Results 1 to 20 of 31
Thread: The Last Remnant demo
11-09-2011, 12:03 AM #1
The Last Remnant demo
So, being in the mood for something quick and tactical with RPG elements, I decided I'd give the Last Remnant demo a try again. After running around in town for a bit, at a loss as to what to do, I headed out to find something to kill. Watching/interacting with the combat, at this point, reminds me a great deal of the "Chinpokomon" episode of South Park, I am utterly baffled by what the hell is going on on screen. There seem to be very few actual decisions to be made, with only two "groups" each choosing a single action, but the likelihood that I'm missing something (more likely many, many things) is extremely high.
So, long story short, can someone tell me how the hell to play this thing? I seems like it has the capacity to be interesting, but I can't make heads or tails of it and the demo doesn't seem very interested in explaining much of anything.
11-09-2011, 12:58 AM #2
... explaining it is kind of hard. Let's try like this and hope it sounds appealing:
Normal JRPG games (or party-based RPGs in general) have singular characters making up the party. The Last Remnant (TLR) instead has singular Unions making up and army, where the Unions are composed of 1-5 characters. By grouping characters together it means you don't issue individual orders to the Union, rather you give a general order such as: Attack (normal attack moves), Attack using Weapons Arts (uses AP to power various weapon-based moves for various people in the Union), Attack using Magic Arts (uses AP to power various magic-based moves for various people in the Union), etc (sometimes Item Arts will be used [these can be healing herbs, enhancing potions, bombs, that sort of thing], sometimes healing Arts, sometimes superawesome moves).
In the game, you start only being allowed to make 2 Unions (I think) and have a limit of 3(?) characters. This will increase throughout the game by doing Main Quest missions up to having 5 Unions with up to 18 characters distributed between them. Characters in Unions are arranged into Formations, of which you will find more and more throughout the game, which give different bonuses and are each better suited to different situations. If you get your ass handed to you in a fight it is entirely possible to win it immediately upon reloading if you try more suitable Formations (eg. against something that uses lots of magic that typically does area effect damage, try using a Formation which spreads the people out or gives increases Magic Defense).
The availability of actions your Unions can perform relies on various factors: Union composition, available AP, position on battlefield, enemy targeted and, most importantly, morale. Morale can be controlled to a certain extent when various arts become available or when you have more Unions so can Flank Attack. Otherwise, if you have high morale then your better moves will often be open and the enemy will be more constrained by their corresponding low morale. However, in true JRPG fashion (reminiscent of Limit Breaks) having low morale can often enable your people to use their most devastating moves in order to "turn the tide". This means you're never beaten until your last Union drops dead.
This is already getting too long, and I could keep going for ages. The wiki (http://lastremnant.wikia.com/wiki/Th..._Remnant_Guide is a great place to go for help, although a bit lacking when it comes to introductory material. I've never tried the demo but I can imagine it being very lacking in all areas just because this game is massive. One recommendatino I'd immediately make is to play it with a gamepad (360 controller preferably). It makes the QTEs far more fun/simpler and it controls better in general.
If there's anything specific you want to know then just ask. I've put several hundred hours into the game and am well aware it has a Marmite-style appeal; even though I love it I realise it is both confusing and still baffles me at times so I understand why some just don't have time for it.
11-09-2011, 01:11 AM #3
Sounds a bit like Ogre Battle, where you give directives to squads rather than choosing individual actions of characters. Is it like Ogre Battle? Is it?
11-09-2011, 01:18 AM #4
I have heard it is, in fact, the spiritual successor to Ogre Battle and Romancing SaGa (and apparently something called "Soul Nomad And The World Eaters", which sounds fantastic). I haven't played either of those so can't back that up though, but TV Tropes says so.
11-09-2011, 01:45 AM #5
Deep is good and I don't mind confusing, I'm just trying to get a handle on it. The appearance at present is of something very simplistic, actually, with very few decisions and virtually no tactical options. The demo appears to be set in the early/middle part of the game but not at the actual beginning. Your explanation is helpful, thank you, I'll try to drum up some specific questions when I have time to tinker with it again.
Oh, I can think of one right now actually: what IS up with the QTE's?
I've been playing with a 360 controller (didn't have one the last time I tried this and quickly gave up in frustration at the controls, with the 360 pad it plays just fine though). I'll have a look through the wiki. Thanks again, Casimir.
Last edited by vinraith; 11-09-2011 at 02:30 AM.
11-09-2011, 05:49 AM #6
The unions part is like Ogre battle I suppose, but the actual battles are more like RPG's. There's a button for being able to see specifically what attacks you are choosing between, instead of generic descriptions. Gives more control I find.
The quick time events(if that's what QTE stands for) are basically for combo attacking. If you do it right for one attack, the next ally will get to act immediately. If you get all of them right, you'll be able to use all your guys before the enemy makes a move. Not entirely sure on this, but I think your attacks are guaranteed to hit as well.
Haven't played for hundreds of hrs, or even beaten the game yet, but it's definitely one of my favorites. Even if it is still confusing at times.
11-09-2011, 11:06 AM #7
The beginning of the game would be a big battle involving some people on a plain, then you - as Rush - fall down a hole with Emma and the tutorial is the fight out. Then you head off to Athlum for more tutorial & some proper quests. Is this anything like the demo? I just bought the game for about £10 off Amazon a couple of years back now then discovered to my joy it was Steamworks and loads of fun.
Pressing 'X' will show what each character will do for the Command selected. This is necessary to do in every fight really as the game levels up your characters Arts through using them in battle (actually by merely giving the command to use them - if the enemy is dead before they get to hit with, for example, 'Spark' then the 'Spark' move will still gain some way towards its next level).
As the guy above said, the quick time events effect your unions actions. Succeeding will move all your characters up the list of Who gets to attack next, which is often incredibly important and will save your ass, and success will also mean your attack will hit in part at least and it will often do more damage. They can actually be turned off if you don't like them but they were something I really enjoyed about the combat because it gave some extra interactivity in a simple way.
The game is definitely quite simplistic right at the start when the number of characters/unions you're allowed is few and they don't have many Arts. But this quickly changes after pursuing the main quest a bit when you're allowed to have 4 Unions and 12 people (it goes higher, but this is the point you can start to have bigger fights and more variation in things). Unlocking the healing arts (especially the resurrection herb Art) is what really opens things up and can lead to taking on bosses in battles which last 30mins+ where you almost die many many times. There can be some good fights at the start too but, as you say, there are few tactical options.
11-09-2011, 01:36 PM #8
11-09-2011, 09:05 PM #9
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
I should just point out that, while I want to like and get into the Last Remnant, 2 things put me off. Firstly, the start is slow, and it seems to be a long while before complex tactical options really open up.
Secondly, the main character is infuriatingly stupid and oblivious. He's terrifically rude and self centered not because he's a jerk (he's actually a pretty nice guy) but because he's too thick to know better. He's tough to put up with.
11-09-2011, 09:22 PM #10
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Reading, Berkshire
Some Last Remnant trivia: Square-Enix originally planned to have two playable characters, one for Japan (Rush) and one for the West (The Conquerer, aka the guy in red coat on the cover of the PC version of the game, would consider this a spoiler if he wasn't on said cover), but this idea fell through, only to return in console rpg Nier, also by Square Enix.
And that's my contribution to this thread, other than to say that I too enjoyed the demo to an extent.
13-09-2011, 04:39 PM #11
The Last Remnant is a weird, weird game. I've never beaten it, but I have poured something like fifty or sixty hours into it. It has a tremendous amount of extra material, including sidequests, extra dungeons, and bonus characters. It's also surprisingly visceral for a JRPG, with lots of meaty violence. But it never really clicks, because the battle system never stops feeling luck-based. Yeah, you can stack the odds by mixing and matching characters and unions, but you will always feel your options are at the whim of the game's inscrutable algorithms. Still, it's worth giving a shot, if for no other reason than it really is trying to do something different; the worst thing that happens is you're out ten bucks.
SPOILER, sort of: The game also features a hefty dose of homoeroticism that it hilariously tries to avoid making explicit. It serves, in its way, as an example of how to include a romantic relationship in a game without it dragging down the plot, and I actually wish it had had the balls to make it a little more front and center rather than just maintain game-long sexual tension.
13-09-2011, 11:25 PM #12
Continuation of the SPOILER, sort of:
About the homoeroticism: my first playthrough was done using Japanese voices and English subtitles (not out of any particular preference it's just some of the voices bugged the hell out of me) and there was NO hint of sexual/romantic tension between Rush and David (what I assume you were talking about). In fact the impression you get is that David will be hitting on Irena. But when I started a newgame+ I went for the English dubbing to see the difference (and it doesn't grate on me so much anymore) and you're right, there is something there. But it's very much one-sided, to the point where I'd say there is actually a love triangle between David->Rush->Emmy->David. The main problem I have with TLR is that there needed to be more story, and that's not something you can often accuse a JRPG of being short of. There's tonnes of content and a lot of world-building but not enough story to go with it, which is one of the great videogame shames of recent times.
14-09-2011, 07:35 AM #13
I love the Last Remnant, if it weren't for Rush. Most of the other characters are nice and interesting, but I was seriously put off by having to play a spoiled brat which I couldn't even kill off, because he was supposed to be me.
I enjoyed playing Ruby from WET a lot more than I enjoyed playing Rush, which I think says everything.
14-09-2011, 05:24 PM #14
15-09-2011, 03:39 AM #15
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
It is an rather pretty game. I like the fights that look a bit more like fights than most games. The big clangy parries don't happen often enough- I find them satisfying.
15-09-2011, 08:11 AM #16
Reading this thread is making me want to reinstall and finally finish the game. My main problem was the lead, Rush. I want to stab him in the face repeatedly. Would've been quite awesome if they had done a Nier like character for the European lead, though. Ah well.
The combat system was just.. different, and fun. As were the pretty good visuals(Why don't we get more PC J-RPG releases?) and I remember the music being good, too.
15-09-2011, 05:00 PM #17
15-09-2011, 05:18 PM #18
My actual first J-RPG experince was via a SNES emulator with Chrono Trigger(Had a SNES. Never had it. Go figure) But I'd love to have seen Nier on PC. I adore Nier and it's.. uniqueness, and would've loved a PC version, but alas! Technically, we have both Wii and PS2 J-RPG's on PC, via emulation. It's not the same, but it's something.
Still, Sqaure if you ever see this.. Please, publish stuff on the PC. We love you really.
15-09-2011, 07:33 PM #19
To everyone else: yes, Rush is a bit of a prick initiall and for a good half the game after that. But then something happens. Something so rare in games: a character evolves. He starts to become less whiny and more pragmatic. Takes more responsibility but assumes less self-pity. It's actually pretty impressive once you notice it, and noticing is the hardest part seeing as so few games have character arcs (off the top of my head I can only think of the Prince of Persia games Sands of Time and the reboot whose Princes subtly change to a decent extent during the game).
So in other words: he gets better.
I agree with the game being beautiful, although the V-sync problems sometimes make me want to punch a kitten and mean nHancer is a must. The look of the moves, the blocking, parrying and dodging, and the way the models all seem to interact seemlessly is all very impressive and goes towards making the battles so appealing for me.
Like you I wish there were more PC JRPG releases. There were rumours that FF XIII would be making it's way to PC but that seems to have disappeared.
My first JRPG was Grandia 2 on the Dreamcast and I tracked down the PC copy 2 years ago and had a lot of fun playing through it again. Great game and highly recommended.
16-09-2011, 01:00 AM #20
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Reading, Berkshire