Samsung 960 Evo review: Still the best value NVMe SSD money can buy

Samsung 960 Evo

When Samsung first launched their pair of flagship 960 SSDs at the tail-end of 2016, they were the fastest NVMe SSDs on the planet. Coming in 960 Evo and 960 Pro flavours, they were five times faster than your typical SATA3 SSD and offered almost as much speed as their PCIe-based interfaces could manage.

Today, little has changed, and both remain widely regarded as the best SSDs around, NVMe or otherwise, with the 960 Evo in particular often being the favoured choice over its more expensive sibling. Available in 250GB, 500GB and 1TB size options, the 960 Evo is still a lot more expensive than SATA3 SSDs like the Crucial MX500 or even Samsung’s own 860 Evo, but with 250GB sticks starting from around £110 / $120, at least it doesn’t feel like you have to remortgage your house just to get your foot in the door.

First things first, a small word about NVMe. Also known as ‘non-volatile memory express’, NVMe SSDs use a different interface to SATA3 SSDs and are mounted directly on your motherboard via an M.2 slot. As such, you’ll need a fairly modern motherboard to take advantage of an NVMe SSD, so you may want to check your PC actually supports it before you rush off and buy one. Provided you’ve got the right board, though, then the 960 Evo certainly won’t disappoint.

I was sent the 1TB version for review, which has better write speeds than the 250GB and 500GB models according to Samsung’s spec sheet, but its read speed should be more or less identical. My test rig also consists of a 3.6GHz Intel Core i5-8600K processor, 16GB of Corsair Vengeance 3000MHz RAM and an Asus Prime Z370-P motherboard, so all the results below should be broadly representative of what you’ll get on a modern PC.

NVMe SSDs require an M.2 slot (above) on your motherboard

Got an M.2 slot (above) on your motherboard? Then you can use NVMe SSDs.

First up in the benchmark arena was AS SSD’s 1GB sequential test, which reads and writes 1GB of files in adjacent locations on an SSD’s storage. Here, the 960 Evo produced a phenomenal 2484.64MB/s read speed and 1916.56MB/s write speed, which is pretty damn nippy.

Admittedly, the former isn’t quite as quick as Samsung’s claimed figure of 3200MB/s read (its write speed, however, is spot on), but when you stack it up against what a SATA3 SSD is capable of – say, Samsung’s own 860 Evo, which managed 524.45MB/s read and 496.29MB/s write in the same test – that’s still a heck of a lot faster than what you’re probably used to.

Indeed, when I ran Samsung’s own performance benchmark in its Magician software tool, the 960 Evo did in fact hit a 3328MB/s sequential read and 1925MB/s sequential write speed, so it’s certainly capable of producing some astonishing results under the right circumstances.

Of course, sequential tests don’t really provide the best picture of an SSD’s overall speed day-to-day. Normally, SSDs have to read and write data from all over an SSD’s storage, which makes AS SSD’s random 4K test a much better indicator of everyday performance. Here, 1GB of files are read and written to random locations on an SSD’s storage in small 4K chunks.

The 960 Evo scored highly here, too, but its read speed of 42.35MB/s isn’t actually much better than the 860 Evo, which managed 40.27MB/s in the same test. This is still pretty great, all told, but not exactly revolutionary. Instead, the 960 Evo’s main strength is its exceptional write speed, which came in at a massive 143.92MB/s. That’s the highest I’ve ever seen, and puts the 860 Evo’s 98.25MB/s to shame.

Samsung 960 Evo vs 960 Pro

The 960 Evo also held up well in CrystalDiskMark’s strenuous 4K 8-queue-8-thread test, too. This is the kind of workload you’d expect to see on a server or workstation, but the 960 Evo handled it all beautifully, producing a read speed of 1635MB/s and a write speed of 1473MB/s.

In fact, the 960 Evo either outperformed or came in just behind its more expensive sibling, the 960 Pro, in almost every test I threw at it (which you can see in the graph above), making the Evo a much more competitive SSD despite a couple of shortcomings. Indeed, the only slight irritation about the 960 Evo is that its warranty only covers three years as opposed to the five years you get with the 960 Pro. Its endurance rating isn’t as high as the 960 Pro, either, but 100 terabytes written (TBW) for the 250GB version, 200 TBW for the 500GB model and 400 TBW for 1TB owners is still pretty standard considering it came out around eighteen months ago.

All in all, the Samsung 960 Evo is a pretty tempting SSD. It’s a huge leg up over traditional 2.5in SATA3-based SSDs, and much better value for money than the 960 Pro. It also looks a heck of a lot neater inside your PC case, too, as it slots right into your motherboard without the need for any extra cables. Just be aware that the 960 Evo doesn’t come with a mounting screw in the box, so you’ll need to buy one separately in order to fix it onto your board. While not technically necessary, it’s probably safer to have it secured than flapping around in the breeze. As long as you’ve got the right motherboard, then, the Samsung 960 Evo comes highly recommended.

15 Comments

  1. Axyl says:

    For anyone who doesn’t already know… 250GB (the smaller size mentioned in the article) is more than enough for your OS install, which I can’t imagine anyone NOT using their NVMe drive for.

    • Premium User Badge

      phuzz says:

      I’m using a NVMe drive just for games and a SATA ssd for my OS drive, mainly because booting from NVMe was such a pain on my motherboard.
      Also, my Z170 board does support NVMe, but using the slot disables two SATA ports. So anyone thinking of getting an NVMe drive, check your motherboard manual first.

    • BlueTemplar says:

      But I thought that the 250GB was significantly slower than the 500GB, and especially the 1TB, due to lower parallelism?

  2. Banks says:

    Excuse my ignorance but… can you even notice the difference between this and a Sata SSD for normal usage? My computer already boots up in 7 seconds and all the programs open instantly, how would I benefit from buying one of these?

    • Morte66 says:

      Once you have a bog standard SATA SSD, you really don’t gain a lot in the real world. Faster drives show a difference in benchmarks that were specially developed to tell faster drives apart.

      Better to buy a *big* SSD, so you will spend less time dealing with spinning drives, than a fast one.

    • BlueTemplar says:

      Yeah, I was disappointed, as going from a SATA 830 128GB to a M2 960 Evo 500 GB, I didn’t feel any difference… (in speed that is! Having more space for commonly used files is such a relief!)

      (Of course, YMMV, and I didn’t do any specific testing except for one game that kept running as crappily as before, poor programming often can’t be saved even by great hardware…)

    • TormDK says:

      I went from a Samsung 850 Pro 500GB, to a Samsung 960Pro 1TB and it is not worth your money for speed alone.

      Sure, it’s nice if you talk with people in the industry that your hardware at home can do 300.000IOPS without problems, however in the real world day to day stuff you are not going to see much improvement, except if you copy and paste alot of data around every day because the write speed is mental and you will get used to that quite fast.

      I’m not a huge fan of using regular HDDs for storage, so that’s why I spent the money on the 1TB version – however from a budget perspective you can do alot better, so if you are constrained there, NVMe is not the right approach.

      • BlueTemplar says:

        “I’m not a huge fan of using regular HDDs for storage”

        Why not ?

        They’re cheaper, more reliable (in the sense that you get warnings before complete failure after which only a dedicated company might be able to retrieve your data at the cost of many £££), and can be completely erased…

  3. LearningToSmile says:

    I was actually thinking of getting one, since I got the upgrade itch, and that’s the only thing that makes sense right now given the current market situation.

    But what I want to know is if I upgrade from a regular SSD with performance similar to the 860 Evo, will I actually feel the real life performance difference, or are synthetic benchmarks all it’s good for?

    And is it comparable to the jump from HDD to SSD?

    • Jer_Stryker says:

      Probably yes to the first question (you can feel it.) Definitely no to the second.

    • TormDK says:

      No, you will not be able to feel it all that much unfortunately.

      The only use case, is when you copy/paste files around, because then it will actually get used. For all other day to day activities, it’s not going to do you much good.

  4. Ghostwise says:

    If any of y’all is wondering when a new drive that’s better than the 960 will *finally* emerge, I have a PSA.

    I will buy mine in 2-3 months. And experience strongly indicates that a much better model will be unexpectedly released on the following week.

  5. poohbear says:

    so the author never answers the crucial question: For those of us on SSDs, will we ever notice a difference in real world tasks? You said its the same in the 4k test as the 860 Evo, but you never talked about how it is on a day to day basis when you were using it. This would be a crucial question to answer and mention in such an article, no?

  6. Jer_Stryker says:

    I’ve had the NVMe 1TB 960 EVO for about a year in my main gaming PC, and SATA SSDs in the two laptops and HTPC in my home. Yes, you notice the speed difference. It doesn’t change your life like your first SSD, but it definitely “feels” at least 2-3x faster. I’m extremely happy with this drive and intend to go NVMe from now on unless I’m doing a budget build.

Comment on this story

HTML: Allowed code: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>