Comments on: Crayon Physics Demo

By: st

st — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:58:16 +0000

What’s The Purpose of life ?

Here you will get the answer :

http://www.islamtomorrow.com/purpose.htm

The quran miracles encyclopedia

http://www.55a.net/firas/english/

Islam house

http://aslam-ahmd.blogspot.com/

An Invitation to The Truth

http://www.harunyahya.com/

By: Heliocentric

Heliocentric — Sun, 25 Jan 2009 06:57:27 +0000

Played and enjoyed the demo. No intention of paying $20 on it mind you, no intention of pirating it either.

To be honest there is not all that much *game* here.

By: lalahsghost

lalahsghost — Sun, 25 Jan 2009 06:27:16 +0000

I also agree that the game is too expensive. If you look around at the torrent sites, you can see S#!?-tons of people downloading this game (I haven’t checked since the week it came out). I know his time is worth the $20, but my time and money is not worth this game, I have found out.

By: Van

Van — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 23:17:10 +0000

Well, hinges are in the demo, just draw a small circle on any object. You can’t anchor directly to the paper, but anchoring to a permanent object gives the same result

By: ShardPhoenix

ShardPhoenix — Tue, 13 Jan 2009 05:43:21 +0000

I guess I’m not really the naturally creative type because I didn’t feel much desire to solve levels in anything other than the simplest way I could think of. And on most of the levels, that was pretty darn simple. I do like the aesthetic and the implementation of being able to draw whatever you want, but I just don’t think it’s interesting enough for the price.

By: datter

datter — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:50:00 +0000

It’s about what I expected, but this game has been kicking around in development since the Carter administration and other variations on the theme have long since come out that are generally more… phun.

By: Thiefsie

Thiefsie — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:27:52 +0000

To me Crayon Physics is massively flawed in that you can pretty much solve anything by using two pivots stuck to a single block as a virtual immovable piece.

Takes the fun out of it really, no point being creative otherwise.

Great idea but it needs more limitation imposed on it.

By: qrter

qrter — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:27:14 +0000

I’m disappointed with it. Because of the lack of restrictions, the level design starts to look lazy. Seeing another level with two platforms, one with a ball on, the other with a star becomes pretty boring.

Same here, I’m afraid. I’m all for bringing a dollop of Your Own Fun to any game, but this game seems to think I should bring fun for myself and the game. Look, I don’t have limitless fun, alright!? Fun doesn’t grow on trees!!

By: K

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:05:36 +0000

I’m disappointed with it. Because of the lack of restrictions, the level design starts to look lazy. Seeing another level with two platforms, one with a ball on, the other with a star becomes pretty boring. It’s definitely at it’s best when it’s being a little crazier and giving you more to do. Also, I can understand why they stuck to one screen per level, as though you’re drawing on this single sheet of paper, but, more space to work with could have been great. A rocket-powered car is only so much fun when the journey is over in a second. :( Maybe World of Goo has raised my expectations too much, eh.
It’s also too expensive.

By: qrter

qrter — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:57:51 +0000

I need to “eff no” that Whiskey, start blindly supporting high profile indie and you might as well take up a subscription to Madden 20XX. Dropping money on things with no indication of quality is daft and also bad.

Agreed. Good work needs to be supported, be it from an indie developer or a semi-evil megacorporation.

By: Bobsy

Bobsy — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:53:20 +0000

Is Crayon Physics on Steam though?

Well, it OUGHT to be.

By: Joe

Joe — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:48:24 +0000

That music will drive me insane after a while…