By Alec Meer on February 26th, 2013 at 4:00 pm.
Nuffle be praised!
See that picture above? That’s quite literally all there is to tell you about Blood Bowl II right now.
Why are you here? Why are you still reading? WHAT DID I JUST SAY? Damn you and your neediness.
I’m just going to post the picture again, then.
Now, what do you suppose that means? Hint: oh come on, you don’t need a hint.
This arrived via publisher Focus’ Twitter account earlier today, none too subtly implying that a sequel to the cult classic videogame adaptation of the cult classic Games Workshop tabletop sports game is on the way, accompanied only by “There’s something big brewing… and it’s not Bugman’s Beer!” So we don’t know when, what platforms, whether Cyanide are still developing, whether it’s a whole new game or a tweaked re-release, or ANYTHING. One more time:
See that picture above? That’s quite literally all there is to tell you about Blood Bowl II right now.
Don’t say I didn’t tell you so.
Important update: an extra fact! Sounds as though Blood Bowl II will land next year, and has six months of devtime under its gore-splattered belt already.
So: what do you lot particularly want to see in BB2?
26/02/2013 at 16:02 caddyB says:
SPACE HULK
26/02/2013 at 16:06 Danbanan says:
Face Hulk!
Well hopefully its not Cyanide.
Overpriced and all the races were not in from the start.
26/02/2013 at 23:38 UmmonTL says:
Seriously, don’t give this game to cyanide again. I have no problem with a 30-50$ pricetag but please give the game to someone who knows how to make a goddamn user inteface. And maybe make a decent tutorial, I love blood bowl and I want other people to like it too. But with a game where most people who try it can’t even find the rulebook and an interface that actively hides information they need that’s not going to happen. Improve the graphics a bit, add in all the races and you’re golden. Maybe as an extra make the AI not shit or add mod support so people can tweak it to their hearts content.
26/02/2013 at 16:44 almostDead says:
I think a reasonable case could be made that this announcement would be well served with a wall of BLOOD BOWL.
Please don’t spend any time developing the real time stuff.
26/02/2013 at 16:02 pakoito says:
I will enjoy this game (provided I roll a 4 or more).
26/02/2013 at 16:08 darkChozo says:
Critical failure, reroll, critical failure, turnover
26/02/2013 at 16:13 Lord Custard Smingleigh says:
ILLEGAL PROCEDURE!
26/02/2013 at 16:46 KikiJiki says:
REALLY STUPID
26/02/2013 at 17:46 frenz0rz says:
Loner reroll fails :(
27/02/2013 at 08:33 Hmm-Hmm. says:
Red skulls! Red skulls everywhere!
26/02/2013 at 17:07 SkittleDiddler says:
Because no one else is willing to say it, I will: the die rolls in Blood Bowl are fixed. The developers should be ashamed of coding in an AI cheat system.
26/02/2013 at 19:23 Ted D. Bear says:
The only people who constantly claim this are terrible at the game. If it helps you feel better about losing against a brain-dead AI, it’s okay. But spreading this type of misinformation is annoying. The AI will constantly do terrible moves first and cause a turnover before even standing up all players. If you know the rules and force the AI into lots of dice rolls, it will lose. It has no concept of proper play.
26/02/2013 at 19:51 Grygus says:
Oh, yeah? Well, I’m terrible. And I’m blaming the dice. And you can’t stop me. Probably.
26/02/2013 at 20:00 SkittleDiddler says:
I’ve heard that all before. In my experience with the single-player campaign, the AI consistently and overwhelmingly gets better die rolls. Prove me wrong by rolling out all those biased charts and tables you Blood Bowl players love to harp about.
Did I suck at the game? Yes, most certainly — I only put in about 20 hours before I got tired of the game’s rule-bending in favor of the AI teams, so I never got a chance to get really good at it.
Blood Bowl is a shitty game made by a shitty developer, and the fanbase tends to sink to that same level of shittyness when they insist on defending the most blatantly broken parts of the game.
26/02/2013 at 20:18 sinister agent says:
I’ve never heard any players defend Blood Bowl’s broken parts. Quite the opposite, in fact. And I’d never even heard of the board game before I played the game (full disclosure: I actually bought it thinking it was a real-time sport game, a lá the why-is-nobody-remaking-this Brutal Sports Football I had on the Amiga 20 (arrrgh) years ago. Yes, I am an idiot, thanks for noticing). And I’ve never lost a game against the AI, even playing as goblins, one of the teams who are expected to lose most of the time by design.
If the dice are fixed, I must be an incredibly good player to literally never lose, but I’m not, as my record in the RPS leagues will show.
26/02/2013 at 21:41 Daave says:
That which can be claimed without evidence can be dismissed without any.
Wouldn’t it be easier to create something which can accurately simulate the roll of a 6 sided dice than to build some sort of elaborate cheating mechanism? I would be astonished that a developer which let a lot of crippling bugs into a game was capable of such a feat.
26/02/2013 at 21:46 darkChozo says:
A claim regarding AI cheating probabilities is going to have to be substantiated by someone actually doing a statistical analysis of the dice rolls. Humans are absolutely terrible at judging that kind of probability-over-time. There’s a good reason why people think they can be bad at rolling dice or flipping a coin (the efforts of the Random Number God, of course).
27/02/2013 at 03:26 Geen says:
The Random Number God is punishing you for your randomly-generated sins.
27/02/2013 at 03:29 drewski says:
I’m terrible at the game, but I *don’t* blame the dice. I’m perfectly aware that I suck.
26/02/2013 at 23:57 Delixe says:
The die rolls aren’t fixed they can be just as harsh on the AI as a human player, that’s just Blood Bowl. The AI does cheat by stacking the odds in it’s favour. Get a program like SQLite and examine the database and you will find after nearly every game the AI gets +Stat rolls and doubles all the time meaning their players get abnormally overpowered teams. You can change this yourself but then you find that without stacking the odds in the AI’s favour in that manner you just faceroll every game.
27/02/2013 at 04:47 mabnvw646 says:
And maybe here too:
http://www.ngohq.com/graphic-cards/22136-how-to-fix-hybrid-physx-with-latest-physx-and-geforce-285-solved.html
26/02/2013 at 16:03 Temperance says:
I hope it’s not a clusterfuck of different release versions at full price like the current Bloodbowl.
26/02/2013 at 16:09 telpscorei says:
I really hope it’s not Cyanide developing. They seem to get half a good game out and then some how screw up. Blood Bowl is the only game of theirs I like, and quite frankly that’s because of the underlying game systems. The stuff they had to do on their own (like introducing new players to the rules) they really messed up. Hell, I think the manual is a link to the board game’s manual.
26/02/2013 at 18:55 Reapy says:
Strongly agree. I encountered bloodbowl when I was a small kid via the pc game and didn’t know wtf was going on. I cam back around and got the legendary edition after RPS held a gun to my head and made me purchase it with their awesome AARs.
The game itself is awesome as hell, but all the things you said were so true. Coming in not knowing anything it was overwhelming. Also the implementation of it just seemed, well, bad. It obscured game mechanics, and when you went to go to that ‘details’ tab the dice roll formulas were done in such a cryptic way it looked like utter gibberish, even when I had read several strategy guides and knew mostly what was going on.
I still think the game of blood bowl itself is awesome, the fact that there can be such a significant difference between having a 2 or a 3 for a stat in itself is really cool.
I have a feeling though we are going to see a micro transaction laden ‘buy your race for XXX dollars’ game though. I smell it in the air.
26/02/2013 at 16:05 Surlywombat says:
Too elfly to tell if this will be good.
26/02/2013 at 16:11 Jams O'Donnell says:
Unlike that pun, which was just Khorney.
26/02/2013 at 16:25 cpt_freakout says:
Don’t just nurgle your response like that, you should be more thoughtful next time.
26/02/2013 at 17:14 DarkFenix says:
Enuffle of the puns already!
26/02/2013 at 17:22 Zungado says:
Don’t make this orcward.
26/02/2013 at 17:48 frenz0rz says:
These puns absolutely skink.
26/02/2013 at 18:14 Drake Sigar says:
I have a feeling Blood Bowl II will dwarf it’s predecessor.
26/02/2013 at 19:06 DarkFenix says:
Oh yes, it should positively tower ogre it.
26/02/2013 at 20:05 tstapp1026 says:
How many people will be goblin this up on release day?
26/02/2013 at 21:20 Punchbowled says:
Meh, I can wight for the sale.
27/02/2013 at 00:39 transientmind says:
This is why I read RPS. Also, the headline almost caused me to give my keyboard a coke glaze.
27/02/2013 at 01:01 Rognik says:
Personally, I hope Cyanide will be halfling nothing to do with BB2.
27/02/2013 at 08:42 Molotova says:
It will probably be cyanide tho… all there is left for me to do is to cuddle up to my Mummy and cry.
26/02/2013 at 17:01 Syra says:
Not sure if this game will be able to scratch that tzeentch… Even if I am skaven it.
26/02/2013 at 17:36 sonson says:
Good for the good god?
26/02/2013 at 16:07 Captain Loco says:
Cautiously optimistic for this. I still play Chaos Edition nearly every day.
Hopefully they can fix some of the long-standing bugs and improve the matchmaking system.
27/02/2013 at 10:54 Malibu Stacey says:
That’ll be those long-standing bugs which have been around since the original release and 3 commercial releases plus numerous patches later still exist?
They still can’t even make a turn-based game which allows a disconnected player to rejoin the game. Even Dota 2 which moves at a slightly quicker pace being a real time game allows basic functionality as this.
No thanks Cyanide, not buying any more of the buggy, unsupported, unfinished crap you’d like your customers to think are actually finished games.
26/02/2013 at 16:10 sinister agent says:
Oh great, force everyone to shell out at their lousy prices just to be able to play with the already splintered and unsteady playerbase. Wonderful.
Cyanide are pretty damn shifty as far as I’m concerned. Blood Bowl still has the same problems it had two years and two full price iterations ago. If they think I’m going to hand them more money just to do it all over again, they can shove it up their arse.
26/02/2013 at 16:13 wyrmsine says:
As much as I love Blood Bowl, I have to agree. There’s 3 versions of BB out now, each one a modded version of the last, all with the same bugs and awful AI. There’s no way Cyanide is getting any more money from me.
26/02/2013 at 16:37 President Weasel says:
Actually, to be fair to them, the Chaos Edition is much less of a rip-off compared to the Legendary Edition – compatible multiplayer with legendary, whereas Legendary wasn’t compatible with the original, forcing people to shell out for the new version or stop playing. Chaos Edition is optional, you only need to buy it if you want the three teams it adds, plus it’s heavily discounted if you already own Legendary.
However it’s true there are several niggles still with their implementation of the rules, the occasional bug like players going missing when you set your team up then reappearing out of position when you kick off, the ‘end turn’ button is still in an idiotic place, and they still, after three iterations, haven’t included the full roster of Star Players.
“Blood Bowl 2″ sounds like code for “you will lose all the existing teams you’ve developed over years of play” to me; I am hells of looking askance at this. What is it, a new engine? Why?
26/02/2013 at 17:09 Dog Pants says:
Why indeed. The issues with the existing versions could be fixed with a patch. This just strikes me as another tug on the udder of the Blood Bowl cash cow. A new, prettier engine is lovely, but since the rules would need to remain the same for it to remain Blood Bowl then is it really worth shelling out for again? Lots of people still play Fumbbl despite the limited graphics, so pretty isn’t really a big deal to Blood Bowl players. However, for the right price, a unified version with decent net code, an improved online league system, and inevitable engine update would be worth it. What are the chances of them releasing one complete version though, given their track record?
26/02/2013 at 17:53 frenz0rz says:
I actually used to have a mod for LE that reduced the size of the End Turn button and moved it to a spot in between the scoreboards. It stopped working after I upgraded to CE though…
26/02/2013 at 18:30 Archonsod says:
Every version has been heavily discounted if you owned the previous ones. I’ve got all four, and in total I haven’t spent more than £40 on it.
26/02/2013 at 19:35 Squirrelfanatic says:
You’re right with the points you raise PW, but still – Chaos Edition has just been released. We’ll have to wait and see if there will be any way in which BB player can play against someone who owns BBII. There is no chance I am shelling out for a bugfixed version of a game I already own. Bloody hell.
27/02/2013 at 08:40 Hmm-Hmm. says:
How long has it been since CE was released? I dunno, it feels a bit soon. As said it’s likely to divide the playerbase even further. And I wonder exactly why there’s really a need for a new game. They just have to fix the bugs and implement all the rules correctly (and, y’know, add missing bits).
26/02/2013 at 17:22 iniudan says:
Actually there is 4 version, original, dark elf, legendary and chaos. =p
26/02/2013 at 17:28 somnolentsurfer says:
Wasn’t Dark Elf released as a free update to the original?
26/02/2013 at 17:39 SkittleDiddler says:
Only for a limited time, so those who waited too long to upgrade got screwed.
26/02/2013 at 17:59 somnolentsurfer says:
Ah. Can you claim it on Steam now, or was that time limited too? I had the original preordered from Cyanide at release, and recently got it added on Steam by entering the code. I’ve not played it since though. All my friends long ago moved to Legendary.
26/02/2013 at 19:12 SkittleDiddler says:
I’m not sure — pricing schemes that I’ve seen for the upgrade deal have been confusing. Amazon stopped offering it almost immediately after Dark Elves was released, while Gamers Gate held on to the discount a bit longer than that. I don’t purchase from Steam so I have no clue which offer they’re currently pimping.
I think it all comes down to Cyanide and the publisher. They can’t seem to keep track of who’s selling what. When your distributors are featuring conflicting versions of the same game right next to each other, you need to step up and clean house.
27/02/2013 at 08:43 Hmm-Hmm. says:
@somnolentsurfer: perhaps you could, but even so, Legendary contains all previous content -and- isn’t compatible with previous editions. So if your friends play LE you’re probably best off by getting the LE yourself.
26/02/2013 at 16:12 povu says:
Nice timing, I was just watching some youtube videos of the Blood Bowl tournament that The Game Station network has going on at the moment.
26/02/2013 at 16:15 Reset says:
Hoping for-
A way to do asynchronous play, even if it’s under an optional alternate rule set
A way to save and resume online league games later, to get around connection loss issues
And it’d be nice to be able to have a little more options and control over player visual customization, given BB’s miniature gaming roots
26/02/2013 at 16:32 Captain Loco says:
Asynchronous play would be awesome. I suppose it’s too much to hope for an iOS version, I would play the shit out of this on my iPad.
26/02/2013 at 16:15 Choca says:
Actually there is more to tell : the game is set to come out in 2014 and has been in development for 6 months.
26/02/2013 at 16:18 Dan Griliopoulos says:
Do you have a link for that?
26/02/2013 at 16:25 FurryLippedSquid says:
https://twitter.com/Cedriclag
26/02/2013 at 16:30 Choca says:
https://twitter.com/Cedriclag/status/306349912596029441
Cédric Lagarrigue being the CEO of Focus Home Interactive.
26/02/2013 at 16:20 ocelotwildly says:
Oh please please please let them include vaguely functional AI which can provide a bit of a challenge. The current version always gives me flashbacks to when I attempted to teach my 8 year old brother and utterly indifferent sister how to play the boardgame, with similarly frustrating consequences.
26/02/2013 at 16:21 Discopanda says:
Creative Assembly blood bowl on the Rome 2 engine, with thousands of animated spectators, potentially a real time mode that isn’t awful like the cyanide version? So much potential!
26/02/2013 at 16:24 KikiJiki says:
I’d rather whomever is developing this title get the turn based version right and stuff any idea of real time back in the ‘terrible ideas’ box.
26/02/2013 at 16:25 Random Gorilla says:
Praise Nuffle!
26/02/2013 at 16:38 Vorphalack says:
One does not praise Nuffle lightly, for he is a spiteful god who will send dooms upon you (in the form of triple skull re-rolled triple skulls) should you attract his baleful gaze.
Yes, i’ve been having a bad run lately.
26/02/2013 at 17:59 frenz0rz says:
I can confirm through over 700 hours of trials and experimentation that avoiding his gaze, putting your fingers in your ears and pretending he doesn’t exist or cowering under your desk makes absolutely no difference whatsoever. Nuffle will catch up with you eventually, and when he does, he’ll bring the pain.
Invoking his name, however, will always spell doom on your next roll. Always.
26/02/2013 at 20:04 AndreTheTinny_withagiantdick says:
It is as thou a thousand mouths cry out in pain when this annoucement was made.
26/02/2013 at 22:01 frenz0rz says:
Nice quote, wrong game :)
http://youtu.be/O03WLn8SzaE?t=22s
26/02/2013 at 16:29 jmexio says:
So: what do you lot particularly want to see in BB2?
A picture with a logo, clearly.
26/02/2013 at 16:31 Ian says:
I fear that if it’s Cyanide that alone will be enough to put me off. Short of the response after release being unanimously along the lines of “They’ve fixed all that annoying shit.”
26/02/2013 at 16:35 Rich Tea says:
I love BB, but I could never recommend the current pc version. Look at it. It’s horrible.
26/02/2013 at 16:41 Skeletor68 says:
Improved UI, camera, player customisation, transparency of rules and campaigns AI etc. would be good.
We all know how ridiculous pressing ‘Quit’ to save is, so how does three iterations of a game ship like that!
26/02/2013 at 16:49 Kapouille says:
I’m looking forward to the new random ways in which it will crash or mess up your gameplay experience. Maybe they can manage to make the UI even more confusing? I’m sure they can, Cyanide have proven to have plenty of potential in that area.
26/02/2013 at 16:50 almostDead says:
I want to see much more blood and violence on plays. Including modelling of injuries specific to body parts.
26/02/2013 at 16:53 Screwie says:
I hope for at least all the star players this time around, and optional rules such as the special play cards being implemented. Better league management tools (especially if they extend to custom rulesets with custom team rosters like NTBB or BB7) would be amazing, as would a play-by-email option.
If it’s under development by another studio, then mostly I hope that they don’t take a step backwards but instead try and out-do Cyanide’s effort in making a faithful translation of the tabletop experience.
27/02/2013 at 13:34 UnlovedAlien says:
Or you know a working game.
26/02/2013 at 16:57 Loyal_Viggo says:
I want to see other Games Workshop IP developed, like:
Battlefleet Gothic – you know this!
Man’O'War – Warhammer on the High (Elf) Seas
Necromunda – Gangland massacres are fun
Epic 40k – Stomping across the battlefield in your titan… majestic!
In other words:
BB2 can fcuk right off.
26/02/2013 at 17:39 wodin says:
If I won the lottery I’d set up a development company to make game very similar to the above..the mere thought of it gives me an odd tingle sensation around the nether regions.
26/02/2013 at 17:42 SkittleDiddler says:
You forgot Advanced Heroquest.
26/02/2013 at 18:54 strangeloup says:
And Warhammer Quest, which was the same kind of thing but I liked it.
26/02/2013 at 19:14 SkittleDiddler says:
Then there’s standard Heroquest, which was a bizarre Hasbro/Games Workshop tie-in. Not sure if that was available outside the U.S.
27/02/2013 at 10:37 Guvornator says:
However, with all due respect to Cyanide, I’m pretty sure I wouldn’t want them getting within 10 miles of any of those IPs. A Creative Assembly made Epic 40k game may well cause me to have joygasm…
26/02/2013 at 16:59 iucounu says:
I have the Legendary Edition, I think? Which is kind of a mess – the graphics are kind of naff, the UI is atrocious – but it feels like Blood Bowl is all there, at least. What’s annoying is that they didn’t try to build on or reinterpret any of it. The Blitz mode stuff and extended inducements are deeply unexciting additions and all very boardgamey.
I like boardgames, but if this is just going to be another Cyanide Blood Bowl conversion with some extra frills and teams, I’m not going to shell out the silly price they’ll put on it.
Oh, years ago I remember there was a controversy about multiplayer – that the die rolls were being handled server-side, and so could be manipulated to cheat? Did that ever get sorted out?
26/02/2013 at 17:10 Captain Loco says:
Cyanide Studio retweeted the logo, so I think it’s a safe bet to say they’re involved in the project.
26/02/2013 at 19:36 Squirrelfanatic says:
Oh gods, no!
26/02/2013 at 22:39 X_kot says:
Gotta have something to do after Impire, right?
26/02/2013 at 17:15 naetharu says:
The main thing I really want to see in here is some better support for campaign games. The first game is great for one-off sessions but the campaign stuff felt like a bit of a mess. Also, much better customization options and a generally cleaner menu system would be really nice. The first game was deeply flawed in many ways, but at its core it was a brilliant direct translation of BB onto the PC. I have high hopes!
Oh, and I am with you on wanting to see a PC version of Necromunda. That game was fantastic – I spent way too much time and money on it in my early teens. If they did a version of it that was true to the actual rules it would be fantastic.
26/02/2013 at 17:38 sonson says:
And Mordheim.
An RPG set in either 40K land or the Old World is probably the most obviously missed cash in I can think of in PC gaming also.
26/02/2013 at 18:16 iucounu says:
I would like a procedurally-generated UFO-style TBS based on Necromunda rules, maybe about the WH40K Inquisition, and including a psychological model for each soldier that would work like a beefed-up version of what they were doing in Valkyria Chronicles; like what Dwarf Fortress does. Your troops remember stuff that happened, tell stories about it, have relationships and trauma and stuff that needs to be managed. Also, craploads of weapons and psychic powers and daemons out of the GW sourcebooks to play with. Could we do that instead of more phoning-it-in Blood Bowl from Cyanide?
26/02/2013 at 18:34 Archonsod says:
Sod Necromunda. Gorkamorka was always where the skirmish game was at.
26/02/2013 at 17:22 somnolentsurfer says:
Just scores my first victory in The Banner Saga, and have to say so far I’m much more interested in the future of that than I would be in this. There’s still some features it could do with adding, but it does away with a lot of the nonsense I found infuriating about BB. And it looks absolutely gorgeous.
26/02/2013 at 18:07 Atic Atac says:
Yay! I hope they will release yearly small expansions/patches as full price products again! I love that model..
26/02/2013 at 19:30 Arkhonist says:
If this doesn’t have all the races on day it’s a no-go, just like DoW 2
26/02/2013 at 19:31 Svant says:
Better gui etc for the standard turnbased mode and a more interesting realtime mode that ignores all bloodbowl rules would be fun, especially with hotseat multiplayer. 2-4 players duking it out with controllers.
26/02/2013 at 20:28 Warduke says:
For God sake I hope they scrap the Real Time version of the game (i.e. console) and just focus on the true core game, getting it right and fixing all the damn bugs! Please fix the bugs! Oh and bring in all the Star Players, Oh and how about Chaos Pact and Slann?!?
26/02/2013 at 21:17 Vinraith says:
What do I want to see? AI that can play the game, obviously, but I doubt it’ll happen.
27/02/2013 at 08:50 Hmm-Hmm. says:
What I suspect we can expect:
-That it’s Cyanide.
-That they want to release it so soon because BloodBowl = money.
-That we’ll have to start with a very limited roster again. And bugs.
-No compatibility with the preceding game. But you might get a discount.
-Potentially somewhat improved AI/UI/introduction to the game/campaign
27/02/2013 at 09:03 Molotova says:
+1 for imprved AI
Seeing the AI going for the endzone on the last turn before half-time or end of the game, even if it does not have a theoretical chance to reach it makes me cringe every time.
Also thank goodness i found the free BB living rulebook on pdf as i started playing. I shouldnt have had to rely on a third party resource to be able to undesrtand and play the game properly.
27/02/2013 at 10:06 Nick says:
Necromunda game please.
27/02/2013 at 13:37 migueluli says:
First and foremost: asynchronous multiplayer. A plus if it is cross-platform and I can play my turns on the go on the iPad.
Second: Space Hulk! (And the above applies here too)
27/02/2013 at 14:04 Gothnak says:
Better campaign so it feels like i’m a league, with a transfer system, sponsors, player morale, not wanting to work with other players, rivalries etc (God that would be awesome, better than the overly simple league they have now), better Ai in matches, Better way of explaining the odds of succeeding at an ability.
If it had all that, i’ll be extremely happy. To be honest, i don’t really care about the game engine, just a lick of paint would be fine (Oh and more varied commentary!)
13/03/2013 at 22:40 Dunk69666 says:
Most important is a better AI (the opposition should really start going for a touchdown when they are behind and there is only a couple of turns to go, instead of making a cage).
Secondly is a more advanced off field part to the game similar to Championship manager, with the option to go for coaching positions in other teams (so you don’t get bored of the race you initially picked).
Thirdly have a hundred odd star players of which a handful are available for hiring (appropriate to race/alignment) at each game.
27/02/2013 at 14:25 Sunjammer says:
I’d be excited if I had more faith in Cyanide. I just don’t trust them to create something that isn’t riddled with idiotic holes. They seem almost completely incapable of producing something genuinely solid.
I just want a Blood Bowl 2 that is a modern game that works, and hopefully has better information systems because god knows, Blood Bowl barely communicates.
27/02/2013 at 14:53 Rich Tea says:
Sack whoever it is that scripts the ”humour” for this game. It makes me want to pull my teeth out.