<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Sunday Papers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/04/the-sunday-papers-50/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/04/the-sunday-papers-50/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:08:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Helm</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/04/the-sunday-papers-50/comment-page-1/#comment-131036</link>
		<dc:creator>Helm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6857#comment-131036</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;shorter, snarky version: democracy is fugly.&lt;/i&gt;

even shorter version: humanity is ugly. But still, at least a lucid examination of the snarky thing (and yeah, it does seem like the same discussion occurred before it only about irony) is in order when people are starting to champion that this effect of human behavior is a positive one and a cry for truth and straightness and whatever else. It&#039;s one thing to default to the truism &quot;humans are kinda awful sometimes&quot; and another, newer thing, to suggest &quot;we&#039;re awful because we&#039;re awesome!!&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>shorter, snarky version: democracy is fugly.</i></p>
<p>even shorter version: humanity is ugly. But still, at least a lucid examination of the snarky thing (and yeah, it does seem like the same discussion occurred before it only about irony) is in order when people are starting to champion that this effect of human behavior is a positive one and a cry for truth and straightness and whatever else. It&#8217;s one thing to default to the truism &#8220;humans are kinda awful sometimes&#8221; and another, newer thing, to suggest &#8220;we&#8217;re awful because we&#8217;re awesome!!&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kadayi</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/04/the-sunday-papers-50/comment-page-1/#comment-131017</link>
		<dc:creator>Kadayi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6857#comment-131017</guid>
		<description>&quot;When i read snark my first thought was of the weapon/species in halflife. Those little things were awesome in deathmatch.&quot;

This.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;When i read snark my first thought was of the weapon/species in halflife. Those little things were awesome in deathmatch.&#8221;</p>
<p>This.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pags</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/04/the-sunday-papers-50/comment-page-1/#comment-130929</link>
		<dc:creator>Pags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6857#comment-130929</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;i sort of dig champion’s counterthrust but am very, very confused as to why the subject of tom cruise requires serious thought or emotional commitment&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I once saw someone struggle through a great deal of inner-turmoil in deciding their feelings on Tom Cruise in a Youtube comment. It was a video of Tom Cruise being squirted in the face when he was doing an interview and subsequently chiding the person responsible; the comment went something along the lines of:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;heh, tom cruise is cool...kinda.. but he&#039;s still a bitch and can&#039;t take a joke&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>i sort of dig champion’s counterthrust but am very, very confused as to why the subject of tom cruise requires serious thought or emotional commitment</p></blockquote>
<p>I once saw someone struggle through a great deal of inner-turmoil in deciding their feelings on Tom Cruise in a Youtube comment. It was a video of Tom Cruise being squirted in the face when he was doing an interview and subsequently chiding the person responsible; the comment went something along the lines of:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;heh, tom cruise is cool&#8230;kinda.. but he&#8217;s still a bitch and can&#8217;t take a joke&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dhex</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/04/the-sunday-papers-50/comment-page-1/#comment-130925</link>
		<dc:creator>dhex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6857#comment-130925</guid>
		<description>i dig that too, daddio.

perhaps the deluge of snark (back in my day it was a deluge of irony) is merely a reflection of this webbed up, 2.0 world we live in where everyday dicks like me can say whatever with little or no cost. not everyone is going to have something of substance to say about something; the rest of us are going to have a like/dislike reaction, and one way to get attention for something that&#039;s otherwise insignificant is to be a jerk about it.

shorter, snarky version: democracy is fugly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dig that too, daddio.</p>
<p>perhaps the deluge of snark (back in my day it was a deluge of irony) is merely a reflection of this webbed up, 2.0 world we live in where everyday dicks like me can say whatever with little or no cost. not everyone is going to have something of substance to say about something; the rest of us are going to have a like/dislike reaction, and one way to get attention for something that&#8217;s otherwise insignificant is to be a jerk about it.</p>
<p>shorter, snarky version: democracy is fugly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kieron Gillen</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/04/the-sunday-papers-50/comment-page-1/#comment-130881</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieron Gillen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6857#comment-130881</guid>
		<description>Dhex: The counterthrust is what made me decide it was worth linking to. Snark as a failure of even attempting to understand something strikes me as something that&#039;s quite true. It&#039;s one of the things we were thinking about when making RPS - this odd dichotomy between the mainstream games sites which seem to just say what they&#039;re told and the countercultural ones seem to just say what they&#039;re told and add a sarcastic comment after it. Neither is that inspiring, y&#039;know?

KG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dhex: The counterthrust is what made me decide it was worth linking to. Snark as a failure of even attempting to understand something strikes me as something that&#8217;s quite true. It&#8217;s one of the things we were thinking about when making RPS &#8211; this odd dichotomy between the mainstream games sites which seem to just say what they&#8217;re told and the countercultural ones seem to just say what they&#8217;re told and add a sarcastic comment after it. Neither is that inspiring, y&#8217;know?</p>
<p>KG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dhex</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/04/the-sunday-papers-50/comment-page-1/#comment-130871</link>
		<dc:creator>dhex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 14:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6857#comment-130871</guid>
		<description>david fuckin&#039; denby. david motherfuckin&#039; denby.

i sort of dig champion&#039;s counterthrust but am very, very confused as to why the subject of tom cruise requires serious thought or emotional commitment. is it not a core cultural problem - or so everyone seems to be stabbing at from some direction - that far too much work is put into the inconsequential, even in destroying it? a film critic might not want to get too close to that particular line, for obvious reasons, but still.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>david fuckin&#8217; denby. david motherfuckin&#8217; denby.</p>
<p>i sort of dig champion&#8217;s counterthrust but am very, very confused as to why the subject of tom cruise requires serious thought or emotional commitment. is it not a core cultural problem &#8211; or so everyone seems to be stabbing at from some direction &#8211; that far too much work is put into the inconsequential, even in destroying it? a film critic might not want to get too close to that particular line, for obvious reasons, but still.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gnarl</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/04/the-sunday-papers-50/comment-page-1/#comment-130831</link>
		<dc:creator>Gnarl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 12:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6857#comment-130831</guid>
		<description>I thought Snark was a new web social thing that I&#039;d missed, like Twitter, when I first clicked the link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Snark was a new web social thing that I&#8217;d missed, like Twitter, when I first clicked the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phil</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/04/the-sunday-papers-50/comment-page-1/#comment-130818</link>
		<dc:creator>phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 10:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6857#comment-130818</guid>
		<description>Snark doesn&#039;t necessarily dismissively shut down online discussion on media topics, the onion&#039;s AV board sometimes seem to be nothing but endless snarky oneliners, but still makes for enjoyable reading thanks to talent of regular posters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snark doesn&#8217;t necessarily dismissively shut down online discussion on media topics, the onion&#8217;s AV board sometimes seem to be nothing but endless snarky oneliners, but still makes for enjoyable reading thanks to talent of regular posters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gassalasca</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/04/the-sunday-papers-50/comment-page-1/#comment-130810</link>
		<dc:creator>Gassalasca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 08:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6857#comment-130810</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d just like to say that The Sunday Papers is currently the highlight of my reading week.
I just wish I&#039;d found out about RPS before. :gives out a little yelpy sob:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d just like to say that The Sunday Papers is currently the highlight of my reading week.<br />
I just wish I&#8217;d found out about RPS before. :gives out a little yelpy sob:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/04/the-sunday-papers-50/comment-page-1/#comment-130786</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 05:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6857#comment-130786</guid>
		<description>Dinger: It&#039;s a genuine celebration of things I was impressed by, not meant to be snarky - I actually began writing captions for other quotes but pulled them to avoid snarkiness. I really hoped (probably delusionally) that someone would get excited for being honored for saying some ridiculous thing earlier in the year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dinger: It&#8217;s a genuine celebration of things I was impressed by, not meant to be snarky &#8211; I actually began writing captions for other quotes but pulled them to avoid snarkiness. I really hoped (probably delusionally) that someone would get excited for being honored for saying some ridiculous thing earlier in the year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A-Scale</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/04/the-sunday-papers-50/comment-page-1/#comment-130782</link>
		<dc:creator>A-Scale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 05:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6857#comment-130782</guid>
		<description>As did I, helio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As did I, helio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heliocentric</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/04/the-sunday-papers-50/comment-page-1/#comment-130771</link>
		<dc:creator>Heliocentric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 02:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6857#comment-130771</guid>
		<description>When i read snark my first thought was of the weapon/species in halflife. Those little things were awesome in deathmatch.

No love for alien weapons in halflife 2 except antlion spores.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When i read snark my first thought was of the weapon/species in halflife. Those little things were awesome in deathmatch.</p>
<p>No love for alien weapons in halflife 2 except antlion spores.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.162 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2009-11-22 22:18:38 -->
