Comments on: Order Of War, Coming Right Up

By: theleif

theleif — Tue, 19 May 2009 17:07:11 +0000

Men with Guns: Hot Struggle

By: autogunner

autogunner — Tue, 19 May 2009 16:04:33 +0000

snore, why would i play this when i have men of war and its map editor?

By: Lady Bobz

Lady Bobz — Tue, 19 May 2009 13:13:36 +0000

With the advent of the digital download, it doesn’t matter if the product’s name is horseshit because word of mouth is word of finger and no-one actually has to enunciate it to get a copy. You couldn’t ask for ‘Roar of War: More’ in a shop because it’s just a meaningless noise.

By: SwiftRanger

SwiftRanger — Tue, 19 May 2009 10:48:57 +0000

Looks like a WiC mod idd, though that doesn’t too bad.

By: Chaz

Chaz — Tue, 19 May 2009 10:05:00 +0000

This reminds me more of Sudden Strike than Company of Heroes. Which in my opinion is no bad thing, because call me a mad crazy fool, but I actually prefered the Sudden Strike series to Company of Heroes. Codename Panzers wasn’t a bad effort either.

By: Ashurbanipal

Ashurbanipal — Tue, 19 May 2009 09:55:13 +0000

I feel like “Warriors of War” has to happen at some point. Or maybe “War’s Warriors” but that doesn’t have an “of” in it, so I guess it’s not valid.

Soldiers of War?

By: devlocke

devlocke — Tue, 19 May 2009 09:38:05 +0000

I feel like “Warriors of War” has to happen at some point. Or maybe “War’s Warriors” but that doesn’t have an “of” in it, so I guess it’s not valid.

Gap Gen: It says you can’t lose unless you play it on the hardest difficulty setting, at which point it becomes… hard. That sounds ideal to me. I suck at RTS games, and I’ve been hitting brick walls in them where I can’t go any further since I played Dune 2 on a 386SX a gajillion years ago. It would be nice to have brute-forcing the levels I’m not smart or capable enough to beat as an option. And also nice to challenge myself with a difficulty setting that had legitimate stakes. Seems like a wonderful compromise. As long as you get some kind of negative feedback from sucking, even at the lower levels, then I don’t see a problem.

If the play experience is exactly the same on normal difficulty, whether you’re completely incompetent or masterful, then that would be a problem. But it doesn’t sound like that’s the case. I get the impression that more people die when you suck.

By: Gap Gen

Gap Gen — Tue, 19 May 2009 08:43:18 +0000

“In single-player, you can’t lose, apparently.”

Hmm.

By: Subject 706

Subject 706 — Tue, 19 May 2009 08:14:09 +0000

And how is this one going to rise from obscurity, considering its competition and the saturation of this genre?

By: psyk

psyk — Tue, 19 May 2009 07:27:21 +0000

Churchill Vs Adolf : “Kick Hitlers Ass”

would love to see that on the shelf.

By: leeder_krenon

leeder_krenon — Tue, 19 May 2009 07:00:30 +0000

all these companies are just disappointed that they got beaten to the punch on the ‘wargasm’ name.

By: Lack_26

Lack_26 — Tue, 19 May 2009 06:58:41 +0000

Looks like WiC meets WWII