For Honor’s training hub aims to turn squires into knights

236H, 623M... wait, wrong game

When you stack it up against just about any other major multiplayer game, medieval murderfest For Honor seems a little esoteric, but Ubisoft are still sure that the game has legs as a competitive scene – it just needs to remind the players how to run. In a major free update rolling out for the game tomorrow, For Honor is expanding with a series of official training missions, a complete in-game glossary of terms and a freeform arena mode to test classes and weapons in.

The training hub seeems impressively comprehensive. Complete beginners will start out with a step-by-step tutorial teaching you the absolute basics of gameplay, but the new Warrior Trials missions are designed specifically to teach the finer points of the game, from map-control tactics to how to effectively feint in order to create openings. It’s not entirely unlike the Situation missions in Rainbow Six: Siege, and it’s a little strange that For Honor has been left without this level of tutorial until now, but it’s great that it’s happening, even if it’s a bit late.

Ubisoft’s efforts don’t seem to be wasted. A quick glimpse at the Steamcharts figures for the game (unofficial, but reliably accurate) reveals that its active player-base has grown by more than 50% over the past three months on Steam alone. Considering that this is a Ubisoft game there are likely a good number of additional players logging in via Uplay as well. It would seem that the introduction of dedicated servers and the company’s commitment to a second season of updates hasn’t gone amiss.

The release of the training mode comes not long after the launch of the Starter Edition for the game. While not ideal for anyone planning on pouring extensive time into For Honor due to its greatly increased grind to unlock additional characters, dabblers and super-casual players can now jump in at the fairly reasonable price of £12/$15.

I must say, much as people snark over the games-as-service concept, I’m always sad to see a multiplayer community fizzle out without support. Ubisoft’s new imperative to prop up even their less immediately profitable online games seems to be paying off so far, and I’d much rather see this continue than go through another age of of multiplayer could-have-beens being axed within months of launch.

4 Comments

  1. abstrarie says:

    Adding a training mode a year after release. Brilliant!!! Wait. Why wasn’t it there to begin with?

    • Hartford688 says:

      Of course very true, but at least now they are trying to fix their mistakes. I respect it more than EA’s approach (i.e. dumping ME:A once the initial release was a disappointment) which doubly screws over anyone who buys their product – you buy into a series (or at least further story DLC), then initial release is poor, then they cancel the rest.

      Given how Ubi have supported R6:S and this, it gives me a little more confidence to take a chance with them in future.

  2. Nelyeth says:

    To be fair, there was a tutorial in the single-player campaign (and, arguably, the whole single-player campaign was a tutorial), and you could always play custom games against bots of various difficulties to get the hang of a class.

    But yes, the whole thing was rather rigid, and a proper training mode should be miles better.

    • mike69 says:

      Maybe… but would you have used it?

      By the time I’d finished the tutorial and a couple of practice matches I was ready to get swinging my axe. Even if I could have benefited from a little training it’s not a job it’s a video game. I trained myself while playing other people.

      This would make sense to me if the game didn’t have any learning material, but it already has more than a lot of games. I haven’t even started the single player campaign. Strange thing to focus on IMO.

Comment on this story

HTML: Allowed code: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>