Rock, Paper, Shotgun

Tyrantsaurus Hex: WWII Global Conflict Demo

By Kieron Gillen on March 5th, 2010 at 11:45 am.

Ooh, doesn't look good for the forces of Democracy. Will they turn it around? Let's hope so. I've got a bad feeling about that Hitler fella.

By putting on my Tim Stone hat – which is a handsome cross between a deerstalker and a camoflaged Brodie helmet – I can bring you news of the Strategic Command WWII Global Conflict demo’s release, in advance of the full game. It features the whole world circa 1942, at the high water-mark of Axis power. Will the allies pull it back? Well, they won’t in the demo, as it’s limited to two months of game time. Poor Western Democracies. Sad face.

Er… tralier follows.

__________________

« | »

, , , .

18 Comments »

  1. qwegfsdv says:

    :/
    I thought this game would be about dinosaurs… All I got was a TBS for WW2.
    I want a good dinosaur game.

  2. HermitUK says:

    So all the RPS contributors are just Kieron in various different pieces of headwear. Who’d have thunk it.

  3. MarkN says:

    Is a dearstalker someone who follows old ladies?

  4. Dan says:

    I didn’t think that trailer was any tralier than other trailers.

  5. Web Cole says:

    I’m not seeing any dinosaurs… or hexes!

    I feel this is very misleading.

    (Though your hat sounds splendid.)

  6. Senethro says:

    World War: Global Conflict is one hella tautologous title.

    Still, at least its not World of War or Global of Conflict.

  7. Lacero says:

    I’m confused. I’ve not loaded a game and been presented with the enemy killing me before. The player usually goes first.

    This must be what it’s like to be an AI.

  8. Noc says:

    WHEN FLOPPY DISKS MAKE WAR

  9. Burp says:

    This looks like the gaming equivalent of “Simpsons already did it” (and better), with Hearts Of Iron II and Arsenal Of Democracy being the Simpsons.

    Also, trailers with movies instead of gameplay = teh suck.

    Case closed.

    • TC says:

      SC is expensive bu it is IMO by far the best and most enjoyable grand strategic WW2 game out there….mainly because it has just the right level of abstraction to keep you involved in tech and production decisions but actually is accessable and can be played in a few hours with a satisfying result.

  10. Bonedwarf says:

    I have the earlier Strat Com games and while overpriced they are awesome.

  11. Shadrach says:

    Looks a bit too old-school for me. But seriously if RPS covers this, they should do something on Gary Grigsby’s War in the East coming out this year from Matrix Games. Really looking forward to it.
    http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tt.asp?forumid=696

Comment on this story

XHTML: Allowed code: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Respond to our gibber

  • Martel : “Forgot to mention, I own my own rabid desire for board games to you Rab. Been reading RPS for a long time, and cardboard children ...” on Cardboard Children: Change Or Die
  • Big Red : “Yeah right I bet he doesnt even read the comments, it all about him thats why, Hey Florence are you reading this..knock once if you ...” on Cardboard Children: Change Or Die
  • Homercleese : “As well as taking language seriously most RPSers I think take their games seriously and know what type of game it is they want to ...” on Heavy Gear Assault Enters The Kickstarter Arena
  • Boronian : “Yeah, I never got the feeling that boardgames are weird or something. Everybody loves them in Germany. I'm always surprised about how much energy Rab ...” on Cardboard Children: Change Or Die
  • Martel : “I have to say, Wil Wheaton and Tabletop was the only way I was able to convince my wife to sit down and play some ...” on Cardboard Children: Change Or Die

Read our finest words

Wot I Think: Sanctum 2

Search for clues

Browse the archive