If you click on a link and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. Read our editorial policy.

Squeenix Seek Anachronox Pitches (If You Fund & Make It)

Eidos IP on Square Enix Collective

Square Enix want indie developers to make a new Gex game! Wait, no, that's not exciting. Let's go again. Square Enix want indie developers to make a new Fear Effect game! Alice, look, come on. Buck your ideas up. Square Enix want indie developers to make a new Anachronox game! Lawks!

As planned, they've had a root around in the Eidos back catalogue and pulled out three IPs they don't really know what to do with. If you have an idea and want to do the work of crowdfunding then actually making the game, Square Enix might let you (in return for a small share of profits). You could even propose making Gex into a turn-based strategy game because... reasons?

Square Enix say in today's announcement that they're not strictly "looking for straight-up sequels – we'd love to see different takes on those universes." They ask "What would Gex look like in a side-scrolling adventure, or a turn-based strategy?" Pointless and awful, probably.

It's an odd selection. Gex was a generic late '90s 3D platformer starring another anthropomorphic animal. Fear Effect I didn't play, but a quick look of YouTube suggests it's an unexciting futureshooter in Hong Kong with demons. They're not especially strong, interesting, or missed, and are generic enough that someone inspired by them could perhaps make their own thing anyway.

Then there's Anachronox.

Made by Ion Storm, Anachronox was a sci-fi JRPG-y thing with wonky combat but was funny and charming and- wait no, would I even want a fan follow-up to that knowing it's highly unlikely to get anywhere near enough money to do it justice? No, probably not. I don't know. I don't understand. I don't understand any of this.

This is part of the equally-baffling Square Enix Collective crowdfunding service thing. How it works: developers submit game ideas, then Square Enix check the devs aren't just chancers, the Internet at large leave feedback and vote on whether they'd back a game, if it's popular Squeenix will help the devs launch a crowdfunding campaign, and finally Squeenix take a slice of the crowdfunding cash and a share of the profits. Bizarre.

With these Eidos games, they plan to take 5% of the net crowdfunding cash, then from sales they'll take 10% of net revenue plus 10% as a license fee for using the IP.

It's all just so odd. Developers get a small amount of profile from association with Square Enix but still need to raise the money themselves, and the feedback they get from Collective is just random Internet folks. Backers still take a chance on games being finished and turning out well, like with regular crowdfunding models, as Square Enix don't guarantee anything. Even Square Enix are only getting a small slice of what have so far been small sums. Why would people use this? What is this? Why?

About the Author

Alice O'Connor avatar

Alice O'Connor

Associate Editor

Alice is likely in the sea.

Black Friday Sale: save 25% off a yearly membership!

You want more great writing from the RPS team, and we want to make that happen. Your support helps keep RPS silly and strange, and the most unique place to read and discover exciting new PC games since 1873.

See more information


More News

Latest Articles

Supporters Only

Rock Paper Shotgun logo

We've been talking, and we think that you should wear clothes

Total coincidence, but we sell some clothes

Buy RPS stuff here
Rock Paper Shotgun Merch