Rock, Paper, Shotgun

Australia To Ban Rest Of World, Probably.

By Kieron Gillen on June 25th, 2009 at 9:36 pm.

This is pretty much straight news-blogging. It’d be easy to editorialise on it, but I suspect you know exactly what I’m going to say. Australia is already known for its lack of an actual real 18/R rating, so banning any game that would get over a 15 here. It’s also known for its [forwarding - Ed] net-censoring, with active network-level blocking of sites [being proposed -Ed]. It’s being reported that they’re bringing these wonderful developments together, wanting to block access to sites including any content that doesn’t hit that 15 rating, including everything from shops that will ship real games to Australia to flash games to any other downloadable adult-rated game. Do read the full story, which does explore some of the implications – like, say, World of Warcraft not being rated in Australia due to being an online game. So… is that going to be banned? We’ll follow this one carefully.

Actually, let’s editorialise a bit: Piss Right Off.

__________________

« | »

, .

157 Comments »

  1. undead dolphin hacker says:

    Australia lost its last shred of cultural significance with the passing of Steve Irwin.

    Also, what does anyone expect from a former exile/prison country? I mean, aside from the obvious treating its citizens like exiles/prisoners via draconian censorship, of course.

  2. changeling101 says:

    All I can think to say is : Man does it suck to be them.

  3. Tei says:

    On my university we where disallowed to use internet. But with the help of hackers, we breaked the system and get outside anyway. Theres nothing more “pro-hacker” than settings a wall.
    And of course, this don’t stop piracy. So warez can be distributed, but not legal software.
    Maybe once the people has grown with games become old enough and maiority these politicians can change?. Is obvious that are using videogames as a scapegoat. Probably are corrupt politicians, or trollish politicians that want “cheap votes” creating hate against games, because are a easy prey.
    Horrible bad politicians, hope you guys (aus guys) can remove these from power as fast as posible.

  4. Railick says:

    They got them there kanaroos though so it ain’t all bad.

    It is kind of ironic that TF 2 , which contains one of the few Australian characters in any game I can think of (I can’t even think of one other game with an Australian character in fact) is going to get banned if it isn’t already. Or does TF 2 carry a rating in Austarlia ? It is an online game but not quiet like WoW.

  5. Rob says:

    The bureaucrats clearly know what is best for their country.

    /s

  6. Linfosoma says:

    This is so bizarre, aren’t we supposed to evolve as a race an acquire a higher level of tolerance?
    I feel like we are going backwards, I need to check my calendar to make sure this is not the year 1930..

  7. Railick says:

    99 out of 50 of my Australian friends are beach bums (that doesn’t explain how I met them on WoW and I’m just going by their own self description) I learned a great deal from them, for example the meaning of axe wound. (I.E. she was a real axe wound) I dunno if that guy just made it up or if they use that a lot of Australia, I dunno but it was funny because we were all drunk over team speak playing WoW together poorly, getting pwned over and over by a single undead priest who could kill us all in under 30 seconds (we didn’t care we were drunk)

  8. Sarble says:

    @Linfosoma
    “This is so bizarre, aren’t we supposed to evolve as a race an acquire a higher level of tolerance?”

    If only…

  9. Dave says:

    Stay classy, Australia.

    Oh wait.

  10. Junior says:

    Those poor buggers!
    Can’t we invade to liberate them from a corrupt and evil government?

  11. pissrightoff says:

    if you ask me, the world is going to be a controlled enviroment more and more, until we have camera’s in our bedrooms……….

  12. Bhazor says:

    Like Tei said, piracy on all formats is going to sky rocket. But I also feel it is important to enforce age restrictions http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KnqLyYeyOCs. Also these guys clearly show the dangerous effect on behaviour games can have http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAT_JNd6UGI. Lets have less rappers and tits and lots more Noby Noby, Space Invaders Xtreme and Katamari. Who doesn’t want a bit more Noby, swollen balls and Minter lead mania in their life?

    This comment thread is gonna get racist I feel, ruddy racism, boo racism.

  13. Joseph says:

    Fuck this.

    Yes, sucks to be us.

  14. joe says:

    I think somebody put a monkey in a suit and told them to make up a law at random.

  15. sebmojo says:

    Rallick: Halo had some Australian space marines. And as to the ‘axe wound’ – that sounds authentically Ocker. I was staying in a hostel in Stockwell a few years back and some ozzie was leaning out the window and yelled ‘suck my sweaty danglers!’ at passers by. They’re a strange and crude people to their southern neighbours.

  16. Novotny says:

    Are these twats elected? If so, get rid of them at the next election.

  17. Gap Gen says:

    So Yahtzee turns into a ball of rage and engulfs the south pacific?

  18. Jeremy says:

    @Linfosoma

    Kind of an interesting way to say it, because if we’re so evolved why are we intolerant of Australia’s stance that is obviously so very different from the rest of the worlds?

    Regardless of your take on the matter, tolerance isn’t a one way road.

  19. Clockwork Harlequin says:

    @Tei: They don’t have to be corrupt. In modern democracies we have system that punishes ‘honourable’ politicians (if your party doesn’t hit the news at least once a week, people forget you, your ratings drop, etc). And also a situation where if you don’t use games as a scapegoat, the opposition probably will. And blame you.

    I don’t blame politicians, I blame voters. Attention span of a gnat.

  20. stormbringer951 says:

    Racism time. Sigh.

  21. Pidesco says:

    This is just moronic.

    And that’s proper editorialising, by the way.

  22. Zaphid says:

    The should move Max Payne 3 from Brazil to Australia.

    You know Rockstar are dicks enough to do that.

  23. Railick says:

    GTA 5 could be in there :P or they could change Postal 3 to being in there at the last second and give you a special weapon where you use a Tasmanian devil as a weapon and use a platypus to stab people with it’s poison claws :P piss of a roo and have it kick people in the stomach.

  24. Carra says:

    It’s time Saxton Hale kicks some sense in his fellow Australians.

    Luckily blocking never has worked before. Remember the drought. And with the internet it’s just too easy to buy your games at an online shop. Or pass any proxies. Or…

  25. Kadayi says:

    Isn’t all this shit down to just one politician who hates computer games?

  26. Mil says:

    If they do ban WoW (although I can’t really see it happening), the situation will be ripe for the rise to prominence of the Australian Pirate Party.

  27. Ashurbanipal says:

    Axe wound: I’m Australian and I’ve never heard of it. Might be a regional thing.

    As far as this story goes, it’s depressing and I feel incredibly helpless. In any case, I strongly doubt the internet filter thing is going to go through, since it’s been marked by controversy from the start. Not only outrage from the web plebs, but I understand also from ISPs and businesses themselves, since the more “accurate” filter would impact on our already woeful speeds.

    And it’s not so draconian as you lot seem to think. The only games I can think of that Australia has banned outright are Manhunt and Dark Sector. I’m actually a bit surprised to find myself cheerfully playing the ultra-violent Prototype.

    I’m definitely not happy about the classification debacle or the web filter thing. It makes me a little uncomfortable to see how that sort of thing is perceived abroad as well.

  28. Railick says:

    Postal 2 was banned in Australia too, don’t forget :P

  29. Railick says:

    List of games banned in Australia – 7 Sins, 50 Cent:Bulletproof, Blitz: The Leage, BMX XXX, Dark Sector, Dreamweb, Fallout 3 ( didn’t know that!) FEAR 2, The Geataway, GTA 3 , GTA SA, GTA VC, GTA IV, Leisure Suit Larry Magna Cum Laude, Marc Ecko’s Getting Up:Contents Under Pressure , Manhunt 1 and 2. Narc , Posatl 2, Phantasmagoria, Reservoir Dogs, Sexy Poker (lol), Shellshock : Nam 67 , Silent Hill Homecoming , Singles :Flirt up your life (that game is like Nasty sex Sims) Solider of Fortune : Payback (awesome game) Tender Loving Care, The Punisher, Voyeur.

    So yah, they’ve banned a lot.

  30. AlpineViper says:

    Um… theres no filtering of sites in Australia… yet. It’s still in a trial. And given more independent senators keep jumping the filtering ship it’s fortunately starting to look like there never will be.

    Axe wound: I’ve heard of this term, but can’t be used in the context mentioned above.

  31. Blast Hardcheese says:

    Ashurbanipal: “As far as this story goes, it’s depressing and I feel incredibly helpless. In any case, I strongly doubt the internet filter thing is going to go through, since it’s been marked by controversy from the start.”

    Sir you do realize that it’s basically already underway?

  32. Railick says:

    The only country that comes close is Brazil (and not very close at all) most of the games they banned are ancient. It says they banned Ever Quest for high impact violence O.O !??!?!?!?!?! You can’t even see the weapos hit the enemies and the only way you know is by watching their health drop wtf.

    Germany has a few banned but only because the reference the N word so that is totally legit ot me. Then China has banned a few games because they make the army look bad or make Taiwan and other conquered countries look like they’re free and their own country (Like Hearts of Iron of all games which is set in WW2)

  33. Jason says:

    I just moved to oz from dear old blighty, say what you like about casual rascism and it being 5 years in the past but its a lovely place. and there isn’t technically a recession here. now the more they talk about the ISP filter the more ridiculous it sounds and the less workable it sounds. In recent new china is having to insist that new pcs are sold with built in hardware to enforce its filter. I don’t think rudd has got the balls on this one.

    also when Senator Nick “crazy” Xenophon is against it, its not gonna pass easily

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/02/27/2503830.htm

  34. AlpineViper says:

    I can’t comment on that whole list, Railick, or where you got it from, but I’ve seen a fair number of them in stores here. Fallout 3 was banned until morphene got renamed med-x (or whatever) which was never because they changed it before actually releasing the game. Phantasmagoria my friend and I played when we were about 14 (whoops…) before downlaoding games was ever heard of. All the GTAs have been on sale in stores here, FEAR 2, that list looks far, far too large.

  35. Bhazor says:

    Reply to Railick
    Blitz? That was a sports game right?

    Also I feel the need to point out, how many of those games would actually be missed? Also the bans seem to relate to drug use such as in Fallout or GTA rather than violence. That stuff can be neatly side stepped by renaming drugs or referring to them as magic or a secret serum.

  36. Railick says:

    That is just wikipedia, so take it for what it is ;) I tried to find an offical list on some Australian government website but my work computer doesn’t allow connections to other contries and many of these games may have just been banned until they changed X or Y like Fallout 3

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_banned_video_games#Australia

  37. Wooly says:

    Australia’s government is trolling the world.

  38. Jpipesup says:

    @ AlpineViper: Apparently there is already filtering of our sites in Australia, the liberals did it when they were in power, but I believe it is Opt-In and ISP level. Or something like that…

    Honestly the whole situation is a bit ridiculous. We have to get rid of this government… I don’t know where these policies are coming from!

    And I’d say that was a use of the AW phrase… Though we should probably stop throwing those words around like that here, or Mr Conroy might decide rockpapershotgun.com is too much for him… I enjoy the reads too much to risk it

  39. MrBejeebus says:

    RIDE THE KANGAROOS TO REVOLOUTION

    FLING THE KOALA’S OF FREEDOM AT THEM

    sorry this is the last web page im looking at before i go to bed, i wanted to make my contribution noticeable

    BYE

  40. Railick says:

    Sound the Didgeridoos of FREEDOM!

    THEY CAN TAKE YOUR VEGIMITE, BUT THEY CAN’T TAKE YOUR FREEDOM!!! rawrl

  41. PJ says:

    I was in Australia for a couple of months last year, and was really shocked by how incredibly right-wing their goverment and media appeared, especially since this is in total contrast with every Australian I’ve ever met ever.

    Still, censorship of this kind seems like it would actually be fairly hard to pull off in practice so hopefully this will fizzle out.

  42. Live-Dimension says:

    @AlpineViper, Railick
    That ‘ban’ game list must of included a list of games that got edits.

    @Kadayi
    Yes. Twice now, the move to create a R18 classification has been stopped by one State Attourndy General.
    http://games.on.net/article/4378/Atkinson_squashes_plans_for_R18_games_in_Australia

    The ‘net censoring’ aka firewall hasn’t started yet. The trial which several ISP’s took ends this/next month? There is so little support for it, so I can’t really see it passing. They can’t block the sites without this firewall, so I don’t see this happening either.

  43. Railick says:

    Michael Jackson died! I blame the right wing Aussie government for this!

  44. SirKicksalot says:

    I can’t believe there’s no news about the Trine demo, hours after it was launched.

  45. drewski says:

    Australia’s current government is actually “left wing”…

    All Australian politicians are nanny state interventionists though. The only real difference is that one cuts taxes and the other goes into deficit.

    As for Australia currently having internet censorship – nope. You could download home software filtering for free from the government if you so desired (which nobody did) but the current government, in their desire to micromanage every aspect of life, binned that for compulsory filtering at an ISP level.

    Fortunately they have to get it through our upper house of Parliament and it looks like there’s enough opposition that it’s going to get killed. The government is basically trying any angle they can to get the votes in the Senate, hence offering to ban anything and everything regardless of whether or not anybody actually wants it banned.

  46. Luther Blissett says:

    @ Railick & sebmojo

    Axe Wound i’ve never heard but sweaty danglers I have… basically like any place there are jerks who get tanked and throw up vulgarities…

    @ all y’all
    Howard got voted out because he sold every public service to private businesses (which in cases like public transport has made them shit and expensive) and Rudd seemed a charismatic guy more interested in fellating China than America.
    For the rest of us intelligent mammals we sit slackjawed at this ridiculous ISP filtering farce that Conroy keeps blathering on about despite the fact that it never gets good press; has less support than either “One Nation” and “Australia: The Republic” and would seem to have no chance of passing the senate… we do have a fairly common aussie phrase for Conroy:
    “Go and Get Fucked Mate!”

  47. Real Horrorshow says:

    I hate to sound kind of like a redneck, but after the Germany stuff and now this, I’m all the more comfortable knowing that I’m in a country where anything remotely like this could never be legal.

  48. Leelad says:

    Surely the reason that MMO’s like WoW can’t be rated is that they’re essencially a chatroom with a game slapped on.

    The actual content of the game CAN be rated i’m sure none of the quest givers i’ve met in WoW ask me to go fetch 10 shitting hides from cunty twatting kodos.

    So why not patch that version of the game so that the parental filter can’t be turned off and strict it up some, sexual terms as well as swearing……or is it not that simple?

    There is nothing else I can think of that could make a game like that un-rateable

  49. Railick says:

    Personally I think this sort of thing should be left up to the parents of the children and more laws should be changed/put into place to allow parents to abuse their children in public and at home again in the name of controlling them. This may sound harsh but I’m serious. We need to be able to spank our children or swat them on the hand or punish them by taking away everything they hold dear and crushing their souls in order to teach them important lessons in life. The way kids are now in the US is HORRIBLE, 12 -13 year olds trading sex for everything from money to potato chips.

    Secondly I think there needs to be some sort of test you have to take and pass with an A to become a parent and up until you pass it you’re forced to take drugs that keep you from having children. The world would be a much better place for it as extreme as it sounds. Not everyone is cut out to be a parent and most of the people that become parents young never actaully wanted it to happen they were just to lazy to do anything about it. Further they shouldn’t have been having sex in the first place with is THEIR parents fault. IT’s a vicious cycle and in a few more decades these jack ass kids are going to be taking over for us!!

  50. drewski says:

    I think Rudd got in because everyone was sick to the teeh of Howard, not the privatisation thing. Australians are broadly in favour of most former public utilities being privatised.

    I’m looking into emigrating to the US.

  51. Tworak says:

    something something prison colony.

    that said, this is some pretty dangerous stuff.

  52. Bluester says:

    As they say…

    …get fucked mate…

    …editorialy speaking.

  53. jalf says:

    @Real Horrorshow:
    What makes you think it could never happen in the US?
    http://news.filefront.com/top-ten-banned-video-games/ shows at least one game that was banned in the US. Why not more?

    As far as I know, several states have at least temporarily banned violent games (even if they’d had to lift the ban again soon after). So far, it has been mostly talk, exactly like in Germany and Australia. Neither country have banned violent games yet. Politicians have talked about doing it. Just like more than a few US politicians have.

    I don’t see the big difference.

    If anything, I’d rate the US as being close behind these two countries in the drive to censor and ban sex or violence.

    There is nothing else I can think of that could make a game like that un-rateable

    I’m not sure of the reasoning, but I can think of two reasons why that wouldn’t work.
    First, what guarantee is there that the parental filter won’t be removed in a patch next week? Add it while the game is being rated, and then go all-out porn and gore afterwards.
    And second, a chat filter wouldn’t prevent you from posting links to bad sites, and it can always be circumvented if you want to.

  54. luminosity says:

    @drewski: No, they’re not left wing. Not technically, not pretending to be, not at all. Labor is just a poor man’s conservative party who stand for nothing but holding power. Sadly, just like America we don’t really have a major left wing party to balance things out.

    Congratulations to Stephen Conroy on finally making up my mind on who to hate more out of him and Atkinson (the SA AG who keeps blocking an R rating).

  55. Tims says:

    Oh wtf? I may never move home then.

    Btw, Australia is only trialing the internet filtering. And some major isp have withdrawn from the trials saying it’s technically ridiculous, even impossible to do, and just a stupid idea anyway. So many people are upset about it, it may never happen (hopefully).

  56. Railick says:

    @ Jalf – You’re wrong . The US has never succesfully banned a video game, though there are those that try. One lawyer got debarred (is that the proper term?) in the course of trying to get games banned and it is still his lifes work, I’m not sure why.

    The only things that are banned in the United States are child porn and other exploitive mediums like that which I think we can all agree has nothing to do with freedom of speech.

    Germany has banned games with Nazi references in them only and if you just take out the Nazi references and replace them with normal army units they’ll let you release them (that is a common law in that part of Europe I’m told) As far as US being close behind Australia on banning games I have to heartily disagree.

    They’re selling their public services to private business, we’re buying private business and making it public we couldn’t be more different ;)

  57. Tims says:

    Anyway… banned content is what torrent sites are for.

  58. Railick says:

    Luminosity did you mean what you said that America doesn’t have a major left wing party? Who do you think is Presdient here Rush Limbaugh?

  59. Darthey says:

    I look forward to Yahtzee’s return to the midlands. Its been too long, and he’s never answered my fanmail.

    In other news; stupid governments are stupid. Is Germany next?

  60. tycho says:

    @drewski – the current government left wing? hah! Rudd & Co are part of the powerful conservative right faction within federal labor (with the notable exception of Julia Gillard). They are about as left-wing as Ronald Reagan.

    The heart of the matter is that the government is rolling over on the net censorship issue because they need the vote of that rabid family first senator Steve Fielding, and he has a major hard-on for all things net-censorship. Him and Conroy got together and decided to tell us all what we should and shouldn’t be doing/seeing/playing on the net.

    Also, regarding the comments in Australia – wow, just…wow. Its like saying that all Americans are like the Texan red-neck stereotype, and all Brits are toothless, cider-swilling bovver-boys.

  61. jalf says:

    @Railick: He’s right. It has an extreme right, and a slightly right wing party.

    Obama is hardly left-wing. He’s just more moderately right-wing than the republicans. If you look at politics outside the US, you’ll see just how far left the spectrum goes, even in modern, first-world capitalist countries.

    About the banning thing, yes, Germany bans nazi references (given their history, is it surprising?). But it doesn’t ban violent games as a whole. Anyway, my point was simply that the US, just like Australia and Germany, has a very outspoken group of politicians with quite a lot of power, who keep trying to ban violent games. They haven’t had much luck with it in either country so far, but they keep trying. In all three countries, there is a constant push to get them banned.

    There isn’t in many other countries. In most of Europe, no one even suggests banning violent games.
    That is why I said the US is close behind.

  62. Railick says:

    @jalf I would disagree , America has a moderate left and slightly right wing party, no extreme right wing party here has any power. The republicans have to be moderate to border line left wing to even get elected and they offer no resistance to Obama and his left wing party.

    As far as Obama being modreate right wing I would disagree, he is a modeate socialist buying up massive pieces of private businesses and in some cases entire companies then TELLING them what kind of cars to make. He wants to redistrubte the wealth from the rich to the poor forcefully and dicates companies policies even when they don’t have any ownership of said companies (for examplec capping bonuses and changing tax laws to stop giving breaks for people giving to charity after a certain amount) This is pretty hard left wing, extremly socialist.

    There has not been a constant push by anyone with any power in the United States to get video games of any kind banned and every time it has come up any where in the coutnry it has been shot down extremly fast. Even when violent video games are used as an excuse for violent crime the idea is thrown out of court right away. There are a VERY few vocal people with no power what so ever that try to get everything banned , for that matter there are senators here that try to get the draft put back into place every session but no one pays any attention to them what so ever.

  63. Real Horrorshow says:

    @ Jalf – Yeah, that game wasn’t banned by the U.S. government, that’s literally impossible. The only way games in the U.S. can be SUPPRESSED is if stores refuse to sell them, usually because the ESRB gives it an Adult rating.

    In the U.S. it’s perfectly legal to buy and play any video game ever made, as long as it doesn’t feature child porn FMV sequences.

  64. Real Horrorshow says:

    ^ That extends to all forms of creative expression too.

  65. sinister agent says:

    I heard “bearded axe wound” back in school, c.1999, London. So nerr.

    This won’t go anywhere that’ll last, surely.

  66. luminosity says:

    @Railick: The Democrats certainly have left wing members, but as a party they aren’t really left wing. As far as most of the world measures the terms.

  67. Real Horrorshow says:

    I stand corrected on The Guy Game. But this is a little different, because as the description reads: “It was banned because a 17 year old was flashing her lady bits.”

    That’s child pornography under U.S. law, and has absolutely nothing to do with it being a video game or not. If it featured an 18-year-old flashing her tits and blowing two men at the same time while getting analized, it would have been perfectly legal…you just wouldn’t be able to find it in Wal-Mart :)

  68. Real Horrorshow says:

    And I’d like to agree with Railick. I think you’re a little uninformed Jalf.

    In the U.S. there’s a movement by a small group of politicians who want to restrict children’s access to violent and pornographic video games, just like porn is restricted to adults. That’s not quite the same as outright BANNING the games, the production of the games, and blocking your citizens from viewing the websites of those games. I repeat: the things being attempted in Australia and Germany would be completely unconstitutional in the U.S; could. never. happen. Saying that there are similar movements in the U.S. is false, as dumb as the anti-game politicians are, they know that banning a game is impossible so it’s not even a part of their agenda.

  69. Wulf says:

    @Jeremy: Thank you.

    If you hadn’t said it, I would have. In fact, I think I’ll stress the point anyway.

    @Those having a go at Australia: This reminds me of people I’ve encountered in online gaming communities (more on this later); because anyone can throw a lifestyle slur, or present an uneducated racist sentiment, but if I hear someone slandering an entire nation, the person is almost always English.

    Not even so much Scottish, Irish, or Welsh in particular. English. And it’s really getting me down and my nerves fray because of it. Oh yes, so civilised as to mock every other freaking civilisation out there, poorly veiled racism en masse.

    There are two things to consider, here: The first being that the British empire is so flaccid at the moment that it’s making our country metaphorically look like a small, bald, fat man with a tiny dick who presents his bitterness about this for the World to see as hatred and hostility toward anyone who might be a little bit better off and/or simply different.

    Dignity. Now. Please?

    The other thing is that Britain isn’t as superior as Brit supremacists out there (and in here) would believe it to be. Has anyone checked out our HDI rating lately? Frankly, we’re racing backwards! The HDI of a country implies how developed a nation is, how well its people are cared for, the state of education and progression, and so on.

    Currently, Iceland, Norway and Canada are way ahead of us. So anyone who’d want to slag off another nation, consider that before you do. In fact, I wonder what Australia’s HDI is?

    Oh look, they’re in 4th, behind Canada, Norway, and Iceland. I really can’t say I’m surprised.

    They might have some screwy laws going around (what country doesn’t have screwy laws agoing around?), but I’d say they’re doing pretty well for themselves considering they’re a “former prison/exile country” filled with “strange and crude people”, eh?

    Also: I feel a frustrated “fffffffffffff” coming on. To assuage it and ease my indignant feelings about all this, I’ll paraphrase Kieron and say: Frigging English.

    I apologise for that, but this kind of thing gets me down. It’s a sore spot, because a game group I’m a part of (one comprised of various ethnicities) recently had to ostracise an English member for this very reason; really bad choice in ethnicity-based insults and slurs, lifestyle attacks, calling nations backwards and full of primitives and whatnot.

    And yes, I’d say this to anyone I’d see doing this kind of thing. Such supremacists spout corrosive ideas, they’re eroding away the collective intelligence and progression of Britain, and they’re going to make us truly isolated if we alienate the World any more. So knock it off already!

  70. Real Horrorshow says:

    For the record, I like Australia.

  71. Dorian Cornelius Jasper says:

    This stereotype of Americans being on the whole more right-wing than everybody else probably comes from a habitual inability to agree on what’s actually left or right.

  72. Butler` says:

    Man, if that’s you stressing a point, I’d really like to see you make a point, Wulf.

    Also, at least based on conversations I’ve had, the HDI system isn’t terribly well respected.

  73. Real Horrorshow says:

    Dorian Cornelius Jasper – Also because simple “left or right” doesn’t really cover all of politics. The simplest I think it could be stripped down to is left-right economics and liberal-conservative social.

    I’d say on average Americans are socially liberal (the republican party is a corpse everywhere but the south due to their inability to keep up with the times socially) and economically centrist.

  74. Nicomallo says:

    I’m an Australian, and this doesn’t worry me in the slightest, because the net filter will never happen. The government don’t have the numbers in the senate to get it passed, and aren’t even going to try until they can get it to work properly, which will be never.

    They just have to come out with little news items like this every now and then to make it look like work is still being done on the legislation and they aren’t just holding it back because they are embarressed.

    Also RPS, your line that Australia is “also known for its net-censoring” is a bit misleading, as it makes it sound like we already have a net filter; the news here isn’t that the filter is being chaged, just that the proposed filter has been changed.

  75. Krondonian says:

    @Dorian: A great Wikipedia page that one. The key bit I think was that left-right politics are based ”along a one-dimensional political spectrum.” Arguing that a huge party is simply left or right seems frankly ridiculous when made up of so many members. I’d tend to agree with Real Horrorshows lowest common denominator of political opinion.

    @Wulf: Could the fact that you tend to hear English slating entire nations have anything to do with you tending to play English people? I of course don’t know who you game with, but I for one play at least 50% Brits. Gotta love a sub 20 latency.

    I don’t think Britain is any worse than most countries to be honest. The European elections gave rise to some nasty parties getting a large share of the vote in some countries (the Netherlands, for example), and just last week the Iranian supreme leader basically called the UK ‘evil’. I think you sell the country a little short.

  76. unique_identifier says:

    Stephen Fucking Conroy. Gah. Why do both major political parties over here have to be equipped with such an amazing spectrum of muppets.

  77. Serondal says:

    @Bah I’m not the only one posting about politics mate, this entire thread is about politics as is the post itself so , as to use an Aussie catch phrase “Go and get fucked mate”

  78. tapanister says:

    Man, and how about France disallowing Muslim women to wear the burkas? “For humanitarian reasons” and everything too.

    How come supposedly progressive countries in this world are becoming so controlled and do things that should be considered unconstitutional and/or downright fascist?

  79. tapanister says:

    Oh, and I didn’t forget about Sarcozy trying to pass that idiotic antipiracy bill, I just didn’t mentioned it because it, thankfully, got canned already.

  80. wcaypahwat says:

    Im pretty sure most of our prime ministers are elected based on potential hilarity.

    There’s been a large public outcry ever since this idea went public (in the online/tech enthusiast crowd at least.

    Most everyone else is caught up in the ‘big things’, such as the terrible state of our health system and public transport network.

    I really do doubt this will ever happen. But if it does I’ll be most upset.

    Also, around 60% of us australians don’t know our national anthem. The ones that do have no idea what its about :D

  81. tycho says:

    Oh, for all those non-aussies scoffing about how this would never happen where you live, just wait. A lot of countries are apparently watching this keenly to see if they can do the same in future… think of this as a test-case.

  82. vagabond says:

    @wcaypahwat: It’s about stealing sheep innit? :)

    I for one can’t wait for this to happen (and if they promise to block enough online gambling sites, they might get Xenophon to agree).
    The current situation where one small state can block changes to legislation that are unanimously agreed upon by everyone else needs to change, but at the moment there is too little impact from the situation for anyone to really care. Start blocking access to WoW though, I can see the headlines now… “crazed videogame junkies burn South Australian Parliament to the ground”

  83. James says:

    There was a reason you Brits kicked them out, yes?

  84. klumhru says:

    I very much doubt that an ISP filter or other restrictive law on digital media will go to be law in Australia. Most natives I’ve talked to seem to sensible. It strikes me as the usual hyper reactionary political BS that goes on in any country with more than one political party. The suggestion has come up here a couple times (Iceland) and been laughed out of the discussion. That it is technically possible is not really a point of debate, seeing as one of the largest nations on earth does it quite effectively.

    Comparing the US political spectrum with any other western country is an exercise in futility. Social (that is completely – no questions asked – absolutely free) healthcare is an absolute prerequisite for being even slightly left of the center in my opinion. For all my respect for individual US citizens, friends, relatives and casual acquaintances, I can’t even include a country in a personal tally of the civilized without it.

    As for the HDI. We (Iceland) have lead the list along with Norway for some years of the last decade, and I’d like nothing better than to emigrate off this forsaken reef… It needs to be taken with a grain of salt really.

  85. autogunner says:

    aussies what you want to do is cripple petty government with a benefit scandal, all the big important stuff carries on as usual and everyone ahtes the ministers so much they cant even begin to start vote nabbing with dumb policies

  86. Ben Abraham says:

    As an Aussie, I think the low-level racism many have encountered in fellow Australian’s more comes from sheer ignorance than malicious intent. We’re still a very white/middle-class nation in many respects. Just look at our politicians for an indication of this – parliament is a massive middle-aged white dude sausage fest.

    Of course, that’s not to excuse us as a nation, but just know that the those of us in the generation that only ever knew a ‘multicultural Australia’ stand a much better chance of overcoming those prejudices.

    Oh yeah – this thread was about internet filters and stuff. Yeah no one I know is taking that stuff seriously.

  87. BBQ says:

    Re: changeling101 – You got it right mate. But the smart ones in the Aussie crowd will find their way around to get what they want. Well until our rubbish politicians implement Big Brother 2 anyway.

    What’s up with all those penal references though? Such prejudice against us Aussies… tsk tsk. Remember, we aren’t too impressed with our government either.

  88. Serondal says:

    What country in the world has free health care? You say completely, no questions asked, absolutely free? Do the Drs not get paid? Do the owners of the hospitals and medical facilities not get paid? I don’t understand what system you’re describing here Klumhru. So far as I know there is no country in the world that has free health care. Even if you don’t have to pay up front you’re paying for it through your taxes and your hard work. All that is is public insurance where everyone in the country shares the risk for everyone else’s health even if they don’t want to.

    It is worth noting that you get taxed 15% or more on your income tax then I do (I know this because you have a flat tax ;) ) and your government more or less fell apart because of your health care system among other things.

    I’m not bashing Iceland mind you, just pointing out the differences (Where as you are bashing the United States calling us uncivilized O.o )

  89. The Fanciest of Pants says:

    As enraging as this is, it’s not likely to ever actually happen.

    Precious tax monies are at stake here. Any government-level internet censorship lost all credibility when the prospective list of websites that would be blocked was leaked.

    The list included a tour guide operator’s website and other things that had absolutely no objectionable content. The communications minister has been distancing himself from the plan ever since.

    TL;DR this ubercensorship is likely to die a quiet, pitiful death once it fades from public view.

    If it doesn’t, I’m becoming a full time pirate.

  90. Jazmeister says:

    Could be worse. Could be french. French people wear onions, ffs. Weirdos. Get a modern bike, stripey shirt! And wash your moustache!

  91. Muzman says:

    You folks aren’t getting it. This is actually a good thing as far as proposed implimentation of the ratings and filter system goes.
    Conroy and others have always sought to apply ratings to every single thing and block anything which is not rated or prohibited (incidentally this is across political lines. Howard Inc. tried two or three times to look at the same thing. Labor are decidedly left wing, however).
    People just keep pointing out all these fancy new ways that people can see rude and violent things and they just keep writing them in. The last thing was proposing to monitor all P2P traffic and rate that. Now someone has pointed out that there’s web games and digital downloads etc, so they add that.
    The whole thing was already destined to fall on its face for sheer unworkability. The trials of the various systems keep collapsing because the law makers don’t understand how the internet works and the ISPs pull out.
    So you see all you’ve got to do is point out some fancy new thing on the net, Conroy adds it to the bill and the whole thing becomes even more inclinded to topple over than it already is.
    I plan on making some suggestions myself. I’m not sure they’ve had a look at the rise of international podcasting yet. Every second of it must be rated! Right now.

    (btw. Axe Wound is just an amusingly gruesome euphemistic way of saying ‘cunt’. Most of the time the real word does the job fine.)

  92. squadman says:

    I live in Australia and hate the sun. Is there anywhere cold left in the world that isn’t melting? If so… wanna swap?

  93. lumpi says:

    Germany? Your turn at being a dick. Can you surpass Australia?

  94. n01d34 says:

    God I’m sick of my nation’s leaders being a bunch of pricks when it comes to censorship.

    You know we’re not even allowed hardcore pornography here? One would assume they’re going to use this filter to stop more than just videogames.

  95. Serondal says:

    Squadman I assure you if you moved to the US and lived in Washington or MN you’d find it more than cold enough for your liking ;)

  96. verspunken says:

    The government’s ISP level internet censorship is yet to be enacted – a couple of ISPs are running small scale trials, however no laws have been passed, as the government does not have the numbers in the senate – the greens and Nick Xenophon (an independent senator) have both said they would not vote for the ISP censorship.

    This is all just posturing by the government, trying to justify their censorship policy, but in fact probably only making it less desirable.

    Re the statements about WoW, have a look here: http://www.ausgamers.com/features/read/2614953

  97. mickiscoole says:

    @Nicomallo The thing is that the government is fairly sure that they can get this done without legislation.

  98. Fumarole says:

    I thought everyone knows what a hatchet wound is. At least here in the California. Maybe it’s a beach thing?

  99. NegativeZero says:

    Australians suggesting that it’s not worth worrying about because it’ll never happen are burying their heads in the sand. The only reason it won’t happen is because the balance of power in the upper house is held by independents. The government lacks the seats to ram through whatever they want unless they get the greens or all the independents on side. This issue is split such that a single independent changing their tune would flip it back to the government’s favour.

    Additionally, the opposition seem to be opposing the plan for the sake of opposing it, not because of any deep & meaningful convictions. The more important issue is that they’ve been blocking a lot of other stuff. There’s all that talk of a double-dissolution going around, which would mean kicking the entire senate and starting over. If that happened, the chances are extremely high that we would end up with a government majority in both lower and upper houses of parliament, which basically gives Krudd a free license to do whatever the hell he wants.

    Not to mention there should be another election next year which will mean a changing of the guard then too.

    Be very worried, because this retardation is going to happen eventually, unless Australians are constantly vocal about how much they dislike the idea. Though at this point it seems that Conroy is basically ignoring everyone because he ‘knows’ that it’s in our ‘best interests’. :\

  100. Muzman says:

    Howard Inc. had effective domination of both houses as well and used every opportunity to say “We won the election, therefore we have a tacit mandate to impliment every hare brained scheme in the policy fine print. And anyone who opposes us is anti-democracy and Un-Australian”
    Labor aren’t any more authoritarian and arguably less so. They’re more destructively helpful in a Frank Spencer kind of way.
    I don’t think we or our foreign friends need to worry in the long term because it’s going to be an utter disaster one way or the other. But that doesn’t mean we have our head in the sand. It should definitely be opposed at every turn. It’s just that that vociverous opposition is there to prevent the unpleasent experience of them trying to make it work.

  101. AlpineViper says:

    I’d actually expect a double dissolution to go against the current government, due to some of the shine coming off of Rudd now that people have seen what he’s actually about.

    Not that I’d expect the opposition to actually win the damn thing.

    I’m not TOO worries about the filter, but there is some cause for concern as has been said, it’s riding on the greens and independents, and that mob is capable of all kinds of crazy thinking.

  102. Dylan says:

    I think you should check your facts before just regurgitating what you read on the internet RPS. Poor journalism indeed.

    1) We dont have a net censor, they are looking into it and I have all confidence it wont get enacted (they are just trying to make a senator happy so they can have a coalition in the senate)

    2) WoW IS rated in Australia, that was just a rumour that passed around a while ago and has since been cleared up.

    3) Just because we dont have an R18 rating doesnt mean that games inappropriate for 15 years olds will get banned, we get 99% of games ok, its just the few extreme ones that get banned (and have _slight_ changes like fallout’s renaming of morphine to stimpacks and then are allowed).

    4) We will eventually get at R18 rating, its just the attorney general of south australia is being a dick about it.

  103. AlpineViper says:

    4) One day he’ll die or retire.

  104. DigitalSignalX says:

    Everyone’s just super pissed (the U.S. kind of pissed) about the new alcohol tax. They’re legislatively lashing out at everything in order to distract the public.

  105. c-Row says:

    lumpi
    Germany? Your turn at being a dick. Can you surpass Australia?

    Actually, our government is currently looking into the exact same options with their newly established web filters…

  106. denright says:

    Man, I love australia. I wanted to emigrate there until they started being douche bags about electronic entertainment. It’s one of the most secular countries in the world on top of of it all. Makes no sense to me.

  107. denright says:

    Oh, also. Dylan, I think you are being confused by the media spin there. Fallout’s stimpacks were ALWAYS called stimpacks. If you read somewhere that Fallout was banned because they were called Morphine you are being misinformed. Fallout was banned till the Australian government got its head out of its ass and that story you heard was just a cover up.

  108. verspunken says:

    @ Dylan: WoW isn’t rated in Australia – have a look at the OFLC’s website, no WoW there.

    http://oflc.gov.au/www/cob/find.nsf/simple?searchview=&searchwv=1&searchmax=5000&count=25&query=%28%5Btitle%5D%3D%22World+of+Warcraft%22%29

  109. Mr.President says:

    Haha, I’m loving the “sweaty danglers”.
    The expression, I mean.

  110. TCM says:

    Can’t wait for Yahtzee’s reaction.

  111. tycho says:

    Not only is WoW NOT rated, it can’t be – as they say when you connect – “content may change during online play” – the game itself can be as family friendly as you like, but people can still join and start sexually harassing people and simulating sex (i’m looking at you WoW guild of naked men).

  112. Crescent says:

    While they’re at it, they should also ban movies, television, alcohol and smokes to be thorough with it.

  113. Lukasz says:

    so i came to rps to find out about awesome stuff and i am told that:

    1)country where i live in is trying to copy their close friends: the china
    2)MJ is dead!

    shitty day today.

  114. Psychopomp says:

    “in Australia, the liberals did it when they were in power, but I believe it is Opt-In and ISP level. Or something like that…”

    That breaks my brain…
    Over here the conservatives are the book banning censors, and the liberals are, well, liberal. Any American who identifies himself as liberal should be *screaming* at this.
    I’m curious as to how the two words acquired a different meaning here in America.

  115. Nicomallo says:

    In australia we have the Liberal party, who are conservative. We use the term small l liberal to refer to actual liberals

  116. MD says:

    @Nicomallo: That’s true up to a point, but the Liberal party comprises both a conservative and a liberal tradition. They’re certainly not liberal in the American sense of the word (where it seems to basically be a synonym for ‘left-wing’), and the conservative strand is dominant on social issues, but their economic policy is ‘liberal’ in the true sense, i.e. free markets with minimum government interference. (Though of course all of these things are relative, in this case relative to the other major parties in Australia. I think it’s pretty much futile trying to come up with an absolute centre to define everything else aroumd.)

  117. Muzman says:

    The Australian Liberal Party has ideals that come straight from Locke and Smith (and others I forget), ie the classical definition of liberalism. Since most of the individualist changes demanded by those times have come to pass, their legal and social conservatism sticks out.
    Since the US’s entire political landscape pretty much comes from the same place, and it’s systematically stamped out the traditional left over the last hundred years or so, the divide is over other things. The fact that the US’s major parties used to be the same party (kinda,sorta,a little) is nicely symbolic I think.

  118. Cheeetar says:

    I’m from Australia, so I can safely say Fuck Australia. In other censorship news from Australia, the laptops they are providing to schoolchildren instead of textbooks will be blocking near everything.

  119. Captain Haplo says:

    Yeah. As it stands, the Liberal Party and the National Party are the conservative ones, united in a government coalition. (The NP usually represents the country, the LP the cities). The Labor Party (the current government) was born out of a massive strike action, and is also one of the oldest parties in the country. For a lot of its years its policies were effectively social-liberal to socialist, but its factionalism has resulted in a rather dramatic shift away from that.

  120. Brett says:

    So, up front, I’m not for this. It’s just firstly, the difference between unrated/unratable content and RC content hasn’t been grasped by a lot of the people over the internet talking about the issue. It helps sensationalise things, but the issue is pretty big all on it’s own. Secondly, it seems that people seem to have a gut reaction to the word censorship without thinking about it. At some level though some censorship is welcomed by society, Conroy himself has been using that as a tactic when speaking about the filter. The problem is more nuanced than people want to give it credit. The problem isn’t government interference, because there are acts that society wants the government to intervene in, like the child porn example that Conroy is also fond of.

    As should be obvious unrated content is fine. WoW and so on fall under this. It’s the content that gets refused classifcation that is banned for sale. This internet scheme is, basically, the logical extension of having a government ratings board that has the power to refuse classifcation. If something is refused classification – that is the board, and therefore the executive, declaring that some work is, on some moral grounds, unfit for sale in Australia. The internet we have today effectively means a government no longer has this sort of control. If something is RC in Australia then a person can still go out and buy it from the US or SE Asia or somewhere, if discovered in transit it’d probably get confiscated, but otherwise it gets in. So under our current scheme you have to either accept that RC material will be bought by Australians (so why bother RCing anything?) or try this completely whacky scheme that hopefully won’t get out of the water. I think actually the answer is a third option that reigns in the remit of the board, but I’ve been writing this post for 30 mins already.

    I did like the commenter above defending America saying ‘we absolutely don’t have any form of censorship. No child porn though.’ My argument isn’t that child porn should be allowed, but that stopping it is censorship. It’ s also important to stop it, but that doesn’t mean that it isn’t a form of censoring expression. Just one that I, and almost everyone in the world, agree with. Certainly then there is a line at which freedom of expression stops. The difference here is where do you draw the line and how is it policed. The reason child porn can’t be sold in America is because the works created are illegal, the reason is the same for RC material in this country. The line is just put in a different place.

    Anyway,

    yeah.

  121. Brett says:

    Goddamn I was going to write something saying that even if this untenable scheme were somehow piggybacked to the NBN and got up on those grounds, as outrageous as it would be, it would not be close to the atrocities of our previous government. It would be a huge inconvenience to Australians, so maybe more people would be upset about it.

  122. Thermal Ions says:

    I’m not TOO worries about the filter, but there is some cause for concern as has been said, it’s riding on the greens and independents, and that mob is capable of all kinds of crazy thinking

    Not so much crazy thinking, but crazily their “stands on principle” can usually be purchased for the right price / token action.

  123. drewski says:

    To the people disputing my categorisation of the ALP as left wing, you’re right in the hard sense of the political spectrum – but politics in the West is so dramatically skewed to the right that in fact centre right parties like Australian Labor become the de facto left wing of the two party spectrum in that nation.

    The old concept of the left as being socialist is gone in the West – the definitions of what’s left and right have changed.

  124. drewski says:

    @ denright – Fallout 3 WAS banned in Australia because it had morphine in it – they changed morphine to Med-X, not stimpacks.

    Do your research. And it had nothing to do with the government, the OFLC is an independant body.

    Sorry for the double post, but the misinformation and ignorance in this thread is killing me.

  125. Ashurbanipal says:

    Greens? Capable of crazy thinking? Independents, maybe, especially Fielding and Xenophon. Although it’s easy to dismiss them as tree-hugging nuts, Greens are the most level-headed of all the parties. They’ve shown themselves as superb at going through bills with fine-tooth combs and sifting through the bullshit.

    The Greens have shown themselves if not opposed, then visibly unwelcoming towards the plan for a while now.

  126. CMaster says:

    @Psycopomp – in the US, liberal has become a code-word for “Social Democrat”. Look at Hillary Clinton for example. Self describes as a liberal, however is behind lots of censorship, gun control (it may be a good idea, doesn’t mean it’s liberal), “nanny state” ish policies etc.

  127. Psychopomp says:

    @CMaster

    To be fair, Hilary Clinton terrifies a lot of people.

  128. Tei says:

    I don’t understand banning a game for having morphine. Setting it for 18+ it can understand, but ban? ban sould be reserved for terrible things.
    Also, what about tons of books that show drugs? sould these books banned to? are we in medieval times again?

  129. Muzman says:

    That’s the thing. It’s not that it was bannable offence. Merely that something about drugs and children in the game (can’t be arsed looking up the ruling) meant the game could not fit into the existing ratings for video games.
    Almost no games are outright banned. They just have content outside an M15+ rating, and thus are unable to be sold.
    If it was a movie or a book it would have been fine as a) the rules are more lax, and b) there are ratings that cover everything anyway.

  130. Clockwork Harlequin says:

    @Serondal: ‘Completely free and no questions asked’ does not really exist. But here in Sweden (and I believe the rest of Scandinavia) public health care is dirt cheap, and you pay only a fraction of what it costs to visit a doctor or dentist, get operated etc. And with universal health care, no-one is /unable/ to afford subsidized health care. (Incidentally, some people blame irresponsible investment practices for Iceland’s plight?)

  131. Kanakotka says:

    Let’s bring the P-word in.

    Isn’t this an obvious increase to piracy rates in Australia? I mean, if i didn’t have an access to a game in my country, for some reason, and had the resources to play it, but not buy it… i would certainly resort to piracy. Even if there was a method of buying, but it probably would cost an arm and a leg, or both.

  132. clive dunn says:

    Interesting debate fellahs.
    I don’t think anybody has mentioned the proposed banning of ‘all internet access’ for the aboriginal people in northern Australia. This was hoofed about a few years ago (when Howard was still in power) and basically boiled down to an example of state racism. They apparently decided that because a few aboriginal men had downloaded kiddy-porn the whole lot couldn’t be trusted with the internet. Can anyone in Australia clarify this for me? My only aussie freind died last year and i’m a bit out of the loop.
    The whole Howard/Rudd axis though reminds me of the transistion from Tory (thatcher-major) to Labour (blair-brown) where the left had to veer so far right to become electable after so long in the wilderness you end up with the muddy centralised nonsense that passes for politics nowadays.
    At least the crooked fuckers have all be found out now though.
    Not that it’ll change jack shit………….
    sigh.

  133. A-Scale says:

    Are all British commonwealths (and Britain itself) destined to become Orwellian dystopias?

    I don’t have the time right now to read all of the responses. Did anyone actually support this bone headed idea?

  134. Garreett says:

    BAN SEX! BAN VIDEOGAMES! BAN BOOKS! COMPULSARY TELESCREENS FOR EVERYONE! WAIT A SECOND! THIS ISN’T ENOUGH! WE NEED TO POLICE THEIR VERY THOUGHTS.

  135. Wulf says:

    @Dylan: I feel for you, but I didn’t find it surprising. Perhaps some things just shouldn’t be covered, especially when it knocks my faith in my mental image of Kieron being well-educated and intellectual. And I like that image, damn it!

    @Cheetar “the laptops they are providing to schoolchildren instead of textbooks will be blocking near everything”: Isn’t that actually a very responsible move? If you’d said that the network of legal adults was being screwed around with, you’d have something, but the Internet often exists within a World that’s as strongly based upon fantasy as video-games are, and misinformation is abundant here.

    So given that they don’t want those kids to be exposed to large amounts of misinformation and pre-programmed hate, they lock out the sections which would be unhealthy for them until they’re old enough to comprehend the difference between a biased, idiotic opinion and a truth of high-probability based on peer-reviewed research.

    @Tei: There’s a difference between “displaying correct drug information in a medical journal” and “actively, effectively and merrily promoting the usage of fantasy drugs with real names, and actualising the usage of such drugs within the game as largely positive whilst downplaying the negative side effects”, eh?

  136. Supraliminal says:

    I wonder when are they going to ban all (video)games, just cause politicians don’t play ‘em.
    Maybe that might provoke some arguments and riots and stuff, but do they really care:..of course not.

  137. Talorc says:

    I am so pissed off with our politicians in Australia who are so fucking out of touch with both contempary social values in Australia and technology

    Every poll shows the politicians as more conservative what the public actually thinks on stuff like gay marriage or abortion.

    And most of them are technological fucktards. We had a big political scandal the other day – and the thing nobody commented upon – our Treasurer (Finance Minister) gets SHIT SENT TO HIS FRICKING FAX MACHINE. Like 400+ pages of it. BY PEOPLE EMAILING AND ADDRESS IN OUTLOOK FOR HIS FAX MACHINE

  138. Talorc says:

    @Clive Dunn – Yes, that is true. Although technically the ban was pornography. And they have big signs up at the roads into the settlements saying PORNOGRAPHY IS BANNED HERE.

    So all the little 12 year old aboriginal kids can read the signs and ask mummy and daddy what pornography is.

    And the sad fact is that both the Liberal (eg Tory) and Labour parties here are actual extremely conservative on social matters.

  139. Wulf says:

    Oh, I missed this one…

    @Krondonian: I didn’t properly stress this before: I’m actually part of a gaming group which is comprised of people from various nations around the World. Sometimes, having fun with a large group of people from various cultures is more important than a low ping. GASP! Scandalous, I know.

    So to answer your question, no. I tend to play on servers around the World, even where I have a high ping, it’s nice to find out how people from different cultures play, and thus pick up a few new tricks in the process. Notwithstanding that there are massively multiplayer online games which don’t even require a low ping. The thing is, I’m not the sort of isolationist gamer who lets ping rule their life, and my days on low-end dialup taught me a thing or two about how to compensate for that anyway, so even on a high-ping server I find that I can do pretty well.

    At least online gaming doesn’t desynchronise any more. fffffDuke Nukem 3D. No, I kid, I still love you Duke, but those instances of desynchronising were annoying, especially since I liked gaming with this chap from Canada way back when.

    Anyway, back to the original topic; despite playing around, the worst example of nation-slamming is still from England. In fact, I was even witness to a thread recently on a forum about the worst people in games, and there was consideration given to loud kids, elitist gamers, armchair commandos, and yes… the British. There were people who were just tired of British people slagging off their nation of origin whenever they lost.

    And this is the exact thing that one English acquaintance of mine got ostracised from that gaming group for.

    We can stick our heads in the sand and ignore it and blame-dodge as much as we like, but this is a problem and something needs to be done about it, and I can’t do much but damn it I can at least try to shame people into better behaviour. At least try to keep up good appearances for the rest of us, eh?

    It’s tiresome having to explain to everyone else that not all British people are like that. I frequently have to show that not every British person out there is a fascist who despises every nation which isn’t their own, or at least that I’m not like that.

    /sigh

  140. clive dunn says:

    Thanks Talorc. That’s truly messed up.
    When i was travelling in Australia a few years back i met an aboriginal chap who filled me in on the state-racism that is prevelent there. Truly shocking. Akin to aparthiad South Africa and only allowed to continue becuase of the shocking amount of ‘brushing it under the carpet’ that goes on.

  141. bubky says:

    @wulf
    I agree if theres one thing i hate its racist nation bashing dickheads like those f***ing english. When are they gonna realise you cant prejudge people based on their nationality.

    And ye its so tiresome being British when tolerant people from other countries quite rightly assume that im a racist prick because of where I come from and those goddamn english.

    P.s. Im not 100% sure if you were being serious but just to clarify im not. So no offense if our sarcasm levels dont match :<

    More on topic stuff like this often tends to get blown out of proportion becuase people enjoy whining about it. Hopefully for the sake of australians that ends up being the case here (or someone with half a brain steps in and says "wait this is retarded lets not doing this")

  142. Doctor Doc says:

    What are they going to do when everything is banned? Ban all the 16+ year old from the country since Australia is obviously not meant for them or ban childrens from the country so the previous bans can be removed?

  143. aufi says:

    remember folks:

    this is why it’s important to split your voting ticket!

    even if you are a died-in-the-wool Labor voter (like me), it’s always important to vote minor or vote across the aisle on the Senate ballot; the major parties are big tents, and they’ll allow any old yahoo in who’ll hold the line in a division. no matter how much of an ardent partisan you are, it is NEVER, EVER a good idea to surrender parliament to one party.

    thank fuck for the Greens (and those dodgy indies).

  144. Melf_Himself says:

    When will people learn… when you can’t get your homicidal-ramprage-fix from slaughtering the random population of some medieval village, you just take out your aggressions at the local office.

    Also, yeah, our government sucks.

  145. Gorgeras says:

    Left and Right are meaningless in any country without a Monarch or Autocrat Head of State. The terms refer to those who sit on the ruler’s right or left in a parliament. It used to be that the Aristocracy sat on the Monarch’s Right and the Middle-classes on the Left. That system is not entrenched any more, but can loosely be translated to mean that anyone to the Left of the Monarch is Left-wing and anyone to the Right of the Monarch is Right-wing. A spanner is sort of thrown in the works in modern Britain because we don’t actually have a friggin clue what the political alignment of the Queen is, except that she’s obviously a Monarchist. The only clues you can get are from how those around her behave, but that’s even more confusing: Prince Philip is likely a Rightist wingnut, but Prince Charles seems to be a Leftist moonbat.

    The US gives the impression that it is very Right-wing; but this is their media doing them a disservice. I’ve visited about 5 states in the mid-west and bible belt and only Indiana and Oklahoma seemed quite overtly Right-wing in my opinion. Kentucky, Florida and Illinois are if anything quite hostile to Fox News; you can always tell the political leanings of the area you are in by watching the local Fox news programmes. When they are louder than the main Fox News channel, you’re in wingnut country.

    I have recently changed my position on the subject of game bans: let them. Let the politicians ban what they want. I want them to see the resulting mess.

  146. drewski says:

    The misinformation on the Aboriginal question is terrible in this thread as well.

    Yes, pornography (and alcohol) is banned in some remote Aboriginal communities – but it’s not because of a “few” Aboriginal men, it’s because of a systemic culture of child abuse and rape. And it wasn’t “swept under the carpet”, it was a giant political firestorm that essentially forced then (then Liberal) government to take action.

    And the “intervention”, as it was called, was broadly supported by Aboriginal groups, although not supported by many Aboriginal groups as well.

    It is absolutely nothing like apartheidt.

    Personally, I think there has to be a better way of changing the culture of Aboriginal communities, but I don’t know what that is and I am absolutely positive that they had to do something.

  147. video games says:

    I doubt they’ll get away with Internet censorship. It’s not like they’re Korea. Their people should be too used to freedom to allow this to happen.

  148. Horhe says:

    I’m australian, and the internet censorship proposal has been around for a while, and now there’s talk that they’ll start inplementing it without voting :S but i’m pretty sure there are some important politicians who are heavily against it so it probably wont go ahead.
    @Railick: I hear australian characters all the time in games. Anytime people want ‘international’ characters in their games they use australia coz we’re so damn cool.
    I cant think of any R18 games that i’d want to play, but having the rating would stop shit like the Fallout 3 censorship happening again (australia said no, so they changed every copy in the world).

  149. James T says:

    Speaking as an Abo myself (*draws flag around shoulders*), the need to “do something” does not warrant sending soldiers to do social workers’ jobs. That’s fucking idiocy. I think bringing the army in was a sign that Howard appreciated the scale of the problem, but had no clue what to do about it except throw a handy supply of meatheads at it — no surprise that a bloody privatisation-happy neoliberal wouldn’t have a clue what to even try to fix a social problem (“Shouldn’t the Market have sorted this out? I sold our telecommunications infrastructure and everything! The outback should be doing great!”). Meanwhile, I really couldn’t give a shit if Noel Pearson was impressed; I wonder if he still is.
    The situation’s not analogous to apartheid, no — there’s no official structure splitting blacks from whites. The problem is more one of class — black and white communities of similar income levels are strikingly similar, in my experience — but this is exacerbated by an unthinking racism. Would a prime minister dare send the army in to clean up those dirty Westies?

    Drewski, saying the ALP are ‘left wing’ because our available spectrum has shifted so hideously to the right is ridiculous; it’s a lame capitulation to anyone who want to put certain ideas beyond the pale. The “spectrum” still exists in its entirety, no matter which parts of it are thriving at this particular moment, in this particular place.

    Meanwhile, as for the net filter bullshit, I’m not worried; coming from a party whose main election plank was the rejuvenation of our telecom infrastructure, a program which would catastrophically sabotage said infrastructure is the most blaringly obvious case of political suicide I can imagine. No amount of “won’t someone think of the children”-s can turn around the universal hatred for this scheme. The ALP, insanely, decided to attack the only thing the Australian electorate gives enough of a shit about that it’ll actually get up off its collective arse to protect — its luxuries. They’re holding a knife to their own throats and daring the Australian people to come closer. “Go on, take one more step! I’ll do it!”

  150. LionsPhil says:

    Yeah, the real gaming angle here is: what’s going to happen to Zero Punctuation?

  151. win now says:

    I finally decided to give you a little feedback ! well you got it! i love your site !!! no , really, its good…

  152. click here says:

    Ein wirklich sehr Interessante Seite mit guten Informationen.

  153. visit says:

    Warm greetings! Thanks for all the information, a very nice and well done site! Cheers.

  154. tips says:

    YES,VERY GOOD WEBSITE!

  155. visit says:

    I just want you to know that I think you did a terrific job on this websight.

  156. poker free says:

    Nice work chief ;-)

  157. Dennie says:

    A slip of the pen. Maestro Falletta is indeed still music director of the Virginia Symphony.

Comment on this story

XHTML: Allowed code: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Respond to our gibber

Read our finest words

The Flare Path: Elegant Elefanticide

Search for clues

Browse the archive