I really, really want a new printer. I've switched from HPs outright banditry to Kodak's sophisticated theft, and now I just want a printer that doesn't make me replace ink cartridges every five seconds. Any suggestions?
I really, really want a new printer. I've switched from HPs outright banditry to Kodak's sophisticated theft, and now I just want a printer that doesn't make me replace ink cartridges every five seconds. Any suggestions?
A laser printer. Mine takes cartridges that print about 1500 pages per 40 euro cartridge, and that's the original product. The knock-off cartridges print 1750 pages for 29 euro.
Sometimes the printer claims the cartridge is empty when it obviously isn't, but you can fix that by taking it out and shaking the remaining toner around. It rarely happens though. I do have doubts about how many pages you can actually print per cartridge, but since I'm not the only person using it it's hard to keep track of printer use, and it obviously depends on the coverage factor.
Full disclosure: I work for a company that manufactures printers of all types.
I'd suggest laser too. Toner will net you more impressions than ink will, but you may run into maintenance issues down the road (this is not an issue for me personally because of my employer and skillset). The price is also cheaper for toner versus ink, especially if you get a B/W unit.
The downside to laser printers is size and weight. An ink printer will be much smaller and lighter compared to a laser printer of the same capability.
My girl is a student and prints a lot more than I would imagine is necessary for school. She goes through about a ream of paper per month, but I cannot remember the last time I replaced the toner. About a year, maybe. So that's about 6,000 impressions on this bottle, unless she replaced the toner without me knowing (not likely). We have a small (for an office, large for an apartment) multifunction device that prints about 20 pages per minute, in case that helps you.
edit - I looked up the stats and my MFP model is rated for about 7,000 impressions per bottle of toner.
Last edited by Fumarole; 02-04-2013 at 12:01 AM.
The Medallion of the Imperial Psychopath, a Napoleon: Total War AAR
For the Emperor!, a Total War: Shogun 2: Fall of the Samurai AAR
Black toner is a lot cheaper yes. I generally just look at my document and select grayscale if I don't care about the colors. I prefer to read research papers on actual paper but I'm done with them quite fast, so I put tonersave on maximum for that (makes the blacks print gray, uses less toner).
Whichever way you cut it though, printing is expensive.
I've had 2 HP AIO printers and they've been fine - sourced genuine HP inks online for a fraction of RRP and all that jazz.
Only thing is I don't print much - my first printer's carts lasted a year and my latest one is 8 months old and they're 80% still...
I only replaced the printer because the old one was getting moody about feeding paper and the new one was only £10 more than a pair of carts were anyway - e.g. the printer is £10 and the carts make up the rest of the cost!!
Creator of Steam Greenlight LITE
What do you plan to print and how often? B/W, greyscale? Color? Photos?
The Medallion of the Imperial Psychopath, a Napoleon: Total War AAR
For the Emperor!, a Total War: Shogun 2: Fall of the Samurai AAR
I've always thought that but with my previous printer they displayed 'full' when new and were branded/marked as regular cartridges in regular packaging in the box.
HP sell 2 'sizes' of each printer's cartridge and these were the smaller ones of course - but they were full and proper carts, identical to the ones I bought to replace them.
The advent of showing people the amount of ink used probably stopped them giving-away half-empty carts - people would have complained?
p.s. there's no way I'd print 100s of sheets a month on this thing - if you're printing that much stuff, DEFINATELY get a laser printer!
Creator of Steam Greenlight LITE
Keep in mind that the more saturation on your prints, the fewer impressions you'll get. The volumes quoted on new cartridges/bottles is for about 5% page coverage. This is why printers are sold as loss leaders; the profit is almost all in the supplies.
I should point out that you can use less ink/toner by switching fonts. Some more info here.
Last edited by Fumarole; 03-04-2013 at 02:01 AM. Reason: removed image
The Medallion of the Imperial Psychopath, a Napoleon: Total War AAR
For the Emperor!, a Total War: Shogun 2: Fall of the Samurai AAR
Color laser printers do exist and aren't that expensive. I have a Samsung CLX-3185fw I got for 250 euros. Ok, that's a high initial investment for a printer, but it's also a scanner and fax, and it prints color but also has a separate black cartridge.
Even if they do bone you on the carts (and I suspect that's a thing of the past) it's nothing to the way they insult you by making you installed 100s of Mbs of crapware just to use the printer - and then update it every 20 mins too!
Kodak, it should be noted, are being sneaky with their new printers too. Ink costs are low because the carts don't contain the print-head - that keeps costs down but it also means that sooner or later you'll need a new printhead which is more money again!
The wireless Kodak I setup for someone last year keeps completely uninstalling itself from their PCs too - it's really quite scary, it just disappears from the Hardware list, cannot be detected and when you force it's detection it insists on a complete driver reinstall AND insists on firmware updating itself which takes eons.
I hate printers - they are by far the most annoying thing about PCs - when people call me and say "printer" I'm always busy ;)
Creator of Steam Greenlight LITE
The Medallion of the Imperial Psychopath, a Napoleon: Total War AAR
For the Emperor!, a Total War: Shogun 2: Fall of the Samurai AAR
That's one of the reasons I went with the Galaxy Nexus and not the Xperia S. No crapware.
My printer is also very good about crapware. Windows 7 seems to have the driver in the repository and it just works.