Comments on: Red Alert 3.5: Red Alertier

By: cyrenic

cyrenic — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:51:49 +0000

I like how an advertisement for a game’s expansion also has to be brought to you by ATI.

By: Heliocentric

Heliocentric — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:04:24 +0000

Mr president. Its not glue.

@Sene i wasn’t complaining its too hard. I was stating a preference for advanced strategy. The likes company of heroes and battlefield 2 provide, i mean i know they are not simulations but a classically weaker force can win in those games because of application beyond brute force reflex.

It wasn’t a “boo hoo i lose too much” post. Just a “i wish game x had more depth” post. Call me stupid but i like my highly strung action games like i like my women, able to make me reflect on higher reasoning.

By: RabidHamster

RabidHamster — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:54:11 +0000

You know what would be a worthwhile expansion? The three factions attempt to make peace at a conference, and the briefing girls (Eva, Dasha and whats-her-name) from the three factions join in a bubble bath together. Oh, and Yuriko wants to join in too…

…now that’s a video I’d watch off-game.

By: Mr. President

Mr. President — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:19:56 +0000

My problem with RTSes is that there is usually a very thin line between “Oh no not another wave WHY” and “That’s it, should be safe, now how do I get through these crazy defences in the least tedious way?” You know, the point where it can go either way, where the real excitement is? Well, in RA3 single player these good parts are relatively big, it’s never too hard or too easy, and for a casual strategy player like me it’s a real blessing.

…But what the hell is with Jenny McCarthy’s hair? She looks like she’d fallen asleep in a puddle of glue or something.

By: Ryan Matsunaga

Ryan Matsunaga — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 04:18:40 +0000

Why is Yuriko not wearing underwear? With a skirt that short, that seems highly impractical.

By: FaceOmeter

FaceOmeter — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 15:33:56 +0000

I really like Red Alert 3! I’m still playing it, and I like it over some of the other big strategy titles for the same reason I prefer Saint’s Row 2 to GTA4: it proves that a game can be a rollercoaster of hilarious idiocy without compromising depth of gameplay. I eagerly anticipate the stupid explosions and shitty acting of the addon

By: Gap Gen

Gap Gen — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 15:13:12 +0000

You’ve spoiled the name “Die Hard” for me now. Although Die Hard 4.0 was a stupid name anyway.

By: Optimaximal

Optimaximal — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:28:11 +0000

It’s clearly Red Hard with a Vengence if it’s number 3.

That’s the title of a porno right there!

By: SuperNashwan

SuperNashwan — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 03:37:49 +0000

I’m pretty surprised enough people bought RA3 to justify an expansion. Maybe the idea is to get people who skipped it in the christmas glut to remember it’s still out there?

By: Rich_P

Rich_P — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:07:00 +0000

Shame you have to purchase it through EA’s abysmal digital store.

By: Scandalon

Scandalon — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:02:31 +0000

A campaign w/ a dungeon crawler mode? Sounds like Myth.

Thanks for the Mammaries EA!

By: Senethro

Senethro — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:59:24 +0000

Yes, because Blizzard is clearly going to put 1/3rd of a standard RTS single player mode in each of three fully priced games.