Rock, Paper, Shotgun

Windows 7: To Upgrade Or Not To Upgrade?

Posted by Alec Meer on May 6th, 2009 at 5:55 pm.

Share:

Don’t worry – I’m not going to inflict a blow-by-blow technical details post on you. This is more to point out that the Release Candidate 1 for Microsoft’s next operating system is now free to all comers, and to address the question of whether we gamers should care about it a lot, a little, or not even slightly.

Personally, I’m going full-pelt for a yes, whether you’re running Vista or good ol’XP. It’s free from a lot of the bloat and associated chugginess of the former, but adds in a spot of whizzbang and the DirectX 10 support (and 11 too, in theory) that that the latter lacks. Best of all, RC1 will continue to run until July 2010. So if you haven’t yet moved from XP to Vista and have a DX10 card, you now get to try it (and DX10’s) best bits without spending a penny or breaking any laws. I’ve been running an earlier version 7 as my main OS for a while now, and I can honestly say I’ve been a lot happier with it than I ever was with XP or Vista. It’s definitely a better option for a laptop or other lower-spec system than any version of Vista, as it’s far less memory hungry.

A Release Candidate, incidentally, is just that – a fundamentally finished version that Microsoft hopes is fit for release. The major wrinkle with it is that you’ll not be able to simply upgrade to the final, final version come July 2010 (or whenever you end up buying Win 7, which is due for release later this year), but rather will have to do a whole new install. So this is probably a second-hard-drive job, unless you subscribe to the philosophy that giving your Windows a thorough clean every now and again keeps performance tip-top.

For all Microsoft’s bally-hoo, there aren’t really any gaming-specific features worth trumpeting in either Vista or Win 7 (bar the fact that a 3D card driver crash doesn’t usually require a system restart, but can instead recover itself), but it’s definitely a nicer desktop environment than, arguably, any other Windows to date. If I get the chance, I’ll run some comparative benchmarks to see gaming performance stacks against XP and VIsta in hard numbers. Grab RC1 (in either 32 or 64 bit flavours) from here – it’s only 2.5Gb, surprisingly.

__________________


Related Stories:

__________________

« Duck Super: Qwak | Eve Online Is Six Years Old Today »

, , .

101 Comments »

  1. Moe says:

    Regarding Windows 7 being as fast as XP for gaming, I will tell you the following- I am running both Windows 7 and Windows XP. My systems specs are as follows:
    Phenom 9850BE
    4GB 1067 MhZ RAM
    GTX 260 (OC’d to 649/1180)
    780G mb

    I ran DX9 for all my gaming, so I could test evenly. BTW- DX10 Runs slower for all the games I tested in Windows 7.

    Farcry2 – Average 20% drop in FPS using Windows 7(Everything turned up to Ultra – but using only 2x Anti-aliasing)
    Crysis- Same thing.
    Crysis Warhead- Same thing.
    See a pattern here?

    All drivers completely updated. If I’m missing something, please let me know cause I do like Windows 7 for regular day to day. But I’m just gonna keep gaming on XP. But for the record, I’m really tired of looking at XP, and Windows 7 is SO COOL!

Page 3 of 3«123

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

GamersGate has loads of PC games.

Respond to our gibber

Browse the archive

Buy classic PC games from Good Old Games, please.