Why Adventure Games Don’t Have To Suck: Ron Gilbert Talks Thimbleweed Park

Yesterday, I spent forty five minutes with influential adventure game designer of yore Ron Gilbert. We played a portion of his point and click revival Thimbleweed Park and discussed adventure game design in depth. Many of my questions were inspired by Gilbert’s 1989 statement of intent, Why Adventure Games Suck. As Thimbleweed Park looks back to that time, it seemed appropriate to ask what has changed for the better. And for the worse.

A clown is scrubbing and clawing at his face, attempting to remove the pasty makeup and honking red nose that are the tools of his trade. He can’t. The clowning is no longer a costume, it has become his reality. Long live the new flesh.

Thimbleweed Park is an absurd, sinister, comedic point and click adventure that looks back to the golden age of Lucasarts, when its creator Ron Gilbert helped to forge many of the rules and standards of the genre. I spoke with Gilbert at GDC as he and programmer Jenn Sandercock walked me through a few scenes from the story’s first act.

It begins with the detectives, the two first playable characters, but the demonstration is all about Ransome the clown. He’s grotesque, in both appearance and character, an uncaring celebrity made famous by a stand-up routine that seems to consist entirely of heckling his own audience. The insults he slings aren’t creative or witty; they’re cruel, attacking any visible difference or perceived flaw for cheap laughs.

In a flashback sequence, he targets someone whose words have actual power and she responds by cursing him, making the cosmetic alterations that are the costume he hides behind a permanent fixture. Of the five playable characters in the game, three will be introduced through similar interactive flashback sequences, set in self-contained areas of the wider world. They’re origin stories, of a sort, explaining how these people came to be the (in one case literal) ghosts that haunt this derelict town.

An important part of Gilbert’s design ethos, as I understand it, is that every part of the game should serve every other part of the game. At its most basic level, that means a puzzle should inform the player about the state of the world, the progress of the plot, or the motivations and flaws of a character. In a more intricate sense, as it relates to the flashbacks, it requires the self-contained puzzles within to teach the player, ensuring that the kind of logic they’re discovering is applicable in the large, nonlinear area of the ‘present day’.

I hadn’t expected to find the game as weirdly charming and creepy as I did. The entire setup of Ransome’s life has its own peculiar logic that serves as an efficient cornerstone of worldbuilding. We’re in America – the diner, the feds and the store signs are confirmation – but this is an America where an Insult Clown is not only a celebrity, but an apparent A-lister, who can treat fans and employees with Hollywood disdain and fly from show to holiday home by private jet. He’s a rockstar and circus tents are the stadia and arenas of this world.

And, yes, Ransome’s introduction is funny, packed with gags that in the current build are delivered through uncannily well-timed text that leaves just the right pauses and hits all the right beats (voice acting will come later). It’s also weird though. Why a clown celebrity, I ask Gilbert.

“I’m a huge fan of David Lynch and, as you pointed out, the agent coming to a small town to investigate a murder is reminiscent of Twin Peaks.” The Lynchian influence isn’t just present in terms of nods, winks and allusions though. “What I love about Lynch is that he can show an ordinary situation, something calm and everyday, and skew it so that it becomes strange.”

Strange and sinister.

“Yeah. He only has to change one or two details to make something recognisable seem incomprehensible. Thimbleweed Park isn’t about the corpse you see at the beginning. I can’t tell you what it is about but it’s much bigger than that and you haven’t even seen the beginning of the real mystery yet.

“It is a dark story. Not as dark as some of the things in The Cave but it does have a serious quality to it. That’s been the case as long as I’ve been making games – look back to Monkey Island and it’s a serious story about a man who wants to become something better than what he is, a pirate in this case, but he is a flawed character. It’s a romance as much as anything else.”

Any story can become funny when seen through the right lens, perhaps. I’m reminded of the Mel Brooks line: “Tragedy is when I cut my finger. Comedy is when you fall into an open sewer and die.” Tragedy is when my aspirations are mocked and the person I love is abducted by a hideous undead brute. Comedy is when you make a point and click game about it. I suggest that point and click adventures have an inherent absurdity that can become comedic even unwittingly.

“I think you’re absolutely right. The way that you interact with the world and the things that you’re asked to do are often so unusual that it becomes amusing. If you need to open a door, you don’t get the key out of your pocket, there’s a whole sequence of convoluted events required to get where you need to be. If I don’t acknowledge the absurdity of that by having the characters respond humorously, the player will still recognise it.”

While we’re on the topic of convoluted and absurd things, it seems appropriate to ask Gilbert about puzzle design. I relate to good puzzle design in the same way that Justice Potter Stewart related to pornography: I find it hard to describe but I know it when I see it.

“An adventure game is like an onion.” Not that it should make you cry, The Walking Dead style, but in that it’s constructed of layers. “Every layer should feed into the ones around it. A good puzzle has to tell you something about the world, about the characters, about the mystery, about the plot. Too often, and I’ve been guilty of this myself, puzzles are used as roadblocks to slow you down and block your progress. Really they should be like signposts that you’re trying to decipher.

“In Thimbleweed Park we have a large world to explore and that can be intimidating so there are some obstacles to prevent you from going everywhere right at the start. But when you need to solve a puzzle to advance, that puzzle must have some context. When you solve it you should understand how and why it was necessary to do what you did in order to move forward and to open up a new area.”

A good puzzle should also make you think. You should puzzle over it. This is one of the reasons Gilbert and his team have returned to a verb interface similar to that seen in his SCUMM days.

“I sometimes enjoy the simplicity of modern point and click interfaces but I like to make the player think and explore the world in more detail. If you can choose to push or pull something, or use it or look at it, you’re thinking about the specific way in which the character is interacting. It helps you to understand the interactivity rather than clicking on something and seeing an animation play out that shows something completely unexpected. Maybe you didn’t want to, or understand that you had to, act in such a way but the game does the thinking for you.”

For convenience, Thimbleweed does highlight a suggested verb when you hover the pointer over an object in the world, but you’re free to select any of the available options. And the suggestion is the most obvious choice – for a door, ‘open’ or ‘close’, for a person, ‘talk to’ – rather than the correct choice. Correct and obvious might be one and the same in most cases, but not always.

“Having these interactions, particularly ‘look at’, is a way to add details to the world as well as more jokes. And the jokes are adding detail to the world as well.”

The same is true of dialogue.

“The two agents have different dialogue trees and they’ll reveal more information about the people you’re talking to and the history of the town, as well as characters’ motivations and thoughts. You learn about the agents, who are working together for the first time and don’t always trust one another, by seeing how they read situations differently.”

I asked Gilbert if he can think of a single puzzle that he’s created that captures his thoughts as to how good design can work. One that he’s particularly proud of. He thinks for a while before answering.

“The faith puzzle in Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade is one of my favourites. The game tells you that if you need to have faith to walk across a ledge that seems impossible to cross. If you spend time clicking on things in the environment and trying to find a solution, you will fall. To cross, you need to ignore all of the usual puzzle interactions and just click the other side of the bridge.

In that sense, it’s not a complex puzzle but the player has to read the situation and understand the context of the world in order to solve it.”

That subversion of expectation is something that has been a part of Gilbert’s games since the beginning.

“With Maniac Mansion, we didn’t really know what we were doing. Monkey Island refined our ideas.” I’ve never been sure if the fake death scene in the first Monkey Island game, in which Guybrush falls to his apparent death, terrifying any players who haven’t saved recently before delivering a punchline that allows them to continue, was a jab at Maniac Mansion’s punishing design or a jab at rival developers Sierra, whose Quest games required a great deal of trial and error.

“It was mainly aimed at Sierra,” Gilbert says without hesitating. “That whole situation was so annoying because we made these games that encouraged players to explore and experiment and rewarded them, and we got better reviews, but Sierra would outsell us. They sold ten times as many games as we did sometimes.”

That’s not to say there isn’t an element of self-critique though. “With Monkey Island we were supposed to make a forty hour game. That was the requirement, seen as value for money. That leads to filler and puzzles that serve to frustrate and delay the player rather than to tell a good story.

“Thimbleweed Park is challenging, the verb system is part of that, but there’s an easy mode in which the harder puzzles will be solved for you. You still encounter them but the solutions are in place. Even if you’re playing in the regular mode, those puzzles form part of the story and characterisation though. Everything that you do has to fit in with the context of the plot and the world.”

The entire conversation changes my idea of what Thimbleweed Park is, or of what it is supposed to be. I’d thought, backed up by the notion that this is a throwback of sorts, that Thimbleweed was about returning to a golden age. Finding solutions by looking to the past where problems had already been solved and correcting decades of deviation from the correct course.

Gilbert’s views are far more complex.

“We want to make a game that is like your memories of those games. If you go back and play Maniac Mansion or Monkey Island now, they’re kind of crappy, and not necessarily as you remember them at all. We want to make a game like the thing that you remember rather than the thing that you played.”

The Lucasarts games, beloved though they are, were experiments. Not the ideal form of the adventure game but a process of discovery for the designers as well as the players. When he says that Thimbleweed Park should feel like the way you remember those games rather than they way they are, he isn’t simply talking about the addition of neat lighting effects and pixel graphics that are an improvement what could have been achieved on the machines of the time, he’s also talking about the design of the puzzles. And, perhaps most important of all, the storytelling.

“The behind the scenes fight in Monkey Island,” a scene in which a prolonged action sequence takes place entirely out of sight, “had originally been planned as a big visual setpiece. We didn’t have time to finish it so we came up with the solution of hiding the action and suggesting all of these things through on-screen text and visual cues. It turned out to be a great gag.

“Working within limitations is always helpful and makes you think of solutions that work. People sometimes say to me, what would you do if you had an infinite supply of money. What kind of game would you make? And I say, I wouldn’t make ANY game. I’d fuck it up.

“Good design needs limitations and flexibility. And that’s what we’re working within. It’s like a stage play, where you need to understand and work within the specific limitations of the set and the space.”

Thimbleweed Park will be out at the end of the year or early 2017.


  1. Premium User Badge

    Aerothorn says:


  2. Premium User Badge

    gritz says:

    No mention of the obvious X-Files influence?

    • Velox says:

      I think you misspelled Twin Peaks .. or maybe it’s both? ;-)

    • TheSplund says:

      I saw the Agent Reyes reference as well as the fairly obvious Mulder+Scully characters

  3. LionsPhil says:

    Promising talk!

    I’m pretty sure verb suggestions were in the original SCUMM games using that interface. You could right-click as a shortcut to just use them, rather than left-clicking a verb and then a thing to build a sentence. It was more a shortcut to keep opening doors and looking at things from being a tedious exercise in uninteresting UI interactions than any kind of hint.

    • tomimt says:

      If I recall at least from Monkey Island forwards they had them but Maniac Mansion didn’t. It’s been ages I’ve played either though.

      • ansionnach says:

        Maniac and Zak didn’t have it. You even had to click twice to confirm an action. From Monkey Island they did have hints for the right button (Look at, Talk to, Open, Close). Inventory items all defaulted to Look at (both buttons). In Day of the Tentacle, they improved it further by defaulting left click as Use for the inventory. After that their UI changes were regressive and aimed more at using the full screen (and consequently, increasing the amount of clicks to do something).

  4. Risingson says:

    “Shocking” headline that repeats the same thing that we have been suffering since the late 90s? Some random namedropping? Why cannot you talk about adventure games in a way that does not irritate me, please?

    • Premium User Badge

      Graham Smith says:

      What? The headline reflects the topic and an article written by the subject himself, and I don’t know what random name-dropping you’re referring to.

      • Rumpelstiltskin says:

        Another possible headline: “Ron Gilbert: Monkey Island is kind of crappy”

  5. Hmm-Hmm. says:

    Some nice bits by Gilbert, here. I would’ve preferred a specific bit on that interview itself, though. But it’s possible that what was discussed all appears (edited and shaved down) here.

  6. Andy_Panthro says:

    I’ve never been bothered by the death mechanic in Sierra games, you just played them a little bit differently to the Lucasarts ones. At least with a Sierra game, if something killed my character I knew I’d been doing something wrong (and sometimes the death message would have a clue about what I should have done, or just an amusing message).

    Despite my love of Sierra adventure games, Monkey Island 2 is probably my favourite adventure game of all time. They may have made fewer games (far, far fewer!), but they made some of the best.

    • vorador says:

      I think time has sweetened your memories, because in the oldest Sierra titles death was random and infuriating.

      • LionsPhil says:

        Death is easy. Save early, save often.

        (And often fun. If you’re not finding every way to top Roger in Space Quest, you’re missing out on about half the jokes.)

        What made some of Sierra’s stuff truly bastardly evil—especially the King’s Quests—were silently unwinnable conditions. Cross a bridge unecessarily and hours later into the game it’ll collapse under you when you need it.

        Save early, save often, save in new slots…and expect you may have to redo stuff as not-particularly-satisfying padding.

        • Thirith says:

          While they shouldn’t drop the way saves work in adventures, especially games that derive a lot of humour from gruesome deaths would do well to offer a more convenient rewind/undo function in addition.

          In fact, this could even be used for more humour, with a character dying horribly, rewinding, talking about how he’d almost had his head crushed by an elefant in heat – and then he goes and does exactly that again. The player character could then start commenting on the player’s obvious sadistic glee.

          • LionsPhil says:

            Full Throttle was a LucasArtser that actually did death, with “OK, let me go back to just before that bit”.

            I remember Gabriel Knight complaining that he didn’t want to be dead, but I can’t remember if there was one that actually picked up on you repeatedly causing it.

            (Heh. Also reminded of the narrator in Bastion’s response if your first action in the game is to run straight off the side of the world into the abyss.)

  7. BooleanBob says:

    Well now, what a good read. I had no idea this game even existed but I’ll be keeping an eye on it. Now all we need is that Toonstruck sequel..

  8. caff says:

    I’ve got a lot of faith in Ron Gilbert. As soon as I saw his ambition with this new game I had to back it. The font in the screenshots alone just screams “PLAY ME” like a huge nostalgic kiss.

    I was a bit disappointed in The Cave but it seemed like a vision not quite executed perfectly. Stuff happens. Ron is a god in my eyes because he was a lead writer on Zak McKracken, absolutely and totally my favourite Lucasarts game.

    • caff says:

      And looking at the credits for Zak I’m glad to see David Fox is involved in this one too! I have high hopes.

      • David Fox says:

        Thanks caff ! Loving being on the Thimbleweed Park project team and working with my old friends. Just a correction, Ron didn’t do any of the writing or scripting on Zak. He did contribute a lot to that game by upgrading SCUMM from the Maniac Mansion version to give me some additional functionality. All writing on Zak was by myself and Matthew Kane.

  9. Thankmar says:

    I’ve never made it that far into The Last Crusade, so maybe I’m missing some context, but the description of the Faith-Puzzle does not sound good to me at all:

    “The game tells you that if you need to have faith to walk across a ledge that seems impossible to cross. If you spend time clicking on things in the environment and trying to find a solution, you will fall. To cross, you need to ignore all of the usual puzzle interactions and just click the other side of the bridge.”

    For me, this does not expand the rules or sth., for me, the game demands to do the exact opposite from what you do in every adventure: gathering as much information as possible, draw conclusions, then try them. If you do that here, you fail.

    • cpt_freakout says:

      Which is exactly what ‘having faith’ implies there. Don’t be rational about the puzzle, just click on what seems the impossible, yet most simple, solution. It makes sense for the magical realist settings of Indy; it’s not so much an expansion of the rules of the game as it is an expansion of the rules of the setting.

  10. polecat says:

    I wonder if Ron Gilbert of Lucasarts fame and Dave Gilbert from Wadjet Eye have met. Are they the same person? Are they part of a von Trapp style adventure game dynasty?

  11. Deano2099 says:

    My big worry with this is that while I still believe Gilbert can make a great point and click game, his last few games (The Cave, Deathspank) just weren’t funny. If the humour falls flat in this it’ll be dead in the water.

    • mechabuddha says:

      Have you gone back and played his old games? I remember them being hilariously funny, but upon playing them in my 30s, they just kind of fall flat.

  12. Shellyjerry says:

    I have been earning upto $5000 to $8000 each month since Last August by working online on my laptop for 5 to 8 hours daily. previously I thought the job will be tough but contrast to opinion it was too easy sometime i myself wonder how easy the job is for such a big money if You too are interested then Visit……….

    ║║Check my S☸urce║║ ✪ ••••••••••••► http://www.working247.tk

  13. fenriz says:

    Is this another Sierra-sux-because-you-can-get-stuck-lucas-rules-because-it’s-more-friendly adventures topic? Plz no :(

    Sierra adventures are more important than lucas games! They were born as pure, primordial, all-encompassing games (which explains the generic word, “adventure”), they were just what one would do as interaction, manipulate items, plus fighting and dying. Sierra games are better because they “cross” throughout gaming’s origin, bringing the whole burden of it.

    Sierra games are more important, they include every genre because they are the torch bearer, they witnessed the birth of text-based, complex-pc interaction! Lucas games don’t have the aura of origin, they are peasant, plebeians, mudblood, they crystallized the genre, made it what it is, and it was their death sentence.

    So, i repeat, Sierra is better because it’s reconciliation of all-genres, the origins, alpha and omega. Lucas is bad because it’s separation, isolation, the puzzles ghetto.

    • fenriz says:

      The stupidity of modern mindsets is to conceive as separated what was born as melanged, even tho it’s contradictorial, as a Sierra game. That’s what Gilbert doesn’t understand, he is grumpy about something, but he should blame himself, he wonders what makes good adventures, he doesn’t understand that adventures are just “total” games, their puzzles are good when they have that variety of all-encompassing. That’s why the insult pirate contest puzzle was so good, because it didn’t belong to a crystallized genre.