Comments on: Ragdoll Cricket http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/07/ragdoll-cricket/ Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:52:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Tom Penfold http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/07/ragdoll-cricket/#comment-164773 Tom Penfold Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:32:56 +0000 http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6987#comment-164773 Our office has got a bit obsessed by it. I am top score with 1075 (runs not with run rate). 2nd: binks: 639 3rd Raj: 623 4th Ad: 576. Screenshots exist Our office has got a bit obsessed by it.
I am top score with 1075 (runs not with run rate).
2nd: binks: 639
3rd Raj: 623
4th Ad: 576.

Screenshots exist

report

]]> By: Greg http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/07/ragdoll-cricket/#comment-135624 Greg Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:50:40 +0000 http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6987#comment-135624 260. I am going to stop playing this now. This was my game of the year, I think. 260. I am going to stop playing this now. This was my game of the year, I think.

report

]]> By: Greg http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/07/ragdoll-cricket/#comment-133354 Greg Sun, 11 Jan 2009 22:24:37 +0000 http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6987#comment-133354 253! SO CLOSE. 253! SO CLOSE.

report

]]> By: uppi17 http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/07/ragdoll-cricket/#comment-132672 uppi17 Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:59:39 +0000 http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6987#comment-132672 @Nosebleed I think you're on about the unlimited version on <a href="http://www.foddy.net/Cricket.html" rel="nofollow">foddy.net</a>. This one is limited to ten overs, therefore the most you can get is 360 (6 every ball, 6 balls per over, 10 overs). @Nosebleed I think you’re on about the unlimited version on foddy.net. This one is limited to ten overs, therefore the most you can get is 360 (6 every ball, 6 balls per over, 10 overs).

report

]]> By: Bobsy http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/07/ragdoll-cricket/#comment-132496 Bobsy Fri, 09 Jan 2009 12:35:41 +0000 http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6987#comment-132496 There should be a Wii cricket game. There probably is. I don't know. There should be a Wii cricket game. There probably is. I don’t know.

report

]]> By: NoseBleed http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/07/ragdoll-cricket/#comment-132481 NoseBleed Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:57:18 +0000 http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6987#comment-132481 882 at a 3.23 run rate which adds up to a lovely 2848. Screen shot available upon request. 882 at a 3.23 run rate which adds up to a lovely 2848.

Screen shot available upon request.

report

]]> By: Schmung http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/07/ragdoll-cricket/#comment-132451 Schmung Fri, 09 Jan 2009 10:13:15 +0000 http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6987#comment-132451 nargh, 169 is my best. This is infuriating. nargh, 169 is my best. This is infuriating.

report

]]> By: Hypocee http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/07/ragdoll-cricket/#comment-132382 Hypocee Fri, 09 Jan 2009 03:31:43 +0000 http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6987#comment-132382 We've established a couple of times before that the lobes of the RPS hivebrain don't necessarily read each other's posts. Especially if one of them's Alec. We’ve established a couple of times before that the lobes of the RPS hivebrain don’t necessarily read each other’s posts. Especially if one of them’s Alec.

report

]]> By: uppi17 http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/07/ragdoll-cricket/#comment-132249 uppi17 Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:07:53 +0000 http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6987#comment-132249 Well I got 220 <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/uppi17/3179773989/" rel="nofollow">http://flickr.com/photos/uppi17/3179773989/</a> And how does <i>Yes, this is probably the first and only time we ever post about cricket.</i> match up with <i>Related stories: Anyone for Cricket Demo? (trad.)</i>? Well I got 220 http://flickr.com/photos/uppi17/3179773989/

And how does Yes, this is probably the first and only time we ever post about cricket. match up with Related stories: Anyone for Cricket Demo? (trad.)?

report

]]> By: Ian http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/07/ragdoll-cricket/#comment-132242 Ian Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:47:28 +0000 http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6987#comment-132242 I spent far too much time on this ages ago. Still do from time to time. I spent far too much time on this ages ago.

Still do from time to time.

report

]]> By: Acosta http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/07/ragdoll-cricket/#comment-132241 Acosta Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:45:18 +0000 http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6987#comment-132241 Holy shit, this game is a time destroyer. As clunky as it is, I find some kind of fascination in its physic nature and the "feeling" of hitting the ball. Scoring a 6 is really satisfying. 205 so far, would like to appear in top 10 but the frontier of 200 is a tough one. Holy shit, this game is a time destroyer. As clunky as it is, I find some kind of fascination in its physic nature and the “feeling” of hitting the ball. Scoring a 6 is really satisfying.

205 so far, would like to appear in top 10 but the frontier of 200 is a tough one.

report

]]> By: cyrenic http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/07/ragdoll-cricket/#comment-132218 cyrenic Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:30:10 +0000 http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=6987#comment-132218 That did nothing but make Cricket even more confusing to my weak American mind. That did nothing but make Cricket even more confusing to my weak American mind.

report

]]>