristics of polytetrafluoroethene based gaskets under EN13555 standards and then having to write reports of said sealing characteristics in as boring as possible third person passive.

    I need a new job… does RPS need a research chemist with an overly large head? I have experience in creating car polish and anti graffiti cleaners also….

    I am a chemist I can make things go bang…

  3. mrrobsa says:

    More splodes are always need, surely?

  4. mrrobsa says:

    *I seem to have blown the end off of ‘needed’ :S

  5. cyrenic says:

    “Lud” the Mad? FOR SHAME.

  6. kadayi says:

    Looking forward to the Farcry 2 verdict. Initially I was down on the game, but the more I’ve played the more I’ve come to embrace the challenge to it, and in a lot of ways understand where Tim is coming from in his review. If you’re on of the many complaining about the respawning checkpoints, you need to think beyond the road when it comes to getting from A to B. You’re a hostile in a warzone…travelling on a road in broad daylight is always going to be a recipe for disaster. Start thinking like that and the game becomes that much more pleasurable.

  7. Radiant says:

    @mrrobsa
    I don’t think I’ve ever read the New Scientist.
    Or indeed looked at the cover. ;)

  8. Radiant says:

    @Kadayi
    That’s what I thought reading a lot of the complaints on FC2: “The checkpoints! They have guards!”
    Maybe some dyed in the wool FPS players are too used to straight lining a game; COD4′ing themselves from A-B in the shortest line possible.
    With the shift in gameplay that FC2 presents it’s hard to understand that you really don’t have to go through any checkpoints if you don’t want to.
    I don’t know, I just think some people [the ever present horde of you people that love to moan if the porridge is too lumpy] just want to grind to the end of the game to get to the next.

  9. Hobbes says:

    KG: ‘Jochen: I never fight Alcohol’.

    Only because you lose when you do…

  10. Zuffox says:

    Abyss: Gillen has a degree (at what level I do not know) in Biology, so consider yourself redundant.

  11. Iain says:

    Re: Boogie Wonderland. I only could think of one thing when watching that video – it’s a singing Klingon with an afro!

  12. Sam says:

    @Zuffox: Of course, as Physicists and Chemists know, Biology isn’t a Real Science, as Abyss specified.

    Of course, as a Physicist, I should note that Chemistry isn’t a Real Science either.

    *ducks*

  13. mrrobsa says:

    @Sam:

    We all know what’s needed…. SCIENCE WARS!!
    It’d be chuffing brilliant! Chemists vs Physicists vs Biologists TO THE DEATH.

  14. kadayi says:

    @Radiant

    I’d say the flaw to the game is that it doesn’t actually encourage you think differently about your play style, in the way that say Portal does, but instead leaves you to figure out why your butting heads all the time, or end up on forums/websites bitching about ‘respawning Checkpoints’ and ‘they need to patch it’. I watched the 1UP show last night and although all of the reviewers on it were super enthusiastic about it as a game, it was abundantly clear that one of them at least hadn’t made the necessary leap of imagination required to get past the whole Cars/Roads/Checkpoints conundrum.

  15. Down Rodeo says:

    Sam: we physicists win :)
    Oh, crap, I do maths as well don’t I? I agree, a fight to the bitter, messy end is needed.

  16. Radiant says:

    Absolutely.
    My personal view of it is that it sits in between two camps. It’s flaw being it’s not RPG enough for the explorers ["no XP? no leveling? no inventory?"] and it’s not signposted enough for straight forward shooters.
    It’s not really a flaw in the game dynamics more a flaw in the games perception.

    It reminds me a lot of Project IGI.

  17. Radiant says:

    But your right it does need a Cpt. Price to show you the ropes in game.

  18. Kadayi says:

    Although Farcry 2 is building on the bones of STALKER & Boiling point and GTA to an extent; it’s going to be very hard to go back to the linear shooter for a lot of people after they’ve played it I feel. It’s definitely going to shift the FPS paradigm in terms of mainstream player expectation (someone had to say it, so it might as well be me), which kind of makes me fearful for titles like HL2:EP3, but at the same time makes me excited for future releases that evolve the concept further.

  19. Fede says:

    Sam and Down Rodeo: look here :D

  20. sinister agent says:

    New Scientist is a shitter for it too, ‘WHY WE’LL BE DEAD TOMORROW’, and the article reveals a new style of string theory which hypothesises an alternate dimension each day where we all die or something equally rubbish.

    The only time you can be sure that the end of the world will be tomorrow is when the New Scientist doesn’t appear at all, because all the staff are out snorting cocaine off a prostitute’s buttock.

    I don’t know, I just think some people … just want to grind to the end of the game to get to the next.

    Judging by what I’ve seen and heard from many people, this is depressingly true. Although it seems to me that they’re often the most easily pleased players as well – give them shiny graphics and they’ll grind through it and move on to the next one for another £40. I’ve even seen this done with Guitar Hero – people sitting there mechanically pressing the buttons on easy mode until they’ve passed all the songs once, then ditching it forever. Totally missing the point, but there you go.

  21. The thing is, biologists get laid.

    KG

  22. sinister agent says:

    Growing your own doesn’t count.

  23. Gorgeras says:

    Theoretical Physicists unfortunately don’t get laid. They just meet very charismatic, athletic and attractive multi-ethnic women with engineering expertise. Then, NOTHING HAPPENS.

    The bloody anti-shag field is down now. They should be gagging for it.

Page 2 of 2«12

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

GamersGate has loads of PC games.

Respond to our gibber

Browse the archive

Buy classic PC games from Good Old Games, please.