The best PC games ever Best PC games of 2018 Best graphics card 2019 Best free games Fortnite challenges 100 Apex Legends tips

37

The Secret History Of Rock Paper Shotgun - Part Four: Storming, Norming, Performing

Let the waters bring forth swarms of living creatures

Featured post

We reach Part Four of The Secret History Of Rock Paper Shotgun, a retelling of the first few months of the site, as recalled from the emails at the time. You can read parts One, Two and Three, for chronology’s sake.

Today, the site has launched! And gosh, we’re at each other’s throats. Readers start arriving, our reputation starts building, and then we get an email that changes everything.

“I’ve just added pics to the two top stories on RPS, on launch day.

We’ve got to remember pictures – today especially!”

We were ever the most professional of websites. That was a grumpy email I sent on Monday, 20th August, 2007, the day we told the world Rock Paper Shotgun exists.

“I’m not entirely sure that an enormous picture of Trip Hawkins which you have to scroll past is how we’d want to invite people to the site either,” replied Kieron.

Gosh, looking back at it, all the exchanges were so snippy. I feel no pride whatsoever about my tone. I think we were likely feeling the pressure. Although saying that, I’m pretty sure passive-aggression and sniping was ubiquitous in how we communicated throughout those early years. Creative types.

I wish I had some sort of tale of jubilant launch parties and public affection, but honestly, it was just another day on the site. The most dramatic moment was when we sent out a press release to the entire gaming world. From reading through emails, Jim was somehow away that day, Alec had just gotten back from a trip, and Kieron and I were fighting about image sizes. Oh, and in the afternoon Kieron announced he was going to the zoo. Everyone was clearly extremely annoyed with each other, each working from our own homes, all the clashes of a new project reaching a head. Urgh, here’s a reply I sent to Kieron:

“You can be more accurate when being patronising.”

On August 21st, essentially Day 2 of RPS, Kieron sends an email that was clearly the result of another bust up. I know this because Kieron begins, “Alec and I have been brainstorming.”

In this instance, both had started writing a post about Mafia at the same time. We had absolutely no method of organisation. We were mostly talking by email, individual IM windows, and the phone. Because, at the time, there was no Slack, no Discord, no Trello. Our first solution, as best as I can recall, was an open IRC channel.

Kieron’s suggested solution to accidental clashes was to stake our claims to an article by writing an aggressive title into the CMS. “I AM WRITING QUAKE 5” was his example. A system of bagsying. God that’s so RPS.

Attention to the site began trickling in. We got the occasional nice email from industry types, and PRs started to take some slight notice of us, sending the odd press release. People were actually reading! Kieron had set up a stat counter on the site, and reported:

“Since I set the thing going about an hour ago, we’ve had 150 uniques and over 300 page views. And 5 returning viewers.”

Clearly these are not numbers anyone would want to boast of, but in an hour that felt pretty good!

Still we argued away in the background, a lot of storming still to do before we could begin performing. Although in between the snarky missives there were more positive, upbeat exchanges, alongside incessant exchanging of ideas, and forwarded kindly notes from friends and strangers.

Then Kotaku linked us. That was September 2nd. It was significant. It was an established site recognising us as a peer, and recognising some of our BioShock coverage had been unique amongst the rest of the industry. Thank you Maggie Greene.

Other sites started linking in, and while we were still very small fry, the industry was beginning to take us seriously. And we were being canny about it. PR firms and big name games weren’t going to waste their time talking to us while we were tiny, so we focused on lesser-known games, or the titles on a PR’s lists that the other sites were ignoring. We wrote about what we found interesting, and we wrote it in ways we found interesting to write. People were reading us. Editors at other outlets were getting annoyed by our scooping them, trying to wield power they no longer had. It was working. By the 8th September we were averaging 5,000 to 10,000 pageviews a day. Tiny by any standards, but it was an extant readership. And then something very big happened. Valve happened.

While Valve was, of course, the absolute apex of PC gaming, it’s crucial to note that Steam at the time wasn’t all that big of a deal. But it was about to be. In 2007 it carried a handful of third-party games, and it had been big news when 2K announced they’d be releasing BioShock on that platform. But wasn’t until something called The Orange Box was announced that everyone wanted Steam on their PC.

When it appeared as unreleased in our Steam press accounts, I got in touch with Valve’s PR guy to ask for more information. And he replied with:

“Congrats on the launch of the new site.

We should have you all over for a visit some time soon.

Let me know if someone would like to fly over to play Portal and EpTwo so you can have those reviews ready for the moment they go live.”

I really don’t think we can underestimate how significant this was for the early success of RPS. We were, as a website, nobodies. Looking through the emails of that first month, we couldn’t even get PRs to let us send emailed Q&As to known developers. Our reputations had weight, but our web traffic did not. And then, somehow, we were being offered the biggest reviews on the planet, in time to compete against all the biggest players on the planet.

I sent an email to the others, titled, “Um, so this is quite big”.

“I want to do this. Obviously I really want to do this. I can’t imagine that anyone doesn’t want to do this.”

I’m laughing out loud as I read the emails between us as we discussed this opportunity, our hesitation (there was hesitation!) being that, “We don’t do reviews.”

“We don’t do reviews. But I think at a certain point, this is unmissable. This is big hits, and big prestige. And we can have reviews without scores, because we can.”

We were so convicted of our determination to be different that there was even a moment of wondering if we should grab this with both hands and both feet because it went against our self-determined remit.

I sent that email at 2.30am. At 8.30am I followed up,

“It seems that no one objects to my going, which is excellent – hooray! Kisses for everyone.

So, if this doesn’t fall through (eg. he realises that we’re not IGN or something) I will obviously be getting as many interviews for RPS as I can. With this in mind, I’ve started a Google doc for people to put excellent questions into.

Man, it would suck if this fell through.”

It was so hard to believe it wasn’t a mistake. It really wasn’t. I found out when I was over there that in the less than a month we’d been going, we’d become a favourite site with a significant number of Valve staff. They were really keen to have us there. Perhaps something not so true today…

But it really did present a dilemma! While it was still only three weeks since we’d launched, we’d made quite the thing internally about how we wouldn’t review games. We hated scores, we wanted to talk about games. And yet here was our biggest opportunity, that revolved around reviewing three of the biggest games of the year.

Maddeningly, the discussions that led to our somehow deciding “Wot I Think” was the best possible direction all took place in the pub, so I don’t have a record of them. But safe to say, we compromised, and recognised reviews for what they were: our opinions. With a decade each of games criticism behind us, we all strongly understood that reviews were as subjective as writing could be, and wanted to make that central to our ethos. The name was intended to make clear that not only were our reviews opinions, but they were individual opinions. As in, just because, say, Kieron thought a game was great, it didn’t mean RPS thought a game was great. We could disagree with ourselves – a concept that was utterly alien to games journalism at the time. And as for the misspelling of “What”? Spelling it correctly just felt so bloody arrogant. We were pricking our own pomposity with the goof.

As for the Valve trip, it all went well. I played Portal and Half-Life Ep 2 through while I was out there, and interviewed Portal’s leads Jeep Barnett and Kim Swift. Oh, and I interviewed a certain Gabe Newell, too. Which, and I can’t prove this, I think was something only RPS got to do. And gosh, it brought in some readers.

To be continued tomorrow

Tagged with , .

If you click our links to online stores and make a purchase we may receive a few pennies. Find more information here.

Who am I?

John Walker

Senior Editor

One of the original co-founding robots of Rock, Paper, Shotgun, I'm now a senior editor and hero of humanity. Old and special.

More by me

Support RPS and get an ad-free site, extra articles, and free stuff! Tell me more
Please enable Javascript to view comments.

Please log in to reply.

Advertisement

Latest videos