Comments on: 4idos Gam4 Nam4s R4v4al4d

By: Nalano

Nalano — Wed, 13 May 2009 19:55:48 +0000

Tomb Roider:

Solving the double mystery of Lara’s bust size AND aptitude for outlandish athleticism.

By: sinister agent

sinister agent — Tue, 12 May 2009 23:23:42 +0000

DriVer’s pretty drivey.
But Driver 6 is DriVIer…

Shameless. I know.

7/10

By: DMJ

DMJ — Tue, 12 May 2009 21:58:46 +0000

@MeestaNob!: I’ll shake your hand for that. Before I bludgeon you to death for the exact same thing. Naturally.

By: Taill4f4r

Taill4f4r — Tue, 12 May 2009 20:35:15 +0000

DriVer’s pretty drivey.
But Driver 6 is DriVIer…

Shameless. I know.

By: Pod

Pod — Tue, 12 May 2009 20:19:11 +0000

Tomb R-lol-der?

DrIVer is a beaut. And of course unmber 5 could be DriVer, or drVr in this day and age

By: JoeyjoeJoe

JoeyjoeJoe — Tue, 12 May 2009 20:00:20 +0000

ROFL!!! Bravo to writer.

By: ACESandElGHTS

ACESandElGHTS — Tue, 12 May 2009 17:37:35 +0000

Let’s put the blame squarely where it belongs, and that’s on David Fincher’s brilliant motion picture “Seven.” Or, as IMDB and half the world likes to call it, “SE7EN,” which doesn’t make any god-damned 7ense at all.
We REALLY should’ve put the hammer down on this garbage with that steaming pile of a movie “Independence Day,” aka “ID4.” Huh? ID4? Way to confuse A) Americans who are questioning where ID1-3 are and B) the rest of the world who don’t care about the significance of the number four. Really, really a desperate, awful naming convention that should’ve been buried alongside a million E.T. carts just outside of Albuquerque.
Now is the time to channel Howard Marion-Crawford and his single, bile-filled and oft-repeated, word of condemnation from Lawrence of Arabia.
OUTRAGEOUS! OUTRAGEOUS!
Stop the madness. It’s not 1337. It’s not cool, not in the slightest.

By: John Walker

John Walker — Tue, 12 May 2009 17:16:25 +0000

More offensive than Driv3r was their NOT using DrIVer for the fourth game.

By: MeestaNob!

MeestaNob! — Tue, 12 May 2009 16:16:15 +0000

@DMJ
“Thief 4ranchise.”

By: Nick

Nick — Tue, 12 May 2009 15:22:43 +0000

I’m not sure which I found more amusing, the people who didn’t get it, the humourless people moaning about it being posted or the post itself. Winner!

By: jalf

jalf — Tue, 12 May 2009 14:27:31 +0000

@Alaric: Offended? Who’s offended? I just think it’s funny that they misspelled their product’s name during the big unveiling.

By: DMJ

DMJ — Tue, 12 May 2009 14:18:21 +0000

Actually I’m finding it difficult to imagine the level to which a human being had to sink before they didn’t feel offended by something of this nature.

It smacks of shoe-horning in a number because “games with numbers in the middle of a word sell better according to market statistics!”.

The sort of person who came up with this would probably use the word “product” instead of “game”.