By John Walker on July 27th, 2009 at 2:22 pm.
We’ve done some psychic research and are aware quite how many Diablo II fans there are reading. Loads of you. So there should be some smiles at the news that there’s an unofficial patch to finally let you play it at a decent resolution. If you’re still playing the game, and we know you are, you’ll know the frustration of the limitations. Fret no more! (The small catch is it means you can’t play online.) You can get the patch from ModDB, and then play the game in any resolution your monitor is willing to present.
Huzzah!
Shame that Warden is so shit that it prevents you using stuff like this online though :(
report
Huzzah! I just this week reinstalled my D2
report
So on bnet this will be classified as a map hack and get the account banned, right?
report
Diablo 3 just lost sales. Not mine, i have titan’s quest.
report
You can’t even Log-on with it.
report
Antonymous, not as a maphack, but a third party application, so yes.
report
This makes me so very, very happy.
report
That screenshot has RED in it!
Typical WoW-alike nonsense, says I.
report
The other catch is that it doesn’t fix the inherent coded problem of enemies being turned off until you get within the bounding box designed for the original screen size. 800×600 still looks okay to me.
report
Tim, really? I can recall being able to hit enemies with my bow amazon that I couldn’t see on screen.
report
I’m still waiting for someone to do this for Starcraft. It looks pants on a LCD monitor.
report
Modding is unstopable!. We don’t need a SDK, we don’t need readable script!, we don’t need unencripted files!. Everything will be modded, forever!!.. Helll Yea! Modders FTW!.
report
Tei, except in this case, modding means you’re unable to play on Battlenet.
report
Great; I just bought the Diablo Battle Chest a few weeks ago!
Honestly, Diablo 1 and 2 are pretty awesome. I can’t say I need Diablo 3 in my life.
report
Heh, I was thinking about Diablo II the other day. I saw the Diablo 2 Battle Chest for $29.99 USD at Target. I’ve recently bought Fallout 3 and Empire Total war for just $25.00 (via Steam). How is it possible that Blizzard hasn’t actually bought its own country yet??
I enjoyed Diablo II a bit and will eventually buy Diablo III if it ever drops in price, which I guess wil never happen unless it really sucks.
report
I wonder how long people will be saying “I don’t need Diablo 3″ when it’s in every store in town, beckoning…
report
@Jacques: I’m guessing here, but I think what Tim meant is that enemies outside the screen won’t move until they’re in view. You can notice this at places even at 800×600.
More on Topic. Personally I’m going to stick with 800×600, as the grainy graphics never bothered me. I would also say this gave me the will to replay the game, but that’s a lie as I already finished the game enough times to go into the double digits (including once this year) so it may take a while until I do that again :(
I really need Diablo 3
report
Add a few extra pixels of resolution doesn’t change an old game, it just makes it look prettier, something that I really don’t care about too much :) I love Diablo 2, but have played it to the bones, I’m readily waiting for D3!
report
Blizzard do have their own country Clovus, it’s Korea! And it will most likely implode when Starcraft 2 is released.
Guess it’s time to whip out Hamachi and replay this all over again.
report
Xocrates, you’re probably right, the only place I ever noticed that was in the cow level.
I’m also one of those people that like 800×600, means I can play in windowed mode and check on other things in between MF runs.
report
How can 1 game kicks so much ass even so many years from release? Screw diablo 3 give more diablo 2 datadisks :D
This game have epic atmospherics, epic music, epic gameplay well i have high hopes for diablo 3.
Still todays crappy games that nobody likes will be good old games, i just love that paradox! (Not diablo)
report
Mmmmm – high res for old games…
*hugs Fallout High Res Patch*
http://www.nma-fallout.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=42386
report
Hmm, I am wondering what the imminent 1.13 patch for D2 will contain, a true official higher resolution?
report
No sure Swift, Blizz asked the D2 community the one thing they’d like to see, and for most people it involved changing items like the Enigma runeword.
report
VERY nice! Pity about the MP compatibility, but at least I can go have another swing at a game I’d thought was permanently rendered unplayable by its resolution constraints.
I don’t really get all the “hahaha no Diablo 3 for me!” chatter, why would people excited about revisiting 2 have no interest in 3? Barring something unforseen I’ll be hard pressed not to pick it up VERY close to launch, personally.
report
The hack supports all the way through Surround Gaming.
http://www.widescreengamingforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=16131
http://www.pcgameshardware.com/aid,690914/Diablo-2-in-3840-x-1024-pixels/News/
report
Now how about some Resident Evil 1 mod so it works in Vista and a Resident Evil 2 mod that allows me to play in resolutions higher than 640×480 and about a quarter of the screen, yes?
report
@Heliocentric: I have played many top down action rpg’s(rogue-like-lite-likes aka diablo clones), but nothing has ever bored me as much as titan quest. Its horrible, like they missed the entire point of that kind of games. All the good spells have huge cooldowns making it pointless to use anything thats not the most basic spells skills, and most warrior skills were ”Yay, now your normal attack has a chance to hit multiple enemies woop!”. Also all the enviroments look almost the same, but that might be because I got only to act 2 or something.
report
@jsutcliffe:
There is a similar hack for StarCraft. I stumbled across it once when I was PC-less, shrugged it off since there wasn’t a Mac version, and now am kicking myself that I can’t find it for my new PC :(
report
“The small catch is it means you can’t play online.”
It would have done to put this in the title in big red letters IMO.
report
To be perfectly honest, I don’t get why one would want this. It isn’t really higher resolution. All you get is zoomed the hell out. Meaning to see even the slightest of details, you’d have to have your nose connected to your screen to sse them. In that position, the pixel probably look pretty much the same.
… and about not being able to play on teh internets: the 1.13 content patch is coming out soon, so in a few weeks everyone will be playing online anyways. No use getting used to another resolution.
Oh yeah, and Diablo3 sucks penises in hell. Just to include the obvious.
report
Isn’t this really old? Dunno if it’s the same patch, but I’ve been playing D2 at 1680×1050 for like 6 months.
report
Never played D2 and don’t really care to. D1 is where its at IMHO.
report
@Kakksakkamaddafakka: It’s obvious that a game that is probably years away, and is being made by one of the top developers in the market, is going to suck?
report
Only put about 5 hours or so into D2 previously. Looks like it’s time to remedy that.
report
Bigger resolution? It doesn’t make it any better as a game.
report
Being able to see four screenlengths in every direction is pretty awesome, but since the UI elements stay at their original bitmap sizes, your health and mana globes get really tiny and easy to miss at higher rezes.
report
Well that’s nice, I bought D2 a few days ago.
report
Sweet. D2 wasn’t as good as Diablo but it was fun. Looking forward to D3 when it comes out in 2013.
report
I just know I’m going to regret asking this, but having played both I can’t say I understand why people are championing D1 while lambasting D2.
report
@Vinraith: Probably because D1 was more atmospheric and (slightly) more RPG-ish. Not to mention that by having seniority it biases a lot of opinions.
All in all it’s entirely a matter of opinion, as otherwise D2 is a much larger game with a lot more gameplay and story dept.
report
Opinions over at ModDB don’t seem to be very clear, so… does this require the LOD expansion or will it work with Diablo 2 standalone?
report
Pretty useless without online play…
I wish Blizzard would adapt this. I would play again.
report
+1 to the comments about Blizz adding this officially. Psssstttt… hey guys… it’s two-thousand nine. Lets get with the program shall we? Chop chop.
report
Blizzard won’t adapt this because it involves strentching the camera (zooming out) allowing players with higher resolutions to see more of the map – which is an unfair advantage and so will never be implemented.
What they SHOULD do though is allow users to stretch the game to size (keeping the same veiw/camera point) and have the wide-screen resolutions put in black borders on the left and right to keep things at 4:3.
report
@jsutcliffe, ascagnel
There are actually two I know of, one at http://www.starcraftresolutionhack.de.vu/ (by ‘McBane’) and one at gamethreat.net (search “starcraft resolution” in the forums, it’s written by ‘hellinsect’). I’ve had better luck with the second, but both seem to be working for me now. They make Starcraft look quite amazing, aside from a few bugs (the resource display and messages are still in their original positions, and some resolutions don’t seem to work for me).
report
No online isn’t exactly a small catch, it kills the mod for me :( All of my characters are online just in case I do any multi. What Blizzard should do is allow one way exporting of character data, so I could take my b.net character to single player, but not the other way around.
report
Wow, I actually beat RPS to the punch. I found this mod on Saturday and am now in Act II with my level 21 Barbarian, Clide. It is a bit eye-straining though.
report
I played it through again (after many years) with this mod a while ago, and I can confirm it’s still the best game ever.
report
I’m going to be killed, but…
Diablo II sucked. There, I said it.
While the first Diablo was interesting, novel and looked pretty and unusual, the second one was boring, ugly and tedious. When you enjoy a game the point of which is to click on animations until they stop animating… something is wrong.
You could do it if the story is good. Sure. However, the story was … well, about the quality of Doom 2.
You could do it if the game looks gorgeous. Sure. But the original Diablo 2 was 640×480 in year 2000. Yea, sure in 2001 it was increased to 800×600 if you bought an expansion. Whoopti-doo. Just to compare, Total Annihilation, which was released in 1997 scaled to ALL resolutions.
/sigh
I’ll never understand why mediocrity is ever so popular.
report
It may have design problems, but boring?
So all those people who are now playing D2 for a 20th time, are what — lying to themselves?
I loved it, not so much for gameplay, but for movies, story and general looks.
report
Alaric I’d say that the game didn’t suck, it just wasn’t for you. It isn’t a mediocre game which spawns its own genre.
I’ve raked hundreds of hours in D2 and tried lots of hack and slashes since. Not one got the sense of progression and pacing as good as Diablo. When I play Titan Quest for example I see it represents everything that people say it’s wrong with the genre, that’s why I’m waiting patiently for D3 to get it right again.
report
D2 didn’t spawn it’s own Genre Alse, the genre had already existed for some time before Diablo was ever made, sorry mate.
report
@Serondal
Action RPG’s may have existed before Diablo, but I don’t see how one could deny that Diablo/Diablo 2 were the principle force in popularizing the (sub)genre.
report
I agree that Diabo was the first game to make the Rogue style game play popular and Diablo 2 was the best example of a Roguelike game ever made (To this date I can’t think of one that tops in my book) I’m just saying it didn’t /create/ the genre. I certainly wasn’t saying Diablo 2 wasn’t good. I loved that game ^_^ There is more than just clicking on animations until they stop animating. getting the perfect gear, skills, stats ect and putting them to use is a great deal of fun to me. I used to love whirl winding through hordes with my barbarian with my friend backing me up with a necromancer.
report
I’ve just this week hit D2 with four IRL friends and are currently bashing through hardcore NM. Then there’s a post on RPS about it! Wtf!
God damn I’d love to play it online at 1920 res. Makes you wish Blizz would somehow shoehorn it in to the game officially.
report
Diablo 2, a Roguelike? That’s… not something I’ve ever heard suggested before. It wouldn’t occur to me to call something real-time and lacking permanent death a Roguelike.
report
The elements of a rogue like are that the game is randomly generated each time you play it. The items/levels/location of monsters and bosses (and indeed some of the bosses) are all randomly generated each time you play the game. Plus there is a perma death option if you want to be Hardcore ;) I’m certainly NOT the first person to suggest Diablo 2 is a rogue like.
report
Even the wikipedia page lists Diablo as a roguelike ;P
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diablo_(video_game) (and no I didn’t just edit that in thank you very much)
report
But the original Diablo 2 was 640×480 in year 2000. Yea, sure in 2001 it was increased to 800×600 if you bought an expansion. Whoopti-doo. Just to compare, Total Annihilation, which was released in 1997 scaled to ALL resolutions.
Wakey wakey, Blizzard go for strong art direction over graphical fidelity. There’s also more people playing Diablo 2 and Warcraft III regularly online right now that have probably ever played Crysis. Mediocrity etc…
report
You seem to suggest that artistic beauty and non-yesteryear graphics are mutually exclusive.
As to the amount of people playing any particular game… if we judge the quality of anything by the amount of fans it has, then Diablo II is certainly a magnificent game, Titanic is the best cinema has to offer and McDonalds makes the tastiest food.
report
Zzz the old popular != good crowd. Don’t tell me you got a Blackberry instead of a iPhone and you use Linux over XP.
i’m not talking popularity like sales i.e. Fifa
i’m talking popularity ten years on – longevity if you will – as testament to how good the game is
report
Things are judged by the amount of fans they have all the time. The President of the United States is elected that way. There is more to Mcdonalds than the taste of their food they are popular because of several things. they food is tasty enough to eat it, it is cheep enough to afford it , and service is fast enough to fit it into your schedule very easily. They provider a service that is in demand for a reasonable price.
Just because you didn’t like Titanic doesn’t mean it isn’t one of the best movies ever made, the people that go to see it/pay to see it/buy it obviously disagree with you on the quality ;P
Diablo 2 is still popular after all these years despite the graphics. That is because the game = fun, no one is going to keep playing a game if they don’t enjoy it. There are countless Japanese MMORPGs out there that are free to play and offer very similiar game play with better graphics , other Diablo like games that are very cheep to buy now, but Diablo 2 is still popular. Why, because it is a good game, peroid.
report
Umm… neither, I have a G1, and for precisely this reason. Just because the herd went for something (iPhone) doesn’t make it good. In fact it’s probably not good since the average intellect of a crowd is always… well lacking.
In any event, I don’t think Diablo II is a bad game. I just think it’s mediocre. It is well polished, yes, but nothing about it stands out. Not the story, not the graphics, not the gameplay, not … anything at all.
I’d say Diablo II to games is what Toyota Corolla is to cars. A lot of people have it. It’s cheap. It’s reliable. It works. But there is nothing special about it. It’s not comfortable enough to be luxury. It’s not fast enough to be sport. It’s not good looking enough to turn heads. It’s just the celebration of the middle ground. Which is what makes it sell.
report
@Alaric – Only when Diablo 2 came out it cost the same as any other computer game and it’s expansion cost the same as any other expansion so your obivously missing something here. If it is a Toyota Corolla of PC games why are people willing to pay the same for it as they would the Ferrari video game ? O.o
report
@Serondal,
Yes, the president is elected that way, which is exactly why we keep having an epic fail after an epic fail. There is no such thing as “wisdom of the mob.” An individual can be kind or cruel, smart or stupid, brave or cowardly. A mob is always cruel, stupid and cowardly.
In any event enough about politics.
report
@Serondal,
You seem to be having a bit of a logical breakdown here. First you said that Diablo II cost as much as all other games, and then you said that people are paying for it as they would for a Ferrari. I’m not much of a car person, but I am fairly confident that Ferrari costs a wee bit more that most other cars.
Anyway, until recently all games cost the same on release. That was just the way things were done. Diablo II was prices as was appropriate for the time.
And I am not saying that nobody plays it now. I simply see no cause and effect relationship between the amount of people that plays it and the quality of it.
report
I’d simply reply with this: name a better action RPG. Hell, name any RPG with better character development, a better array of unique, well defined classes, better replayability and longevity (random map generation, random world encounters), better developer support ten years on where they are STILL adding actual content.
The same cane be said about WoW, people just instantly take a disliking to it because it’s popular, despite the fact that it’s popular for a reason.
report
@Butler,
I like WoW. It has it’s problems, certainly, but overall it is more or less a good game.
As to a better dungeon hack, I would say Nox was a far superior game. It came out the same year as Diablo II, but looked and played infinitely better. It got murdered by EA, when they took over Westwood.
report
As much as I love Nox, I’d struggle to label it the better game in terms of what I outlined above (of course your definition of my constitues a better game may differ, depending on what you’re looking for).
I’m just long since bored of the anti-popular stance people have in gaming and technology circles. Popular certainly doesn’t always mean good but, crucially, it doesn’t always mean average/bad either :p
report
Hmm yeah I didn’t express myself well. What I meant is that it spawned its own sub-genre: Diablo clones. I’m very familiar with roguelikes and it’s a bit similar to what Rogue created. If anything, D2 was underrated by critics. It had marks around 8 I think, and I’d rate it above many action games made since.
report
My point above was that a Ferrari IS more expensive than a Corolla Alaric, so if Diablo is is the Corolla why did people pay Ferarri prices for it? Even now Diablo 2 is around 20 dollars new on some online websites so people are buying your 9 year old Corolla for around half the price of a brand new Ferrari ;P My point being that your analogy is horrible and wrong. You can’t compare diablo 2 to a car or any other game for that matter.
If you want to believe that a game that has maintained extreme popularity for 9 years is some how medicore you can go right ahead and believe that. I don’t see nearly as many people playing nox, Dungeon Siege 1 or 2 or Titans Quest online . . .
report
My favourite diablo alone is guild wars. I love that i can fashion a build which feels personal and unique (even if that isn’t really the case) and with friends build complex cross plays.
report
I just couldn’t get into Guild Wars long term, I played the origonal for some time and created and help maintain a guild with its own guild house ect but it just never really grabbed me like Diablo 2 did. I can see what other people see in it but It just never got me hooked ;). I did play a lot of Hellgate London which is a LOT like Diablo 2 but lost interest in that as well. Nothing since diablo 2 has hooked me long enough to get a character near the max level.
report
” When you enjoy a game the point of which is to click on animations until they stop animating… something is wrong.”
You can break down every game ever to such a simple formula. And you’ll always miss the point.
You could do it if the story is good. Sure. However, the story was … well, about the quality of Doom 2.
The story in Diablo 2 is utterly irrelevant. Not that it was that bad, anyway – the usual nonsense story you get in games, but it was well told, and with remarkable cutscenes.
You could do it if the game looks gorgeous. Sure. But the original Diablo 2 was 640×480 in year 2000. Yea, sure in 2001 it was increased to 800×600 if you bought an expansion. Whoopti-doo. Just to compare, Total Annihilation, which was released in 1997 scaled to ALL resolutions.
Well, now you’ve completely lost me. Resolution only has something to do with the purely technical quality. Look at the high-res shots with this mod. It does look gorgeous. Still. Now look at TA today. It looks terrible. Bland and uninspired, like it did from day 1.
I’ll never understand why mediocrity is ever so popular.
Well, that I agree with. Only I’d never apply it to something so blatantly not mediocre.
report
Exactly
report
Diablo 2 at the time of it’s release was very good in many ways but after all these years it doesn’t quite pass muster anymore. It’s still fun but there are mechanical issues (brought to light, ironically, by the innovations of WoW) that linger.
Anyway, we aren’t forced to grade it one way or another. As long as you have fun with it, it matters not.
report
@Xocrates:
Yes, it is obvious. The team working on Diablo3 can’t be arsed with using the lore of the Diablo universe, so they just mash up some WoW esque BS on their own. That’s simply ultra weak sauce.
Look at the Witch Doctor, just look at it. It’s like Fisher Price got a hold of Diablo and tried to redesign it for 7+. Necromancers? Nah, that’s a bit scary. Not enough colours on that lot, let’s make them sort of goofy looking indians, with feathers and shit. The kids will go crazy!
I don’t care how much other people enjoy lazy lore like WoW. Stealing from 30 years of pop culture isn’t good lore. Neither is creating art for the lowest common denominator hardwarewise. The models in D3 have a severe case of WoW-itis, and if the almighty Blizz can’t be bothered hiring artists that can do two separate designs, why would I be bothered by checking the steaming pile out?
… and don’t get me started on having item art the size of post-stamps. Diablo2 was about having awesome gear with killer names, over the top mods and COOL ARTWORK. Jay Wilson just doesn’t get it. He has no clue about why D2 was the awesome game that is was. Simply put, the guy is almost as shitty a designer as Ken Rolston, and I almost feel bad about saying that, but he deserves it. This guy would remove the ball from Pong if he had the chance.
I’m sorry, but D3 just doesn’t look good, and the game mechanics certainly leaves something to be desired. Wilson seems to think a limited amount of cookie cutter builds is hot shit, and that about wraps it up. Unless a miracle occurs, D3 will always be know, amongst people who aren’t braindead, as the lesser successor of D2.
I do think SC2 looks pretty spiffy, though. But that’s another story altogether.
report
The cut scenes in D2 are still impressive, 7 years later.
Maybe this time round I can get a char past level 67. At least my clicking finger has had a few years to recover from the last attempt.
report
Of course, that’s 9 years later. Whoops. Still, even more impressive in cgi terms; 9 years is a hella long time.
report
@Angry-Man-With-A-Long-Name
Dear sir, would you kindly care to elaborate on your above statement, where you claim that Diablo II lore is somehow superior to the WoW lore? I am asking because it seems to me that you are confusing the desirable and objective realities.
The Diablo I and II lore was bland and just as borrowed from volumes of generic fantasy as WoW. Heaven vs. Hell, Lesser Evils vs. Prime Evils, etc. There is not a single original, or even well executed aspect. Even the so called “plot twist” at the end was a joke.
As for the Witch Doctor, why do you think that a tribal shaman type figure is any less realistic or appropriate for the setting than a girl with a spear wearing a bikini for example?
report
Can anyone get the mouse wheel to work in this? I assume its because the game is now forced toa window?
report
Alaric:
Actually, I never compared the two qualitatively, however I basically mentioned the WoW lore is shit.
I find it somewhat refreshing that they do half-interested mish-mash of clichéd fantasy and pop culture (I mean, tongue-in-cheek lore can be fun) — for about ten minutes. Then it gets tedious and boring. At least Diablo has a defined style. It’s dark, brooding and a with several notches more realistic art design. The main point in my previous post not being that WoW is shit, but that Diablo is distinct and needs to stay that way. Nobody in their right mind is interested in a sequel that looks and feels nothing like it’s predecessor.
report
@Kakksakkamaddafakka
I’m not so sure creating art for the lowest common denominator of hardware is a bad idea. Creating stuff that only the top end of stuff can run it seems more like iD’s schtick. Pretty much everything Blizzard has made seems like it runs on anything you have lying around, with the possible exception of WoW right at release.
@sigma83, I share the thought on mechanical issues; I had an experience where I decided to pick up D2 after D3 was announced, and I was mystified when pressing a hotkey didn’t use whatever I had bound to it. There were a host of other minor issues I ran into due to getting used to how WoW deals with things. Maybe I’ll revisit it later now that I’ve been off of WoW for a while, see if my assumptions on how a game should play looking as it does.
report
Diablo 2 was a “streamlined” MMORPG with fullloot. And was ***EXTREMLY*** popular for the hardcore players. Is not a singleplayer game that was played 9 years, it was the PVP game (I could be wrong, but thats my impression).
The question is… will D3 be compatible for the hardcore gamers? full-loot these days is niche market. If the answer is NOT, then i see a game that will be played 8 years less than the old title.
report