Results 301 to 320 of 1217
29-08-2014, 12:45 AM #301
29-08-2014, 01:52 AM #302
But I misremembered. He wasn't the one who made the classist comments in the Charlie Rose piece; that was someone else. My bad--Skoll didn't say anything particularly troublesome.
ERgh. And one of them talked about Bill and Melinda nearly eliminating polio. And ... I was frustrated ... because most of the legwork in that had nothing to do with Gates charities but was more associated with global organizations and Google.org charities. Larry Brilliant is a better name to drop in terms of eradicating polio than "Gates."
Not that CBS bothered to correct that. Or pushed any of them very hard about their general arrogance. Or touched on this awkward bit:
Warren Buffett: I've got I've gotten a lot of yeses when I've called people. But I've gotten a lot of nos, too. And I am tempted, because I've been calling people with a billion dollars or more, I've been tempted to think that if they can't sign up for 50 percent, maybe I should write a book on how to get by on $500 million. Because apparently there's a lot of people that don't really know how to do it.
Randall Lane: The public has a right to know who owns the world. [referring to Skoll's efforts to make films that talk about corporate ethics ... conception of irony not included]
Randall Lane, the editor of the business magazine Forbes, says billionaires like Skoll have become so influential he devoted an entire issue to philanthropy.
Randall Lane: Government is showing, you know, over the past couple decades that it can no longer solve the great problems of the day. Now these philanthropists who have incredible wealth, the problem-solving brainpower, and also the name and the influence to be able to open doors are uniquely qualified right now to solve the huge problems.
But that does raise the question: do these billionaires have too much power?
Charlie Rose: There's some people who say big philanthropy is not such a good idea, meaning that somehow you have enormous power and you're not elected and, and that that may not be such a good idea to have people with enormous wealth to have so much influence.
Warren Buffett: Well, would they prefer dynastic wealth? Pass it on. Or would they prefer, you know, obscenely high living? There's a couple other ways to get rid of money, but I-- I-- I-- think it's better if you're helping other people, using a good bit of it for helping other people. [edit: sidestepping the question!]
Charlie Rose: OK, so there's no instance in which somebody could say, "Look, I mean, we got too many people of huge wealth who are having too much influence."
Jean Case: Well, Charlie. Think about Bill and polio, for instance. Bill and Melinda's work in polio. I mean, they're coming close to eradicating polio on the face of the Earth. I think when we have a couple of examples like that, people will see, that's not power being used for personal purposes. That's really leveraging everything you have to change the world to make it better. [sidestepping the question!]
Last edited by gwathdring; 29-08-2014 at 02:02 AM.I think of [the Internet] as a grisly raw steak laid out on a porcelain benchtop in the sun, covered in chocolate hazelnut sauce. In the background plays Stardustís Music Sounds Better With You. Thereís lots of fog. --tomeoftom
You ruined his point by putting it in context thatís cheating -bull0
29-08-2014, 06:38 AM #303
29-08-2014, 07:08 AM #304
An associate of Quinn leaked FB details leading to harassment.
Well, so much for the moral high-ground!Nalano's Law - As an online gaming discussion regarding restrictions grows longer, the probability of a post likening the topic to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea approaches one.
Soldant's Law - A person will happily suspend their moral values if they can express moral outrage by doing so.
29-08-2014, 07:40 AM #305
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
I don't care about the issue of one woman and gaming journalism, to me the most tragic part of all this is the fact these people wanted to do some good and got dragged into a shitstorm and then ignored as the rest raged on, no one in the gaming media made any attempt to get their side. They are the biggest casualty in this ridiculous fool's farce. reading that message I can feel how worn down this person is and defeated by the very people who should be celebrating his and his colleagues work.
His videos on influential women have done more to open my eyes to what women have accomplished and can in this field than anyone else, this is the person people should be looking to and we've all failed.
I'm not well known nor do I have a large post count. I'm just someone who has watched this whole thing unfold and pitied them. make of that what you will.
29-08-2014, 07:43 AM #306
Total Biscuit has written a worthwhile article/blog/whatever on the polarisation on this issue and why the terms SWJ and MRA have no real meaning. Its a bit long though.
http://blueplz.blogspot.ca/2014/08/t...o-players.html I don't know how to make nice looking links, sorry.
29-08-2014, 11:18 AM #307
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
I'm not suggesting we let it slide either. I'm suggesting people look into it, determine if there was a breach, and hold the people who commissioned/employed them to account *for that instance*.
I don't seen any epidemic though.
Well that statement contradicts what others have said, and based on duplicity on other fronts I'm inclined to put more faith in their opinions than yours at the end of the day.
29-08-2014, 11:30 AM #308
29-08-2014, 11:35 AM #309
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
People made accusations about NG, someone asked for evidence, Jim seconded it, someone provided a link to something that didn't fit the timeline, Jim said if that was the only evidence the discussion was pointless, the thread vanished.
That you don't understand the difference between reporting fact and opinion is probably why you're so confused on this matter. You can choose to disbelieve a report of the facts, but you can't choose to disagree with it.
29-08-2014, 12:15 PM #310
Someone ASKED IF THERE WAS ANY EVIDENCE and at least 2 people said that there wasn't any, one of which was myself.
I am not confused on this matter, not in the least but I do find that you have a nasty habit of being disingenuous.
29-08-2014, 12:17 PM #311
Actually, I do seem to recall that someone was making allegations, as to which I replied asking for evidence for that. So you are both right.
29-08-2014, 12:21 PM #312
29-08-2014, 12:24 PM #313
No point in arguing, the thread is gone.
29-08-2014, 12:28 PM #314
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Stockton-on-Tees, UK
Somebody posted a link to something that they claimed had Evidence of some wrongdoing or other, but since I'm not going to follow any of the links in these discussions I can't say what was in it.Irrelevant on further examination of the rest of the thread.
29-08-2014, 12:37 PM #315
Here is another statement by the feminist activist that advocated for trigger warnings in literature and movies a couple of months ago.
The truth is, opportunists have a lot to gain right now. We are looking at the same system of corruption that has led to academic imperialism among radicals in the States. Allies and activists who are acting in good faith have just started to make baby steps in institutions that are classically engrained in Old Boy clubs, and the fruit is ripe for the picking for huge activist support, if you have the right connections and the motivation. And, what happens is, social justice activists bite into the fruit that they originally aimed to destroy. Instead of demolishing the institutions, why not just join them and try to benefit from them? Why not forward your own liberation, while remaining radio silent on the plight of others? We don't simply bite into that fruit: we devour it. And we grow fat on the gains.
And because so many people equate actions with personal compassion, we begin to hero worship. We throw out the phrase "your fave is problematic." Hell, we throw out the idea that EVERYONE is problematic. We assume that anyone fighting the good fight can be given a little leeway. Who cares if a white male equates gamers with "ISIS with Steam accounts?" Who cares if you call someone a "scummy neckbeard with Cheetos," because it's all in good faith, huh? Who cares if a critically acclaimed writer says "I hope you die," because, hey, they're fighting the good fight - right? It's our side, so those kind of comments are A-OKAY, right?
This is not fighting the good fight. This is not positive. This is not liberation. This is harassment. It is not just interpersonal, one-to-one harassment. It is often oppressive, because it promotes oppressive hegemonies that exist regardless of your "intent." Hateful vitriol can come from anyone. You can defend Anita Sarkeesian, and still be a shitty person. You do not get a free pass just because Anita has valid points. Sending harassment is sending harassment; let's be honest with ourselves. And the way that many people have conducted themselves in the past two weeks have been shameful, with people comparing us to ISIS and claiming we have sent bomb threats to SONY.
29-08-2014, 01:41 PM #316
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
No it isn't.
Zoe Quinn slept with people in the industry (lets ignore that she cheated on someone). One of those people was a reporter who wrote stories on her.
Phase two is repeating the same lie so many times that it becomes accepted by the followers of the event, becomes received information, passed on as fact, no one actually checking.
Mods - linking to a cached version of a deleted thread is totally breaking the rules, and I'm sorry, but I couldn't let this slide. Ban me for a while for it if you want, it's worth it. I'm tired of some posters hiding behind the rules to avoid being accountable.
29-08-2014, 02:03 PM #317
Ursula Le Guin - The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
29-08-2014, 03:09 PM #318
Actually everyone should tone down the paranoia and assume that rps members are being nice. Maybe they are forgetful. Maybe they are wrong. That doesnt mean theyre saying stuff out of spite
Quanta out..- Tom De Roeck.
"Quantacat's name is still recognised even if he watches on with detached eyes like Peter Molyneux over a cube in 3D space, staring at it with tears in his eyes, softly whispering... Someday they'll get it."
"It's frankly embarrassing. The mods on here are woeful."
"I wrinkled my nose at QC being a mod."
"At least he has some personality."
29-08-2014, 03:23 PM #319
- Join Date
- Apr 2013
Regarding harassment, I'd like to point this out which has nothing to do with this recent matter regarding Brad Wardell of Stardock:
He also wrote two articles, one just a few days ago and another a few months ago that are probably worth reading:
This was also really great, but long:
29-08-2014, 03:53 PM #320
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
If someone went on your Facebook wall and accused you of being corrupt in your job, would you delete it? Can you understand why someone would?
The Chief Editor of Kotaku pretty much confirmed that the claim is true, he just said that the timeline is supposedly off by a few days (which nobody can really prove or disprove entirely):
"pretty much confirmed" = "didn't confirm"
"nobody can really prove or disprove" = "I can't prove my accusation"
You can't say it doesn't matter because it's off by just a few days! Because that's when it happened! I don't really know how I can explain this...
'We accuse you of unlawfully entering the shop premises at 3am and leaving with a Playstation 4'
'err, In my defense, I went in there when it was open at 3pm, and bought one'
'There you go, your honour, he pretty much confirmed it, the timeline is off by a few hours, but no-one can really prove or disprove that, send him down'