Results 301 to 320 of 324
04-03-2013, 06:51 PM #301
I get it, you didn't like the scene, but the scene had it's reason for being there.
04-03-2013, 06:54 PM #302
04-03-2013, 07:15 PM #303
And I actually like CoD4, IMO it's the last good CoD, but the game is not really aiming to be some high-brow expressive artistic endeavor (and it doesn't have to be).
04-03-2013, 08:35 PM #304
Lack of customisable difficulty. A recent example would be Hitman Absolution. I would really like to be able to play the game with the amount of enemies present in the Expert difficulty, but without the incredibly paranoid AI that detects you fairly quickly.
Additionally, when AI characters are about to explain something but they don't, because the main character is considered to be an unintelligent brute.
"Oh hey, i am going to do something clever. I would explain it but you wouldn't understand"
Last edited by YeOldeSnake; 04-03-2013 at 09:32 PM.
04-03-2013, 08:42 PM #305
04-03-2013, 09:02 PM #306
Yeah. While the Modern Warfares definitely go for shock value, I also give them credit for making it work in 1 and 3 (2's "No Russian" was just trash).
MW1: You get to basically be "The Marines of Eagle-Land" from every single movie, and it feels DAMNED good to do it. Going back for the downed chopper pilot is also really fun. And then, you get nuked. It doesn't make what you did any less heroic/awesome, and it sets the stage for the rest of the series as a whole. Up until then the game is basically a "Marines save the world", but it rapidly descends into almost a warm beer style spy series where the "heroes" are pretty despicable human beings who aren't above torture, assassination, and genocide in the name of "the greater good". And, it gets bonus points for a pretty brutal hopespot as you live the final seconds of the character's life (Pvt Ramirez, if memory serves)
MW2: No Russian's biggest problem was that the level itself was bad. I understand what they were going for ("What will you do in the name of the greater good?") but they failed horribly for three reasons:
1. It is the worst level in the entire history of CoD. You are walking slowly and your enemies don't do anything
2. They give you the illusion of choice, which just serves to drive home how little choice you have.
3. It sets up the stupidest reason for a war ever (the US government would have instantly said "he is a rogue terrorist" and we wouldn't have gone to war with Russia, especially since the other corpses WERE Russian)
MW3: This one worked again. It further establishes Makarov as a sick bastard AND it is a really fun level. Shooting up the subway while on the back of a pickup truck and the great gunfights make that one of the better levels/set pieces in the series. And, the "shock" scene is actually pretty painful (in a good way) as you watch a simple family on vacation die because of the rivalry between Price and Makarov.
Not 100% related, but I think it is still a good article on the subject http://www.joeabercrombie.com/2013/0...value-of-grit/
Abercrombie subscribes to the Martin school of "Let's kill viewpoint characters and nice people", but I find he does a much better job of not having "shock for shock's sake". And, overall, his (POV character) bodycount is MUCH lower and they generally work well (The Heroes had a few chapters that were nothing BUT POV characters dying, but even that worked well to depict the battle).
Just be careful reading an Abercrombie book: The man does not know what a flatbow is and it is REALLY annoying :pSteam: Gundato
If you want me on either service, I suggest PMing me here first to let me know who you are.
04-03-2013, 10:37 PM #307
To be honest, Modern Warfare's nuke segment wasn't anywhere near as controversial as the MW2 and MW3 segments. Its shock value was mainly directed towards the player, as it came off as a huge unexpected surprise that made the story somewhat darker, and briefly touched upon the pointless nature of war. That is what made it incredibly good and it was not yet another attempt to promote the game by making it appear offensive.
05-03-2013, 12:25 AM #308
But ultimately point well taken. I still think it's main purpose is shock-value though :P
06-03-2013, 02:01 PM #309
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- "MoerasGrizzly" on your favorite social platform!
Modern Warfare's nuke segment also works as subtle criticism for the Iraq war (since the entire invasion mimics it up untill that point): In the end, a lot of marines died without actually having achieved anything.
However, a nuke works a little bit faster then a lot of IEDs. So they went with the nuke.
06-03-2013, 06:12 PM #310
06-03-2013, 07:33 PM #311
06-03-2013, 09:24 PM #312
Yup. I remember back in the day, scratching my head at the hilariously low dreadnought firepower figures. Someone at BW forgot to explore the implications of a technology that can turn a AA battery into a planet-killer, methinks.
07-03-2013, 12:18 AM #313
Oh, I love people that tries to explain sci-fi stuff with scientific principles. It always ends up being a learning experience.
I remember an old thread on the Beyond The Red Line Battlestar Galactica mod about the Viper's atmospheric flight capabilities that went on forever. It was simply amazing. I learned a lot of stuff (and later forgot all of it, obviously).
07-03-2013, 01:04 AM #314
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
I'm going to defend No Russian. It made you really think about just how much you (should) identify with your character in a game and why it is that it is much more shocking to put the player in the character of a terrorist. Of course, most people skipped the thinking part and went straight onto enraged, as usual.
07-03-2013, 06:48 PM #315
11-03-2013, 08:28 PM #316
It pissess me off when another game with a classic title comes out. Sim City, X Com, Syndicate, Alien vs Predator, Tomb Raider. For me it's like crapping on a good old game and trying to rewrite history. It's the identical name that really gets me.pass
11-03-2013, 09:43 PM #317
Movement based on the position of the camera rather than the character. The camera position then, of course, changes over and over again. Just played a bit of Heavy Rain on the PS3, and I can't count the number of times I've had to spin around, run into a wall or desk because of that annoying design 'feature'."He has anointed me to bring good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim release to
the captives and recovery of sight to the blind, to let the oppressed go free". ~ Luke 4:18
11-03-2013, 09:45 PM #318
15-03-2013, 10:18 PM #319
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- United States
I know they're trying to re-boot the series or whatever, but there's no reason to assume they can't add an post title to it. They should take example of the recent Batman reboot which was perfectly successful without having to re-use the classic title. Tomb Raider Begins would have worked just as well.
15-03-2013, 11:50 PM #320
- Join Date
- May 2012
At least with a film they make a new film. The gaming industry is like bringing out a new "football" and making it include boats, fishing and snooker so as to be "inventive".
A change in pacing or play style is ok I guess. I'll not complain about that. It can be a nice refresh to a theme or game.
I think someone else put it better. Build on the success, don't try to reinvent the success. If you are making a "game" just for the name (or a movie for that matter), then less will result from it. Names are just labels. Franchises just empty numbers. The things they stand for are the real value we attach.
So "Mario" is valued either for the consistent character or the platforming. This shows in game that follow the character (Paper Mario, Mario cart etc), or the system of play (platforming). Putting "Mario" on an Olympic game, etc may not carry on the value.
As to my current annoyance with gaming, it's the online requirement. Even the likes of Minecraft needs it. Almost ever game does now. Thankfully some avoid it. Kerbal Space Program only requires the purchase. The rest of the value of being a real customer is in the community, game updates and service they provide. It seems to be about making people want to pay for the product, as suppose to forcing/tricking/coercing/intimidating them to pay. Oh, those other ways work, but what would you rather spend your time doing as a developer or publisher? Chasing pirates, or serving customers? I know what I'd prefer to do as a customer, and it's not filling in endless online forms, constantly checking my internet connection (BT has a habit of sending sledge hammers at my ISP), etc.