If you click on a link and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. Read our editorial policy.

Playing Monster Train dev's new co-op roguelike with pals is going to be harder than I thought

RPS Treehouse friends have opened my eyes

I've played Shiny Shoe's upcoming roguelike Inkbound once before, and not only is it markedly different to their previous game Monster Train, but it also featured the snappiest turn-based combat I'd seen. With that in mind, I dove into the game's recent technical test with fellow RPS Treehouse-dwellers Ollie and James to sample the game at a more leisurely pace, and to draw upon their greater strategic expertise. Did the combat hold up? Were they pleased to be dragged into a co-op session with me? Yes... and no. We had fun, but it didn't come quite as naturally without the guiding hand of the developers showing us the ropes.

When I last played Inkbound, I sampled a run with Shiny Shoe's CEO Mark Cooke and creative director Andrew Krausnick, and I was left smitten with the game's turn-based combat (do give it a read if you want a quick rundown of how the game's runs and upgrades actually work). At the time, I had no doubts in my mind that the game successfully sped up turn-based bashing without hurting the strategic side of things. You and your pals are all able to take your turns simultaneously, you see, moving and unleashing your hotbar full of abilities all within a single turn. Once you've all clicked the "Yes, that's me done" button, the enemy gets their go. It's quite like Marvel Snap, in that sense. It's fast and fluid and ensures that most runs don't drag on for too long.

Last week, however, I returned to it during its recent public technical test, which was pretty much the same build as I'd played before. Only this time I had Ollie and James in tow and no developers to guide us through it - and the result was quite a different experience. Whereas before Cooke and Krausnick had gently steered me through proceedings, we now had to figure things out for ourselves, and in our attempts to co-ordinate attacks or survive the toughest encounters, it turns out it was quite a bit harder to problem solve as a team.

A Magma Miner takes on an anthropomorphic bull boss in Inkbound.

With most turn-based strategy games, combat can take a while because you're forced to sit through each unit's moves. Everything is flagged for all to see: the meteor shower spell, the mana cost of the spell, the damage it dealt, the radius of the spell in question – you get the idea. Sure, it takes longer, but at least everyone's clued in on what each other's doing even if the chat room's gone quiet. There's room to potentially comment on whether the meteor shower spell is better spent on the large orc instead of the little goblin, or quickly point out that your icicle blast is able to take them out, so there's no point in your pal wasting their mana.

Inkbound's simultaneous turns may make progression through its stages that much snappier, but it also means that even in co-op, you can feel a little isolated. This may change in time, of course, but starting out, James, Ollie and I weren't well-versed enough in each other's abilities to know what everything did. We had no idea what upgrades we'd all invested in. Moment to moment, turn to turn, we slapped our abilities down and hoped that they'd contribute to the group goal: kill the bad. To be fair, this was almost entirely our own fault. The game itself has a text chat feature, much like you'd find in an MMO, but trying to relay all that complex information by typing is... impractical to say the least. Still, despite all of us sitting on a Discord call together, we also didn't end up chatting much there either, and in hindsight we probably should have been hitting each other with intel throughout the run. Thing is, are you prepared to discuss everything in quite a lot of detail, all the time?

For some, the answer will be a definitive "Yes, that's fine by me". If you're a talkative person, or you play with such a well-oiled group of strategy heads that it's second nature to chat through each move and upgrade acquired, you'll find Inkbound slots naturally into your methods. While Ollie, James, and I got away with very little in the way of planning, I imagine tougher runs will require a lot more focused yapping. So, for those of you who aren't all that talkative either, you might find the game a little exhausting. I also worry that those more difficult runs involve lots of turns where you're forever running each other through your moves, which could detract from the game's snappiness in general. The game's playable on your lonesome, though, so there's always that option.

Ollie, James, and Ed fight a Rhinferno boss in Inkbound, with purple mist and markers filling the arena.
Ollie, James, and Ed fight some soldiers in a marker-filled arena in Inkbound.
Ollie, James, and Ed fight a mixture of enemies with markers covering the arena in Inkbound.
Ollie, James, and Ed fight some rotund purple enemies in a purple marker-filled arena in Inkbound.
Enemy designs are wonderful and each stage looks the part, but when purple cones start littering the floor it's very difficult to tell what's going on.

The main bit of co-ordinating we did lay in drawing aggro from enemies who'd direct their attacks to whoever smacked them last. That is, if we managed to get our heads around the game's overlapping area-of-effect markers. Fights take place in a circular arena, with a poisonous fog that closes in as they progress. This means that tougher fights are often in cramped spaces, against enemies who are capable of spawning enemies, or exploding, or charging you. All of these circles and lines and markers begin to merge into an indiscernible mesh when this happens, making it very difficult to understand what's about to happen between turns. Talking things through helped a bit here, but there were times where we also had to just give up and hope for the best, too.

Despite all that, though, we did manage to make it work and complete a run together. And I think that speaks to Inkbound's strengths, which is that, even without rigorous planning or much knowledge of everyone's strengths, we were still able to hop into a game, focus on our own thing and have a good time. We genuinely had a lot of fun! But the difference between my previous experience with the game was palpable, and I worry that snappy combat may end up becoming quite long and protracted if those tougher runs require players to explain their moves to one another over many, many potential turns. I think we'd all like to see some sprinkles of clarity over the battlefield, too, and perhaps a way to quickly see what moves your allies have used at a glance if you're not able to chat (or type out long, complex battle plans) in real-time. Still, with its release date remaining a general 2023 for now, there's hopefully plenty of time to grow.

You're not signed in!

Create your ReedPop ID & unlock community features and much, much more!

Create account
About the Author
Ed Thorn avatar

Ed Thorn

Senior Staff Writer

When Ed's not cracking thugs with bicycles in Yakuza, he's likely swinging a badminton racket in real life. Any genre goes, but he's very into shooters and likes a weighty gun, particularly if they have a chainsaw attached to them. Adores orange and mango squash, unsure about olives.

Comments
Rock Paper Shotgun logo

We've been talking, and we think that you should wear clothes

Total coincidence, but we sell some clothes

Buy RPS stuff here
Rock Paper Shotgun Merch