Rock, Paper, Shotgun

The Sunday Papers

Posted by Kieron Gillen on September 20th, 2009 at 2:36 pm.

Share:

Sundays are for trying to get a collection of interesting mainly-games-related reading from across the week posted before you have to run to the cinema, hoping you don’t – in your haste – find yourself including a link to an edited version of a pop song that you’re sad the full-length version isn’t easily available yet.

Failed.

__________________


Related Stories:

__________________

« RPS Bargain Bucket: Gratuitously Saintly | Aion Release Trailer, Are You Playing? »

.

119 Comments »

  1. dsmart says:

    I uploaded the demo today actually to match the current retail 1.00.35 build. Thus far only WorthPlaying has the demo update.

    Anyway, the previous 1.00.21 was based on an older pre-release version (the released version was 1.00.26). So I figured I’d update the demo to match the current release build so that nobody has an excuse for buying the game without trying the demo first.

  2. jackflash says:

    Derek, I was just reading your piece. While I agree with your point about America losing its manners (that’s as far as I’ve gotten so far) and game reviewers going for shock value over substance, you should read some book reviews from 100 or even 150 years ago (from America or England). They were often far, far more merciless (and personally insulting) than what you see today. Something to keep in perspective.

  3. Kadayi: I think you may have just proved John’s point.

    KG

  4. jameskond says:

    I actually might go to Fuck Buttons in October, there new album is pretty rad, less noise = more hearable/less earpain

  5. Matosh says:

    Wait a minute, you featured me in The Sunday Papers? I wasn’t aware anyone actually read my blog. Mr Gillen, I fear you’ve imposed upon me an audience that my level of writing cannot justify… I thank you anyway :-)

    Guess I should work on the blog more, make it worth reading, huh? Challenge accepted!

    Also, folks, if you’re at all interested in RPGs, at least play the demo of Spirit Engine 2. And then when you like it, if you have any pull with the Steam people go and pester them to put it up.

  6. Karry says:

    Whats with the huge ads on the main page ? Now the site doesnt fit in width of browser window…

  7. Radiant says:

    So, ODST, made Dave Taurus quit?

  8. Radiant says:

    If you like to write: write.
    Good writing will always find it’s audience regardless of ambition.

    If you want to chase hits start a porn blog.

    http://www.tittaycitay.com/

  9. David says:

    Jackflash makes a good point. Game devs get off lightly compared to creators of books, music, and other media that’s been around for, you know, more than thirty years. That said, shifts in the way media is criticised probably has a lot to do with it. (Not saying this is what Derek’s original post was decrying; just as a general comment.)

    Menaker’s piece on the neurotic business of bringing new books into the world is right on the money.

  10. Doug F says:

    “Wait, aren’t we supposed to hate Derek Smart? Or have I read video game sites for too long?”

    Very late in responding to this one, but I think we’re supposed to make our own minds up about the guy.

    • kr8 says:

      I read approximately one third of the Derek Smart’s post, which I imagine is more than most people. It was badly written, arrogant beyond belief and the arguments were strung together with duct tape. Why Kieron linked to it is beyond me.

      It also suffered from angry old man syndrome. Which I generally like, but it has to be tongue in cheek, otherwise it’s just sad.

  11. Tam-Lin says:

    You might try Bookslut; I’ll admit I don’t read many of their book recommendations, but they’ve got a similarish vibe.

  12. Pi says:

    Godhand! YES! That, my friends, is a motherfucking game!

  13. Quirk says:

    I have a God Hand problem.

    I played it through on Easy, and won, and it felt good.
    So I played it through on Normal, and won, and it felt very good.
    And I played it through on Easy for a Kick Me sign run, and that was pretty fun too.
    And then I played it on Easy again just because it’s a hell of a game and a lot of fun.
    And then I played it on Hard. And I got about halfway through, and it was ball-bustingly hard every step of the way, and then life intervened and I took a break. A long break.

    I feel as though at some point I should complete the trip. Fight to the finish on Hard. But I still remember that last boss fight. More precisely, I remember it on Normal, and that was one of the most evil encounters I’ve had in a videogame. I fear it on Hard. I fear it with a great fear, and I have grown weak in the meantime. (Although, I can still pick it up on Normal and do very well for a few levels until I feel slightly unsure of my footing, by which point I’m stuck on Level Die and evil things happen to me in a swift and uncompromising fashion. Playing through a good chunk of the game on Hard has helped me lose the ability to get beaten up just enough on Normal to keep it from brutalising me.)

    So, to those who’ve completed it on Hard: how was that final boss fight? Is it as brutal as I’ve been dreading? Is it ever to be contemplated except as the culmination of a several-week God Hand binge?

  14. bill says:

    While I’m not likely to play All Aspect Warfare, and I do feel that Derek for some reason always comes off as a little irritating in print, I do agree with at least one of his points.

    A well written review will tell you if you’d like the game, regardless of whether the reviewer liked it or not. I’ve read several reviews (and not all by KG ;-) ) that were generally negative, but made me want to play them. Or positive reviews that let me know id never like that game.

    After reading Gamespot/IGN for a long time, it was quite a shock when i came to RPS (and a few other sites) to discover that there was an entire universe of other games out there that i’d never even SEEN. What?? Where did all these games come from?!?!

    Then again, just like every game can’t be perfect, every review can’t be perfect either. Even good reviewers have bad days.

    • bill says:

      …and now reading Dave Taurus’s exit letter maybe says why… “I emailed several websites and magazines to ask if they’d like an import review of the best/most interesting game this year (Demon’s Souls) and nobody was interested until someone else reviewed it and got a load of hits.”

  15. Tony M says:

    Cliffski’s video is good, but he doesn’t have Dejobaan’s hypnotic muppet eyebrows.

    Tony

  16. RogB says:

    @Derek

    the blog post was immense, and I have to say I didnt manage it all, but I do have to say that you credit the customer with too much intelligence. i dont know if its because you are too busy trying to vilify the reviews but this statement:

    >>>>>>If you write an objective and well written review that conveys a factual and unbiased slant, the reader will obtain enough information to make his/her own decision even if reviews don’t form the basis of their buying decisions. Now more than ever, most – sensible – gamers, buy games based on consensus in which reviews play little or no part because they realize that reviews are based on the opinions of a select group of people who may or may not be professional.
    >>>>>

    … I do not believe to be true. i wish it was, but almost every comments thread I read is about the score at the end regardless of whats been written before it.
    If you take these people out of the buyer base as a ‘vocal minority’, the largest buyer base seems to be the people that buy heavily advertised stuff, regardless of reviews. The big names with huge promotions (see Assassins creed, Need for speed, transformers etc).
    Your ‘intelligent review savvy’ buyer who actually reads reviews properly I feel is a very small percentage of the overall buying population. to quote an old colleague ‘you could put shit in a box on the shelf and it’d sell with good marketing’.

    this has nothing to do with the quality of reviews that is the main point, I just thought i’d mention my take on buyers. (as a developer of 10 years).

  17. pepper says:

    Derek, You are correct about the reviews. I mostly listen to what my friends have to say about games. Since nowadays I tend to enjoy LAN playing, or very organized(tournaments, etc) more then just random MP.

  18. dhex says:

    fuck buttons are really great live.

  19. AndrewC says:

    Who is Bill Harris? I’m afraid I don’t know him. It’s just that, reading lines like ‘ I would much rather talk to children’ without any prior context of where the writer is coming from give off a real Michael Jackson vibe.

  20. Oh man, John would bitch slap John Constantine :/

  21. Kadayi: Yeah, but that's bullshit.

    KG

Page 2 of 2«12

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

GamersGate has loads of PC games.

Respond to our gibber

  • j : “05. Which wasn't too big a deal.” on The Mystery Of Dungeon
  • Vinraith : “"There’s room for both" I agree wholeheartedly, but I'm a little concerned that developers and, particularly, publishers may not.” on DragonLC: Return To Ostagar
  • archonsod : “There's room for both, and it's not like there's some law somewhere that says expansion packs must be so big while DLC must be this ...” on DragonLC: Return To Ostagar
  • Diverse : “Great interview. I've been playing Cactus' games for years and am always eager to see what he comes up with next. I was very surprised ...” on “Unexplored Territory”: The Cactus Interview
  • JKjoker : “See, the thing about anti-conspiracie~ rebuttals, is that they very rarely take in the whole picture selectively denying reality to see what they wish to ...” on DragonLC: Return To Ostagar

Browse the archive

Buy classic PC games from Good Old Games, please.