<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: War Plan Pacific: Nimitz with limitz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/04/war-plan-pacific-nimitz-and-limitz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/04/war-plan-pacific-nimitz-and-limitz/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:20:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TC</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/04/war-plan-pacific-nimitz-and-limitz/comment-page-1/#comment-131289</link>
		<dc:creator>TC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6864#comment-131289</guid>
		<description>@MCHN 
CMSF is actually worth a punt now so get it by all means, theres also a British army module coming out soon.

Tim..you missed Strategic Command Pacific Theatre published my Battlefront in December.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@MCHN<br />
CMSF is actually worth a punt now so get it by all means, theres also a British army module coming out soon.</p>
<p>Tim..you missed Strategic Command Pacific Theatre published my Battlefront in December.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calistas</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/04/war-plan-pacific-nimitz-and-limitz/comment-page-1/#comment-131222</link>
		<dc:creator>Calistas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6864#comment-131222</guid>
		<description>Does WPP have PBEM? I love me a good PBEM game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does WPP have PBEM? I love me a good PBEM game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/04/war-plan-pacific-nimitz-and-limitz/comment-page-1/#comment-130906</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6864#comment-130906</guid>
		<description>Guadalcanal.

That is all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guadalcanal.</p>
<p>That is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy Goodfellow</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/04/war-plan-pacific-nimitz-and-limitz/comment-page-1/#comment-130869</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy Goodfellow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 14:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6864#comment-130869</guid>
		<description>The point about WPP&#039;s longevity in single player is a good one, but this is a great light wargame in many ways. It was one of my choices for wargame of the year primarily because of how easy it is to pick up. This could be the Recommended Newbie Wargame that I have been waiting for for years.

Re Combat Mission Shock Force, I haven&#039;t tried the Marines module, but yes, the core game has improved over the weak launch version. It&#039;s still a little fussy for my tastes, but certainly worth a look if you are interested in modern urban combat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point about WPP&#8217;s longevity in single player is a good one, but this is a great light wargame in many ways. It was one of my choices for wargame of the year primarily because of how easy it is to pick up. This could be the Recommended Newbie Wargame that I have been waiting for for years.</p>
<p>Re Combat Mission Shock Force, I haven&#8217;t tried the Marines module, but yes, the core game has improved over the weak launch version. It&#8217;s still a little fussy for my tastes, but certainly worth a look if you are interested in modern urban combat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Real Horrorshow</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/04/war-plan-pacific-nimitz-and-limitz/comment-page-1/#comment-130801</link>
		<dc:creator>Real Horrorshow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 07:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6864#comment-130801</guid>
		<description>I just had an epiphany...with cover, naval battles, building occupation, etc. implemented in Empire Total War, it might be possible to make a Pacific War game out of it.  That would rule.

I&#039;d just be happy with a naval battle mini-mod though.

Anyway, this looks interesting.  I will DL and have a looksie :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just had an epiphany&#8230;with cover, naval battles, building occupation, etc. implemented in Empire Total War, it might be possible to make a Pacific War game out of it.  That would rule.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d just be happy with a naval battle mini-mod though.</p>
<p>Anyway, this looks interesting.  I will DL and have a looksie :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weylund</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/04/war-plan-pacific-nimitz-and-limitz/comment-page-1/#comment-130751</link>
		<dc:creator>Weylund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 22:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6864#comment-130751</guid>
		<description>It is more than half-decent.  I spent about eight months on the testing team for it (got a manual credit on the latest release, no less) and pretty much everything has improved by leaps and bounds.  Infantry combat (a gripe of mine with the original version) is now amazing, and Steve, Charles and team are at work making the whole game even better every single day.

I&#039;d definitely recommend checking out the latest demo - the Marines module just came out so hopefully there&#039;s a demo of that.

I had serious issues with the game for about six months after its release... now I can&#039;t put it down.  It&#039;s come so far from the version that was reviewed at release that it&#039;s practically a wholly different game.

Hopefully you&#039;ll enjoy it.  Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is more than half-decent.  I spent about eight months on the testing team for it (got a manual credit on the latest release, no less) and pretty much everything has improved by leaps and bounds.  Infantry combat (a gripe of mine with the original version) is now amazing, and Steve, Charles and team are at work making the whole game even better every single day.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d definitely recommend checking out the latest demo &#8211; the Marines module just came out so hopefully there&#8217;s a demo of that.</p>
<p>I had serious issues with the game for about six months after its release&#8230; now I can&#8217;t put it down.  It&#8217;s come so far from the version that was reviewed at release that it&#8217;s practically a wholly different game.</p>
<p>Hopefully you&#8217;ll enjoy it.  Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MCHN</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/04/war-plan-pacific-nimitz-and-limitz/comment-page-1/#comment-130745</link>
		<dc:creator>MCHN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 22:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6864#comment-130745</guid>
		<description>Not to derail the conversation, but can anyone give a more complete explanation as to the status of Combat Mission: Shock Force? I loved the earlier CM games, but was completely put-off by the horrible reviews for CMSF. If it is half-decent now, I wouldn&#039;t mind having a crack at it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to derail the conversation, but can anyone give a more complete explanation as to the status of Combat Mission: Shock Force? I loved the earlier CM games, but was completely put-off by the horrible reviews for CMSF. If it is half-decent now, I wouldn&#8217;t mind having a crack at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alikchi</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/04/war-plan-pacific-nimitz-and-limitz/comment-page-1/#comment-130743</link>
		<dc:creator>Alikchi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 22:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6864#comment-130743</guid>
		<description>This does look really lovely, and hopefully it&#039;ll interest more people in the Pacific War.

Speaking of Matrix Games and the Pacific.. the game I&#039;m most excited about right now is War in the Pacific: Admiral&#039;s Edition. Basically Matrix hired all the people who did the best mod work on the original WitP and set them to work for a couple years.

Link: http://www.matrixgames.com/products/351/screenshots/War.in.the.Pacific.-.Admiral%27s.Edition

Of course, this is more for people who prefer &quot;annoying taskforce babysitting.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This does look really lovely, and hopefully it&#8217;ll interest more people in the Pacific War.</p>
<p>Speaking of Matrix Games and the Pacific.. the game I&#8217;m most excited about right now is War in the Pacific: Admiral&#8217;s Edition. Basically Matrix hired all the people who did the best mod work on the original WitP and set them to work for a couple years.</p>
<p>Link: <a href="http://www.matrixgames.com/products/351/screenshots/War.in.the.Pacific.-.Admiral%27s.Edition" rel="nofollow">http://www.matrixgames.com/products/351/screenshots/War.in.the.Pacific.-.Admiral%27s.Edition</a></p>
<p>Of course, this is more for people who prefer &#8220;annoying taskforce babysitting.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dreamhacker</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/04/war-plan-pacific-nimitz-and-limitz/comment-page-1/#comment-130730</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreamhacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 20:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6864#comment-130730</guid>
		<description>.........CMx1?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;CMx1?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theleif</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/04/war-plan-pacific-nimitz-and-limitz/comment-page-1/#comment-130718</link>
		<dc:creator>theleif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 18:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6864#comment-130718</guid>
		<description>looks like a nice game!

But 2008 a stale strategic year? Well, yes, except for Europa Universalis: Rome with the Vae Victis expansion. Try it out.
Wink wink, nudge, nudge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks like a nice game!</p>
<p>But 2008 a stale strategic year? Well, yes, except for Europa Universalis: Rome with the Vae Victis expansion. Try it out.<br />
Wink wink, nudge, nudge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RichP</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/04/war-plan-pacific-nimitz-and-limitz/comment-page-1/#comment-130717</link>
		<dc:creator>RichP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 18:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6864#comment-130717</guid>
		<description>For some reason, I&#039;m really digging the game&#039;s fonts, especially on the battle map.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some reason, I&#8217;m really digging the game&#8217;s fonts, especially on the battle map.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leeder_krenon</title>
		<link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/04/war-plan-pacific-nimitz-and-limitz/comment-page-1/#comment-130716</link>
		<dc:creator>leeder_krenon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 18:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6864#comment-130716</guid>
		<description>Too bad this is Pacific theatre, I&#039;d be interested otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad this is Pacific theatre, I&#8217;d be interested otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.204 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2009-11-08 13:25:31 -->
