Watch’n’Game: At A Distance

Him: silent, stoic, patient. “OK.”
Me: jabbering, confused, hectoring. “Go there, what about that, does that look like that?”

A right pair, Jim and I. Entirely inappropriate, surely, to tackle a co-operative puzzle and exploration game together. We did it, though. We conquered At A Distance‘s abstract shape-worlds, and we did it together. And creator Terry Cavanagh (VVVVVV) only had to give us big, fat hints around half a dozen times. Perhaps he was inwardly thinking “these feckless jokers run a website about videogames?”, but outwardly he was patient and understanding, so I’ll presume we weren’t quite the most pathetic pair he saw tackle his brain-teasing wonder.

Right: here’s the main problem with writing about At A Distance. You say how it works, you spoil it. I’m going to take a cowardly middle-ground and obliquely reference key elements without actually shining a direct light on them (and certainly not on how to solve the game), but if you want to go in totally blind to this 30 minute-long co-op indie game that requires two adjacent PCs to play it, stop reading now.

Still here? OK. I can’t tell you much – you may leave knowing little more than when you started, but that’s alright too.

You start alone, bathed in colour. But you are not alone – your companion is right next to you . You can talk to him, and you can see what he sees – he too is bathed in colour, but another colour, with different shapes within it. Shapes, detail, objects – it’s hard to see much of anything through the colour, until you’re right on top of it. Same for him.

You move, carefully. Nothing changes in his world. He moves. Nothing changes in your world. You explore, he explores, you can’t find each other. Alone. And yet…

Clues emerge: he is in a room of towering blocks and obstacles, you are in an enclosed room split into three tiers. He can do nothing but run and jump, you can do that but also you can pick up a set of cubes containing strange, twisting, angular shapes within. What to do, what to do? Talk. Investigate each other’s world. Experiment. Triumph.

Well, there I must curtail the hints. I’ve said too much already. For both players, the perspective is always first-person, the better to get across the initial sense of being lost and confused and to swamp the senses with the overload of near-unichrome colour each room presents.

What comes later, once the initial eureka! has arrived, is two separate journeys, but in tandem, communicating all the while (unless you’re Silent Jim Rossignol), with one player facing a test of logic – i.e. puzzles – and the other a test of spatial awareness – i.e. jumping and navigation. Colour is a vital part of At A Distance, both in terms of the calming yet sombre appearance and in terms of the pair of you besting its challenges and even identifying your own location. One player roams far and wide, the other must decipher the mysteries of an enclosed space – but one that eventually opens out into new and different types of skill and reasoning.

Eventually, the roaming player too faces an escalation, as the game’s initial core puzzle flowers into a vaster, stranger endgame that, for the first time, evokes VVVVVV – but a slower, lucid dream approach to puzzle platforming. By this point, the game’s greatest achievement – muddling out a broader puzzle together while not being able to physically work together – has been bested, and the game becomes a one-player journey to an exit, with an equally absorbed but no longer directly occupied observer egging their erstwhile companion on.

I do have a newer build of the game here that apparently alters (eases, I think) the end game, but I’ve yet to lure someone to my house and play the game on a laptop with me, so I can’t speak for that just yet. But the arc of At A Distance is, in my experience, this: Confusion, Realisation, Excitement, Industriousness, Confoundment, Struggle, Triumph.

At A Distance is a truly ingenious take on co-operation, one where each player simply cannot meaningfully progress without sustained, thoughtful engagement with their companion. It is a finely interwoven puzzle-cube, each challenge linked to the last but regularly taking dramatic u-turns at the point where a player might start to become complacent. It is also a one-time deal: once you’ve solved it, you’ve solved. Your relationship with the game probably won’t end there, however: armed with your knowledge, you will become an advisor to another pair of unknowing adventurers.

Many will fail to best At A Distance without the benefit of another’s wisdom – and that is how it should be. The dawning realisation of how it works is the game’s finest feat, and to make that obvious will bring down the whole house of dreamlike cards. Phenomenally clever, to the point of dastardliness, and a sterling example of how we haven’t even begun to see the outer limits of the experiences videogames can offer us.

At A Distance has been touring various events for the last few months, but will be publicly released on Terry Cavanagh’s website on December 7.


  1. Hoaxfish says:

    Friend not included I’m guessing

  2. Bfox says:

    Why do so many indie games hurt my eyes?

    • Dances to Podcasts says:

      Because your eyesight has been dulled by boring greys and dirty browns.

    • soldant says:

      Pretty sure bright green and bright red aren’t so good for your eyes either…

    • bear912 says:

      There was a room in the Action Half-Life map that Quinns wrote about a while back (“ahl_5am”) which, if you spent enough time in it, would temporarily desaturate your actual, real-life vision…

  3. Kefren says:


    • Kefren says:

      If you mix link to with×192&url=/wosfiles/ingame/CastleMaster.gif you get the first screenshot, almost.

      I loved Driller on my C64. I remember making the cardboard globe map. Sadly I can’t play it now, even on emulators, it is so slow (and if you accelerate it you lose the sound). How did I ever play a game that ran at abut 0.15 frames a second? Probably because imagination filled in the gaps.

    • Premium User Badge

      zapatapon says:

      My thought exactly

    • Jekhar says:

      @Kefren: Maybe you want to try the remake then: link to
      I don’t know how faithful it is because i haven’t played it yet, but the Cholo-Remake by the same group was excellent.

    • Kefren says:

      @Jekhar Thanks, I’ll have a look.

    • 3lbFlax says:

      I’d forgotten about the cardboard map. I ploughed hours and hours into Driller because it was a Christmas present and I’d been looking forward to it for ages. I don’t really have any recollection of enjoying it, but I certainly remember being absorbed in it. When I think of it now it reminds me of the fuzzy, distorted broadcasts from the future in Prince of Darkness. Unsatisfying but vital.

  4. ChainsawCharlie says:

    I love Terry and his work but this is just out of my reach. Local LAN multiplayer game, sorry not possible.

  5. nimzy says:

    And they called him Silent Jim… o/`

  6. HermitUK says:

    How does the multiplayer work then? If it’s essentially a LAN setup does that mean it’ll be possible to get it running over the interwebs with something like Hamachi? Any potential co-op partners for this are some distance away.

    • Sic says:

      If I understand this correctly, you will also need a webcam, a microphone, and a second monitor, for this to work. I would think internet play is out of the question, really.

  7. westyfield says:

    What was the name of that (Unity-based, if I recall correctly) first-person platform game where everything was varying shades of red? And you had to move slightly in order to change the angle at which you were looking at stuff so you could see it. And then you look away from the monitor and everything’s different. Because this reminds me of that.

  8. YourMessageHere says:

    I was trying to guess what this was; I thought it might be some sort of optical illusion/magic eye-based game where you can’t see what’s going on properly from normal playing distance, and instead need to be further away. Thus the approved playing method is that one person controls the player, while the other watches from further away and gives instruction. Sounds interesting but very restrictive as to player base – unless it would also work played as remote co-op with VoIP? Does it literally have to be someone else in the same room?

  9. hypercrisis says:

    this here is where the threshold between game and art is crossed. This belongs in a gallery, not on our computers

  10. Pod42 says:

    Can’t wait for this, absolutely love all of his games, so much so I wrote him fan mail and he actually answered ;D.

  11. Koldunas says:

    This looks like something I would enjoy very much and then get a headache from the colour scheme. Unfortunate.