Results 241 to 260 of 1990
Thread: What book are you reading?
10-09-2011, 12:38 PM #241
That said, I felt that the last 80 pages or so were rushed. It felt a lot like the author was on a deadline and had to end the story quickly so that he could start writing on the next book in the series (Absolution Gap). A shame, because Reynolds works best when he writes 10 pages where an ordinary Sci-Fi author would write 1.
Now reading Absolution Gap. Better read that now that my memory of the universe and characters is still fresh. :)
10-09-2011, 01:07 PM #242
My opinion on Artemis Fowl is what Xercies said. I haven't read them since I was a teenager but i found their ideas original and an it was an intriguing world with clever and funny writing but they're probably a bit kiddy maybe not even as grown up as harry potter (in the later books at least).
10-09-2011, 01:30 PM #243
(Spoilers below, highlight to see)
Much of the second half of the book felt like it was leading up to the epic confrontation between Clavain and Skade (backed up by the other Conjoiners). Then the next chapter begins with 'Then Clavain woke up and the battle was over'. I was quite disappointed, but not enough to sour the experience of reading an otherwise great book.
I was two pages into A Feast For Crows, then bought Terminal World and started that instead. It's an enjoyable read so far - the setting is lovely; a tower-city where each level is at a different stage of industrial development, all the way up to the Celestial Levels which are inhabited by transhuman angels.
10-09-2011, 03:11 PM #244
10-09-2011, 03:35 PM #245
10-09-2011, 04:15 PM #246
It's noble to try to make that difference, but how do you think it feels to be the little boy with his tenth finger in the dam when you see another leak pop up out of reach?
Certainly atheists find joy in their lives. I know quite a few. But in Adams' case I can at least suspect a connection between his growing conviction that there is no deity and his growing passion for environmental conservatism that maybe introduced some bleakness in his later writings.
10-09-2011, 04:22 PM #247
Oops. I just deleted that post as on reflection I think my instant, hackles-up defensiveness was off topic and unproductive. That's a discussion which quickly derails every thread it rears its ugly head in, and this is still quite a focussed and useful one. I'd be appalled if I was responsible for its implosion. I take your point though.
(As an aside, although I appreciate his insight and academic accomplishments, I can't help but feel that extended proximity to Dawkins might have a deleterious effect on ones outlook. He just rubs me the wrong way.)
10-09-2011, 04:28 PM #248
10-09-2011, 04:31 PM #249
It didn't come across as too defensive to me :) I know some people that are very prickly. Just felt you were raising a legitimate question/criticism.
By his own description:
AMERICAN ATHEISTS: Mr. Adams, you have been described as a “radical Atheist.” Is this accurate?
DNA: Yes. I think I use the term radical rather loosely, just for emphasis. If you describe yourself as “Atheist,” some people will say, “Don’t you mean ‘Agnostic’?” I have to reply that I really do mean Atheist. I really do not believe that there is a god - in fact I am convinced that there is not a god (a subtle difference). I see not a shred of evidence to suggest that there is one. It’s easier to say that I am a radical Atheist, just to signal that I really mean it, have thought about it a great deal, and that it’s an opinion I hold seriously. It’s funny how many people are genuinely surprised to hear a view expressed so strongly. In England we seem to have drifted from vague wishy-washy Anglicanism to vague wishy-washy Agnosticism - both of which I think betoken a desire not to have to think about things too much.
10-09-2011, 04:39 PM #250
Ok; I was wondering if you were perhaps using the term synonymously with 'militant', 'fundamentalist' or similar, where those are appellations I could see fit for Dawkins but was unaware of any such applicability to Mr. Adams' atheism.
10-09-2011, 04:56 PM #251
I don't know, something about the 4th book made me think that it was made by someone who had just fallen in love so maybe the 5th book is after they broke up or she died or something
10-09-2011, 05:19 PM #252
16-09-2011, 08:28 PM #253
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
Currently reading "I shall wear midnight" by Terry Pratchett. About 180 pages in and very much enjoying it. Could be accused of having a few scenes that don't necessarily read easily, but they're very much the minority, and his ability to turn a phrase is just phenomenal.
16-09-2011, 08:55 PM #254
16-09-2011, 08:56 PM #255
Reading: Gunslinger (and have the next 3 books of the dark tower)Why are you wearing that stupid human suit?
16-09-2011, 09:15 PM #256
Blonde Bombshell by Tom Holt
I've always like Holt and put him up there with the likes of Adams and Pratchett in having an eye for the absurd scenario and a gift for the comic turn of phrase.
16-09-2011, 10:39 PM #257
16-09-2011, 10:45 PM #258
Finished Matter, um well I wasn't expecting that ending unfortunately I kind of didn't like it. It came out of know where in the narrative, it didn't really have anything to do with either characters narrative. Also it kind of jumps around a bit at the end and characters that we were following all throughout the book get deaths very quickly which don't really amount to anything. Hmm.
16-09-2011, 10:56 PM #259
16-09-2011, 10:56 PM #260
I thought Matter missed the target a bit too. It's not terrible, it just felt like it needed a ruthless editor to underline vast sections and say "oi! Banks! Fix this bollocks!" But fear not! Surface Detail is a return to form. Much better.
I've just read "Death from the Skies" by Phil Plait. Eschatology is fun!