Premature Evaluation: The Flame In The Flood

Considering how large floods figure in the early myths of nearly every culture on the planet, they have been a surprisingly unpopular trope in Western apocalyptic fiction during the course of the last century. Despite terrible floods ravaging parts of the third world during my life-time - I particularly recall the news footage from Bangladesh in the 80s and 90s - it has really taken the advent of personal documentation with mobile phones and YouTube, as was proliferate in the flooding of New Orleans and the Japanese tsunami, to really bring home the incredible human horror of such events. So much so that even Hollywood was able to look piteously upon the reefs of corpses revealed by the receding floodwaters of Thailand’s 2004 tsunami, and ask, “Gosh, but what if it had happened to white people?” - as in The Impossible, starring Ewan McGregor and Naomi Watts. Maybe such films do good, in a cynical, roundabout and kinda racist way; maybe that “what if” is really the only way to engage a complacent Western audience in sympathy with people of another skin colour. But I’m not convinced. I tend to think films like The Impossible permit a kind of callow self-pity, allowing a privileged audience to dip into the suffering of another people and come out unscathed, while at the same time reinforcing the notion that the outside world is a place full of chaos and death.

Each week Marsh Davies paddles through the polluted torrent which is Early Access and comes back with any stories he can find, or otherwise tumbles overboard and lets himself sink beneath the surging water. This week he’s been fighting against the tide in The Flame In The Flood [official site], a survival game set in a drowned world, in which a girl and her dog paddle between islands looking for resources – then eventually fail to find them and die.

Games that successfully ignite the imagination suffer under a particular curse: with every evocation of a greater, richer world beyond the borders of the game’s mechanics, the journey between “I want to play this” and “I actually like playing this” grows ever longer and more perilous. Looking at The Flame In The Flood, it’s so easy to imagine stories that the game, in its current bare-bones state, just doesn’t offer. The artists may simply have done too good a job: the sumptuous, saturated colours give such a sense of scale and atmosphere to its sketchy, polygonal landscape, and its tumble-down wood-panelled buildings describe an appealing rural Americana that is dramatically threatened by the raging river which has consumed all but the highest points of the land. What better narrative propellent than a surging torrent of water buoying you forever onward? What better excuse for neatly vignetted experience than the islands you might stop at on the way? Then there’s your own character, Scout, who immediately feels so, well, characterful: her oversized head and soulful eyes give her a childlike vulnerability, but her expression is one of stoic perseverance, of certain capability.

In a much, much less consequential way, the UK experiences flooding of its own - now on a nearly yearly basis in Somerset, where I live. Obviously, there’s no comparison to the suffering caused by the aforementioned tsunamis, but it is remarkable in how ill-prepared we appear to be for what is now a regular and costly occurrence. Partly this is because it is a problem for the little people, who are beneath our politicians’ attention, and simply shouldn’t be so foolish as to live on a floodplain. But it’s also because nobody gets back into government by spending money to prevent something that doesn’t happen anyway - and, until recently, flooding wasn’t something you could guarantee to happen during your five years in office. This is how we as a species face even larger disasters, like the prospect of economic collapse, meteorite strike or major volcanic eruption, by pretending it won’t happen. It’s an inevitable aspect of human psychology - we are not prepared for, and can rarely even conceive of, unpredictable or outlier events - “black swan” events, as termed by the thinker Nassim Nicholas Taleb.

Then you play the game and discover that actually Scout is, in crude totality, a series of numbers that are always getting smaller, and the islands she can visit little more than fortune cookies which may temporarily allay that process or hasten it. Most survival games can be described by such a mean reduction, but few of the good ones are as bleakly beholden to random number generation. And the river, with all its dramatic potential, is a jolly white-water mini-game that takes you between an arbitrary choice of islands, interspersing the doleful act of item collection, inventory juggling and crafting. Concept art suggests a much richer range of interactions to come, but in the only available mode of the current Early Access build, there is no narrative to your exploration beyond survival, and your survival is dictated primarily by luck rather than strategy. At the moment, you only really have three options: find the stuff you need on an island, go to another island, or die. As far as I can tell, there is no particular approach you can take which will improve the odds you are presented with, beyond attaining a quick familiarity with the game’s arbitrary crafting recipes.

Hunger, thirst, health, body temperature and energy – the constant clamour of these statistics, and the fact that each island may only have meagre resources to fulfil one or two of these needs, is the game’s central tension. Judging when to move on is key. Your inventory has a frustratingly tiny amount of space, too, so you’ll quickly need to gamble between which crafting recipes you work towards, sustained only by the hope that the next island will furnish you with the remaining ingredients. If you’re thirsty, you’ll need to make sure you can craft water filters, so you can make the contaminated river water safe. If you’re hungry, you’ll need to put your efforts into building traps to snag rabbits. If you are injured or ill, you’ll have to craft specific medicines or splints. This sounds like it could become interesting, but the current balance of the game makes it all very reactive: the only real choice here is to choose to do what you must, or, more likely, simply what you can.

The notion is that until the discovery of black swans, it was assumed, with total certainty, that all swans were white. This in no way changed the reality that black swans existed. In a similar way, we assume our lived experience is the totality of possibility. It is, devastatingly, not. As Taleb says, it takes only one black swan to “invalidate a general statement derived from millennia of confirmatory sightings of millions of white swans”. So it was that it took the 1953 North Sea flood, and the deaths of several thousand people in the UK, Netherlands and Belgium, to make clear the vulnerabilities of these countries to a freak tidal surge. Coastal defences were subsequently introduced - a project that, in the case of the Thames Barrier, took three decades to complete. We rely upon it still today, although there is some debate about how sufficient it is to deal with the more regular flooding: there were only four flood closures in the 1980s, but 50 in the period between December 2013 and March 2014 alone.

I do enjoy how granular the horrors you can suffer are, and how they are often the result of an earlier compromise, kicking the can of your mortality down the road rather than kicking the bucket then and there. If you’re hungry enough, you can eat raw meat – though you may well get intestinal parasites. If you’re too busy surviving to treat a wound, then you’ll be faced with a bacterial infection down the line. Healing these harsher ailments is always more complicated than the initial problem, but, when you’re in a pinch, it might be worth the gamble that you’ll hit a treasure trove of resources later on.

Mostly, however, this isn’t a choice: you just don’t find the resources to deal with whatever conditions you face, and are bounced between a series of equally inevitable unpleasantries until death. I have my feet lacerated by ants – not that I recognised the wandering motes to be ants when I walked into them. (And I wouldn’t have necessarily assumed that ants could lacerate me through the shoes I had on, either, but nevermind.) This issue is presented as a growing red bar I need to address before the lacerations become a bacterial infection. A tooltip tells me I need aloe to treat such a wound, but the random number generator determines that I shall never locate any. Stumbling on with my rotting feet, I come across a pig which attacks me – there’s no way for me to escape. I fall over, get up, and it attacks me again. And again. I can’t really do much about this. I manage to flee into a house (the pig continues to break my bones as my house-entering animation completes) but as soon as I’ve finished sleeping the game turfs me out of it, and the pig immediately mauls me again. I now have a large number of broken bones, so I figure this run is a lost cause and let the pig gore me until I am dead.

Pigs are OP.

While many in this country would experience momentary schadenfreude at the prospect of the City of London sinking beneath the waves, the drowning of a major financial centre would be really bad news for the global economy. As Sir Hermann Bondi put it in the cautionary report on the 1953 flood, a tidal surge overwhelming London would be “a disaster of the singular and immense kind [...] a knock-out blow to the nerve centre of the country.” One of the Barrier’s original engineers, the delightfully-named Dick Tappin, is adamant that cautionary over-estimations during its construction make the Barrier viable until 2070, assuming appropriate upkeep. But even he stresses that it is principly a defence against a tidal surge, particularly the freak occurrence of major flooding from the sea in-land, and not flooding caused by heavy rainfall saturating the soil and bursting riverbanks. 41 of those 50 closures between 2013 and 2014 were due to just that. “It has been suggested,” writes Tappin in New Civil Engineer magazine, “that this £1.6bn barrier, designed to protect central London should be used more sparingly to protect the few hundred properties close to the river in western London.” In other words, maybe those riverside mansions aren’t necessarily the investment their millionaire owners predicted they would be. Maybe they should read Taleb’s book.

It’s a little early in the game’s development to complain too harshly about the UI, but the way inventory, wearable items and crafting menus are divided up makes it a bit of a hassle when deciding what to craft, or how much, or determining what amount of backpack space that will free up. I wish the dog didn’t bark at every potential inventory item, even things you’ve discarded (which, confusingly, become suitcases). I wish it was easier, too, to tell what items will do for you just by looking at them, rather than having to make space in your inventory to then inspect them. The major weakness of all crafting/survival games is that recipes are necessarily an abstraction and not always easy to intuit – having the UI help you along the way mitigates some of this. I wish your inventory was larger. Like, a lot larger.

A campaign mode is promised to come soon, and this may well provide the greater narrative purpose I feel the game is missing. Right now, the Early Access build is all about the endless mode – a roguelike score-attack in which you attempt to beat previous records of survival and distance travelled. Alec seems to have had a better time playing earlier versions of the game, albeit with some caveats, but I find this stripped-back mode struggles to grab me at a mechanical level: I’m too beholden to necessity and luck to think for myself. Oddly, and entirely counter to Alec’s experience, I found the rafting mini-game to be the most engaging part – it’s gorgeous and tactile, but more importantly, it was only here that I felt like my skill and agency as a player was actually being called upon in some small way. Even so, the whirling water will not always give you much of a say in the route you take, or which islands you can stop at. It’s a great metaphor for my irritation with the survival genre as a whole, perhaps: an inescapable current, carrying you on towards an inevitable death – you adjust the course a little, but the result is always the same.

The Flame In The Flood is available from Steam for £15. I played versions 0.3.002 to 0.3.006 between 01/10/2015 and 04/10/2015.


  1. amateurviking says:

    You might say that the UK’s approach to flood countermeasures was somewhat antediluvian.

    • unimural says:

      After such a terrific opening, I’m hoping for a deluge of replies

      • magogjack says:

        I suprised we aren’t up to or neck in puns yet, more people need to wade in.

        • magogjack says:

          Oh edit button, why hath thou forsaken me !

        • Nibblet says:

          Indeed, this pun thread seems to be going swimmingly.
          Think i will dive in before we are drowning in replies.

          • tigerfort says:

            There’s a pretty large reservoir of water puns available. Some old geyser will be along spouting them any time now.

          • Geebs says:

            Careful, you wouldn’t want to be too precipitate

      • Robert The Rebuilder says:

        Initially there was a steady stream of replies, but now it’s diminished to a trickle.

  2. w0bbl3r says:

    That’s a pretty bang on review of the game in its current state.
    The only thing I would add is that the rafting mechanic, while fun and engaging, is sometimes also based 100% on luck rather than skill.
    A few times I have come across sections of rapids with non-stop junk cars and containers suddenly breaking the surface and then nonsensically zig-zagging from side to side to get in my way. I can only imagine that with the rafting upgrades I would have been able to dodge them better, but since I had only passed by a single boatyard (the only place to repair/upgrade your raft), and hadn’t found a single blueprint to upgrade any part of the raft, so I was stuck.
    The loot you need to repair and upgrade your boat is based on these blueprints and two other things; nuts and bolts, and old lumber. These things are useless for anything else. They can literally only be used for the raft. And with the limited inventory space, and total lack of places to upgrade/repair the raft, it just doesn’t make much sense to stockpile this stuff because you know you will likely never get a chance to use it before you die.
    Story mode sounds interesting, and the game at heart IS great. It just needs balance and polish. But that’s what early access is (supposed to be) for, so hopefully the devs will be on the case.
    They are active on the forums on steam, they are getting to know the regular people on there, and seem to be listening to feedback, so I am hopeful they will come through.

  3. J. Cosmo Cohen says:

    I was so very close to backing this, and then I realized I enjoyed the song playing over the video more than what was actually in the video. It seems my original thought was justified; not that I’m happy, I very much enjoy being proven wrong when it comes to games (and I very much like the aesthetics, too).

  4. Frank says:

    Backed it for the music and am not disappointed (in that regard alone). The art is nice, too, I guess.

  5. Dr.Ded says:

    I really enjoyed this line, “kicking the can of your mortality down the road rather than kicking the bucket then and there”

    • Harlander says:

      And really, aren’t we all a series of perpetually dwindling numbers?

  6. NephilimNexus says:

    Submerged meets FTL, got it.

  7. ebyronnelson says:

    There is at least one excellent, worthwhile work of fiction set in a post-doom future done in by flooding: J.G. Ballard’s 1962 novel, appropriately titled The Drowned World. It’s a work of strictly plausible sci fi (the term “hard sci fi” gives me visions of the movie Demolition Man … I wonder why) in which solar radiation has melted the Earth’s polar ice caps, resulting in the submergence of most major cities and the springing up of a lot lovely foliage everywhere. Sounds like a ready-made killer game world to me!

    • SpiceTheCat says:

      Exactly this. Also The Kraken Wakes, by John Wyndham, as characteristic a novel of his as The Drowned World is Ballardian. The ice caps melt through external malice rather than natural causes (*wonders why I’m worried about spoilers for a 60-year-old novel*). For some reason the scene where crowds watch as the desperately reinforced Thames embankment fails and London begins to fall made an impression on my adolescent mind. The slow retreat as the waters rise and bring new threats could make for an interesting game setting.

    • kyynis says:

      “After the Flood” by P.C. Jersild is also brilliant near-future-in-80’s scifi story set in post-flood Scandinavia. Quick read too. Similar to works of McCarthy in stoicism and hopeless atmosphere. Though I have no idea how good the English translation is, it does some stuff with syntax and grammar that might be difficult to get across.

  8. Wowbagger says:

    The first thing that stikes me about the main character is that she would look at home in Tearaway (unfolded) art style is definitely a selling point.

  9. Phasma Felis says:

    Funny how this still makes me enthusiastic about the game. It sounds like it’s not really what you’d call playable yet, but they’re on the right track to grow into the promise of the music and imagery.

  10. Darth Gangrel says:

    Man, Marsh has really got bogged down in misanthropic musings with that alt-text. Not that I disagree or question it that much, but he usually comes across more of an enthusiastic historian.

  11. anHorse says:

    Thanks for this, I like the idea of the game and the look of the game but I don’t want to get a bad impression of something that should be improving.

    I think for a survival game to be fun in early access you need to have a really compelling mechanic (i.e EVERYTHING degrading in The Long Dark) and I don’t think rafting is this for me, at least not yet.

  12. Shiloh says:

    I have my eye on this, but the fast-reaction twitchy rafting sections and the thing with blueprints and resources (if you need planks and nuts ‘n’ bolts to repair the raft, why can’t you just tear down a building?) keep me from, erm, taking the plunge.

    So far, at least – this will probably change as they refine the systems and give potential players a story.

    For now, I’m still playing Unreal World.

  13. Wobberjacky says:

    I must be playing a different game than Mr. Davies.

    I have 11 hours in the game since the early access on Steam went live, and my experience has not been anything like what is presented here. Every run I learn some new stuff and get better at surviving, and each time I do a little better than the last. Randomness of loot accounts for maybe 10% of my deaths. You can dodge boar charges 100% of the time. So far the crafting system is pretty straightforward; the only trap I’ve run into is making too many bandages. My only complaint about balance is that wolves often do BS stuff.

    I dunno, my experience is that the RNG doesn’t have a significant impact on survival. Maybe I’m the outlier, but this game is already pushing all the right buttons, even with its lack of content.

  14. Ellistrae says:

    I think that the knowledge that items that you give to Aesop (the dog) carry over if you choose to “continue” the game after you die helps greatly. You can store items on him that may help on your next play through and give you a little bit of an advantage for next time. Without this, the game would be almost impossible. I still get great enjoyment out of trying to survive just a little longer. I imagine that an actual story line will only improve my enjoyment of the game.