The Flare Path: Must Tri Harder

When a Flare Path Friday falls on November 29, the 333rd day of the year, it’s traditional for all the stories to have a topical tripartite slant. Back in 2002 that meant detailed scrutiny of a just released Fokker Dr.I add-on for MSFS, coverage of Bronze Tide, a WIP Battle of Arginusae wargame, and an interview with Trilobyte Interactive, the makers of Lucy Lyme, a Spelunky precursor inspired by the activities of Victorian fossil hunter Mary Anning. Today it means words on Prepar3D, N3V’s plans, and IL-2: Battle of Stalingrad’s early access LaGG-3.

333 + 777

The flush fliers that pre-ordered the $90 premium edition of IL-2: Battle of Stalingrad are currently waggling the wingtips of handsome LaGG-3s and Bf-109s at the paupers that didn’t.

Though gunless and confined to a 50km x 50km test map at present, the two mounts have been drawing a steady stream of forum compliments from their pilots since they were made available. Ground handling and flight models have garnered particularly high praise, and videos like the ones stacked below reveal some rather impressive cockpit lighting and exhaust pyrotechnics too.

Can 777 deliver AI and battlespaces of a similar calibre? I touched on these and other sensitive subjects during a recent email exchange with producer Albert Zhiltsov.

RPS: Are we likely to see AI pilots making mistakes in BoS?

Albert: I hope so, we’re working on it. Problem is, it’s very difficult to teach a robot to make mistakes because it’s infallible by nature. To address this, we invented a matrix of various behavior algorithms. I think they will make AI behavior much more variable, but, you know, players don’t always like such things. When we made AI more human in previous games, this disturbed and agitated players. AI started to escape from difficult engagements or avoid dangerous targets and players thought these are game bugs. After decades of traditional AI we’re all accustomed to the idea of a dumb and fearless AI. It’s very difficult to break such stereotypes, it takes many explanations which modern players don’t like to read at all.

RPS: One criticism that’s sometimes levelled at Rise of Flight is that the randomly generated campaign sorties don’t offer many opportunities for freelancing. Will those who enjoy roaming battlefields in search of targets of opportunity find BoS a happier hunting ground?

Albert: Sure, we have made many changes, but we must keep in mind the hardware limits. Not all players of our community have very powerful PCs, so maps will contain as many objects as a minimal requirements system can handle. There will be plenty of objects, but ROF had many of them as well.

RPS: The IL-2: BoS single-player campaign, like the RoF one, will require an internet connection. Why is 777 so keen on this approach?

Albert: This makes many things easier for us. For example, it helps us to avoid agents while working with customers, provide comprehensive statistics which is essential. Some technical solutions won’t work otherwise. We work quickly, for example ROF has more than 30 add-ons. Sometimes it is more than one version per month. It becomes very difficult without a convenient system of working with users. The traffic is so low, that everyday spam in your mail will bring you a lot more trouble. Furthermore, we plan a lot of interesting things, such as the system of regiments, global events or online battles, all these features are not possible without such base. We understand that users always want to maintain some privacy in the games, and we promise to respect this.

RPS In your opinion, when it comes to combat flight simulations, how much realism is too much realism?

Albert: If you return home from work and find yourself doing more work, it is too much. Flight simulations as a whole and IL-2 in particular are skill based games, where everything depends on player skills, knowledge and experience. We don’t want to make a game where what you need to do is mainly follow pre-flight instructions, we all have more than enough instructions to follow in real life. We concentrate on dogfighting, the aspect you are very unlikely to try in real life. We want a player to experience strong emotions… the exhilaration of aerial confrontation.

RPS: Is coding WW2-era air combat more difficult than coding the WWI variety?

Albert: There is no definite answer to this question – some things are actually easier while others are more difficult. Aircraft systems and equipment are more advanced but plane form is simpler. Flight dynamics modelling starts to be more advanced when you approach trans-sonic speeds, but at the same time it’s easier to acquire any historical data you want. When we worked on WW1-era planes, data mining took as much as half of the whole work time and was impossible without visiting museums. This project is different and we are obsessed with it now. It’s great to work on WWII era aircraft after spending so much time on WWI planes; we get to see how the art of the engineer has evolved.

RPS: Female fighter pilots like Lydia Litvyak fought in the skies over Stalingrad. Do you plan to acknowledge this in any way?

Albert: I agree these are heroic stories. It will be great to tell them in the game sometime. Right now, though this is not possible.

RPS: Will work on IL-2: BoS have any spin-off benefits for Rise of Flight?

Albert: Parachutes, and totally new graphics. But it’s only plans. We are still a small studio that works now on a large project. And we must first cope with the task that we are doing now. But we will never forget about our other projects, whether ROF or IL-2: 1946, and will look for the ways to make them even better. Unfortunately I can’t say anything specific for now.

RPS: Thank you for your time.


Forbidden Fun

Most games produce stony-faced indifference by accident; I know of only one that insists on it in its EULA.

For licensing reasons, Prepar3D, Microsoft Flight Simulator’s disowned and disenfranchised sprog, can’t be sold, marketed or used for personal/consumer entertainment. Buyers of the $60 ‘Academic’ version that aren’t using their purchase for serious training purposes are in clear contravention of the user agreement and, presumably risk legal action and crippling guilt pangs.

It’s a ludicrous situation. For the tens of thousands of MSFS users left high and dry by Microsoft’s surprise exit in 2009, Prepar3D is a lifeline – the promise of significant engine development coupled with the reassurance of backwards compatibility. The inheritors, Lockheed Martin, have just added a DirectX11 rendering engine capable of self-shadowing, ruffled oceans, volumetric water vapour, and smoother framerates. They’ve persuaded well-regarded MSFS add-on studios like Carenado and IRIS to provide a fresh fleet of default flyables (most MSFS add-ons should work with P3D). All they can’t do right now, is actively court the users that care most about these things.

Fezziwig Flintwinch, the RPS lawyer, says it’s fine to watch the following vids as long as you’re careful not to derive any pleasure from them.


Coinz Meanz Trainz

Trainz iz twelve yearz old thiz y3ar. Being young, vigorous, and a huge fan of >insertnameofcoolcontemporarybandhere< I definitely didn’t review the original version for British mag PC Format, and definitely haven’t spent the past decade-and-a-bit periodically praising the friendly route building tools, robust AI, and unique interactive industries, and pillorying the thin physics, frustrating content distribution system, and painfully slow rate of change.

If I was (and I think we’ve established I’m not) the kind of fossil that had followed the 15-instalment series since its inception, I might have greeted the recent announcement of a Next Gen version with a Werthers Original-garbled ‘Fiwally!’.

Assuming Kickstarters supply a further $38,000 in the next 18 days, N3V Games will be delivering T2 around this time next year. Going by the glimpses in the pitch video it looks like there’ll be plenty of Graphics. Heat hazes, volumetric smoke and fog, shadows that pivot, stretch and drape themselves over nearby objects… the Brisbanites are clearly attempting to make their arch rival, Train Simulator look a bit Barry Scrapyard.

Whether T2 can compete with TS2014/15 on the physics and ‘feel’ front, may depend on the preferences of ‘Engineer’-level backers. Though one of the updates talks encouragingly of bouncing bogies and coupling slack, slightly worryingly, features like rainproof tunnels, cab sway, super-elevated track, and plausibly rendered points could end up as stretch goals if a backer vote goes the ‘wrong’ way.

Personally, I’ve always been a little surprised N3V never made more of Trainz’s endearing ability to mimic makeshift model railways. With a proven track laying system and so much competition in the train sim sector, a My First Trainz Set with better physics, more props and venues, and some Tricky Truck/Bridge Construction Set-style puzzles could have been a genre-vaulting joy. Picture it… the challenge of getting that cold beer and ham sandwich to Dad in the back garden without feline interceptions, spillages or serious warming, the satisfaction of conquering that Chat Moss of a bean-bag and that towering Snowden of a snoring aunt.


The Flare Path Foxer

Last week’s Top Trumps slide ruler was the always-match-fit Matchstick. He correctly aggregated the wingspans of a BV 222 and Vickers Wellington, the engine output of an Hs 123, the gun calibre of a Pz.Kpfw. IV, the weight of a TOG II, and the type numbers of a DB electric loco and an Austrian shunter. Sublime sumping!

No arithmetical skill required today, just plain-old transport knowledge and lateral agility. Identify as many collage components as poss then try to work out the reason why those components are sharing the same png. Previous hidden themes have included Sherlock Holmes, palindromes, Shakespeare, and woodworking.


  1. Premium User Badge

    FhnuZoag says:

    I believe one of the planes of a SB2C (Son of a Bitch, 2nd Class) Helldiver.

    Wait, no, a SB2A Buccaneer.

  2. Arglebarf says:

    Well, if the S2BA was like its successor, the S2BC Helldiver, it was unique in having an electric rudder. Something involving electric or electricity, ala the train sched?

  3. skink74 says:

    Buccaneer was also known as the Bermuda in RAF/RN service so bear that in mind. Although that is clearly a USN plane.

    I see a lot of flies – Bluebottles maybe. so that’s two things beginning with B so far.

  4. Stiletto says:

    All hail the british TOG II beast!

    Edit: Also, that’s a Panzer IV (Maybe a III/IV?) with the long barrel 7,5 cm KWK (Not sure with model!)

    Edit: Thinking of it, the TOG II was around 75-80 tonnes, I believe?

    • FurryLippedSquid says:

      Wrong puzzle, sir!

      • Stiletto says:

        Woops! I need more coffee!

        Also, I should re-read the article entierly, once isn’t enough, it seems!

        Thanks for the heads up. :p

  5. foop says:

    The timetable is probably for the Brighton Belle. When 5 car all-Pullman 5BEL electric units were introduced, this was timetabled to take 60 minutes to run non-stop from London to Brighton.

    Edit: 2B, maybe? BlueBottle, S2B*, Brighton Belle… Or not 2B?

    MoEdit: For what it’s worth, here’s a flickr link to the Brighton Belle timetable – link to

    • FurryLippedSquid says:

      The battleship looks like a US ship, so would be classed as BB-something.

      • Premium User Badge

        FhnuZoag says:

        You can also argue that the marked square on the map is square B2.

      • Julhelm says:

        The battleship is either the Richelieu or the Jean Bart.

        • phlebas says:

          The Jean Bart, I think. Named after a corsair, if that helps. Something to do with pirates or the Rime of the Ancient Mariner (given the Albatross)?

    • Dozer says:

      The cockpit in outline view is definitely RAF – Bristol Blenheim/Beaufort perhaps?

      • skink74 says:

        I think the black plan view (or whatever you call it when you’re looking at the underneath) is an A400M Atlas.
        The cockpit is bugging me, judging by the number of levers in the center column it has to be a four engined beast, but I can’t match it to anything… Definitely not a beaufort or bleinheim though…

        • LordBilisknir says:

          I agree that the battleship is the Jean Bart. The plan view plane is not A400m tho I think. It is missing the underwing fairing things and the rear of the wing is forward swept (unlike the A400M)

          • skink74 says:

            You’re right, it’s not an A400 – I’m not having a good day. Some sort of Russian? the Antonovs all looked a bit too pointy at the front…
            Cockpit doesn’t match a mosquito. Aha – it is I believe an Airspeed Oxford.

          • FurryLippedSquid says:

            Good match! This is a long shot, but ships currently docked in Antwerp?!

            link to

            Oxford, Jean Bart, Albatros…

            Nah, stupid idea, move on!

        • JustAPigeon says:

          I disagree with your deduction that it is a four-engined aircraft. I reckon two of those levers are for prop pitch or mixture.

        • FurryLippedSquid says:

          De Havilland Mosquito perhaps? I’m only judging by the yoke, not much else seems to fit!

        • Wrekin762 says:

          Transport plane in the black plan view is a Short Belfast C.1

  6. SpiceTheCat says:

    The odd plane in plan view is the Gossamer Albatross. Doesn’t fit the B theme…

    • FurryLippedSquid says:


    • The Random One says:

      How weird that Tim mentioned that a previous theme had been Shakespeare, and now we’re wondering if this week’s is 2B or not 2B.

    • Premium User Badge

      FhnuZoag says:

      Well, there does exist a Gossamer alBatross II…. Maybe this is reaching, though.

  7. DrollRemark says:

    My favourite thing about the Prepar3D site has to be it’s FAQ, explaining the licensing:

    Can Prepar3D be used for entertainment?
    No, Lockheed Martin does not offer Prepar3D for entertainment, and we have no plans to enter the entertainment space. The EULAs explain that Prepar3D can be used for purposes other than personal/consumer entertainment.


    Can Prepar3D be used at home?
    Prepar3D can be used in any location. Where you intend to use Prepar3D is not a consideration in the licensing EULAs; it only matters how the software will be used. As specified in the EULAs, Prepar3D can be used for purposes other than personal/consumer entertainment.

    Thanks for clearing that up guys!

  8. CookPassBabtridge says:

    I think the theme is “blue”. You’ve got bluebottles, a T-6 (?) fighter which was recently flown by the Blue Angels (so google tells me), the whole picture itself is blue, the Gossamer Albatross propeller is manufactured from a blue polystyrene foam (I know that’s a bit shit isn’t it), Southern Electric have (had?) an electric coach running on the Bluebell Railway … the other stuff, I dunno. Big war boats sail on water, which looks blue. The view out of a cockpit is blue. That little map thing looks like an international vessel tracking map. Erm, I dunno. BLUE.

    EDIT: Bugger its not a T-6. It is indeed a buccaneer

    • FurryLippedSquid says:


      That’s almost as bad as my “ships currently docked in Antwerp” theory!

  9. cptgone says:

    the tabby is a Märklin Tiger Ausf. Mieze.

  10. FurryLippedSquid says:

    Well, hats off to you Mr Stone, you have us stumped once again!

  11. foop says:

    To summarise: we have a collection of things, some of which are superlative in some way. Latest identifications are:

    Battleship Jean Bart (or possibly Richelieu), largest warships ever built by France
    SB2A Buccaneer
    Short Belfast C1, largest aicraft that the British military had operated up to that time
    Brighton Belle, first electric all-Pullman service in the world
    Airspeed Oxford
    Gossamer Albatross, won prize for human-powered crossing of the English Channel
    Flies (possibly bluebottle)
    Some sort of map

    I’m buggered if I can think of a connection between those.