By Jim Rossignol on June 10th, 2013 at 10:05 pm.
Mirror’s Edge wasn’t actually that good. Discuss.
But maybe they’ll get it right this time, eh?
Dice, e32013, Electronic Arts, Mirror's Edge, Mirror's Edge 2.
271 Comments »
02/09/2013 at 05:00
I loved the game, but I think it would benefit from less action, less corridor, and more free roaming lots of possible paths stuff.
14/09/2013 at 15:16
“Mirror’s Edge wasn’t actually that good. Discuss.”
Burn the heretic!
18/11/2013 at 16:00
What i want is: No small rooms, obvious directions, more moves, stealth sequences, choices in wether you wanna attack or go around, go stealthy or run, skill trees could be awesome, and most importantly a deeper more immersive story and world, and better less repeated soundtracks. Then im on it.
10/01/2014 at 07:47
I finished ME1 so it couldn’t have been that bad.
I think the early use of physx might have helped me churn through some of the more soulless bits.
Set inside a body
Sandbox development sandbox
From The Archive
Serial, True Detective And Alan Bennett
Third time lucky. And first and second too.
Simulation and wargame blather
The aesthetics of puzzle game design
From baud to broadband...
XBox Gaming Since 1873
Mars, Minecraft And Beyond
A Smite-y build
Answers in the comments