NCSoft Vs The World: Wildstar Preview

By Alec Meer on August 17th, 2011 at 8:15 am.

“Cool story, Gaffney.” So Wildstar lead Jeremy Gaffney, co-creator of Turbine and now heading up NCSoft’s MMO dev supergroup Carbine Studios, repeatedly mock-chastises himself when unveiling their first game to the media. He’s making promises we’ve heard so many times, about so many massively multiplayer games that ultimately didn’t live up to their wild hype: this is “the deepest, richest MMO ever,” it “lets players play how they want to play”, “this is something new.” You know how that song goes. Cool story, Gaffney. This guy though, right here and now, aims to back up his grandiose claims, right here and now. Carbine are finally ready to show off fantasy/sci-fi hybrid MMO Wildstar. It goes a little something like this.

There’s probably much you’ll recognise when you first clap eyes on Wildstar. The colourful, overtly fantastical world; the exaggerated characters and animations, the middle-bottom icon row; the rooted-to-the-spot NPCs proffering quests and sales… By Carbine’s own admission, Wildstar embraces most of the well-known MMO tropes (though apparently tweaked and improved) in addition to adding its own new ideas. They might be hoping to reinvent the wheel to some extent, but they clearly reckon it still needs to be something that’s round and spins if it’s to draw a crowd.

It might look a little WoW-like, and even play WoW-like on a basic level, but there’s a ton of thoughtful and genuinely bold stuff built on top of that familiar foundation. It’s perhaps tempting to linger on the fusion of fantasy, sci-fi and steampunk, rendered as something of a high-detail ‘toonland, but that theme and aesthetic really isn’t the major force at play here. Why we should play attention to Wildstar is its concept of playstyles, aka Paths – an additional layer of specialism on top of race, class, haircut and all that, and one that’s designed to shape the game as a whole depending on what kind of MMO gamer you are.

Combat, Collecting, Building and Exploring: pick one when you create your character, and that’s going to play a big part in how you gain experience, find loot and level up. Rather than simply doing the quest or killing fields treadmill, in theory you’re making your own path. If you’re a Combat guy, certain points and objects enable you to incite, essentially, a public quest: a wave of angry monsters to chop/shoot/magic to pieces, building in numbers and ferocity and eventually to big-arse boss fights. (You can apparently tackle at least some of these solo, by the way). Concentrate on this and scrolling impatiently quest text will essentially be a thing of the past for you, because instead you’re setting up your own fights and resultant rewards.

The game will also offer you the option of on-the-spot challenges – kill a monster particularly speedily and a message asks if you fancy taking out, say, five more of them within five minutes for a bonus package of XP and loot. In other words: a reason to hang around pestering mobs, and hopefully making what is, in other games, called grinding feel a whole lot more dynamic and purposeful. It’s the game throwing down a gauntlet to you specifically. Will you accept?

I’ve been hands on with the earliest levels of Wildstar, and certainly these on-the-spot challenges always managed to divert my interest, had me focus doggedly on beating them in preference to pursuing whatever quest I was otherwise on. Hard to say how well this will hold up over time – it’ll likely depend on how tough the challenges are. Five in five minutes ain’t too taxing, but ramp that up to where it’s only borderline possible for me to pull it off and the ol’ itch to triumph against adversity is likely to grab me hard.

Combat generally, by the way (as shared by all playstyles, regardless of how much they want to engage with monster-bothering), is along familiar MMO lines, but a touch more dynamic and reactive. Rather than snoresome auto-attack, players are in there blow-by-blow, and able to dodge looming special attacks with a bit of timely double-tapping of the backwards key. Time your evade right and your enemy will be tired out by its futile assault, rendering it temporarily more vulnerable. On top of this momentum, a bonus state achieved by efficient and rapid fighting. Essentially, if you fight better the game will make you a better fighter – which means it pays to fully involve yourself in combat rather than grind through with memorised button patterns and half an eye on Twitter.

The other playstyle on show was Exploring, which I’ll describe momentarily. As Gaffney observes, most of us are likely to fall primarily into one of the four camps they’ve identified. Of the two still unseen, Collecting is going deep into the game’s lore and/or achievement whoring via finding reams of hidden data stashes, reading every last piece of quest and ancillary text and the like. Building has you both contributing to the growth of settlements (don’t know yet if this is in a permanent, major, UO or Galaxies-like way or something more transitory – I’m meeting Carbine tomorrow and will inquire) and fostering good relations with other players and assorted NPCs – it’s the social element of MMOs, in other words, with a for-now still fairly cryptic construction element there too.

Exploring, meanwhile, is totally my ‘type’ – wandering the land over, striving to reach inaccessible places, obsessively scouring every last cavern, getting to somewhere with an epic view just for the pure pleasure of it. In Wildstar, wanderlust has tangible rewards. A Locator device, available only to characters with that playstyle, gives hints of nearby secret areas and objects, and making your way to them will result in xp, cash and/or gear.

Again, it’s a chance to go off-piste, to do your own thing rather than stick slavishly to the quest run. Nosing at it, following leads, I stumbled into bonus quests such as a chasing a floating spatial anomaly, which granted me mega-jump powers that enabled me to reach the top of towering spire. For doing this, the game gifted me some gloves and experience. I hadn’t had to kill 10 rats to do this. I’d instead wandered away from the mobs, to the edges of the map, and I’d found things to do. Another asked me to plant a locator beacon on the top of a high pile of boulders – inaccessible, of course. But Explorers can see/activate paths that other playstyles can’t – tracking my way to a subtly-marked point on my minimap, I found the requisite hotspot, right-clicked and a series of platforms appeared on the side of rocky tower. Up ‘em I went, and my beacon was safely planted. Ding! Gifts for me. Again, you’ll see and be able to interact with routes and challenges as an explorer that the other playstyles won’t. The game will be different for you. Tailored for you.

I’m in two minds about this. Exploring’s what I most want to do in an MMO – my best times in WoW were simply seeing how much of the world I could get to without being killed or hunting for secret spots such as the airport near Ironforge – and the idea of actually getting tangible rewards for being nosy and random is incredibly appealing. On the other hand, having it to some extent be signposted, the game gently coaxing me to certain places rather than stumbling across them from a haphazard mix of investigation and unfocused meandering, could take some of the thrill out of it. Again, it depends how it plays out across the length of the game, and in its later stages. Will I be joining throngs of other explorers placing identical beacons in identical places, or hauling myself to wind-swept ledges in the middle of nowhere, not a soul in sight? Will I be chasing predetermined map points or uncovering new territory? It’s too hard to call it for now. I’m completely onboard with the ethos behind it – let me play how I want to play, not tie my progress solely to how many monsters I kill – but I need to see how it works outside of the starting zones, once I’m free to wander Wildstar’s wider world.

And what is that wider world? Perhaps I should have led with that, but I’m convinced it’s Wildstar’s systems and mechanics that are its major talking point. Maybe that’s because I’m an Explorer, not a lore-hungry Collector. The game is set on the planet of Nexus, formerly the home of the known universe’s most technologically advanced race the Eldan. (Note: my long-abused word processor’s custom dictionary is determined to correct that to ‘Eldar’) These chaps, masters of both science and magic, have disappeared mysteriously, leaving a planet full of techno and eldritch riches ripe for plunder/exploration/nurture by a triumvirate of playable races – but with the lurking threat of whatever did for the Eldan potentially returning. Humans, the rabbit-eared, impossi-chested Aurin and the hulking, golem-esque Granok are your choices (at least as revealed so far), and beyond that you’ll have your pick of fairly familiar tank/rogue/support/etc classes – only a few of which have been revealed so far, and they are warrior, spellslinger (magic pistoleer) and esper (telepathic/kinetic sorts). Beyond that comes the aforementioned playstyle choice, which hopefully is dramatically more meaningful than what kind of fighter you are.

“We layer our world, build layer of layer of content on it. This is how we build the world to make sure we pull off the promises. There’s content everywhere and it’s content that you can play in the way you want to.” That’s the key to all of this. That you’re in a familiar MMO structure, but you’re not forced down a rote path of progression. The world is full of stuff for you to dig up and glean and endless stream of brief rewards from in the manner that you sit fit. While obviously you’ll be locked out of, say, the fighter playstyle’s horde-summoning abilities if you’re an explorer, you can get to share in another’s Alamo moment, in the same way fighters playing with you-as-explorer might get access to hidden paths you’ve uncovered.

This, in long-term practice, will perhaps be Wildstar’s making or unmaking – how every player’s pursuit of their own indulgences and hunger for reward will stitch together to create a game universe better, bolder and deeper for all its sentient denizens on a collective rather than individual level. I don’t believe for a second that they haven’t thought about this (which is perhaps why the Building playstyle isn’t on show yet).

So: cool story, Gaffney. And hey, looks like it’s not just a story. They’re onto something here: the populist MMO I can choose how to play. Let’s just hope it’s not too coldly mathematical about the four key psychologies Carbine have settled on. The socialiser, the explorer, the aggressor, the collector: these are classical ideas (paging Dr Bartle), but writ larger and more determinedly than I think we’ve ever seen before. Wildstar has much to prove still, much it’ll need to do to break down the scar tissue so many of us have built up after years of this sub-industry’s inflated promises and deflating mediocrity. Already though, Carbine have certainly proven that Wildstar should be taken entirely seriously, seen as a promise of something better. They’re trying to make this game for us, in response to our long years of complaining, theorising and wishing. Pay close attention.

__________________

« | »

, , , , .

34 Comments »

  1. sonicblastoise says:

    Comboed enemy-kill xp? Sounds like they learned something from Tabula Rasa.

  2. Lobotomist says:

    What a let down :(

    I really expected something special from Carbine Studios. I mean they were so secretive.
    One would think they are on to something.

    But here we have 1:1 EQ/WOW MMO , that lets you gain exp by other means than combat. And trust me , we seen this so many times before….

    Yawn….

  3. Crainey says:

    “which means it pays to fully involve yourself in combat rather than grind through with memorised button patterns and half an eye on Twitter.” Story of my life :) If this were true for World of Warcraft or other such generic MMORPG’s I’ve played I would have lots of max levels, however after 4 years of WoW I only have 4 level 80-85 characters.
    As for the game, it’s an MMORPG. We veterans of the genre know not to get excited, we’re so use to being let down so I guess we’ll just have to wait and see.

    Now back to waiting for the The International Dota2 competition to start, first match would appear to start in 10 minutes from now!

  4. Tei says:

    This is interesting. Too bad most people hare high on more than two roles, achiever-explorer, achiever-killer. If not enough information is given, I bet most people will choose combat. Or combat-crafting.
    This can be a interesting game.

    • Rii says:

      Yeah, from the sounds of it I’d really want a primary-secondary arrangement here. I do like the idea, though.

      And as others have mentioned, the art style is gorgeous.

    • Jockie says:

      Yeah, when I play MMO’s I like to mix things up to stop it becoming monotonous, sometimes that’s fighting a crapload of mobs, sometimes it’s running off for an explore and sometimes it taking a break to do some crafting.

      Restricting one character to one role seems in some ways a step backwards, because you make the choice on creation and then are locked into it by the sounds of things.

      I do like the sound of the indivdual mechanics to support the roles though.

    • sneetch says:

      Me too Jockie I’d like the ability to do whatever I want whenever I want rather than be “forced” to have Combat, Collecting, Building and Exploring characters. I’m guessing that these will be very much auxiallary means of adventuring rather than the main deal, one or two opportunities for each per zone.

      Still I love the style here. I’ll be eagerly watching this one.

  5. LuNatic says:

    I’m loving the art style. So pretty…

  6. Erinan says:

    Looks very good, but the preview lacks excitement of any kind :(

  7. MultiVaC says:

    The “Paths” thing seems really interesting, but they seem a little too restrictive, especially since I can see there being some overlap between them for play styles. For example, Collecting and Exploring… aren’t they both sort of weakened by having to choose between the two? Wouldn’t you want to be able to read the detailed lore about the ancient ruins you discover while you’re exploring? And how else do you collect things in games other than going around exploring and looking for them? It all seems sort of arbitrarily. Especially because you’re going to have to choose one as the first thing you do when you create a character. How many times have you started a huge RPG game and chosen some main skills at the beginning that sounded cool, but after 20 hours of playing you realize that you hate them? Here it sounds like that scenario will be taken to the extreme; the choice you make dictates what the nature of the entire game will be for you, and in MMOs the characters you make are generally very long term investments.

  8. Balm says:

    it “lets players play how they want to play”

    Will it let me to play it like DCS:A-10C Warthog? Or Minesweeper?

  9. Spinks says:

    Will be curious to hear more about the Building path, this sounds quite interesting. (But bunnygirls? really?)

  10. Richie Shoemaker says:

    Wildstar reads like a fairly typical NCSoft grind, only dressed up with pretty achievements.

  11. Dawngreeter says:

    Switching from one Path to another seems like something that really should be in the game. Otherwise, I like the idea a lot. Still, I’m not sure it’ll be enough to make the game relevant enough in the face of upcoming titles like Secret World, World of Darkness and Guild Wars 2.

    If it’s free, I’ll try it. I really hope there won’t be an up-front price barrier because there’s already too many games for my limited spare time to justify paying for a full title game that I have no idea if I’ll play for more than one afternoon.

  12. J-Spoon says:

    They might be hoping to reinvent the wheel to some extent…

    Pet peeve: “reinventing the wheel” is a bad thing. Reinventing is redundant, it’s right there in the verb! No one should hope to reinvent anything, let alone a wheel. The whole phrase is meant to convey the idea that involved parties are wasting their time inventing something that’s already been invented!

    Which is not to be taken as a personal attack on Mr. Meer by any means – it’s just that people do this all the time now, and I can’t process it as “accepted common usage.”

    This may say more about me than anyone else.

    “While they may be accused of reinventing the wheel, they reckon that…” would be so much better. God, what is wrong with me.

    • PopeJamal says:

      Apple wasn’t the first with a tablet computer. I owned an HP model in 2005.

      Reinventing the tablet computer has gone really badly for all parties involved, amirite?

  13. clownst0pper says:

    I’m too interested in Guild Wars 2 to care about anything else. Clearly they are way out in front!

  14. Kdansky says:

    Second screenshot: Tempest Keep
    Fourth screenshot: Draenei starting area. To the dot.
    Fifth: Ice Giant area in Icecrown.

    Looks like a WoW graphics update to me.

    Mandatory read because it’s incredibly fitting and eye-opening:
    http://greedygoblin.blogspot.com/2011/08/players-only-care-about-their-character.html

  15. Geger says:

    Pretty good graphics for an iphone game.

  16. derella says:

    I love the art direction(minus the bunny girl, ugh), the setting sounds fun, and the Paths sound interesting. Definitely going to follow this one and see where it goes.

  17. thjdm says:

    So this is just an MMO RPG or MMO something else too?

  18. neolith says:

    I hereby nominate “impossi-chested” for the description of the year.

  19. Howl says:

    “Good job killing that wild alien boar! I challenge you to try killing 5,000 more of them before you die of boredom…. GO!”

  20. goodgimp says:

    Exploration path sounds like a good idea marred by cowardly implementation. Way to miss the entire point of exploring.

  21. Brise Bonbons says:

    Oh dear. This really sounds like a deeply flawed idea right from the start, for all the reasons already mentioned…

    Why force me to pick one “playstyle”? That’s just idiotic, even if I can try to partner with others to experience their playstyle. And how can it be “exploration” if it’s just a matter of following dots on the minimap?

    What really gets me is the whole premise of the reveal: “hey, aren’t you guys sick of hearing about another bog-standard MMO? Well I have good news – we’re making another one! But no, listen, it’s OK! We’re Self-deprecating about it, so it’s cool!”

    No, no it’s not cool. I don’t care what cute gimmick you’ve come up with, or how many hundreds of hours of story you have, or how your game will really let us play however we want; mindlessly copy/pasting the same tired MMO formula over and over IS NOT OK IN ANY WAY.

    And yes, this goes for GW2 as well, though they seem to be genuinely interested in a certain amount of innovation.

  22. rhinocorn says:

    @Brise

    I’ve been reading a lot of different previews for this game so far and I think that the class/path thing must not have been communicated well or some people are just not getting it. There was one review that explained it well but I forget which site it was since so many are running this game.

    Paths are NOT classes. There are distinct classes to the game (the three they showed were Warrior, Esper, and Spell Slinger at the con) and paths are on TOP of that. Paths are Soldier, Explorer, Scientist, and Settler. People who are saying that there’s only four classes and only four playstyles (kill, explore, collect, build) didn’t listen or didn’t get it. You get your regular quests like everyone else, which include killing, exploring, collecting, and doing the general fun/boring stuff that quests do. Your path just lets you do MORE of that one particular thing, in a new LAYER of content that’s unique to your chosen path. I wish you could select more than one, but we’ll see where they go with this.

  23. rhinocorn says:

    Also I think Eurogamer mentioned this is a level 3-5 zone, hence why it’s probably highly directed play. It’ll be interesting to see if they open it up and let you truly explore at later levels.

    http://ht.ly/65wph is a pretty informative review by GameReactor tv. It’s really interesting to see the difference in opinion from reviews who played it vs. reviewers who simply attended the presentation vs. reviewers who are just going off of trailers and screenshots and quoted lines.

  24. shoptroll says:

    Their 4 styles sound vaguely like the player traits described by the “Bartle Test”:

    Combat, Collecting, Building and Exploring aka

    Club, Diamond, Heart, Spade

    Although I think there’s more hybridization here. Diamond/Spade hybrids sound more like the Exploring style, while Heart/Diamond might fall into Building?

  25. voidburn says:

    I have a bad feeling that since everybody screams “WoW graphics” when they see this style, the day WoW will die, so will this kind of art direction. Pity, cause I absolutely LOVE it, and there is nothing I don’t like about Wildstar from an eye-candy point of view: very very good animations, nice color palette (way less saturated than WoW), very pleasing spell effects, and adorable landscapes / characters.

    I am honestly intrigued to see how the mechanics fit together and how their vision of these game mechanics will coalesce into a finished product. It sounds like it will have a simple but interesting story background, which could lead the way to a more than decent offering in terms of immersion and feel.

    Just because I’m fed up with WoW (or to be honest its end-game), doesn’t mean that I don’t like the way it plays, heck I spent 5 years playing it, I’d be a pretty darn idiot if I did that while not having fun or finding a challenge in it. I still do, it’s the game environment and its players that make the game feel stale and artificial now, not its art style, not its features. There’s no hiding my misanthropy, but I really hope one day these companies will provide the server software along with the client, so I can choose who I play with, pretty much like FPS clans do with their private servers.

    You lot are becoming awfully quick at dismissing a game before it even has a chance to prove itself. Too much choice is spoiling the crowd.

    • Keymonk says:

      I thought it looked pretty interesting too. I’m not all that much for familiar WoWness, but if I had a friend who was interested too, I’d definitely give it a shot for the fun in it, and possible RP value (if you can actually customize a little.)

      Oh, also love the artstyle. Love cartoony/exaggerated stuff.

Comment on this story

XHTML: Allowed code: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>