Rock, Paper, Shotgun

The Boycott Joe’s L4D Map Campaign

By John Walker on September 11th, 2009 at 8:49 am.

The Boycott Left 4 Dead 2 campaign has taken some very strange turns in the last few days. You may well have heard the remarkable story of Valve flying two of the campaign’s figureheads to visit their Seattle HQ last week. Walking_Target and Agent of Chaos were flown to the developers and shown the game running, as well as given behind-the-scenes access to the continuing development of the original L4D. And it seems to have made a difference. You can read their reaction to the trip here (and of course the furious reaction of others). Then the story gets more strange.

So these two vociferous boycotters wrote after their trip,

“We can definitely say that support for L4D is NOT being dropped by Valve and that they are actively pursuing bug fixes for Left 4 Dead. We’re going to continue to talk to Valve and ask questions as needed, however if the frantic pace which we had seen people working at is any indication, we’re not going to be left in the dust. The staff seemed to honestly love the original 4 Survivors and many said that ‘we’re not done with them yet’.”

It’s a magical story. These ‘Left 4 Dead 2 Boycott Staff’ also reported that the sequel is not the rush job they’d been campaigning against.

“As for L4D2, things seemed balanced and ‘tight’ and did not feel like a rushed job. While we were visiting their offices we personally witnessed what can only be called a small army of artists, coders, mappers hard at work, which explains the rapid transformations in artwork that we’ve all seen. What we can say with confidence is that the quality of gameplay in Left 4 Dead 2 is not in question; and it will only get better (from what we understand, almost daily testing of game builds by most of the staff at Valve).”

Now clearly this isn’t going to appease everyone, and of course many others in the group now feel betrayed by this apparent about-face. But this isn’t a post about them, or what happened there. It’s about what happened next.

Australian L4D modder Joe decided this was decidedly unfair. He’s been making Valve game-based mods for a while, but has never once been flown to visit Valve. He wrote to Gabe Newell to demand that this be changed in light of his currently in development L4D1 map.

And received this reply:

This took Joe by surprise. He realised the tables had been turned, and wrote back:

It seems he does. And not just Gabe. Erik Johnson too.

So rather brilliantly, Joe has now begun a fund-raising scheme to raise the money needed to fly Gabe and Erik out to Brisbane, Australia. Hopefully if they play his mod they’ll change their minds and call off their boycott.

He’s at $400 so far, which isn’t really close to the amount needed to fly Mr Newell in the aerial accommodation to which he’s likely accustomed, let alone Mr Johnson too. Come on everyone, let’s donate! Let’s make this happen! Paypal donations can be made on Joe’s site, and he promises to return the money if Gabe and Erik change their minds.

Will Gabe be creating a Steam group and printing his own t-shirts? So far this information has not come to light, but it can only be a matter of time. Thanks to Nicholas for the tip.

__________________

« | »

, , , .

147 Comments »

  1. Captain Haplo says:

    I live in Brisbane! The idea of Gabe Newell being closer than Seattle warms my heart.

  2. Blast Hardcheese says:

    I would totally buy that T-shirt.

    Y’know, the theoretical one that you said at the very end, since the boycott thing never mattered to me.

  3. Idle Threats and Bad Poetry says:

    See, this is why I love Valve. They may make a decision that causes a whine storm once and a while (oops, did I say that?), but they’ve got personality and they do a lot for the community.

  4. Rinox says:

    Awesome stuff!! If I had a Paypal account I’d donate a buck.

  5. Vinraith says:

    It’s hard to stay mad at a company once it’s no longer a faceless organization and instead is a (very friendly) set of faces that is kind enough to fly you in to look around. This is the first savvy PR thing Valve’s done in this mess, but I don’t think it’ll get them quite the mileage they expect. The fundamental issue (L4D is too short on content) doesn’t sound like it’s being addressed at all.

    I’m not sure following that up by mocking the boycott is all that bright, but it’s certainly consistent with their handling of the situation.

    I wish Joe luck, certainly the mod community is doing a lot more for L4D these days than Valve is (or is ever likely to).

  6. subediii says:

    The hilarious thing about those two boycott leaders is that they’re now being tagged as “sell outs” by members of their own group.

    I’m actually pretty amazed that LaCabra’s raised $400 in just a day though (two days?). Guess Gabe’s going to Brisbane whether he likes it or not.

  7. sigma83 says:

    People will often be silly for absolutely no reason at all. I blame the lack of critical thinking.

  8. Lack_26 says:

    What ever happened to the days where developers could some bug-fixes and provide a good SDK and they would be praised in their work to support their game?

  9. Schmung says:

    This is brilliant. I bet the amount of rage on the steam forums is pretty impressive.

    cuh, now everyone will be trying to get Valve to fly out and have a look at their mods. Time to put a paypal on the front page I guess..

  10. Jayt says:

    I live in Brisbane… DO IT

  11. Liatach says:

    @captainhaplo
    As do I, sentiment Seconded.

  12. Lukasz says:

    Man. I love the internet.

  13. Frankie The Patrician[PF] says:

    Let’s fly them around the globe…Europe, anyone? Well, the only flaw might be that it may delay Ep. 3/HL3 (…) by another ten years…But who would in conscious mind cared about that? >.>

  14. Catastrophe says:

    It sounds to me like they’ve got some lackies to grab the 2 peeps, threw em into a van, drove to airport, flew them to HQ, tied them to a seat and tortured them into submission.

    Or L4D2 is actually good.

  15. Mr Pink says:

    This is so awesome. Although the amount of anger from the rest of the boycott group is slightly scary.

  16. espy says:

    Nearly fell over laughing :D

  17. nine says:

    This could be brilliant.

  18. Scalene says:

    By the way: Here’s Joe’s L4D campaign, since silly Mr. Walker didn’t link to the campaign, which is absolutely mind-blowing:

    http://joesmoddingmenagerie.blogspot.com/

  19. pepper says:

    Hehe, they have humour.

  20. gulag says:

    Watching the Internet Angry Men (L4D2 Makes Me Angry Chapter) tear into each other on the forums is a real treat.

  21. Fede says:

    He’s posting all the donations on the comments. Look at this:


    This is Robin Walker, from Valve. The rest of us at Valve would sure appreciate a couple of days without Erik around, so thanks for organising this!

    Quick question though: if I donated more, would you buy a one-way ticket for him?

    Robin.

  22. Hmm-Hmm. says:

    But.. eh.. what have Valve really shown the L4D crowd? You know, just askin’.

  23. JuJuCam says:

    I feel I’ve basically missed the boat on L4D and am probably going to jump on board L4D2 because everything about it intrigues me.

  24. Lukasz says:

    I just donated 10 bucks. the whole situation is worth two beers!

  25. frags says:

    New steam group created ‘Boycott Valve Boycotting Joe’s Custom Campaign’

  26. vasagi says:

    Valve=funny fuckers

  27. phil says:

    By god, Valve are my favourite corporate developers by a country mile, EA/Sony/Ubisoft’s fan engagement seems to consist of marketing fluff and legal threats, Valve seem… human.

  28. gobion says:

    I’ve donated $10 this whole thing amuses me and Valve’s reaction gives me a pleasant warm feeling :)

  29. Lukasz says:

    lol. Gobion is your real name?

    Hope they will reach the target and valve will fly to Australia!

  30. Ian says:

    I love the smell of boycott AIMs in the morning.

  31. Dominic White says:

    Hats off to Valve. They’ve taken possibly one of the most incompehensibly angry things in internet history, and turned it into whimsical comedy through a mix of clever PR and just being nice/daft.

    It also makes anyone still furious about L4D2 look rather silly. Well, more silly than before. Which was very.

  32. Christian says:

    So…just that I understand:

    There is a bunch of people complaining that L4D will be dropped in favor of all new-and-shiny L4D2.
    So Valve listens to those people, invites the two organizers over and shows them around and also shows them that L4D still is strong and will continue to get support.
    So basically what these people have wanted, what this whole thing is about, right?
    So, instead of saying “Hooray, we truly have achieved something today!” they are complaining and whining and are angry.

    What the f**k do these people want? Is it just about being angry? Seems so, because the original topic has been dealt with..

    Sometimes, the internet scares me a bit..but I still can point my finger at them and have a nice laugh :)

    Or am I missing something here?

  33. Rinox says:

    Hey, this interesting piece of info in the (former) boycotter’s post hasn’t been highlighted here yet:

    The good news: 4v4 matchmaking is supposed to drop before the release of Left 4 Dead 2.

    W00t!

  34. Dzamir says:

    I donated 2$. :-)

  35. Frankie The Patrician[PF] says:

    I donated 2 dollars as well :)

  36. The Hammer says:

    Ahahahahaha.

    This is hilarious news. I totally didn’t expect that.

  37. itsallcrap says:

    So, they got to see the inner workings of Valve by organising a boycott against them?

    Who wants to start a ‘Boycott Mila Kunis’ campaign with me?

  38. Biorbio says:

    What the f**k do these people want? Is it just about being angry? Seems so, because the original topic has been dealt with..

    Seems like it’s part angry brainless mob, part having a sense of community and belonging. They probably also feel they would lose face if they admitted there was no cause for the uproar to begin with.

  39. The_B says:

    I think we should ignore the petty fools clinging on to their original boycott and concentrate solely on the crazy-loveliness of this story.

  40. PHeMoX says:

    “See, this is why I love Valve. They may make a decision that causes a whine storm once and a while (oops, did I say that?), but they’ve got personality and they do a lot for the community.”

    That’s nuts. They don’t do a lot for the community at all, they do as they please basically. I’m sure Left 4 Dead is basically just something to keep us busy anyways.

    Are they still working on HL2: Episode 3? Who knows? Who cares?

    I hope they stop their madness and start working on HL3.

  41. TotalBiscuit says:

    Well played you magnificent bastards. It’s the perfect crime, it decapitates the boycott movement by turning it against itself, shows it to be the angry, unruly, brainless mob of manchildren that we always knew they were and makes Valve look funny, down-to-earth and magnanimous at the same time.

    As we all suspected, the boycott movement has no interest in campaigning for the resolution of issues, the vast majority of them simply want to be angry at something. Reminds me of the healthcare bigots over in the States right now. At least nobody’s going to die as a result of this.

  42. Mark says:

    I’m finding it hard to imagine a bigger bunch of ungrateful whiney nerds.

    Valve made an awesome game that sold and people played heavily and all they get is crap for wanting to make a sequel to their awesome game. So what if you -want- or even expected more content – I bet half the boycotters have got dozens or hundreds of hundreds of hours of play out of the game. It’s no like the game is unplayable and desperate for a patch.

    Valve give gamers more than 99% of the other developers out there and in the process they’ve attracted a vocal bunch of ungrateful twats.

  43. Diji says:

    I got to be the first Daniel, and got Kieron’s name right above mine. This is indeed a great victory for me.

  44. vasagi says:

    Keiron gillen now officaly better than john walker it would appear.

  45. jalf says:

    @Mark: Ah yes, the wonderful old strawman argument which has absolutely nothing to do with why people are upset. Well done. You’re almost as good as Valve at this.
    If I were to buy a new car, the company delivered me a bike, and I got hundreds of hours of use out of it, does that mean I wouldn’t have a case for complaining? The problem is not whether L4D was a good game, or even whether L4D2 will be a good game. The problem is that many people bought the game because of promises made by Valve which have still not been fulfilled. They said the product was something it was not.

    Anyway, like TotalBiscuit said, well played, Valve. They knew the people in the boycott group are apparently total morons, and used that to their advantage. And suddenly they’ve decapitated the group.

    Just sucks for the rest of us who aren’t dumb enough to jump on the boycott wagon, but still think Valve screwed their customers.

  46. Shadow says:

    “itsallcrap says:
    [...]
    Who wants to start a ‘Boycott Mila Kunis’ campaign with me?”

    I will :D, one question though, who gets to test out her “gameplay” first?

  47. Vivian says:

    Reading peoples inappropriate rage on this issue is like putting on special glasses that let me see what I’m like about bioshock. Shit.

  48. Dominic White says:

    @Jalf – so, when the heads of the hilariously angry boycott group say that Valve are still hard at work supporting L4D1, you think they’re lying? If not, then how are Valve screwing anyone?

  49. Malagate says:

    @Shadow, I’d be worried about such a boycott, especially as itsallcrap kind of intimates you’d be doing it to see the “inner workings” of Milk Kunis. Celebrity evisceration is not my cup of tea (usually).

  50. cyrenic says:

    I demand a flight out to Seattle, and a kiss from Gabe when I get there.

  51. Mark says:

    @jalf: You’re talking shit, no two ways about it. 99% of people bought the game because they saw it in gamestop, read a good review, saw an advert, a friend reccomended it to them – whatever. Your “many” people who bought the game because of “promises” from valve are a tiny tiny minority. The reality is the vast majority of probably even those in the boycott group would have bought the game long before they learned of the extra “promised” stuff.

    The fact is the community got its hopes up that is was going to get more than they really were. We still got a fucking ace game that everyone has played tonnes that has been heavily supported since its release. The boycotters are fickle, ungrateful geeks with a hillarious-to-watch sense of entitlement.

    Keep throwing poo at valve if you like though. I’m sure most of them find it pretty amusing, as the rest of us do.

  52. Subjective Effect says:

    What the f**k do these people want? Is it just about being angry? Seems so, because the original topic has been dealt with..

    Seems this post and the commentators have missed the fact that this is all a joke that Valve and Joe are acting out for the lols.

  53. Whiskey Jak says:

    So once again, it has been proved that all this whining and complaining was for absolutely nothing and simply gave a corporation (that I like and appreciate very much) used to get good PR.

    Valve: a Gazillions points. Angry Group of Whiners: 0

  54. jalf says:

    @Dominic White: I’m just saying that Valve is essentially just repeating the same promises they made before launch. The reason people are upset is that we haven’t seen those promises materialize into actual updates to the game. So what difference does it make that Valve *repeats* those promises once again? The situation is the same. Valve still hasn’t *delivered* what they said they’d deliver. If you’re going to boycott L4D2 at all, then surely you should do it until they’ve *delivered* on their promises, not just until they say “oh yeah, about those promises… yeah, we still want to do that, just not today”.

    No, I don’t think the boycott heads “lied” to anyone. I think they’re just parroting what Valve told them. Which is what I find amazingly dumb, since Valve is just saying what they’ve always said. Nothing has changed. Valve is saying what they always said, and they’re still not delivering what they said they’d deliver. I think most of the people in the boycott group expected more than a renewal of the promise for L4D updates. I think they expected *actual* updates.

    Then again, the boycott group was ridiculous from the start. They tried to incorporate pretty much everything Valve has ever done, including all the 14 different reasons why different people are upset about L4D2, including both the one or two meaningful reasons, and the countless flawed ones.

    They never seemed to know what they wanted, or what they were angry about, and now Valve has shut them up.

    To answer your question, Valve screwed their customers by saying that if you bought L4D, you’d get something you never got. Yes, they may, at some point in the future, deliver what they said they’d deliver, and yes, they may even be working on it now (they may even, if we stretch ourselves a bit, have been working on it all along, rather than starting on it a month or two ago when they discovered that people were unhappy about L4D being left for dead)

    But until now, they still have not delivered what, for some, was the reason for buying the game in the first place. (And if we take their promises literally, then it is now *impossible* for them to deliver on their promises, because one of the promises was that these updates would be delivered quickly, and at a faster pace than TF2 updates.)

    Not delivering what people paid for is, as I understand the word, “screwing your customers”.

  55. Biorbio says:

    @Subjective Effect: They’re not referring to Joe and Gabe.

  56. jalf says:

    @jalf: You’re talking shit, no two ways about it

    Why is it that in this thread, the pro-Valve camp is the one acting most like Angry Internet Men?

    99% of people bought the game because they saw it in gamestop, read a good review, saw an advert, a friend reccomended it to them – whatever. Your “many” people who bought the game because of “promises” from valve are a tiny tiny minority.

    Does it matter?
    Is a company allowed to screw over 1% of their customers?
    My issue is not whether or not the majority of L4D owners are happy. But I think companies should play fair. I think companies should be honest to their customers. People were generally happy to let Bernard Madoff steal their money too. I don’t think that makes it ok.
    Is it so crazy to expect a company to deliver to their customers what they paid for? If I were to buy a 500GB harddrive, the manufacturer takes my money and send me a 400GB disk instead, should I just let it pass because “eh, I didn’t need more than 400GB anyway”? That may be true, but I still paid for 500GB, and in not delivering that to me, the company screwed me over.
    Whether or not your customers are happy to be screwed over doesn’t matter.

    The reality is the vast majority of probably even those in the boycott group would have bought the game long before they learned of the extra “promised” stuff.

    Yes, many, but not all. But does it make a difference? Is a company not obliged to deliver what people paid for, whether or not people would’ve been satisfied by less?

    The boycotters are fickle, ungrateful geeks with a hillarious-to-watch sense of entitlement.

    I don’t understand why. If I say “Give me $50 and I’ll give you A in return”, you give me $50 and I then give you B instead, then I think you have the right to be upset. Your sense of entitlement is perfectly justified. You were promised that you’d get something different for your money. The B might be super awesome, sure, but it’s still not what I said you’d get when you paid me. It doesn’t matter if 99.999% of my customers are happy with the B. It was still false advertising. I still lied to my customers.

    Keep throwing poo at valve if you like though. I’m sure most of them find it pretty amusing, as the rest of us do.

    Ah, delicious irony. I must say I find your self-righteous fanboyism amusing as well. Especially because you, who are so exceedingly happy with your purchase, still seems to be the one bursting with anger at these ungrateful people who dare to criticize your heroes.

    Honestly, I’d take you a lot more serious if you weren’t the one coming across as an angry, whining, complaining geek.

  57. Wounder says:

    Where… and I’m not saying it’s not there, I’m asking in earnest… did Valve promise to deliver something that’s not currently already in L4D1? And was there a timeline associated with that promise… as in, “by August 2009, we’ll have five new campaigns, a new set of survivors and a bunch of gameplay tweaks”?

  58. Diogo Ribeiro says:

    Why do people have a tendency to confuse future plans with personal pledges of undying commitment?

  59. Ian says:

    @ jalf: Did it say on the box/download page/whatever that for your $x that there’d be future content?

    The whole 500GB/400GB hard drive comparison isn’t the same thing at all.

  60. Diogo Ribeiro says:

    @Wounder: No. People just like to think there was such a promise.

  61. Martin Coxall says:

    If L4D2 is more than DLC for L4D, why does it look exactly like DLC for L4D?

  62. Ffitz says:

    Haha Jalf. Marvellous. Well done.

  63. Martin Coxall says:

    Also, “bugfixes”?

    That’s all Valve are working on for L4D? Fixing bugs they should have fixed a year ago? Pathetic.

  64. Lukasz says:

    @Meat Circus:
    why is that every single msg of yours is full of negativity and anger?
    It is really hard to pay attention to you.

  65. Zeb says:

    jalf- hang on a second – call me a blithering old nincompoop here, but isn’t there a new l4d campaign about to be released later this month? And what was the survival pack if not dlc delivered free-gratis to the loyal fans / baying masses? What exactly is it that valve isn’t doing?

    peaces!

  66. TotalBiscuit says:

    @Martin Coxall – Probably because anyone who judges a game based purely on how it looks is pretty damn stupid? Yes, that does mean you.

    Debunk the Episode 1, 2 and 3 being described by Valve as ‘Half Life 3′ and the hundreds of other sequels that have looked very similar to the originals bar some updated graphics, monsters, weapons and maps and then we can talk. Until then, your so-called precedent and by extension your nerdrage, is meaningless.

  67. Greg Wild says:

    @Meat Circus: The sheer level of content is easily double that of L4D, if not more. You honestly expect Valve to commit its whole content design team to adding to L4D for free/cheap considering the level of work is apparently (and if the visiting boycotters are right, evidently) that of a new retail release?

    That just self-righteous, greedy nonsense. Valve have bills to pay, too, you know.

  68. Noc says:

    Also, it’s pretty clear from the post that it’s bugfixes and new content.

    But since the continued prevalence of bugs was one of the reasons people thought that L4D support was being dropped, they showed the boycott team that they were, in fact, working on ironing the bugs out. As well as working on new content, and such.

    And presumably their new confidence in L4D2 is due to, after having played the damn thing, being satisfied that it’s not just L4D DLC wrapped in money. Which seems to be the entire point of the exercise, really.

  69. Matt says:

    @ Greg Wild:

    Not siding one way or the other, but it “double the content” accurate? Technically, if they replace 4 survivors with 4 other survivors, you get the same amount of content, no? Being able to choose 8 survivor models among 4 players would be closer to double content… or am I looking at it the wrong way… If I buy a can of Pepsi, and then I buy a Sprite, the Sprite isn’t double the content of the Pepsi. They’re both awesome drinks, but quantitatively they are equal, unless I got both for a 2 for 1 deal… right?

  70. Ian says:

    The best part is where the L4D2 boycott leaders went from justified, rational crusaders fighting for the common man to brainwashed sell-outs who couldn’t find their arses with both hands.

  71. phuzz says:

    So the last post on Mr Joe’s site says he’s going to bed, which I assume was a while ago, and since then, RPS has posted about him and by the looks of things lots of people here have given him money (those who aren’t trying to kill each other while not in the game, sillies!).

    I now imagine him waking up tomorrow, checking his pay pal and finding 000′s of dollars (in my mind, he falls off his chair with a big grin on his face).

    Can’t wait for the next entry in this soap opera :)

  72. CJohnson03 says:

    This is hilarious, who else thinks it’s awesome that Gabe actually finds time to respond to fan emails, and does so in hilarious fashion?

  73. Frankie The Patrician[PF] says:

    I’m probably repeating someone else, but I don’t have the time to read it all:
    1. One of the reasons why they will release a new game instead of a DLC (apart from being far too big for a DLC) is there just MUST be the prediction that such a gameplay changing DLC would displease many players irreversibly, so there wouldn’t be enough players to play with (~bad for newcomers). Hence the compatibility of these two titles.

    2. People keep comparing TF2 and L4D, but it’s different. TF2 is more of an ad for Valve and it works as a f2p MMO (Guild Wars/APB style) just without the hub cities, shops etc.; the way L4D is constructed does not allow that, so it might end up in a loss (or it already did).

  74. Alaric says:

    This whole affair is win.

  75. John Walker says:

    Let’s have this thread dedicated to discussing the story of Joe and Gabe, and not yet more discussion over L4D2 not being free enough, eh?

    Take it to the forum, or any of the 90238342234912378324634 other places where it’s happening. It makes me want to be dead, and I’d prefer to be alive.

  76. Matt says:

    Sorry John. :(

  77. Duffin says:

    I am not a boycotter, or ever was…. but from a boycott perspective I don’t see how this changes anything. They have still made no concrete anouncements about L4D and I don’t see how stating “they are actively pursuing bug fixes for Left 4 Dead” changes anything. The boycotters want more CONTENT simple as, if Valve just came out and said, “yeh we are planning full size campaigns as DLC in addition to Crash Course” that would calm alot of angry men, but still they haven’t. If anything this is only going to stir boycotters up even more.

    Don’t get me wrong, I am eagerly looking foward to L4D2 but Crash Course certainly looks like something jumbled together since the boycott movement started and conveniently labelled as making Versus mode more accesible in order to cover the fact its actually not even half a campaign in length.

  78. DarkNoghri says:

    @Wounder

    http://www.videogamer.com/news/valve_details_post_left_4_dead_launch_plans.html

    “Valve intends to support hotly anticipated zombie survival shooter Left 4 Dead post-release with new characters, new maps, new achievements and new weapons in order to grow the community, Gabe Newell has revealed.”

    Thus far, we’ve gotten no new characters, one new map (no, I don’t think the survival maps count as new, and DA/DT versus should have been in from the beginning (they still have major issues, as well)), one new gamemode, some new achievements, and no new weapons.

    Yes, I’m aware that this is not a promise. This is Valve, however, and I took them at their word. Almost every review of L4D mentioned that it was short on content, but that it was Valve, so that would probably be rectified.

    I’m not a part of the boycott, but I’ve been waffling on whether to buy the sequel. Valve actually fixing some gameplay bugs would go a long way to persuading me to (at least eventually) pick up L4D2. Thus I am waiting for great anticipation for the Crash Course release. Patches/content that come with it will probably make my decision.

  79. gobion says:

    @Lukasz yep its my real name :)
    http://red-redemption.com/team/#gobion

    My dad had a thing for ancient celtic names :)

  80. DarkNoghri says:

    You have my apologies, John. You just ninja posted on me.

    On topic, I do think this is hilarious, and this type of thing is one of the reasons I love Valve.

    I’m too cheap to actually donate, however.

  81. army of none says:

    HA. This is amazing. Things like /this/ are why Valve is one of my favorite developers. Humor and tact together in one tasty mix.

  82. gobion says:

    John Walker says: “It makes me want to be dead, and I’d prefer to be alive.”

    Agreed! :)

  83. Columbus007 says:

    This is a win-win-win situation that is full of win.

    Joe wins! He got thousands of people to see his campaign. If he does raise enough money to fly Gabe and Erik to Australia (which I’m sure he will if he raised $1000 before this got a lot of coverage), and they agree to fly (which they should, they’d let everyone down if they didn’t), then he gets them to playtest his campaign, which can only make it better.

    Gabe and Erik win! Free trip to Australia! (Plus a tonne of good-will)

    Everyone who contributes win! They paid what they saw fit to have some fun on the internet. Plus, with the help of Gabe and Erik, maybe Joe’s L4D campaign will be that much better.

    Thumbs up!

  84. Lilliput King says:

    Sweet name Gobion!

  85. Persus-9 says:

    I couldn’t decide what to say to this so here’s three comments for the price of one: -

    Comment 1: It’s a TRAP! As Fade pointed out Robin Walker has chipped in $100, can’t you see what’s going to happen!?!! He’s paying to get Gabe out the country so he can fire everyone again! If this happens then Robin will finally get his way and all hope for L4D, L4D2, TF2, Portal 2 and HL:E3 is lost!!

    Comment 2: This is so god damn unfair!! Why should ingrates like Gabe and Erik get to see Joe’s work early and get a tour of where it all happens and get to meet Joe and get a free trip to Brisbane just because they were dicks and decided to boycott Joe’s campaign for no good reason?!! How about something for those of us who aren’t selfish troll huh?!

    Comment 3: This is full of win. Last time I saw this it was at $17 after being up on Kotaku for quite a while and I didn’t think he’d make it but now I’ve woken up this afternoon and it looks like a sure thing. People coming together like this to do really silly things like this make me feel all warm and fuzzy.

  86. Tom says:

    LMFAO!!!!! that’s brilliant.
    Only Valve.

  87. TotalBiscuit says:

    @Matt – You’re treating the survivors as if they’re just new models. One of the frequently overlooked aspects of L4D that made it stand out was the stellar voice-acting, along with the sheer amount of it, particularly if you were playing singleplayer. This added atmosphere and gave each character a fleshed out persona. 4 new, fleshed out personas (particularly since they said there would be more voice-acting in L4D2 than there was in L4D) is, for some people, tangible content.

  88. Tom says:

    “We’re boycotting your campaign” LLLMMMAAAOOOOO

  89. Rinox says:

    Someone should really start a Steam group to boycott Joe’s campaign. He’ll be at a million billion dollars in no time!

  90. Heliosicle says:

    Latest count before he went to bed was about $950

    pretty good if you ask me..

  91. TeeJay says:

    Hstory repeats itself, the first time as tragedy, the second as farce (att. Marx)

    History doesn’t always repeat itself. Sometimes it just screams, “Why don’t you listen to me?” and lets fly with a big stick. (John W. Campbell Jr)

    History doesn’t repeat itself, but it does rhyme. (Mark Twain)

    History is an angel falling backward into the future (Laurie Anderson)

  92. Lunaran says:

    I can think of at least seven hundred thousand worthier causes to raise money for than “fly rich men to Australia” just off the top of my head.

  93. Stupoider says:

    It’s moments like this that make you proud to be a fan of Valve. :D

  94. DF7 says:

    I donated $5, just to be a part of this story, which will undoubtedly become part of the legendary Valve tale.

  95. drewski says:

    Sorry, John Walker. I hope Joe gets enough money for the flights, and then Gabe and Erik pay for their own flights and donate the money to charity. Because they should reward the effort of Joe, and go see his campaign, but they don’t need the money and other people do.

    It’s a win win.

  96. Alastayr says:

    Group created:
    Boycott Gabe and Erik Boycotting Joe’s Custom Campaign at http://steamcommunity.com/groups/BGAEBJCC/

    I’m going to steal a picture from up there if no one mind, m’kay?

  97. Rinox says:

    @ Alastayr

    You’ve got yourself a first member! Also, managed to steal someone’s credit card off them to give Joe 15 bucks. Godspeed! Let’s boycott this boycott!

  98. Alastayr says:

    @ Rinox
    That’s the spirit!

  99. Nick says:

    This made me smile, thanks for pointing it out.

    <3 Valve

  100. Vinraith says:

    @John Walker

    Apologies, didn’t even see your post up there, since it’s not colored the way RPS posts usually are. Having observed Mark and Jalf’s exchange I didn’t realize the moderation considerations of the thread had changed mid-way. I suspect I’m not alone in that, maybe you could place your (entirely reasonable) request at the end of the article text so no one could miss it?

  101. Psychopomp says:

    I like where this debacle is going.

  102. Wastrel says:

    I’m hoping that Gabe and Erik will fly over with their own money, and then all the money Joe raised can be sent to Child’s Play (as judging by the site that’s what the majority chose). As Lunaran said, there’s better causes to raise money for than flying rich men around.

    That said, this is really awesome of Valve. <3

  103. Tei says:

    I have created the group “Boycott Mila Kunis”.

    http://steamcommunity.com/groups/boym4k

    I will make co-leaders, the first ones to join the group.

  104. dingo says:

    Damn that will be expensive!
    Gabe alone needs a full row of seats. :p

  105. Anthony Damiani says:

    Is it too late to boycott unless they name the sequel Left Five Dead?

  106. Jelly says:

    Donated the couple of pounds that were left in my paypal. Would love to see this happen, and I bet Gabe and Erik are awesome enough to go with it.

  107. Vinraith says:

    Am I the only one disquieted by the idea that so many people will donate money to send Valve’s (very wealthy) CEO on vacation? Gabe can pay for his own plane flight, thanks.

    Better yet, he can stay home and work on Episode 3 and Portal 2. THAT I almost would be willing to donate money towards.

  108. TCM says:

    @Vinraith: I’m sure they can pay for the trip themselves, and probably will, I think it’s just an interest gauge tool.

  109. Vinraith says:

    In that case I want to know where the donation box that says “my interest is in Valve getting back to making Half-Life universe games” is located.

  110. Dominic White says:

    It wasn’t Valve that set up the donation box, and having them fly over wasn’t their idea either.

    It’s just a a little joke over email that has grown into a larger, more elaborate and fantastic joke.

  111. Rinox says:

    I’m really curious to see how much money Joe will have amassed once he wakes up. I’m guessing at least 1700 bucks, if the trend from when it started continues more or less. I’m sure the money will end u with Child’s Play regardless of whether they actually come over or not. Which is fine.

  112. jsutcliffe says:

    @Vinraith

    What if L4D _is_ the HL universe, and just as soon as we get rid of the Combine the zombies try to take over?

    Or maybe the zombies took over in the years Freeman was away and the Combine saved humanity from them to gain our trust.

    But yeah, more Half Life please.

  113. ChampionHyena says:

    Re: Half-Life 2 universe, I once had an idea in my head about replacing all the zombies in Left 4 Dead with the HL2 metrocop models. I theorized it as taking place just before the Citadel exploded, with frantic unled metrocops running at Gordon full-tilt, trying to punch him and kick him in the groin until he died.

  114. Funky Badger says:

    Far, far more interested in L4D than HL.

    (Valve have evoled FPS gameplay with L4D, the guts of any HL would need a radical rework or look, well, prehistoric)

  115. Roritharr says:

    I’ve just donated 20$ to this guy, simply because i’d love to be in his shoes and wish him best of luck.

  116. NeonBlackJack says:

    I’ll donate a few bucks to this. Why not. It’s more entertaining than the cup of coffee I would otherwise get.
    but.
    I’m relying on you, RPS, to keep me informed of the outcome of my donation!

  117. NeonBlackJack says:

    Also, @ChampionHyena, that’s a great mod idea and I would surely play it with gleeeee!

  118. Greg Smith says:

    C’mon guys…everyone knows Valve don’t have any spare time for any other games…they are too busy making fun stuff for all of us playing TF2….LOL

  119. Johnny Law says:

    Looks like contributions from this point will go to Child’s Play if the airplane trip doesn’t pan out. What the heck, I threw in a few bucks.

  120. Fumarole says:

    Valve is full of win it seems.

    Ever notice how some people always post something negative? Methinks Gabe should fly around the globe and give them all hugs.

  121. Noc says:

    @Fumarole: We’re boycotting hugs.

  122. Lukasz says:

    oh man.
    370$ more and he will reach the target. awesome!

  123. Lambchops says:

    I’ll donate some funny virtual foreign money.

    This a brilliantly awesome story – I sincerly hope that they do end up going to Australia.

  124. mejobloggs says:

    Donating…. Not because I know anything at all about this mod, just the situation is pretty funny and I think it could end up quite entertaining

  125. Lambchops says:

    The guy that runs serverFFS just donated $500 dollars, which means . . .

    Joe has raised the required funds! Good for him.

    now it just remains to be seen whether the guys fly out there or not.

  126. ZedLab says:

    Ok, updates on this hilariously epic situation for my RPS comrades:

    When asked how much he would need to raise for these two return tickets, Gabe replied to him via email:

    =====
    Well, a couple of minutes on Expedia resulted in this:

    from $1211 Roundtrip avg/person (from $2422 total)
    12:00 pm Depart Seattle (SEA)
    Arrive Brisbane (BNE) 7:45 am +2 days Mon 23-Nov
    Duration: 25hr 45mn
    Qantas Airways 3746 / 16
    Connect in Los Angeles (LAX)

    So Erik and I aren’t in too much danger.
    =====

    Oh contraire mon frere! With the help of a huge $500 donation from serverFFS, Joe has at the latest count raised:

    $2,560.22 dollars. TWO THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED AND SIXITY US DOLLARS. (and 22 cents)

    So whatever happens now, you can be sure that Gabe and Erik have to do something in response. The fact he’s raised an amount they thought impossible in just a couple of days from random strangers across the interwebs demands it.

    Joe has said that any further donations will go towards a camera that he will use to film Gabe and Erik touring his house. This tickles me greatly.

    I’m going to have to leave it there, because I’m laughing too much at all of this. But let me just finish with saying – the internet is fucking awesome at times.

    SPARTAAAAAA!

  127. Lambchops says:

    From Joe’s site:

    “Just a quick post to say I urged the previously-skeptical Gabe Newell to view the site again.

    His response?

    Uh-oh.”

  128. Lukasz says:

    A great response.

  129. Rinox says:

    Looks like Gabe and Erik might be making a trip soon! Or at the very least, do something extremely awesome to justify their previous boycott attemtps. ;-)

  130. apnea says:

    @Lunaran

    “I can think of at least seven hundred thousand worthier causes to raise money for than “fly rich men to Australia” just off the top of my head.”

    Indeed. Or “buy a camera for affluent First Worlder”.

  131. Dracko says:

    but what about ma zombie games, apnea?

  132. Fumarole says:

    Yeah, and I can think of several hundred thousand worthier things to do than be cynical in the internet. When this is over, Child’s Play will be several thousand dollars ahead and this Brisbane chap will have a job at Valve, mark my words.

    At least now I know where Gabe’s first few hug stops should be.

  133. El_MUERkO says:

    Saturday, September 12, 2009 – Gabe’s response

    Just a quick post to say I urged the previously-skeptical Gabe Newell to view the site again.

    His response?

    Uh-oh.

    Posted by Lacabra at 5:24 AM

    hehe

  134. Boser says:

    Lunaren: “I can think of at least seven hundred thousand worthier causes to raise money for than “fly rich men to Australia” just off the top of my head.”
    Apena “Indeed. Or ‘buy a camera for affluent First Worlder’.”

    What a mind-numbingly stupid argument. Why throw a few quid to a homeless guy when you can donate to a city levelled by an earthquake? Why bother spending money to help out a single natural disaster when you can give aid to Darfur? Why give aid to Darfur when you can put money into advancing lung cancer treatments? Why put money into lung cancer charities when you can fund a cure for Malaria?

    Just because a few gaming geeks on the internet throw a few bucks this guy’s way it doesn’t mean all those other charitable causes are going to lose out. It probably means a couple less pints down the pub for them, or not buying that mediocre “Classic” PC title from a local store’s bargain bin this week.

    Seriously, screw you both and the morally righteous high horses you rode in bareback on. It’s not your place to judge what other people do with their money. If you feel it’s such a perversion of generosity, then why don’t you go donate 10% of your bank account to the Red Cross instead of whining about other people’s actions on a freaking gaming site.

    Jesus wept.

  135. PHeMoX says:

    @Fumarole: “Valve is full of win it seems.

    Ever notice how some people always post something negative? Methinks Gabe should fly around the globe and give them all hugs.”

    Ever noticed how most Valve fanboys don’t seem to even think at all when their favorite developer milks a franchise in an overly obvious manner?

    Also.. for your info, it’s easy to say people are negative all the time, when the right moment to complain is when you don’t agree. Guess that simply happens often. Why bother commenting when everything is fine and dandy?? Seems like a waste of time to me to be honest, even though critical comments often go unnoticed as well… say with Blizzard and Diablo III. The arrogant bastards. :P

  136. Dominic White says:

    Dear god, man, give it a rest. I’m not even particularly a Valve fan. Hell, I avoid buying stuff off Steam if I can get off Gamersgate/Impulse, and I never really got into TF2 or L4D, but I still think that they need to start a global free hugs project, because some of you guys seem to have pure vitriol running through your veins.

    This thread is all the proof anyone should need. How can anyone be angry/bitter about this? It’s funny, it’s innocent, it’s nerdy.

    How can anyone be so angry all the time? I can’t even be angry for an hour without feeling mentally exhausted…

  137. Vinraith says:

    @Dominic

    Give this thread an objective read through and tell me which came first, the “vitriolic boycotters” or the boycott baiting. Then tell me who’s “angry all the time.”

  138. Savage Designer says:

    Ah, so this man has figured out how to transform potential lulz into cash. Good for him! I’m sure this is a Red Letter day for scammers everywhere!

  139. DarkNoghri says:

    According to joystiq (http://www.joystiq.com/2009/09/11/tired-of-boycotts-donate-money-and-fly-gabe-newell-to-australia/), Valve has confirmed that if the money has been raised (and it has been), Gabe would be flying to Australia.

  140. Basil says:

    I for one would like to see proof of what Valve supposedly “promised” about L4D, because I can’t remember anything that could justify this fascinating display of stupidity on part of the boycotters.

  141. Wedge says:

    I suppose RPS itself hasn’t gotten used to the fact there’s no reasoning with these AIM, it’s kind of a shame so many commenters and even the editors actually try to bother leaving responses. Just because a troll can spell, doesn’t make them any less of one. Really they’re far worse, because it can give the illusion of there being potential for actual discourse.

  142. andrew says:

    Just for interest, the “fly Gabe Newell fund ” now is more than $600 over budget (ie, they have enough money to pay for the flights with getting on towards $1000 left over).

  143. Benny says:

    um… I mean, it’s not super hard to guess, I guess, but should Gabe’s email be displayed in the “does that mean I have to fly you there” email.

    Or is this some private joke that everyone already knew?

  144. MD says:

    It’s a publicly available address, Benny, used for correspondence with the unwashed masses.

Comment on this story

XHTML: Allowed code: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Respond to our gibber

Read our finest words

A Grim Couple Of Hours With Akaneiro: Demon Hunter

Search for clues

Browse the archive