Dyack responds to that Kotaku article

[Bhazor]

... and says... things... very dubious things.

So what we reckon?

For reference the original article.
http://kotaku.com/5955223/what-went-...-x+men-destiny

[Zetetic]

Stewart Lee did it better.

[Tikey]

Can someone be nice enough to post a summary?
I'm not sitting through 30 minutes of this guy talking.

[Bhazor]

"Kotaku's a bunch of stinky heads. My games sucked for reason's entirely unrelated to me. Please please forget about the massive law suit we just lost."

[Internet]

"Kotaku's a bunch of stinky heads. My games sucked for reason's entirely unrelated to me. Please please forget about the massive law suit we just lost."

Can't say I disagree with the first sentence.

[Bhazor]

And now back to Kotaku for their response to his response.
http://kotaku.com/denis-dyack-finall...-sil-508948428

It feels like being at dinner with a couple who are in the beginnings of a divorce. No ones talking to each other they're just passively aggressively talking about each other to you.

[trjp]

I'm sorry, but having played Too Human I'm just amazed they got to make another game at all.

Too Human is a warcrime - some of it's faults are so GLARINGLY obvious that you have to believe no-one who knew anything about PLAYING games had ever played it.

To pickup just one small one - the fact that dying resulted in a lengthy and unskippable sequence of being ascended to the sky EVERY SINGLE TIME IT HAPPENED.

To picked a much worse one - that there was almost zero penalty for death other than a bit of time lost (enemies would even remain at lower health) and that there were miniboss and boss fights which were simply a case of pressing a button about 500 times.

Why are we still talking about that company - how are they still making games? Even Eternal Darkness, whilst really good in places, had some pretty rough edges - it loved wasting your time in particular.