Hearthstone EU: A Closer Look At Thijs’s Winning Decks

Thijs taking the trophy at the Hearthstone EU Regional Qualifiers

The European leg of qualifiers for Blizzard’s various eSports world championships concluded this past weekend in Prague. Over $300,000 USD was awarded across the Hearthstone, Heroes of the Storm, and World of Warcraft tournaments that played out. On the Hearthstone [official site] front, G2’s Thijs “ThijsNL” Molendijk took home first place and $10,000 USD for his performance – and we’re going to look at exactly how he did that.

Thijs posted his decklists to Twitter, and later took to the Hearthstone subreddit to discuss his choices. Armed with this information, let’s learn a little more about the decks that just won the first ever European regional title in Hearthstone…

First off, a cursory glance at any recent meta snapshot from TempoStorm or power rank from LiquidHearth (two of the most popular and prominent go-to places for people to learn about relative deck strength via collated pro player’s opinions and data) shows that three specific archetypes have held the throne in terms of both power and popularity – Midrange Druid, Patron Warrior, and Handlock.

We’ll get to what those are in a moment but to give you an idea of their presence:

In the qualifiers for these regional championships, LiquidHearth noted that players brought these three deck types 22, 15, and 14 times respectively, in contrast with the average of 2.3 appearances that any other archetype had. For pro tournament play, these three styles are the most consistently seen, and certainly the strongest according to people whose job it is to figure that out.

Thijs brought all three of these deck archetypes, but he made some modifications to them for this tournament. Here are his three decks, how they’re supposed to work and the noteworthy details and tweaks to all three.

[Ed: We assume a basic familiarity with Hearthstone but even very new players will hopefully get something out of this!]

Midrange Druid

Midrange Druid has been a popular style for a long time in Hearthstone because it can be played very consistently and steal games. The core of the Druid toolkit in Hearthstone revolves around plays that cheat the standard mana curve – i.e. playing more expensive cards than they should be able to on a given turn and/or accelerating the rate at which you can play bigger threats. There’s also the popular Force of Nature into Savage Roar combo (14 [or more!] damage for 9 mana). Druids sometimes give up some early pressure for this technical advantage.

This is a “standard” Midrange Druid decklisting – the sort of thing you might see as you try to climb the ladder in regular season play. Thijs has opted for a few deviations from the norm in the deck he brought out at the regional qualifiers in order to tech it (“teching” means customizing his deck with specific counters) against the expected Patron Warrior and Handlock meta. You can read more about those two styles below but here is Thijs’s decklist and what’s noteworthy about it:

Thijs’ Druid Decklist

(Click the image for the larger version)

Innervate x2
Wild Growth x2
Wrath x2
Darnassus Aspirant
Savage Roar x2
Big Game Hunter x2
Shade of Naxxramas x2
Swipe x2
Keeper of the Grove x2
Piloted Shredder x2
Azure Drake x2
Druid of the Claw
Harrison Jones
Force of Nature x2
Emperor Thaurissan
Sylvanus Windrunner
Ancient of Lore x2
Dr. Boom

  • He uses only one Darnassus Aspirant. This particular card has drawback – losing a mana crystal when the Darnassus Aspirant minion is killed – which can be problematic in the late game. Taking one out frees up a card slot for another tech choice.
  • There are two Shade of Naxxramas cards. These tend to get cut when the meta is more aggressive or there is more board-wipe removal in play since their stat value (the damage and health numbers) is low for 3 mana, and they can be easily removed by cards that hit all minions if they don’t get played early. Here they improve the odds Thijs can utilize all of his mana by making a turn 3 play (that’s the point where you usually have 3 mana crystals) even if he didn’t draw cards that would increase the mana he has available during the previous turns. That increasing of available mana is called “ramping”, by the way.
  • Thijs also has two Big Game Hunters. This is purely a tech choice in response to the prevalence of Handlock as Handlock is a deck that runs so many minions that have 7 or more attack. They can be removed by the Big Game Hunter thanks to its battlecry which lets you destroy a minion with 7 or more attack when you play the card. Fun fact: if anything, players are opting to go without BGH at all on the ladder these days, since so few decks run organic targets for it.
  • Harrison Jones is included as weapon removal (its battleecry destroys an opponent’s weapon and draws cards equal to that weapon’s durability). This is aimed at the Patron Warrior match-up because the Patron Warrior deck relies on weapons for early removal and as activators for particular card combos. It can also be useful as an emergency response to Lord Jaraxxus – a card which transforms the hero into Jaraxxus and gives him Blood Fury, a weapon with 3 attack and 8 durability.

The decklist is otherwise a standard spread of Druid removal and sticky minions (ones which are hard to remove) to ensure a board presence prior to unleashing the combo. Thijs does include Emperor Thaurissan in this list, which is only a safe choice due to the fact that he was unlikely to hit any very fast decks in this tournament – Emperor reduces the cost of cards in your hand by one at the end of each turn so taking advantage of a reduced-cost combo or other late-game value from Emperor doesn’t happen if you don’t live that long!

Midrange Druid is not openly favoured against or weak to any of the top tier decklists right now. It can be a tough matchup for Patron Warrior, but Patron is another deck that excels at stealing games and winning from behind.

Demon Handlock

Handlock (so-called because the Warlock wants a large hand of cards!) as a style revolves around manipulating your own health pool and hand size to get minions on the board which have substantially better stats than their cost would, on average, entail. These are generally variable-cost or stat minions like Mountain Giant (who costs 12 mana but that decreases by 1 for each other card in your hand), Molten Giant (who costs 20 but that decreases by 1 for each damage your hero has taken), and Twilight Drake (whose measly 1 health increases by 1 for each card in your hand). The intention is the give you an above-curve presence (i.e. you’ve got more oomph than you “should” at a particular point in the game) that is difficult to respond to for most classes.

Thijs plays the Demon variant on this deck archetype – you can see a basic Demon Handlock deck here – which includes the end-game Demons Jaraxxus and Mal’Ganis. There are also two Voidcallers whose deathrattle puts a random demon from your hand into the battlefield and potentially gets the demons out early (another way to cheat that curve), and a lone Doomguard as another way to get value from the Voidcallers (Doomguard has charge so if the death of a Voidcaller brings it into play you can ttack with it immediately) or add damage to finish an opponent off in the late game. His tech choices reveal that he is focused on being the aggressor in a Warlock mirror matchup.

Thijs’ Demon Handlock Decklist

(Click the image for the larger version)

Mortal Coil x2
Darkbomb
Ancient Watcher x2
Ironbeak Owl x2
Sunfury Protector x2
Big Game Hunter x2
Hellfire x2
Defender of Argus x2
Twilight Drake x2
Voidcaller x2
Antique Healbot
Doomguard
Loatheb
Emperor Thaurissan
Dr. Boom
Lord Jaraxxus
Mal’Ganis
Mountain Giant x2
Molten Giant x2

  • No Shadowflame. Shadowflame destroys a friendly minion and deals its attack damage to all the enemy minions. It’s a purely reactive card played almost exclusively by players who are playing from behind and reacting to more threats from their opponent than they have out themselves. Thijs goes without it at all, focusing on being the player with the better board. As he notes himself in his reddit post, “Cutting stable Handlock cards like Healbot and Shadowflame really pays off in tournaments since they often still play arround [sic] it.”
  • Once again, double Big Game Hunters to handle his opponent’s Giants or other eligible targets (Mal’Ganis – a powerful demon who beefs up other demons and makes your hero immune – is a big one in this matchup).
  • Only one Antique Healbot. The 5-mana mech with a big heal (its battlecry restores 8 health to the hero) is one of the only neutral heals in the game, and potentially one of the best healing cards for any class at all. Since Handlock is very risky in terms of how low it can place your life total early on, having Healbots to respond to threats is often mandatory, but Thijs correctly looks to the slower meta and decides that a second Healbot wouldn’t allow him to be the player applying pressure which his opponent is then forced to answer.
  • Double Hellfire. The second Hellfire isn’t always taken in Handlock, but it’s a smart and safe tech choice when you’re expecting to face any significant quantity of Patron Warrior decks (as Thijs was in this tournament) to ensure you have it when you need it. This is because of the 3 health Grim Patrons used in those Patron Warrior decks. When a Grim Patron survives damage it summons another Grim Patron so the 3 damage to every character which Hellfire offers lets you squash then even if the patrons have started to snowball.

The rest of this list is largely unsurprising. LiquidHearth refers players to a list that Thijs himself created as their ‘standard’ Handlock, and you can see some of the other, non-tech choices that feature in a less specialized version of this deck. Notably, that link takes you to a non-Demon variant, and it plays cards that are safer in a general ladder environment and meta.

Patron Warrior

Everyone’s favourite reason to get in here! In the current tournament scene, the meta is 100% decided by Patron Warrior – even if you don’t play it. Decks have to be able to beat Patron Warrior to be in contention, and any deck that doesn’t trade efficiently with Patron hasn’t been seen in top-level competitive play for a very, very long time. Patron looks to cycle* through the deck very aggressively to find cards that set up combinations to flood the board with Grim Patrons or set up high-damage Frothing Berserkers using Whirlwind damage effects. Whirlwind deals 1 damage to all minions so it can be used to multiply the numbers of Grim Patrons on the board or plump up the damage Berserkers can do. They also add in weapons and spells to remove the opponent’s minions along the way. It’s a deck that can play well from behind, since you can develop a board quickly or draw through your deck quickly to find all of the pieces necessary to pull off a one-turn kill.

While the core Patron package is pretty consistent, it’s worth looking at Thijs’ choices within those options, and his one major tech choice:

Thijs’ Patron Warrior Decklist

(Click the image for the larger version)

Inner Rage x2
Execute x2
Shield Slam
Whirlwind x2
Fiery War Axe
Battle Rage x2
Slam x2
Armorsmith x2
Unstable Ghoul
Shield Block x2
Acolyte of Pain x2
Frothing Berserker x2
Warsong Commander x2
Death’s Bite x2
Gnomish Inventor
Brawl
Grim Patron x2
Emperor Thaurissan

  • Thijs opts for only one Fiery War Axe, which makes sense in a slow meta, since there won’t be many early-game minions to answer using the 3 damage it offers. It’s simply not as automatic of a requirement to play with in a meta with fewer early game trades to worry about, and running the second one is almost exclusively done to try and increase your chances of getting it in your initial mulligan (the bit at the start where you can ditch some or all of your hand of cards in the hopes of drawing a better selection).
  • This deck uses all of the armor cards – two Armorsmiths (who gain 1 armor when a friendly minion takes damage) and two Shield Blocks (gain 5 armor and draw a card). These help Patron claw its way back to a stable position if the mulligan or early draws aren’t favourable. The Shield Blocks are also two of the NINE cards in this deck that provide card draw – that’s for that aggressive card cycling we were talking about earlier.
  • A lone Shield Slam serves as excellent removal (it deals 1 damage for each armor you have), particularly if paired with a Shield Block (see previous point). This gives slightly more of a control element to the deck.
  • Most of this deck is quite standard, though, and you see the above variations come or go based on personal preference, taste, or prevalence of aggro. The single – and fairly massive – tech choice here is the inclusion of Brawl. Brawl destroys all minions except one and is therefore great for a Patron player who is waiting to set up a combo and needs to continue cycling cards to find pieces for it, but cannot afford to leave the board state uncontested. It’s also massively powerful against Handlock, which is one of the Patron Warrior’s significant threats.

One interesting thing about Thijs’ tech choices is that they’re all done to balance the matchups he is expecting to see. He has Loatheb for anti-Druid (to increase spell costs and prevent the fabled Force of Nature into Savage Roar combo mentioned earlier) in his Handlock, but not the other two decks; he runs Harrison Jones in Druid to help its Patron match-up, but not in Handlock or the mirror match-up. Teching Handlock aggressively for the mirror match-up helped to isolate a potential weakness in a 5-game series where all three decks could see any of the six possible matchups.

What This All Means For The Pro Scene

Judging by the LiquidHearth data showing the frequency with which these three decks (using varying tech choices) were brought to the qualifiers, and the fact that they were the winning decks in the European Regionals, it seems quite likely that we will see similar decklists going into BlizzCon. These are all decks that can win games from behind by finding critical combo pieces and pushing a ton of damage very quickly.

We should not that these are not ladder decklists, so you may not see these exact decks on ladder, but all three are standard archetypes that are being played by lots of regular players in ranked play every day (without some of the specialized tech choices to swing particular matchups!).

Lastly, what does this mean for BlizzCon? A lot of players and fans expect to see more of the same, but clever pro players have been surprising us with unexpected deck picks in top-level play for a long time. There are no deck archetypes that are overall better, but with the Hearthstone World Championship and a $100,000 USD first place prize on the line, playing the odds with a deck designed to snipe one particular match-up could pay off for someone big time.

You can find out for yourself on November 6 and 7 when the World Championship plays out at BlizzCon in Anaheim. The eSports events, including Hearthstone’s World Championships doesn’t require the Blizzcon virtual ticket so it’ll be free to watch over at http://www.blizzcon.com/

15 Comments

  1. ChairmanYang says:

    There’s a grand total of 1 TGT card in these decklists, and the decks themselves have been pretty much static for a long time now. I guess Hearthstone is popular enough that Blizzard doesn’t have much incentive to keep the game fresh and dynamic anymore.

    • King Rhirid says:

      True that there’s only one TGT card, but so many TGT cards are either slow (Inspire) or unreliable (Joust), so I doubt Blizzard would expect many of them to enter tournament play. They can still be cool cards which make the game fun to play for the rest of us.

    • Roxton says:

      On the other hand, the absence of TGT cards in these decks is a fairly good indication that Blizzard haven’t succumbed to excessive power creep, which is a Good Thing.

      Also, follow the link to the Tempostorm meta-snapshot site and have a look at their tiers. In Tier 1 there’s the three decks mentioned above, but there’s also Secret Paladin, which relies really heavily on a TGT card (Mysterious Challenger). In fact, that archetype didn’t really exist (and certainly didn’t have anywhere near the success and popularity) before that card was released. You don’t necessarily have to have a deck made up of TGT cards for the release of TGT to have affected the meta. Dragon Priest is another such deck, though it’s less popular in tournaments.

      Finally, while tournaments are obviously interesting and important, they’re not really reflective of how the vast majority of players experience the game. Both the rules and the metagame are different, and the fact that the winning decks here predate TGT doesn’t mean that it hasn’t affected the ladder and the arena (which is currently weighted to disproportionately feature TGT cards).

      • Carra says:

        Ladder is filled with Secret Pallies but they’re weak against Patron so you won’t see them in a tournament.

    • Suits says:

      Meanwhile ranked is overrun by secret paladins with “Dr 6”

  2. King Rhirid says:

    I’m really enjoying Hearthstone at the moment as there are an awful lot of fun cards you can build a deck around. It’s great fun when you get to pull off particular combos on the ladder. It’s hard to get them consistently so it can be frustrating, but right now I’m enjoying the Nexus Champion Saraad card, which gives you a random spell when you use your hero power. Naturally it usually gives me something completely useless, but it’s just fun to play.

    There have been tons of tournaments recently, and Thijs’ three decks here are the absolute staples at the moment, give or take a couple of cards. It means that unless there are particular personalities you love to watch, tournament games can get boring with no variation in the match ups. The main reason for this is the Patron Warrior deck – everything else at a tournament is either Patron Warrior or an attempt to counter patron warrior, and the combo druid and handlock seem to work the best for that at the moment. You would think that would mean people stop bringing Patron Warrior, but it is so consistent and effective that it has a really good chance to win even against decks specifically built to counter it and it alone.

  3. Iain_1986 says:

    The prize pool was $300k but first place was only $10k?

    I only really know poker in terms of “gaming prize pools”, but first place only taking what, 3.33% of the prize pool seems a bit off no?

    • Zmobie says:

      From the article: “Over $300,000 USD was awarded across the Hearthstone, Heroes of the Storm, and World of Warcraft tournaments that played out.”
      So my guess is that the Hearthstone pot was smaller than the total, and subsequently the 10k winning was a larger portion than 3.33%

  4. ThomasHL says:

    It sounds like Hearthstone has a much less healthy metagame than Magic (which is weird, since Hearthstone has the ability to patch its cards). I guess there’s a type of player who enjoys these more ‘solved’ formats though, because all the skill is in playing around a limited set of options.

    • ThomasHL says:

      I do like each player having multiple decks though. Most TCG meta’s are Rock Paper Scissors, so it’s cool to be able to bring all three with you (even if in reality everyone just packs their shotgun)

    • MaXimillion says:

      Blizzard seems to hate the idea of patching cards, going so far as to introduce new cards that are in every way superior to certain old cards instead of buffing the older ones.

    • carewolf says:

      They don’t patch cards though they probably should.

  5. wraithgr says:

    Patron warrior is the reason I dropped hearthstone (please spare me the learn to play comments–it stopped being fun for me so I stopped, that’s all). Thinking back, a similar kind of mechanic turned me off M:tG too… I guess I just dislike playing a game with an “If I draw these three cards before you kill me, I win the game no matter what you do” mechanic.

    That and I realized I was spending too much money on expansions and boosters.

    • Imbecile says:

      Its not playable online but for me Shadowfist was the antidote to the deckbuilding focus of games like Magic and Hearthstone. You draw up to your handsize each turn, so you have a larger range of options, and there are no significant killer deck combo’s. This combined with the ability to attack the Characters too mean that the focus is less about the deckbuilding and more about the way you actually play the game. Thoroughly recommend it.

  6. Morcane says:

    It’s always nice to see a fellow countryman/woman win a tournament, whatever tournament, so grats to him.

    I haven’t played HS myself in over a month…I had lots of trouble creating a control deck that was consistent enough. I’m really bad at aggro decks. And yeah, I too got bored with going up against patron and playing the ‘I just drew the cards I needed for the wombo-combo and you’re done’.