I'm convinced that that was the original intent, that was rendered impossible by the late changes to the ending, after the voice-overs for Ash and Kaiden had been done.
It's in one of the books, for what it's worth.
I think that the second option there is a bigger cop-out than any of the endings we got. It's basically the magic shiny pony happy ending. We reject the reapers and that might cause problems in the future, but fuck it, we never have to see the results or deal with the fallout as it's the end of the trilogy. It's the same stunt they pulled with DA:O, you have to make a tough choice about who to sacrifice, unless you don't and choose another option that might be a bad idea in the future - but at least there we knew we'd be importing that save into future games.
ME3's three ending choices may have been a bit naff, but at least we all chose different things. Would anyone, faced with the dark energy dilemma, choose to side with the reapers? One is hope, the other is giving up.
I like dark energy as a motivation for the Reapers (I see why they changed it though - they wanted something that fitted the themes of the games more, it just didn't make sense) but I'm still not sure the Reapers needed explaining in the first place. Hell, the ending as is works fine/better if you just carve that bit of information out. Given that you can't argue or discuss it with the catalyst anyway.



Reply With Quote




