Premature Evaluation: Super Dungeon Run

In these times of austerity and inequality, in which the moneyed elites find reasons to parcel off more of public property into their own private hands under the guise of economic recovery, there is something rather enticing about the prospect of commanding a large mob of fighty peasants. But while Super Dungeon Run’s serfs are suicidally avaricious plunderers of goblin property, traditionally the reason for a people’s uprising has been to take back what was perceived to be already theirs, rather than simply to steal from others. After all, we have bankers for that.

Each week Marsh Davies picks up his cudgel and pelts into the dank depths of Early Access, thrashing wildly, returning with any stories he can find, if he returns at all. This week he’s been playing Super Dungeon Run, a chirpy top-down brawler that combines Diablo’s procedurally organised goblin grinding with Pikmin-ish mob control.

Peasants just love gold. They are willing to throw their lives away for it, bundling into dungeons full of whirring sawblades and spiketraps, diving headlong into ogres and goat-headed necromancers as though they were skittles. I empathise to some extent. I too like gold. But I like gold because of all the other nice things gold can buy me. In Super Dungeon Run, gold buys you the means to acquire more gold, and it’s a feedback loop I fundamentally don’t really get, which is why I will never be asked to work for Goldman Sachs. In games, just as in high finance it seems, we sometimes allow the numbers themselves to become our masters. What surely started out as a way of abstractly representing actual progress – making numbers go up – is now seen as progress in itself. However, unlike in some of the other more naked number traps, like Clicker Heroes, Super Dungeon Run appends a game to the grind, and it’s a rather jolly one – albeit, at this stage of development, a lot slighter on tactical participation than a lot of other dungeon crawlers.

A reasonable parallel for today’s rampant plundering of public ownership might be found in the repeated bust-ups during the 16th to 19th centuries over the process of enclosure, whereby formerly common land was fenced in for the private use of a single landlord. The reasons that this happened weren’t wholly nefarious, but coldly economic: in the 16th century sheep farming was becoming more profitable as English wool was in demand, and it required fewer hands to manage than the cultivation and harvesting of crops. Inflation during the Tudor period also put landowners under pressure to raise the efficiency of their businesses.

You control not one hero, but several, simultaneously. There’s no micromanagement here, though: holding down your mouse button directs your entire mob of peasants to bundle towards that single point. They have some autonomy – individuals will break rank to swipe loot or set upon enemies, but sustained long clicks will drag them back into a central throng. Corralling your troops is an unusual and appealing exercise in fluid dynamics, dragging the jiggling mass down corridors, cascading over obstacles, coalescing on you cursor-point as you shimmy them between lethal hazards. Sometimes your numbers are such that it’s quite a squeeze – you may need to press your army into a wall, shaping their formation into a column before threading it between spike-traps or explosives. It has some momentum too, and, as you weave out of the way of flamethrowers and cannonfire, it’s easy to overcommit to a direction and have your numbers trimmed by a saw-blade.

This dexterity challenge is really the core of the game – the one way in which the skill of the player is expressed. Although you fight monsters too, there’s a limit to the tactical expression currently possible in the game. Your mob starts as mere peasantry but, as you unlock classes through grind, your loot-hoovering serfs upgrade themselves by pulling the newly-available class-costumes from treasure chests. You don’t get a say over which you get, or have a right of refusal, and you have no individualised control over the units either – you can’t drag-select a portion of your troops and control only them: everyone moves as a single pack, swamping enemies as a mob. That said, some minor AI variance means range units tend to hang back a bit of their own volition, while melee units launch themselves in – but you are given no direct control over this. You can try and tempt the aggression of individual enemies before kiting them away from their pack, and you can choose to focus your mob on particular threats with insistent clicking – but these are the only positional tools at your disposal to massage the odds in your troops’ favour.

But there was understandable resistance to it: common land was essential to the survival of the rural populace, and enclosure not only meant the removal of land on which to grow food, graze pigs, fish or gather wood, but the removal of jobs and often entire homesteads. It duly resulted in devastation, leaving people in hunger and despair. And it wasn’t just impoverished peasants who were upset about this - even the Tudor crown could see the problems this would cause: criminality, displacement, depopulation, lower tax revenues and a dangerously reduced level of domestic grain production. Yet their attempts to legislate against it, or levy fines on landlords who perpetrated it, were largely unsuccessful.

You’re given a smidgen of additional agency in deciding when to slug potions. These provide all your troops with a boost to health, damage, speed or endurance. Using them at the right moment is important, but, again, it is a relatively slight means of exerting your influence over the battle. However, the devs say that special class-specific hotkey attacks are in the pipeline. I’m not sure how these will fit within a game where there is so little direct control over individual units – but I welcome anything which gives me just a bit more sense of tactical choice, to allow one battle to feel distinct from another.

This said, combat certainly isn’t without its pleasures at the moment – there is a base level of satisfaction in watching your peasants flood over enemies, cudgels flailing. But, right now, the game doesn’t have quite enough variety to make this enduringly interesting. There are currently very few flavours of dungeon, and the procedural generation isn’t especially granular, meaning that after an hour or two, you are very familiar with each room type you encounter, even if the order of them is different. You can choose between an endless dungeon dive or specific quests, which slowly become available as you grind levels, each offering a bespoke challenge – but you quickly become familiar with these, too. More are planned and hopefully these will begin to offer more profound mechanical variety outside of that which you can experience in the vanilla dungeoneering.

As reported in the excellently titled Of Cabbages and Kings: The History of Allotments by Caroline Foley, a Royal Commision set up in the aftermath of rioting in Warwickshire and Northamptonshire found 27,000 acres had been “wrongfully enclosed, 350 villages demolished and 1,500 people evicted from eighteen villages in the area.” But condemnation for this act came only after the people were inspired to civil disobedience. In 1607, 5000 impoverished labourers, led by a tinker known improbably as Captain Pouch, set about destroying the hedgerows, ditches and fences which defined the enclosures. Pouch claimed divine authority in this endeavour, and reassured his comrades that they would be protected from harm by the mysterious contents of his leather purse - hence his name. This did not prove to be the case.  Many of them were killed in battle with the landowners’ men, and Pouch himself arrested, hung, drawn and quartered. His pouch, when investigated by the authorities, proved to contain a small amount of green cheese.

The incentive for progress at this stage seems to be primarily to make numbers go up, so you can unlock and purchase stuff that helps the numbers go up. Without the ability to directly control a sniper’s shot, or even to choose to have a sniper among your ranks, the pleasure of upgrading his damage is lost among other background stats. You might put it down to my borderline innumeracy, but I just don’t find the pull of the Numberwang to be very strong. I see numbers going up as a useful way of abstracting learning that commutes some other kind of tangible benefit. I don’t care about levels, for instance: I care about the new skills I receive that change the way I play the game. But the experience here is extremely flat from one level to the next. New units unlock – warriors, archers, sorceresses, knights, snipers and grenadiers – but the lack of individualised control means your style of play is rarely radically altered. Only if the number generator spits out an army comprised solely of sorceresses, say, does this force a rethink of how you behave.

New potions unlock, too, but it actually seems a mistake to purchase them for use. Once bought, they become available as a random drop from chests – but only the health potion gives you a permanent benefit. Strength potions are a buff that lasts only a handful of moments, and while this certainly incites the player to think more about timing than at any other point of the game, it’s also way, way less useful than healing your troops. Since you only have three slots at any time, buying strength or endurance potions is only going to dilute the availability of a much more important resource, and, given that each class has its own spread of strength/endurance/speed-boosting items to laboriously unlock, craft and then purchase, these potions also feel a little redundant.

Captain Pouch’s peculiar legend now survives as a rather excellent ale, which you can buy in September and October of each year from Potbelly Brewery, to which this image links. I have some affection for him and for his cause - not least because some of my very own ancestors were involved in a mass-trespass protesting further deleterious enclosures in the very same area of Warwickshire two centuries later. As it happens, they were successful in forcing some reparations from the landowner in question - but, across Britain, the war as a whole was being lost. As we witness the decimation of publicly-owned institutions to the benefit of powerful vested interests, the colonisation of our public spaces, the very streets and squares, by private ownership, and the muscling out of ordinary communities from the city centres to make way for billionaire investment in luxury flats, I wonder if it might not be time for the peasantry to grip its cheese-pouches and get reluctantly to its feet again. Or at least make a game about it.

I’m interested to see where Super Dungeon Run goes. With the mob-movement the devs have found a core dexterity challenge which turns dungeoneering into an unusually tactile pleasure, but, for my personal taste, they will need to parlay that into a game which can sustain interest by evolving mechanically across its many grindsome hours. I don’t think mere variety is the sole solution – the unlocking of classes, kit and potions needs to change the way you think about encounters, and give you more options within them. Otherwise its just numbers going up in the background, gold for gold’s sake – and I like to flatter myself that I have more sophisticated impulses than peasants and bankers both.

Super Dungeon Run is available from Steam for £4 and it’s already some splashy fun for a brief period, with prospects to become something more enduringly interesting as it develops. I played the version with the Build ID 694326 on 22/07/2015.

8 Comments

  1. Premium User Badge

    Andy_Panthro says:

    I quite like the idea, but I’m not sure it would be enough for more than a minor diversion. Perhaps additional features might help. It does bring to mind that bit in Super Meat Boy where you can look back at all the ways you tried to complete a level at once, with a stream of meat boys getting killed before that one guy makes it to the end.

    Loved the alt-text too!

  2. wraithgr says:

    I don’t think it ever made it to PC, but this seems like a cruder, less interesting version of Little King’s Story (wii, vita)…

    Ps: I found the term “High Finance” amusing, as though working at GS is like being part of the fellowship of the ring or something*…

    *inb4 someone compares them to Sauron’s army

  3. caff says:

    Cool preview. Useful for both the developers and consumers alike. I quite like the idea of it though. Perhaps the mechanics of fluid management and zerg rushing could be made to work in another genre.

  4. DeepFried says:

    Is it just me or is the comments section horribly broken lately? with advert tiles spilling out behind the first 3 or so comments?

    Firefox.

  5. Shiggity says:

    I really like the commentary with the pictures. Kinda reinforces my melancholy, but still I like the perspective it brings.

  6. cpt_freakout says:

    Very interesting commentary. I’d really love to play a mob game with a historical background. Make a 4-chapter narrative that starts in, for example, Enlightenment UK and ends with contemporary forms of protest like Occupy, maybe trying to avoid direct management mechanics by adopting something like the Sims model of emotional queues which you can fulfill, follow, or do nothing about with varying results. First setting: Gordon Riots (religion, land); second setting: Luddite revolt (industrial relations); third setting: 80’s unions; fourth setting: Occupy. Every time the opposition is as different as the context, and requires different approaches and tools. Anyway, good stuff as always, Marsh!

    • Ross Angus says:

      Indeed. Perhaps this is bad, but I find Marsh’s political perspective comforting. I feel … among like minded people.

      Sergei Eisenstein experimented with films which featured the actions of a crowd as a central protagonist, during the early years of the Soviet Union. In my opinion, his experiments were unsuccessful. Perhaps games are a better medium.

  7. HuvaaKoodia says:

    Sounds like they took the satisfying part of Overlord (commanding your minions to loot and plunder) and made it into a game. Will bookmark for Normal Access consumption.

    As per usual the alt-text is most excellent. Maybe you should do an article on a historical topic with a relevant game review embedded in the images?