By Kieron Gillen on August 28th, 2009 at 12:28 pm.

Evony have – er – been active recently. The best over-view of the situation is courtesy of Game Set Watch. Bruce Everiss made a series of accusations against United Multiplayer Gaming Entertainment, Evony’s developer. They respond with a series of hefty old threatening letters. The Guardian’s got one too. The case has been filed in Australia of all places, which Bruce reads as an attempt to deliberately make it as hard as possible for him to defend himself. Really, it’s quite the mess. I advise you to start at GSW and see what you make of it.



28/08/2009 at 12:43 Ginger Yellow says:
Unfortunately, Australian libel law is very similar to English libel law, both in terms of the burden of proof and in the broad claims of jurisdiction. So not only would this case be practically difficult to defend, if he were to defend it the legal side of things would probably be pretty tricky too.
28/08/2009 at 12:43 Baka says:
This Blog is a lot of links and a lot of not knowing what the blog is about.
28/08/2009 at 12:45 James G says:
Ugh. The one good thing I’ve discovered from that whole affair is that the UK isn’t the only country with archaic libel laws.
28/08/2009 at 12:48 Heliosicle says:
I kind of saw this coming, however from reading this guys blog I can see that he isn’t too fussed, and to be honest, all of his points are true.
28/08/2009 at 12:50 Heliosicle says:
Oop seems I commented before I properly read the GSW page, shame on me
28/08/2009 at 12:51 JellyfishGreen says:
I was going to ask, is the game any good? I think I found the answer.
Apparently it’s Civ4 reverse-engineered MMO with the occasional Chingrish description, and no, no handmaidens of any description.
28/08/2009 at 12:51 jalf says:
Just tell me where to donate money to his legal defense. Anything to wipe Evony ads off the face of the internet.
28/08/2009 at 12:52 CMaster says:
Couldn’t he just ignore this suit?
I presume civil prosecutions in Oz can’t force you to comply in the UK.
28/08/2009 at 13:06 Kester says:
This is RPS’s worst title wordplay yet. I hope you’re proud of yourselves.
28/08/2009 at 13:09 Innokenti says:
Huh… Australia getting a slice of the Libel Tourism industry, eh? Good for them… er…
28/08/2009 at 13:11 Freudian Slip says:
Actually you’ll find the UK’s libel laws have evolved alot over the last two decades. (hence Ian Hislop winning alot more of his cases nowadasy) The new way to sue is through ‘Privacy’ as it’s still not very well defined in law what is/isn’t privacy. As can be seen in the Max Moseley/NOTW case.
28/08/2009 at 13:11 MD says:
Haha :D
Be careful, or you’ll give our government ideas! There’s probably money in it, it’ll bring cash into the economy via lawyers and judges…
28/08/2009 at 13:31 Seniath says:
Oh I’m sure you could have crammed another punne in that title, Kieron. I swear, it’s like you’re just not trying these days.
28/08/2009 at 13:40 monkehhh says:
“9. Ebony is run by the bad boys of the internet.”
- I’d love it if someone accused me of being a bad boy of the internet :)
28/08/2009 at 13:56 rcsgd says:
The problem is, Bruce is [somewhat objectionable]:
http://www.rllmukforum.com/index.php?showtopic=212771
28/08/2009 at 13:58 cliffski says:
Anything that saps money away from their ad budget and prevents us being spammed with pathetic soft porn in an attempt to sell in-game chat messages at $1 a time is a good thing.
These clueless muppets give gaming and micro-transaction models a REALLY bad name.
Screw evony.
28/08/2009 at 14:18 rocketman71 says:
Bruce Everiss is a bitter old man.While I can concur that what Evony is doing is, let’s say, not right, after having read part of his blog time ago, I have no pity at all for him. He’s not hesitated to hung dry people whenever his had the chance. Let he take a bit of his own medicine.
28/08/2009 at 14:47 skizelo says:
Freudian Slip, we still have a piss-poor track record re: rational libel settlements, Simon Singh’s case being a good recent example.
28/08/2009 at 15:28 Heliocentric says:
@monkehhh you are an internet bad boy.
Feel better now?
28/08/2009 at 15:30 David says:
rocketman71, can you be more specific about the ‘bad medicine’ Everiss has dished out?
28/08/2009 at 15:38 Ginger Yellow says:
“Freudian Slip, we still have a piss-poor track record re: rational libel settlements, Simon Singh’s case being a good recent example.”
This is a whole ‘nother thread, but I actually think the Singh ruling (which is only a preliminary ruling on the meaning of the allegedly defamatory statements, incidentally – the full libel trial has yet to happen) was correct according to the letter of the law. I wish it weren’t, as I think the BCA suit will have a terrible chilling effect on the discussion of pseudo-science and quackery, but I do think it was. Justice Eady may be incredibly unfriendly to libel defendants, but the thing to remember is that he’s working within a legal framework that is also incredibly unfriendly to libel defendants.
28/08/2009 at 15:49 mujadaddy says:
Observations:
1. Other people on the internet aren’t real. Therefore worrying about what they’ve “said” is pointless. qv 4chan, TPB
2. Evony is the Girls Gone Wild of online gaming, except GGW usually delivers.
3. You’ve misused the term “Mary Sue”, but due to the high volume of punnage you must dish out to keep the Captain’s lash from your backs, that’s forgivable.
28/08/2009 at 15:56 qrter says:
I believe rocketman could be referring to the ‘blaming piracy for my company’s downfall instead of our own bad management’ thing last year on his blog. He was called out on this in his comments and that’s when things went really downhill. More info here.
28/08/2009 at 16:34 Derf says:
Probably the worst RPS blog ever.
28/08/2009 at 16:50 Mads says:
28/08/2009 at 17:06 James G says:
@Ginger Yellow
Ridiculous interpretation of the word bogus notwithstanding, that was the point being made, not that our courts are ridiculous, but that the libel laws themselves are. Still, hopefully it’ll all go in a similar way to Rath Vs. Goldacre.
28/08/2009 at 18:06 Alaric says:
I don’t really get it. Yea, these ads are annoying as hell. So are all the other ads in the Internet. How is this Evony crap any worse than SixFlags, MediFast or AccuQuote adds? (I just reloaded this page 3 times to get those names.)
As to the game itself being a pile of crap – well, don’t play it then. I certainly do not intend to.
So again, why is everyone getting their panties in a bunch?
28/08/2009 at 19:22 Psychopomp says:
“How is this Evony crap any worse than SixFlags, MediFast or AccuQuote adds?”
BEST FREE WEB GAME
MARRY ME MY LORD
BEST FREE WEB GAME
MARRY ME MY LORD
BEST FREE WEB GAME
MARRY ME MY LORD
BEST FREE WEB GAME
MARRY ME MY LORD
BEST FREE WEB GAME
MARRY ME MY LORD
BEST FREE WEB GAME
MARRY ME MY LORD
BEST FREE WEB GAME
MARRY ME MY LORD
BEST FREE WEB GAME
MARRY ME MY LORD
BEST FREE WEB GAME
MARRY ME MY LORD
BEST FREE WEB GAME
MARRY ME MY LORD
BEST FREE WEB GAME
MARRY ME MY LORD
BEST FREE WEB GAME
MARRY ME MY LORD
BEST FREE WEB GAME
MARRY ME MY LORD
BEST FREE WEB GAME
MARRY ME MY LORD
BEST FREE WEB GAME
MARRY ME MY LORD
BEST FREE WEB GAME
MARRY ME MY LORD
TITS
That’s how.
28/08/2009 at 19:29 Cutman says:
Best rps news title ever.
28/08/2009 at 19:32 Tei says:
Theres 3 rules of Spam:
1 – Spammers lie.
2 – If you think a spammer is telling the truth, see 1.
3 – Spammers are stupid.
Often a 4th rule is added:
4 – The natural course of a spamming business is to go bankrupt. (see 3)
The problem with Evony, is the spammer mindset. Once you have that mindset, these 3 rules are unscapable .
Now, based on rule 4, Evony natural course will be bankrupt.
I have no see any exception in more than 15 years, and these rules are tested and confirmed daily.
28/08/2009 at 19:35 Tei says:
postdata:
Inside the spammer mindset:
– Spammers think that are more smart that everybody else.
– Spammers think that theres a infinite number of people more idiot thatn thenselves, and that can scam these people.
– Spammers think that can lie to everyone, and escape any problem. Even use lies to put anyone in a problem. So no one can call then spammers, and survive a libel.
28/08/2009 at 20:08 Alaric says:
@Psychopomp
Don’t be ridiculous. Evony crap is appearing in the same spaces as all other ads. If you see more of these ads, it is because they paid more and thus have a right to be there. Paying a lot of money for advertisement is not a crime in my book.
@Tei
They are not spammers, as I have not once received an unsolicited communication form them. Like I said, the ads we see are legitimately purchased and displayed.
And if spam wasn’t profitable, it would not make up over 90% of all e-mail traffic. So these guys are making money. (Not that I approve of them.)
28/08/2009 at 20:28 Vinraith says:
@Alaric
Spraying not-work-friendly ads all over otherwise-work-friendly sites may not be illegal, but it’s certainly worthy of vitriol. Actively changing the web address of your advertising when sites block you for such behavior may not technically be spamming, but it’s certainly born of the same mindset.
28/08/2009 at 20:45 Alaric says:
Hmm true, true. I didn’t realize they did that thing with URLs. That’s definitely some shitty behavior there. Although I don’t think any of their images are NSFW.
28/08/2009 at 21:50 col says:
Bruce Everiss is a tit.
28/08/2009 at 22:19 DMJ says:
Re: Advertising paying for the right to be there: An ad which causes you to instantly close a browser window is hurting the host site. There are some things you shouldn’t be able to pay to put on sites indiscriminately. Like breasts. And swastikas. And child porn.
I’m not saying Evony is swastikas and child porn, but for a time at least those ads made it almost impossible to access RPS at work because it would have led to pointed questions. To say nothing of the embarassment of defending games as being juvenile when even the relatively gentlemanly RPS is covered in breasts.
And on the subject of spam, this may not be mail, but I tend to embrace the “done until death… and it wasn’t welcome in the first place” definition of spam.
Sorry, what was the topic again? :D
28/08/2009 at 22:21 We Fly Spitfires - MMORPG Blog says:
All I know about Evony are the adverts with hot chicks that keep popping up on my blog.
28/08/2009 at 23:02 Ffitz says:
Adblock ruined my life! Flashblock has deprived me! Who do I sue?
29/08/2009 at 00:08 Blather Blob says:
@Alaric: I think the first of the series of articles they’re threatening to sue over is all about them promoting comment spam: http://www.bruceongames.com/2009/07/10/dont-play-evony/
29/08/2009 at 00:14 Isaac says:
Heheheh. Oh Evony how we doth love you, forsooth your troubles are the most entertaining we’ve had in recent days.
29/08/2009 at 01:06 Idle Threats and Bad Poetry says:
So someone explain this to me. If I can put something up on the Internet anywhere in the world, a company from China that judges my comments to be libel can sue me in Australia? If I’ve got that right, that’s a law as outdated at the Salem witch trials.
29/08/2009 at 01:17 Debaser says:
Man, that is straight up the worst pun I have ever seen. I feel worse for reading it
29/08/2009 at 03:24 hitnrun says:
@Idle threats
It depends on which country you live in, and which country the suit is filed in.
If you live in the United States, you can just ignore it.
In some other countries where the whole “sovereign nation” thing is a little more qualified, yes, you might be able to be sued. Particularly in Commonwealth nations (Britain, Australia, Canada). The situation differ from nation to nation and case to case, but the gist of it is that the fact that what you write can be read anywhere, combined with these states’ common legal traditions and only recently diverging histories, is used to justify enforcing libel judgments in courts that sensible people, ie non lawyers, would call “a country I’ve never visited on the other side of the effing planet.”
29/08/2009 at 04:05 nutterguy says:
The only place I have seen these Evony online ad’s is RPS… cos I love you guys and have adblock turned off for http://www.rockpapershotgun.com
Until I pony up for a subscription… then they are gone!
29/08/2009 at 05:24 RobF says:
Tei, you’ve just described Everiss perfectly, man.
Battle of the spammers, who will win?
29/08/2009 at 14:50 bill says:
But can’t he just ignore it? He might have to avoid going to australia in the future… but i can’t see that he’s gonna get extradited for ignoring a libel suit in australia.
29/08/2009 at 17:18 Jetsetlemming says:
I disabled Adblock for RPS and the only ad I see is one for Duke3d on GOG, and that was visible before I disabled adblock. Ah well.
I’d totally click that ad and go buy Duke3d if I didn’t already have it. Sorry RPS!
30/08/2009 at 01:48 Pod says:
a) Bruce Everiss is a cock. But I’ll let him go this time.
b) Has Evony even been sued for completely stealing the Age of Empire 2 + Civ 3 graphics?
30/08/2009 at 11:09 bill says:
The problem with his tactic is that it essentially gives more publicity to Evony.
I’d imagine they are from the “all publicity is good publicity” school of thought, and this lawsuit, and any blogs posting about it, mentioning their game and showing their scantily clad adverts…. that just means more potential clicks.
31/08/2009 at 17:47 eyemessiah says:
@Alaric, it depends where you work. Personally, I have to move the shoryuken forum several inches off the left hand side of my screen at lunch to avoid having cleavage on display for the whole hour.
29/10/2009 at 16:20 Lee says:
I am a student studying computer games design at uni and decided to investigate Evony.com.
Just to see what some of these games are like etc. etc.
The game is actually kind of cool (found myself addicted and even spent a little money on it).
But I started to notice HUGE bandwidth use by the site as I played.
I am not the only one either, there are comments on the evony forums about this.
This is odd because all of the client info, the animations etc. are all downloaded in one big download at the start.
There is no streaming media so I began to wonder what was going on.
To cut a long story short I decided to break the law and reverse engineer Evony’s client.
Not to cheat. Not to rip them off or even to use even a scrap of the code.
But just to poke about a bit and find out what was going on, maybe even offer them some ways to improve things.
Aside from the fact that the whole thing is very poorly constructed (it is really very beginner coder level stuff. Reminds me of a lot of
what the first year students produce for assignments) it contained some very interesting information.
Included with the client are 2 peices of tracking software that monitor your web use and which applications you have open while the client is running.
These do not install independently on the machine though due to the limitations of flash and do not actually damage anything.
But they harvest massive volumes of information. My firewall was blocking a lot of outgoing transmissions and it turns out that these
were the data trying to be sent out. So they know nothing about me. lol.
However there is a LOT of data coming IN over the ports the client uses. In otherwords it is downloading something into my cache for use later.
I have bandiwdth restriction which slows these types of tricks down and I completely clear my cache every couple of hours if I am heavily using the net.
I also noticed that all the varanbles etc. are named Civony still and that there are multiple references to UMGE.
Even a couple of folders are simply called UMGE, one of these folders contains one of the spyware programs.
So I can only guess at where the data would end up if I didnt have a good firewall.
There are also commented out sections in the code which contain references to UMGE and Lam himself, though low on details.
Thank you for reading this.
Lee