Rock, Paper, Shotgun

Like Angry Houses: Panzers – Cold War

By Kieron Gillen on February 11th, 2009 at 9:35 pm.

I've seen colder.

This is a spooky coincidence. I was just about to start writing this when my girlfriend passed me the post. I open a jiffy bag and – strike a light! – it’s got some review code of Codename Panzers: Cold War. Shall I play it? No, I won’t. Because my Gaming PC is still kaputt. So I equally won’t be able to give some impressions on the just released still-fashionable-just-under 1-gig demo for demo for the selfsame game. Instead, I’ll play the video whilst leaning close to my laptop monitor whilst making brrrrmmmm! and dakkadakkadakka noises. Join me!

__________________

« | »

, , .

46 Comments »

  1. Pags says:

    Angry houses is still my favourite PCGUK meme.

    report

  2. Gap Gen says:

    Placid tanks = houses?

    report

  3. Colthor says:

    I am impressed at how that video, despite (seemingly) being made from in-engine footage, managed to avoid telling me absolutely anything about the game that couldn’t be reasonably guessed from its name.

    So it’s a game? With tanks? And it’s set in the cold war? Jolly good. I’m glad that’s cleared up.

    Yes, I’m sure Wikipedia would tell me stuff about it, but I felt like grumbling and if people are going to advertise at me they could at least try and make it informative.

    report

  4. Fumarole says:

    A challenger to World in Conflict? I’m game once I get home from work.

    report

  5. Remember the trailer?
    I was all like “woah, no way” and the trailer was all “asplode”… That was great.

    report

  6. Poet says:

    Translation for Americans….

    Kieron imagined his “real” girlfriend handing him his mail and in it was a package that contained the game Codename Panzers: Cold War which the publisher has sent him hoping for a good review.

    Now as to why a game reviewer can’t repair his own computer I have no clue, isn’t it a requirement that you be a complete computer nerd before you are even allowed to contemplate writing about computer games? Hmmmm, maybe he really does have a rlgf.

    report

  7. I love the Wire but don’t know how to fix my TV either.

    GapGen: Sleeping Houses is the original gag.

    KG

    report

  8. Sorry Kieron, dakkadakkadakka is already reserved for WAR40K: Dawn of War II. We could try pew pew or kablooie instead.

    Other than that… I prefer COH anyway.

    report

  9. Nilocy says:

    I’m quite amazed that the sound effects sounded like they were all coming from a 50′s war film?
    *splodely noise*

    report

  10. Rei Onryou says:

    when my girlfriend passed me the post. I open a jiffy bag and –

    I can’t help but feel the above quote could have been taken from an erotic novel Kieron happens to be penning. Reminding us of your superior stature never gets old ;)

    PS: As an angry houses fan for many a year, I still don’t know exactly when the meme began. But my Googling just turned up this: http://www.shopwiki.co.uk/detail/d=Tanks_-_Like_Angry_Houses%22%3B_25mm_Pin_Button_Badge/

    report

  11. Paul_M says:

    When I see The Wire in any written media I instantly blur my eyes and destroy / close whatever it may have been that I was looking at.

    I haven’t seen season 5 and I’ve already have one incident revealed to me by some ubertrendy Guardian whelp. I shan’t be burnt again. I will not return to RPS until I have seen the last episode. Good day.

    report

  12. Gap Gen says:

    BUBBLES IS A SPACE ALIEN

    report

  13. El_MUERkO says:

    “dakkadakkadakka”

    i loves my Orcs

    report

  14. skizelo says:

    I don’t think they’ve fully graped the concept of a “cold war”.

    report

  15. Pags says:

    I haven’t seen season 5 and I’ve already have one incident revealed to me by some ubertrendy Guardian whelp

    BUBBLES KILLS MCNULTY.

    report

  16. Bhazor says:

    Were there Panzers in the cold war?

    report

  17. Kakrafoon says:

    I just tried it, and something with the graphics seems to be broken; they look awful on my machine although there should be more than enough horsepower for that game – it doesn’t seem to want me to turn on antialiasing, for some reason – among other things. Also, what I’ve seen of the combat so far is bad, bad, bad. Infantry tend to clump together in great, well, clumps chipping away at the enemy’s health bars with their puny-sounding little toy guns, standing around in the open IGNORING READILY AVAILABLE COVER while the medics toss red healing crosses to the wounded. There is no such thing as suppression or flanking. At least the tanks have directional armour, and the upgrade system on them is about the only thing I like in Panzers: Cold War. That, and the connected strategic points. Oh well, I didn’t expect that this game would be able to touch the godlike glory that is Company of Heroes, but to be honest I expected a bit more. So far, it is pretty disappointing.

    report

  18. nabeel says:

    What’s wrong with your gaming PC? Mine has problems playing games too at the moment ;____;

    report

  19. Radiant says:

    I don’t think anyone’s really graped the concept of the cold war to be fair.

    report

  20. Radiant says:

    I’m sure the concept has been ‘mulled’ over.

    report

  21. Radiant says:

    Although I’m not sure using tanks would have been a ‘wine’ing strategy.

    report

  22. Radiant says:

    Look, It’s 5am, 3 posts is as far as I can take a vinous related pun run.

    report

  23. Radiant says:

    You could say I ‘bottled’ it.

    report

  24. Radiant says:

    Ok ok I’ll put a cork in it.

    report

  25. Radiant says:

    This is Bordeauxing on insanity.

    report

  26. @radient
    Defcon

    From now on if rts’s can’t beat coh or at least offer a unique strength then i suggest that they avoid little soldiers with guns being the focus of their game.

    Tanks are fine, as i can handle tanks being stupid. And a massive list of alternatives, even pirates with guns would be fine, i don’t expect a drunk to take cover. Soulless robots too, hell a decent pmc management game could get away with weak combat as long as it lets you switch sides in wars to make them last longer etc.

    Can’t play the demo yet though. We’ll see.

    report

  27. Radiant says:

    Will this be ‘port’ed over to consoles?

    report

  28. Radiant says:

    or better yet ‘dram’ you.

    report

  29. Piispa says:

    So the point of this post was only to bolster that he has a girlfriend… and he’s a nerd that can’t fix his computer.

    report

  30. Nick says:

    That’s the point of most of Kieron’s work.. except when he was single, in which case it was vodka rather than girlfriend.

    It may be both right now, who knows.

    report

  31. Muzman says:

    I bet there’s a lot of blokes who’d reach some mythic contentment if Vodka could indeed bring you your mail.

    report

  32. Doc MacRae says:

    It’s even more micromanaging than CoH.

    Do not want.

    report

  33. If him mentioning his girlfriend bothers you. Just replace the word with the word mother.

    report

  34. Ian says:

    @ Helio: Oh my, a pirate RTS? Now yer talking.

    report

  35. Biff says:

    My experience of this demo: Pick your army, randomly choosing units. Zerg from base to base capturing them while your cleric units magically heal your troops. Die under a rain of missles from an untargetable sumbarine. Uninstall.

    report

  36. Catastrophe says:

    Theres never been a better tank game than Campaign.

    report

  37. NNeeeeeeaaaaauuuw BOSH!

    report

  38. Tei says:

    “NNeeeeeeaaaaauuuw BOSH!”

    Is that the sound of a plane landing into a pig factory?

    report

  39. MacBeth says:

    If him mentioning his girlfriend bothers you. Just replace the word with the word mother.

    Not quite right. Replace ‘my girlfriend’ with ‘your mother’

    No, YOUR MOTHER

    report

  40. Dizet Sma says:

    From the vid, it seems that NATO doesn’t exist, or perhaps the BAOR were on holiday that week.

    report

  41. kuddles says:

    Other than the long loading times, the demo ran well for me. It looked like fun, if not extraordinary. I guess I should count my blessings since it didn’t look like this game would ever be released at all.

    I’ll probably pick it up. There aren’t too many of these real time tactical games out there (although we’re also getting Men of War this year), and I adored both the previous Codename Panzer games and the Rush For Berlin game as well.

    report

  42. El_MUERkO says:

    i downloaded the demo last night but it crashed on me :(

    will try again tonight after some internet spaceships

    report

  43. frags81 says:

    Technically, the game is a mess. It doesn’t look anywhere as good as CoH and runs 10 times worse.

    Gameplay wise, I still need more hands on to get a clear impression but it is promising. A lot deeper than CoH with a lot more units and special abilities. The mission design at least in this one demo mission I’m playing right now is kinda weak.

    Also Enemy choppers are a pain!

    report

Comment on this story

XHTML: Allowed code: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Search

Respond to our gibber

  • nootpingu86 : “For my part, I think it's ridiculous to find the sublime in most games because of the content on display. The medium can do whatever ...” on The Sunday Papers
  • Consumatopia : “@sinister agent, your original argument was "Demanding status updates is just a waste of their time that they could spend making the goddamn game." Kadayi ...” on The Sunday Papers
  • Sinderlin : “@jaheira Gabe Newell made several statements and anouncements regarding the planned trilogy of "episodes". I can understand your reluctancy to call those "promises" as a ...” on The Sunday Papers
  • Hoaxfish : “there's always that opposite example of player/character intelligence... a player (or DM) using a character that is supposed to be a genius by their stats, ...” on The Sunday Papers
  • Vinraith : “I'm a little confused as to why an obvious troll is in the Sunday Papers at all, let alone the first article.” on The Sunday Papers

Browse the archive