Paladins: When A Shooter And A CCG Have A Baby…

“It’s a card game but it’s a shooter but it’s a MOBA but it’s kinda not and there’s characters… JUST MAKE IT WORK!”

Rory “Drybear” Newbrough is laughing as he talks to me about the process of creating Paladins: Champions of the Realm [official site], Hi-Rez’s shooter where in-game progression comes comes via a collectible card system. I’ve been trying out the closed beta and had a whole heap of questions about where the game came from and where it’s going. Lead designer Newbrough (and studio president Stew Chisam) were on hand to answer:

Before we go any further I’ll run down what matches look like at the moment. In the closed beta you can play against either AI or real opponents. The game mode that’s open at the moment has you rushing to capture a point and then holding it until a siege cannon spawns. When it does you can accompany it to the enemy base and start knocking down gates, forcing your way into the enemy vault. There’s an escort and protect element because the cannon is far better at knocking down the gates than you are solo, as well as all the shooter aspects, taking out foes as they contest the point, try to guard against your push or attack your own base.

Over the course of a game (games take about 10-15 minutes in my experience) you level up. Each level gives you a selection of cards to pick from and it’s through these cards that you can earn better abilities or build your character in response to how the game is going. It feels somewhere between Heroes of the Storm’s talent tree and League of Legends’ new mastery system to me.

The game started development in 2014 because Hi-Rez wanted to return to the shooter idea, although it took a fair while to settle into what Paladins is now.

“We started with a very small team under 10 people, probably April or May of 2014,” says Chisam. “The broad direction was we wanted to build a team-based shooter that had some of the aspects we really loved about Global Agenda PvP but did a few things differently and solved some of the problems we thought Global Agenda had had in its PvP.”

Once the desire to create a multiplayer shooter had been established Hi-Rez began iterating and experimenting. “We tried Smite maps, we tried Tribes maps, we tried Global Agenda maps, we tried putting drones in there and monsters in there,” says Drybear. “I think one of the turning points for us, that we knew was like ‘Hey that’s Paladins!’ is right when we put in the mounts and the cards, probably about eight or nine months ago. We were like, ‘That’s actually really cool – let’s do that and started iterating on it’.”

From then on it was a matter of experimenting with all the different permutations of cards and characters and team sizes they could think of.

“It could be a buff system, it could be a talent system – it’s just a way to change your character or empower it in different ways,” says Drybear. “Once we had settled on a fantasy theme we wanted to make sure that bled through all the elements so cards made a lot of sense to us, to have that magical, whimsical aspect come through the cards.”

The team also wanted to see if they could solve a problem they’d noticed in Smite as well as other MOBAs and RPGS.

“If you find a build you like you’re going to build that every single time until you die,” says Drybear. I think guiltily about the Cupid build I like which probably hasn’t changed since Smite was in beta. “We noticed this when we put in recommended builds in games or popular items. We can put anything we want on the popular items tab in Smite and people will build that every time.

“The core idea of Paladins when we started the project was we wanted to make sure we could break that trend [and allow] you to play differently every game and every experience and match is slightly different. You don’t get a repetitive experience. The card system really played into that perfectly.”

He talks about card synergies – the card that will set units on fire and the one which lets you deal more damage to units which happen to be on fire have an obvious relationship. He also mentions Pip, a small squirrely character with an explosive flask, a slowing ability and a jump. Drybear likes the flask and will get cards to augment that and suggests perhaps I might like the jumping ability so I would build a deck around that. I explain that, ironically, I am probably the worst Pip player I know. I’m far more likely to be zooming about as Ruckus and Bolt (a goblin and mech suit combo pairing).

Thing is, from what I’ve seen of card play via Hearthstone, there’s a danger that although you could try out all these cool playstyles you end up not doing so because there are clear optimal combinations.

“That’s always a consideration,” says Drybear. “Obviously balancing Smite is relevant and I’ve played games professionally before – I was a professional CS player and all that. At that level it’s hard to avoid ‘optimal’. There will be a path that is better than a path, even if it’s by 0.05 percent it’s still better. That’s why when you play a casual match of Paladins you’ll draw randomly from all your cards, you don’t even build a deck right now.”

So at the moment there’s a greyed out option for constructed card play and the ones you can access are the practice mode against AI and the casual play. In casual play as Drybear says, you don’t pre-set the cards you’ll draw, you just get a choice of three which the game hands you when you level up and you make the best of that. It’s the more useful mode initially in beta because it stops people sticking with a comfort build, forcing them to experiment. The team are also still working on the constructed mode as well as concepting a ranked play option.

Drybear points out that there’s that shooter skill element deeply embedded in the game. It’s theoretically possible (although difficult) to do well without the cards – he found that out thanks to a bug which didn’t let him draw any cards one game. “Because of my shooter background I was able to outplay most of the players. In fact in the game I had no cards I end up going 12 [knockouts] and 3 [deaths].”

“It’s not that you need the cards as a crutch, it’s that they amplify you and alter your gameplay,” he explains. “It’s not that you HAVE to have these specific cards. Whatever way you play that fits you best, that’s the way you play.”

But what about situations where it feels like the cards are against you? Might a casual player get screwed over if they don’t get the right card draws one match?

“When we launched the closed beta it was pure RNG. You were drawing cards in game and there was about equal chance for all cards except legendaries [which had a reduced chance to drop].”

Basically it was possible that at level one I could draw something that made me move slightly faster and my opponent could draw some epic card, or even a legendary. A little augment versus an ultimate ability. A few days after the closed beta launched that system got replaced by a more curated version.

“That system where you got random cards felt very loose to the point where it didn’t seem like you were on an even playing field,” admits Drybear. “So we added a system where you draw cards per level based on rarity. Everyone in the game for levels one and two will draw common cards, level three will draw a rare, level four you draw an epic and level 5 you draw a legendary. If you don’t have any of those you draw downward so if you don’t have a legendary [in your collection] you’ll draw epics.

“It introduced that RPG style ramp up and a little bit of MOBAs as well where you start weak and get stronger and stronger. We also made sure to move a lot of the damage cards away from the common levels. Common is more that you get some utility aspects – I change some of my movement abilities, I alter the way I play but I’m not blowing anyone up. As you get more and more you get stronger. That had a huge impact.”

Over the course of each game I tend to get to about level four or five but presumably games can go long, particularly with evenly matched teams. An earlier version of Paladins had nine levels of card draw. You would get to level five and pick up a legendary and then wrap around to level one again in order to replace the original card with a second legendary, carrying on until you had five legendaries. Hi-Rez are thinking of going back to that system so as to enable characters to ramp up over the course of longer games.

There are eight playable characters in Smite at the moment with three more in the pipeline. There are also two more maps in development and at least 35 cards. The studio is expecting a slower growth of the Paladins cast than it has with Smite. “Smite adds one at least every month,” says Drybear. “It will probably be maybe half as fast as that. But our plan is to continually add characters for the lifetime of the game, and cards as well.

“My goal right now as lead design is I want to make sure we get to at least thirteen to fifteen characters as fast as possible because for a character-based shooter the way it maps out is you want to have at least fourteen or fifteen characters. What that does is, from a probability standpoint, is make sure you don’t see the same characters every game. You have a lot of options to choose from and it feels like there’s a more rich experience.”

A diverse character roster can also be used to attract a more diverse player base or to target particular demographics.

“With eight characters you might see a play style there that’s yours and you’re really excited about it but maybe you really like snipers a lot and we don’t have a sniper currently so you’ll be a little turned off by that. So we may or may not be planning a sniper coming soon,” he says. “MAY OR MAY NOT.”

It’s not strictly Paladins but I’m curious to know how character types map to demographics.

“There are a lot of very easy ones,” says Drybear. “Sniper is a great one. Usually younger boys between 12 and 16 really love sniper. They also love the darker characters, the Batmans and the crazy creepy angels of death – Thanatos is a good example on Smite. We know that hits a specific audience. The assault run-and-gun machine gun, usually boys between 17 and 24 will have that Call of Duty experience with that. So there are some very easy archetypes that you can fit into that are obviously akin to other titles or experience they have in other games.

“Obviously it’s loose because Paladins may hit a different audience than we expect but just in generalisations when we look at the market and understand statistics we can point at certain areas and say ‘People really want this kind of playstyle. Can we craft an experience that matches it in some way?”

Apparently when you get to my age (i.e. over 24) there’s more variety. It’s the younger players who are more particular. That said rocket launchers and grenade launchers are things I might gravitate towards.

Okay, so a look at the champions. First thing to note is that they are champions and not Paladins. Drybear explains that that’s part of the game’s lore which is still being fleshed out at the moment. The general idea is that “there were Paladins at some point and they go away but why did they go away? What is the intrigue there?” There are also bits of futuristic technology in this fantasy-style world so the idea is that the lore will bring in more detail on that front.

In terms of play, Cassie and Pip are the big crowd-pleasers. Pip I’ve mentioned before and Cassie is an archer character who reminds me a lot of Dota’s Windranger with her ginger hair, green costume and bow and arrow.

Cassie is one of only two female characters in the lineup at the moment and both she and Skye are of a type when it comes to bodies. Apparently the ninth character, and likely the tenth, will be female, though, so I’m curious to see how they turn out and whether they add a bit more variety. As we talk Drybear adds that variety in character design is something he’s keen on building into the game.

“With Smite I did a lot of ratio analysis of male to female to creature. One of the reasons we did Chiron, Ratatoskr, Khepri – Khepri and Ratatoskr are my designs – was, ‘Guys we have to have creatures, we have to have more females. We can’t have a whole bunch of males.’ So I’m huge on that, making sure the ratios are there. You can break those boundaries instead of making a whole bunch of tall white masculine males as all your characters. You can get some variety in there.”

When I spoke to the Overwatch developers earlier this year one of the character discussion topics was about melee characters in a shooter-type game and how hard it had been to get further than one. Paladins’ team experimented with the idea a lot early on but it never got to the point where they were satisfied with the result. A lot was to do with being in first-person but that’s an issue the team might be relatively well-placed to change.

“We have a unique boon in our favour in that we do both third person and first person camera,” says Drybear. When you’re mounted you go out into third person, same thing when you’re jumping as Pip or flying as Ruckus. “That solves the issue so when we’re ready and we feel like we want to do a good melee character we can do that in third person. It makes perfect sense. It happens in Smite, half the characters in Smite are third person melee. […] As far as first person, it’s hard to say whether we would ever do a character where their main weapon in first person is melee. We certainly *could*. We might get some interesting systems around that. But it’s more likely there will be characters that have a lot of fun abilities that do melee.”

On page two, connections to Smite, Paladins’ business model, mode design and the psychology of scoring.

21 Comments

  1. Zankman says:

    Mr. Designer dude, having tall white masculine males as all of your characters *is* bad… But adding a bunch of Barbie-shaped females isn’t the answer that anyone is looking for.

    Go ahead and add a sexy female, but, you know, don’t make all of them like that…

    The first two being very, very typical – Barbie-esque body and revealing clothing – is a bad sign.

    • NegativeNancy says:

      Fuck off.

      • Kitsunin says:

        . . .
        If basically all of Smite and the current state of this is any indication, it’s very much something worth being concerned over. Seriously, it’s kind of amazing how little variety Hi-Rez has created in terms of female body types.

        • bjohndooh says:

          Original character design is not one of Hi-Rez’s strong suits. Some of the character designs in Smite are decent – I imagine only because they had mythology to draw from.

      • Zankman says:

        No.

        If troll: Get bent.

        If actually serious: Get bent.

    • Premium User Badge

      artrexdenthur says:

      This. Among other reasons (relatedly, the small size of the current roster), it’s why I’m more excited about Gigantic and Overwatch, though I do hope Paladins is good as well. It certainly looks like a better game than Battleborn to me.

    • Rwlyra says:

      Shame that they went even further with this obnoxious style as the game concept looked rather interesting :/

      Do they think Tribes Ascend did not sell because of lack of half-naked female characters?

      • Zankman says:

        If that is the case, it explains so much:

        * Why their design philosophy in Smite is what it is.

        * Why the design philosophy so far present in Paladins is what it is.

        * Why Tribes failed – because if they now think that the lack of half-naked ladies is the reason, they aren’t only very clueless now, but must have been from the very beginning!

        • Cederic says:

          Well, the two demographics quoted aren’t really suggesting they’re targeting a mature or even mixed gender audience.

          Maybe skimpily clad female characters do make a difference to peoples’ purchase decisions. Didn’t when I was that age, but I’m not mass market..

  2. DeVadder says:

    I really like the game so far but the lack of constructed is really annoying me. There are some really neat synergies between some cards and the possibility of different playstyles is observable but it is so sad to be offered only cards that really do not fit your current ones.
    Often the choice for the early cards is less of “What would benefit us in this round or what do I want to play this game?” but “Which of these works best even if future cards do not iterate on it at all.”

  3. Captain Deadlock says:

    This is literally my three least favourite game types combined.

  4. Turin Turambar says:

    CCG… pfft.

    The game doesn’t have anything like CCG elements. The cards are just some passive bonus you gain where you level up. +20% move speed, +40% damage to this ability! It’s just the presentation is stolen from Hearthstone (including flashy unlock animation) in an attempt to ape the audience of CCGs.

    • vai90 says:

      This.

      • Hakusho says:

        “Let’s make card shaped buffs and call it a card game”
        – Abraham Lincoln

        • guygodbois00 says:

          “And it just works.” -Todd Howard
          Except when it does not.

    • Xzi says:

      Worth noting that both Rogue Legacy and Ziggurat present certain elements as “cards,” too, but neither claims to be part CCG.

      Quite frankly this looks like the poor man’s Overwatch, and I’m not sure any level of meta-game genre mixing is going to make it any good.

  5. Hanban says:

    Well, that’s a healthy reaction to balanced criticism.

  6. Premium User Badge

    Aerothorn says:

    I’m confused about the cards aspect. Namely: are these really cards?

    Like, cards are a form that delivers certain gameplay: cards can be shuffled in a deck, and one side is all the same (so your opponent can’t see what you have). From the description, though, these don’t seem to have any elements of “cards” – they’re just skills presented as rectangles. They could just as well be circles.

    Am I missing something?

    • Hakusho says:

      I mean they are working on something like a “deck” system, so they want to make a card came like component.
      But you could also call it a “skill-pool” or “attribute-pool”.
      This is all a bit about definition. When do we want to define it as a card game?
      We could also try to make hearthstone without cards, but it is quite more difficult for (new) players to imagine things if they don’t have a model of a physical on their screen.
      This all is pretty much a design question i think. Maybe there will be more card-game-specific things that qualify for the card game aspect one day. But for now it is a bit vague.

  7. banananas says:

    I don’t know, I really can’t take Hi-Rez seriously any more. To me they just come off as a bunch of greedy try-hards, who are mostly late-to-the-party.

    A MOBA-inspired, class-based FPS.

    With cards…

    *groans*