The Flare Path: Topical Titbits

Nice try Shambler Soft. No doubt you thought naming your new Boer War wargame ‘Aasvogels Overhead’ would guarantee you the top spot in this week’s alphabetised news round-up. You hadn’t banked on Happy Hermit christening their new F-111 flight sim ‘Aardvark Attack’ yesterday morning.

A is for Assault on Arnhem aggravations

Is Assault on Arnhem exactly the kind of bijou battle sim I was yearning for when I penned this paean to cheap short-form wargames back in 2013? Not sure. Whenever I try to play, the camera drifts relentlessly northwestward as if snagged on the tail of a homeward-bound Dakota. :(

(Yes, I have tried unplugging my flightstick and gamepad)

B is for Battle of Moscow is nigh

With maps and campaigns ready for beta-testing and the last of the new planes, a Ju 88, almost in the hands of pre-purchasers, IL-2: Battle of Moscow feels tantalisingly close.

C is for classy Close Combat cartography

Unofficial Close Combat sequel Tactical Art of Combat certainly cuts a dash. Glimpsed for the first time yesterday, the battle maps look every bit as impressive as the strat map.


D is for doubtful Dovetail initiative

Not content with occupying most of the slots on Steam’s ‘new releases’ list each month, Dovetail have come up with a nifty strategy for securing the remainder. It appears they’re planning to release several themed standalone train sims based on previously issued bits of TS2016 DLC. The first product of this potentially confusing initiative is the £15 Sherman Hill-utilizing ATS-coattail-riding American Powerhaul Train Simulator.

E is for Entente Cordiale

Some genuinely good news from Dovetail is the recently announced SNCF licensing deal. With Just Trains also working on Gallic routes and rolling stock, it looks like 2016 is going to be a magnifique year for lovers of bullet-quick EMUs and blurred countryside.

F is for foxer

G is for Go For Launch: Mercury

…a promising demo-blessed Alan Shepard sim seeking funding through Kickstarter at the moment.

H is for Heliborne

Sorry, I’ve been meaning to share impressions of this early access multiplayer air combat game for several months. The hours I’ve spent with it so far have been very pleasant ones – the disadvantages of the currently rather limited map/mode selection more than offset by friendly-but-evocative physics, pretty venues, and pleasing play patterns. Alighting in a wreckage-strewn village then watching as your AI-controlled passengers disembark and scamper for trenches – lovely. Luring a foe into range of the Stinger toter you deviously deposited in a clearing a few minutes earlier – delightful. Keep up the good work, JetCat.

I is for I won’t be returning to Volo Airsport until Ramjet Anvil add speed flying

J is for Juha, K is for Kellokoski

The Finn responsible for the not-Flare-Pathed-for-a-few-years Armored Brigade hopes the payware version of his unusually ergonomic top-down* battle sim will be on sale early in 2017 (publisher TBC). Featuring a more capable engine, a larger Fulda Gap map, an expanded 1980-1991 unit database, and a branching campaign system, the coming iteration should appeal to anyone partial to a bit of Close Combat, Combat Mission, or Graviteam Tactics.

*mostly

L is for last week’s foxer

M is for Mius-Front

Two weeks on from this preliminary assessment, my opinion of Graviteam’s latest dual-layer Eastern front wargame remains essentially unchanged. Though I’m still confused by some of the subtleties and unconvinced by some of the interface ‘improvements’, I’m not sure where else in the genre I’d go to find battles as memorable, atmosphere as pungent, and campaigns as naturalistic.

N is for nautical novelty

Once Every Single Soldier and chums RetroEpic have put Vietnam ’65 sequel Afghanistan ’11 to bed, it looks like they’ll be turning their backs on hexes, hills, and hearts and minds for a spell. According to this sparsely furnished web page project 3 will be Carrier Deck “a fast paced management game where you play as the Air Officer on board a Nimitz-class nuclear powered supercarrier, in the midst of active war.” Multi-colour me intrigued.

O is for OMSI successor suggestion

Having failed to secure a job with SCS Software as a geographical flavour-text scribe last week, this week I’m going to try Oriolus Software:

Dear Oriolus, I was excited to hear that the bus portion of your upcoming public transport combi-sim Lotus will focus on Berlin’s famous ‘100’ route. As the 100 passes so many sites of interest (The Brandenburg Gate, the Reichstag, Alexanderplatz, the Tiergarten etc) I’d like to offer my services as a writer of environment-enriching historical snippets. My fees are… etc.

P is for PMDG propliner previewed

PMDG, the outfit behind some of Microsoft Flight Simulator’s most intricate and persuasive flyables, is close to completing its first multi-sim prop-powered project, a DC-6 for MSFS, Prepar3d and X-Plane. Kyle Rodgers’ preview vids provide an exclusive glimpse of what’s on the way. Hopefully PMDG will rethink pricing before release day. Ten million USD is my absolute limit where DLC is concerned.

Q is for quick teabreak

R is reserved for reader handiwork

Recently crafted a cracking scenario, a stunning skin, or an indispensable mod? Blow your own bugle via the comments section and, assuming your creation falls within Flare Path’s Hampden-narrow purview, I’ll paste a link here.

S is for sons of Sikorsky

I was dimly aware that amateur aeronauts were designing, building, and flying fixed-wing aircraft but until a recent YouTube ramble I had no idea that there were intrepid individuals venturing aloft in homemade whirlybirds.

T is for Tigers on the Hunt

Matrix Games’ latest hunk of hexware seems to be generating as many cutting remarks as compliments. Relatively expensive, rather cumbersome, and cursed with a few surprising shortcomings, only Advanced Squad Leader veterans seem truly happy with it.

U is for understandable excitement in the DCS community

A modder called MBot is in the process of addressing the sim’s most significant shortcoming, the lack of dynamic campaigning.

V is for Victory and Glory: Napoleon

Over the weekend I plan to find out whether Victory & Glory (released yesterday via Steam and the Matrix/Slitherine store, price c£20) is as challenging and flavoursome as Hannibal: Rome and Carthage in the Second Punic War, the game whose engine it quietly repurposes. The little I’ve seen of the elegant battle layer and fat event card deck thus far, bodes well.

W is for Wolves of the Atlantic

Horizon specks don’t come much more exciting than Mark Hessburg’s work-in-progress U-boat sim. Between PC periscopalians and delights like dynamic campaigns, fully modelled interiors, crew management and towable Fa 330s, are various interim mobile releases, the first of which – WOTA: U96 – is now apparently only a couple of months away.

X is for xpurgating X for reasons of xpediency

Y is for YouTube tutorials

Press the tutorials button in Victory and Glory and the game reaches for its clay pipe and tobacco pouch – instruction comes in the form of an hour’s worth of YouTube videos. The reliance on external, passive pedagogy seems to be increasingly common in Flare Path’s bailiwick and I can’t say I’m pleased by the trend. In my experience, few things dissipate ‘new game’ excitement – ‘new game’ resolve – more effectively than being forcibly separated from the game in question at the very start of the relationship.

Z is for Zusi 3

After more than a decade of development, this truthful Teutonic train sim is finally in the hands of truth-hungry Teutonic train simmers. Purchasers of the 64€ memory stick (Sadly there’s no digital delivery option) get to choose activities from vast chaos-spiced timetables rather than cramped TS2016-style scenario lists, beetle around an unusual mix of prototypical German routes, and grapple with sophisticated physics. Inspect the demo and translated feature list if the OMSI-reminiscent approach appeals.

*     *     *     *     *

From this site

17 Comments

  1. Premium User Badge

    corinoco says:

    Dammit, you had me going with the Aadvark sim. That would be awesome.

  2. bit.bat says:

    From what I understood, Battle of Stalingrad did not include dynamic campaigns as per the original il-2, are they intending to have one to Battle of Moscow? BoS seemed a bit online centric which was not that appealing to me.

    • All is Well says:

      BoS does have a dynamic campaign. There are 6 scripted missions that can be selected from the campaign menu, but other than that it’s more-or-less dynamic. It’s a bit limited though, in that it’s more like a string of randomly generated missions (which do tend to get a bit samey) that are not really tied together, rather than a real career mode with a persistent pilot/squadron and so on, like the in Rise of Flight. BoM’s campaign will be exactly the same, unless I’ve missed some critical piece of information.

      • All is Well says:

        Actually I just checked and realized that Pat Wilson (of Rise of Flight modding fame) has released a campaign generator for BoS. I have not tried it yet but if it is anything like his previous effort for RoF, it’s going to be precisely the type of dynamic, career-mode campaign that the single player in BoS lacks.

  3. Premium User Badge

    teije says:

    Please give us your thoughts on Victory & Glory once you’ve mucked around with it – it does looks intriguing.

  4. xyzzy frobozz says:

    $12,000,000 to fly a digital aeroplne?!?!?

    Are they fucking serious? I’ll bet you can buy and restore a real DC-7 for that sort of money!

    • Llewyn says:

      Relax, it’s just a typo. Someone obviously meant to enter $120000.00 and missed the point.

      (Actually it’s their new marginal pricing policy. They take the development cost ($20m) plus desired profit (20%) to give a total cost. The first purchaser pays 50% of this, with all subsequent purchasers paying 50% of the remainder. If you’re planning to buy it with friends make sure their transactions complete before yours.)

  5. klops says:

    That “Combat Mission” sure looks pretty. Haven’t played the series since the first and the second one.

    • Cederic says:

      Close Combat or Combat Mission?

      One’s real-time, the other is ‘wego’. Both are fun although I do find Combat Mission just too darn hard – it expects a level of actual military competence.

      • Premium User Badge

        magogjack says:

        After years of sidelong glances I think you just sold me on Combat Mission.

      • klops says:

        Oh! I really meant Combat Mission but the game is Close Combat it seems. Not the first time I’ve mixed the names incorrectly. Then again, the meaning of my previous post stay true: Haven’t enjoyed Close Combat that much after the second one and perhaps this new CC will be a great one. Interesting anyways.

      • klops says:

        And I agree that both CC and CM are fun but I disagree with the claim that Combat Mission requires military competence.

  6. Premium User Badge

    heretic says:

    Tim Stone is awesome.

  7. Victor A Yorke says:

    Have any fellow lurkers of the comments section had any experience with Heliborne? It sounds pretty interesting, and if it’s good/accessible enough I’ll be able to rope in friends, but… any opinions welcome I guess.

  8. KastaRules says:

    Tim Stone… Rocks!

  9. rb207 says:

    can someone do a feature on or mention FSeconomy!