If you click on a link and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. Read our editorial policy.

Raven QA staff and Activision clash over who gets to vote for union

Activision want as many staff to vote as possible

In a National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) meeting earlier this week, representatives from Raven Software and Activision Blizzard clashed over the next steps in employees' attempts to establish a union within the Quality Assurance department. Specifically, both parties disagree over who should be eligible to vote in union elections.

Although the proposed union is specifically of QA staff, Activision want the eligible voting group to contain as many employees as possible. In a statement given to the Washington Post, an Activision rep said: "This is an important decision that will affect everyone at Raven, and we believe that every eligible employee deserves to have their vote counted. We look forward to the NLRB’s decision."

This mirrors what Activision Blizzard said when initially declining to recognise the union last week.

Lawyers representing the fledgling union, which calls itself the Game Workers Alliance, argue that this is an attempt to dilute the voting pool. The people who most want a union for the QA department are staff working in the QA department, obviously, and not those working elsewhere within Raven. Game Workers Alliance say they have a supermajority, with 34 QA employees supporting the union.

Activision Blizzard also restructured the QA department last month, moving staff from a separate team to instead embed QA staff within particular development departments. Given the timing, this is also being seen by Raven staff as an attempt to undermine unionisation efforts.

"The first few days we were supposed to start the embedded testing model no one, not even management, knew who we would be directly reporting to,” one Raven employee told the Post. "Several weeks into being an embedded tester, it is still not clear to me exactly what I’m supposed to be doing."

Part of Activision Blizzard's argument is that a union "could limit the amount of overtime worked, which might affect the quality of a game upon launch." Using some of the billions Activision Blizzard generate to hire more staff to compensate is, I suppose, out of the question.

The decision on who gets to vote will ultimately be taken by the NLRB, a government agency.

QA staff at Raven decided to unionise after first walking out in protest of layoffs of QA staff which began on December 3rd. When announcing the union, workers also cited crunch conditions, low pay, and referenced the allegations of Activision Blizzard having a culture of harassment and discrimination. Activision Blizzard are, of course, also in the process of being bought by Microsoft for $69 billion.

You're not signed in!

Create your ReedPop ID & unlock community features and much, much more!

Create account
About the Author
Graham Smith avatar

Graham Smith


Graham used to be to blame for all this.

Rock Paper Shotgun logo

We've been talking, and we think that you should wear clothes

Total coincidence, but we sell some clothes

Buy RPS stuff here
Rock Paper Shotgun Merch